« first day (714 days earlier)      last day (185 days later) » 

13:00
Yes, seems to be very math-y
Anonymous
But our minds probably don't really model phrase structure grammars
Anonymous
If you consider a language like English, where the verb comes early on
Anonymous
It tells us more or less what to expect from the rest of the sentence
Anonymous
But if you consider instead a strictly head-final language like Japanese
Anonymous
The verb may be the head of the entire sentence, but it comes at the end, so it can't really tell you what to expect from the rest!
13:03
Yes, I've read about it.
Anonymous
In fact, the verb is often implied because the listener has processed enough from the rest of the sentence that they can tell what the verb will be
Anonymous
Oh, I see!
Anonymous
Well, another reason to like CCGs is that they don't have the same problem in this respect
Anonymous
Sorry, I've just remembered that you're not actually interested in grammatical formalisms
Anonymous
13:06
And here I am, talking your ear off about theory… :-)
It's too complex (0:
I mean, one should first sit and read several introductory chapters on this CCG to be really "into it".
"CCGs are known to be able to generate the language {a^n b^n c^n d^n : n \geq 0} (which is an indexed language). Examples of this are unfortunately too complicated to provide here.."
LOL
Anonymous
Poor Wikipedia. Can't keep up.
It would probably be interesting for a programmer who works to create a translation machine
Anonymous
Most MT these days is statistical in nature, at its core
Then it really becomes interesting: how do you parse the sentences properly
@snailboat nods
"Dependency is now the preferred means for representing syntactic structure in computational linguistics, where one is interested above all in automated parsing of natural language. \\ Phrase structure, in contrast, remains dominant in theoretical linguistics, where one tends to pay more attention to fine-grained syntactic and semantic distinctions."
Anonymous
13:20
@DamkerngT. The official CD for the 寄生獣 theme came out. So now I know what the lyrics are, but . . . Well, it's still nigh-incomprehensible for me.
Anonymous
That is some of the hardest-to-understand English I've ever heard.
See you later, @snailboat!
Anonymous
Later, Copper Kettle!
14:28
Oh, nice. I can chat from mobile
I don't see who is online though... is there anyone?
15:12
I'm here. (My connection is not stable, though.)
@Ilan You're welcome!
@CopperKettle My first reaction: both are possible, though the a and the alternatives will be a little different from each other.
@snailboat Hah!
@snailboat Get well soon.
@CopperKettle I have a hunch that it is wrong.
15:50
@snailboat Ah, we don't have to wait for so long.
Hello, @snailboat!
Anonymous
Hello!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I'm okay, don't worry about me :-)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. kasi-time.com/item-74313.html ← lyrics
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I think it's not very often that a and the are actually identical
Anonymous
15:54
Even when both are possible, they're usually (at least) subtly different
@snailboat I think they are indeed different. (I haven't thought of them as the same, even though they finally end up describing pretty much the same thing.)
@snailboat Oh, the s in predators is silent in the song!
Anonymous
There are parts I can't follow even reading along
Same here! T_T"
Anonymous
But it makes a lot more sense now! :-)
Indeed!
Anonymous
15:57
I've heard some Japanese songs with immaculate English pronunciation recently
I wonder if a Japanese can make out the lyrics just by listening to the song.
(Sometimes it's possible.)
Anonymous
Apparently not, judging by the lyrics posted to lyrics sites before the CD came out
Anonymous
It can be really difficult to distinguish a and the in a given phrase, though, because they're mainly pragmatic
Anonymous
Which means you have to come up with sets of contexts to compare them in
Anonymous
16:03
A speaker's ability to distinguish them in a given example, out of context, will depend on that speaker's ability to contextualize that example
nods -- I think I've seen many examples that different native speakers can contextualize different contexts.
I think I normally read "based on the true story" as "based on the true story (that this movie is based on)".
> The question is not of the sentence! Undoubtedly, when you say on the true story of, you must mention whose/which story you are talking about.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I think it presumes audience familiarity with the story (whether that's actually true or not)
I think that's unnecessary. (Somehow I'm thinking of "the wrong choice" out of the sudden.)
@snailboat nods
@MaulikV: based on a true story of everlasting love would be fine ;) — oerkelens 8 hours ago
So would base on a true story of a soldier be, I'd say.
Anonymous
16:20
@DamkerngT. Me too.
Anonymous
Both native and non-native speakers vary in this ability greatly
Anonymous
Although native speakers have a big advantage
Anonymous
That doesn't mean every native speaker is good at it, either
Neither every non-native speakers. I wonder if this is language independent. I mean it depends on a person's trait, not nativity.
Anonymous
You can practice it.
Anonymous
16:24
There are linguists who are very good at it.
Anonymous
Here's a fun question:
Anonymous
5
Q: Is "I can have cheeseburger?" really grammatically correct?

