« first day (46 days earlier)      last day (2483 days later) » 

00:21
@Carrick yes it should be...
@Abcd the equation is not balanced ;P
 
2 hours later…
02:13
I'm getting 3 as the answer
The given answer is 6
Can anyone check?
02:35
@abcd actually i was initially trying to mark those which are definitely not chiral centre than i realised what am i doing. Then i marked the chiral centres
@AvnishKabaj i too got 6.07 approximately
Exam pressure. Simply there is O or N a chiral centre
@AvnishKabaj i think you missed the fact that the number of moles of FeO produced are double the initial moles of Fe2O3 taken
I mean the lone pair of n will be in resonance and so there wont be a chiral centre as there will be partial double bond character?
Please solve question 4.
03:20
@GaurangTandon Yesh thanks
@GaurangTandon please tell me the mechanism...
Ignore equation balancing
@Abcd i think i would need to know what happened to the fourth carbon...how else would I know the mechanism?
In this why OH- has attacked carbon 2 not carbon 2
And why the carboanion first attacked on the double why not on the carbonyl carbon
@Koolman OH- has abstracted acidic H atom from carbon 2. the anion thus formed does a 1,4-addition on the unsaturated ketone (masterorganicchemistry.com/tips/conjugate-addition)
Please someone solve q4 also i am waiting. @Abcd @GaurangTandon @Koolman
03:35
@Jasmine sorry, but I am too lazy to do that. If you want to understand the complete method, consult a standard physical chem book like Cengage, it has many such solved examples in it....
unless you have a specific query in that q4
@GaurangTandon but in carbon 2 there is +I of methyl group so it should be less acidic
Yeah i wrote the equation we dont take inert gas in total pressure?
And even in kc
@Jasmine inert gas is not part of any equilibrium. total pressure = press of inert gas+press of equilibrium mixture.
Yeah still am not getting answer
Ok i will try it on my own
@Koolman to be honest, idk why in first step OH- abstract acidic H and not attack carbonyl. Probably that's because only the former step leads to the formation of a fused ring compound
@Jasmine if you don't get the answer, let me know what the correct answer is and i'll try to solve it
03:41
@GaurangTandoncan you once check for number of chiral centres in resperine
I think i did it correctly the chiral centre one so its ok
@Jasmine the sp2 hybrid N won't be a chiral center
Yeah so yotal 8 chiral centres
04:26
5
Q: Is it possible to have negative bond orders?

J_B892In the MO theory, is it possible to have a molecule with bond order less than 0? The least bond order I have come across as of now is 0 (for di-atomic noble gases), indicating that the molecule cannot exist and the atoms get pulled apart. Is it possible to create a scenario (at least theoretical...

Your opinions on this please
 
6 hours later…
10:12
@GaurangTandon OH- will not attack carbonyl carbon
It is aldol reaction
@Koolman ohhh I totally missed aldol, thanks for informing!
I am asking for either side carbon of carbonyl carbon
oh I now see what you're asking, let me refocus again
In that left side carbon should be more acidic
(I'm sorry I had mistaken your original numeral 1 to be the carbonyl carbon)
Yah, you seem to be right @Koolman
the H atom on carbon 1 is definitely more acidic
where'd you get this reaction from?
10:17
Fiitjee paper
well then it may probably be wrong
you may want to ask on main though
Actual question
Maybe it is due to excess OH-
10:37
could be, but I don't know

« first day (46 days earlier)      last day (2483 days later) »