« first day (5 days earlier)      last day (740 days later) » 

1:05 PM
Great idea to have a geometry-and-physics chat room!
Regarding the nLab entry on higher spin field theory (ncatlab.org/nlab/show/higher+spin+gauge+theory): It's a stub waiting for some kind soul to take the time to fill in some substance. But as per the above request, I now gone ahead and added some brief lines on the general perspective to the idea-section:
Generally by a higher spin field theory is meant a quantum field theory that involves fields of spin >2 (recalling that a spinor field has spin 1/2, a gauge field has spin 1, a gravitino field has spin 3/2 and the field of gravity has spin 2).

Folklore had it that all massless higher spin field theories are inconsistent due to negative norm states (“ghost”) appearing in their quantization. (This argument underlies the dominance of 𝒩=1 11-dimensional supergravity, see the introduction to the entry 12-dimensional supergravity for more on this https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/12-dimensional+sup
Please remind me: Is there a way to point by URL to a specific message in this chat room? If I want to point somebody not generally to this room here, but to a particular message, what should I do?
 
@UrsSchreiber On left, next to every message (whether you are in chatroom or viewing the transcript) after clicking on a small triangle you can click on permalink to get a link like this - to a specific message: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/46459029#46459029
Other reasonable options are linking to a specific day in the transcript: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/82100/2018/8/28 or to bookmark a group of messages and then link to the bookmarked conversation: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/9369/conversation/…
In the chat FAQ you can find a bit on this in the section with the title: "Can I share a link to a specific message? Or range of messages?"
 
1:28 PM
@MartinSleziak thanks! Silly me, I did look at the left triangle menu, but somehow managed to overlook the permalink anyway. May bad, thanks for the hint, and for the other pointers!
 
 
2 hours later…
3:53 PM
@UrsSchreiber oh wow, thank you! I'll take a look at the updated article
 
@ArunDebray thanks, but nothing to be wow-ed by, it's not even an "article" yet. It's just a few sentences as I would say them to you over coffee, to express a broad idea. This entry, like may others, is just a glorified list of references that I found useful to compile. Somebody should eventually fill in some genuine content.
 
@UrsSchreiber sure, but having a bunch of references is still nice!
 
4:18 PM
Good. Yes, it is a beautiful theory, it seems (haven't really worked on it, just had people talk to me about it). I just wish people would go and flesh out the relation to string field theory more (Vasiliev higher spin theory is supposed to be "just" the limit of string field theory as the string tension is taken to zero).
Recently some string folks got excited about the "huge gauge groups" they found in Vasiliev higher spin theory, but that excitement seems a little odd if one remembers that relation to string field theory,
since, after all, we know since the 90s that string field theory has not only a "huge" but also "higher" (L-infinity) gauge symmetry,
corresponding to the generalized spacetime diffeomorphisms as the graviton is accompanied by the full infinite tower of its higher spin mode analogs. Anyway, a good topic for geometry+physics... :-)
 
 
3 hours later…
7:22 PM
@UrsSchreiber huh, yeah, it does sound interesting. Is there any a priori reason to expect the L_\infty structure there? I guess I don't see how homotopy coherence could sneak into "stuff acting on spacetime," but my imagination is not so good
 
8:09 PM
@ArunDebray That closed string field theory is really an L-infinity Chern-Simons theory (see here: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/string+field+theory#AsAnInfinityCSTheory) is not something that seems easy to guess without computation. The actual computation is the great achievement of Barton Zwiebach arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9206084 .
Curiously, it was only in the process of Zwiebach's work that L-infinity algebras were discovered in the first place!
Traditionally people attribute the idea of L-infinity algebras to Stasheff-Schlessinger 85(ncatlab.org/nlab/show/deformation+theory#SchlessingerStasheff85) but while thatr article does talk about many things differential-graded, it does not talk about L-infinity algebras directly.
Stasheff "admits" on slide 25 here ncatlab.org/nlab/files/StasheffHomotopyStructuresReview.pdf that he really recognized L-infinity in Zwiebach's work.
on string field theory. I guess when he saw it he realized that he could have/should have introduced this evident variant of his then already long established A-infinity algebras, but he didn't. It was Zwiebach who discovered it in string field theory.
But actually, in theiy dual, CE-incarnation, L-infinity algebras were discovered by the Italian supergravity theorists a decade earlier. The concept has a convoluted history: ncatlab.org/nlab/show/L-infinity-algebra#History
Later it was found that open string field theory gives A-infinity structure, and open/closed string field theory combines L-infinity with A-infinity in a way that is tantalizingly close to an "infinity-Lie-Rinehart pair" (ncatlab.org/nlab/show/…), except that one of the axioms of Lie-Rinehart seems to remain unchecked for string field theory, which is a pity or a puzzle.
And, to re-iterate, apparently higher spin gauge field theory is "just" the zero-tension limit of this beautiful L-infinity/A-infinity SFT structure.
 

« first day (5 days earlier)      last day (740 days later) »