Four_0h_ThreeAs I was looking for a grammar and style plugin for a word processor to help catch my grammar and style errors. I found LanguageTool. On that page I typed the phrase "I can has cheeseburger?". The correction it made was from has to have. Is the phrase "I can have cheeseburger?" correct or is thi...

Oh, inserting every before non-native speakers as a second thought was not a good idea.
(I just restarted my computer.)
"I can really have cheeseburger?" (I haven't read that post yet.)
"I can really have cheeseburger? By the way, what is cheeseburger?" (Me after a quick glance over the post.)
Isn't it strange that "pizza" can be uncountable, but not "cheeseburger"?
Language got no reason. Language got no rhyme. (whoo-la-la)
Anonymous
I don't think it's true that cheeseburger can't be uncountable. I would say it's true that it usually isn't.
Interesting!
Anonymous
16:38
I think that if you translate lolcat English to Standard English, you get "Can I have some cheeseburger?"
lolcat! :-)
Wow, ten years (actually twelve) is like a blink of an eye!
Anonymous
Hey, he's pretty good.
Anonymous
Hey, they've got more singers!
Anonymous
What happened twelve years ago?
They were all in the same movie, School of Rock!
Anonymous
16:50
Oh!
Anonymous
I've heard of that!
Anonymous
Wow, they were young
Just 10-12 years ago!
Anonymous
I mean, except for Jack Black :-)
16:53
LOL
Anonymous
I like the Les Paul better than the Flying V
Oh, Gibson Les Paul!
Would they sound different?
Anonymous
They do!
(Please forgive me for my ignorance of the instruments.)
Anonymous
The Les Paul is one of the classic guitar models. It's been around forever, and to this day you can buy a new one, mostly the same as it's always been, though a bit too expensive :-)
Anonymous
16:58
Anonymous
That was the one the guy on the left was playing in the reunion clip
Can we still find a new Flying V these days?
Anonymous
They have a nice balance. Their scale length is shorter than on most guitars, and they have a really solid, resonant body
Anonymous
Flying Vs are still around, sure
16:59
@snailboat A-ha! I think he used a Flying V 10 years ago.
Anonymous
They're one of the guitars designed to look cool (like a giant "V") rather than to balance well
I bet!
Anonymous
The one Jack Black has is an SG
Anonymous
A Gibson SG
Anonymous
17:00
I wonder if the name is from "standard guitar".
Anonymous
Um, I don't actually know! :-)
@snailboat That's not very often!
Anonymous
I've got a bunch of guitars with letters in their names, but I don't know what most of them stand for.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Haha!
17:02
Hehe! :-)
Anonymous
It's hard to keep track.
Anonymous
I searched on Google and found "solid guitar"
I don't know why, but electric guitars always look kinda cool.
Anonymous
'Cause it's a solid-body guitar, I s'pose
17:03
Ahh
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I like a lot of them
Anonymous
Some of them look goofy
Oh! (Trying to imagine a goofy one.)
Anonymous
Anonymous
Well, like this sort
Anonymous
17:04
To me, that looks goofy :-)
Anonymous
Hmm... But: *for me, that looks goofy
It's perfect for some anime, I think. :-)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I think guitars are about sound
Anonymous
Looks are entirely secondary
17:05
nods
Anonymous
So I'm unhappy when an instrument compromises some of its utility in order to look cool
I think I can relate myself to that feeling.
Anonymous
But it doesn't matter as long as I'm not the one playing it :-)
Anonymous
I've always felt the Fender Telecaster was the Steve Urkel of guitars
Anonymous
17:08
It has an amazing sound, though :-)
Anonymous
Anonymous
See, it looks like it has its pickguard pulled up way above its waist.
Hey, I found this model from a mecha-anime with a guitar that looks sort of like your goofy one! s37.photobucket.com/user/schide66/media/GGL1.jpg.html
Anonymous
Hah
Anonymous
They put a lot of detail into that!
17:11
@snailboat I'm not sure which part of a guitar is called waist! (_)"
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Guitars don't actually have waists
Anonymous
It's just the image it conjures up for me
Anonymous
You can see how all of these guitar designs look pretty different
Anonymous
17:12
The most famous and most copied design is the Fender Stratocaster ("strat")
looking it up...
Anonymous
Wow, that guitar miniature is really well made!
Anonymous
My favorite guitar these days is an Ibanez
The Fender Stratocaster has the ideal shape of electric guitars for me.
Anonymous
I've barely played my Les Paul in years now
Anonymous
17:14
@DamkerngT. Yeah, it's what a lot of people think of when they think of an electric guitar, whether they know the name or not
@snailboat Is yours black, too?
Anonymous
My Ibanez is a pleasant blue.
Yay! I like blue!
(Should I say, "I like the color blue!"? ;-)
Anonymous
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Whichever you like
17:16
Neat-o!
Anonymous
In real life it's shinier than that, and maybe a bit purpler
@snailboat Aww... Maybe you've already forgotten our question.
Anonymous
Anonymous
I'm just pulling pictures from the internet :-)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, sorry!
Anonymous
17:17
I guess I have
Anonymous
0
Q: Is sentence "It don't seem right" correct?

ReptileIn song "In the Army Now" there is sentence: Your finger is on the trigger but it don't seem right Shouldn't there be "doesn't"?

@snailboat (Or rather, CopperKettle's question.)
Anonymous
Another example of how not everyone uses Standard English all the time
Anonymous
I have a blue Ibanez acoustic, too
Is what looks like ripples on the Ibanez texture or paint?
17:20
Good evening to music lovers!
There's an interesting question:
2
Q: 'more' vs 'the more' - "I doubt this the more because.."

Law Area 51 Proposal - Commit [Last Para, J Blackburn's judgment:] The difference is the same as that between buying a horse believed to be sound, and buying one believed to be warranted sound; but I doubt if it was made obvious to the jury, and I doubt this the more because I do not see much evidence to justify a finding ...

Good evening!
Anonymous
Well, it's got a glossy surface, and there's paint under it. I don't know how much the actual wood resembles the pattern
Anonymous
If you want to see some interesting wood patterns, though, check out the exotic wood line: ibanez.co.jp/products/…
Anonymous
Hello Copper Kettle!
@snailboat Oh, a glossy, painted surface. Nice!
Anonymous
17:21
@CopperKettle Hey, no one's stuck the tag on that yet! ;-)
@snailboat (0:
Anonymous
I really wanted a white guitar last time, but they didn't have any in that color and I didn't want to wait
Anonymous
Since like I said, looks are always secondary... :-)
@CopperKettle I think I agree with Tetsujin.
Agree. Modern version might easily be "I doubt this even more..." — Tetsujin Nov 9 '14 at 10:56
Anonymous
Sounds good
17:23
@DamkerngT. So the is an adverb?
@snailboat And blue is also nice. :-)
@CopperKettle Not very sure, but I think it's simply an article all the same.
@DamkerngT. okay, thank you!
Oh, you must be referring to Man_From_India's answer. I think it should be: "the adverb" used before comparative adjectives or adverbs for emphasis.
Or, the: used before comparative adjectives or adverbs for emphasis; and this more in the more is an adverb.
17:27
nods
@snailboat Should we add to it?
Anonymous
I don't know
Anonymous
@CopperKettle The doesn't have the distribution of an adverb
Anonymous
There are many types of adverbs with different distributions
Anonymous
The is like none of them
17:31
@snailboat I know, I just thought Khan called it an adverb
Anonymous
Oh
Anonymous
I must have missed part of the discussion
I mean Man-From-India
Anonymous
Oh
Anonymous
Well
Anonymous
17:32
Having read the answer, I don't think I would upvote that myself
Anonymous
I see it's at +2 despite calling the an adverb
I upvoted it already!
I think we need to read that dash (-) the way it would be used in InE.
@snailboat I guess he did not mean to call it an adverb, it's just formatting
Anonymous
How else can I understand the answer?
17:34
Replace that dash with a plus sign! :-)
@DamkerngT. I have a question... will ask a little bit later ;)
Admittedly, it's not the best way to format that.
Anonymous
Have a fun delay!
"Historically this the is not the usual definite article but the fossilised remnant of an Old English instrumental case-form meaning "by so/that much". It came to fall together phonologically with the definite article, but its syntactic distribution still reflects its different origin." (Huddleston 13 §4.5)
@Ilan All right!
@snailboat Hee!
17:36
(trying to understand the meaning of the passage)
Oh, the there is like Russian chem perhaps
I think he meant in OE, there was something sounded pretty close to the, but with the meaning "by so/that much".
chem more you eat, tem fatter you are (instrumental case words)
Anonymous
Oh, that's interesting
@CopperKettle It's interesting that it uses two different words!
Anonymous
They don't seem to elaborate
17:40
I've looked up, they're called "conjunctions" in Russian. So maybe they are not in an "instrumental case" (0:
Anonymous
Well, OE had a limited instrumental case
Anonymous
Maybe it does make sense to call it an adverb in that case
@DamkerngT. "chem" is also an "instrumental case of the pronoun WHAT".. sorry for the jargon
Like "by what did you dig this hole?" - "chem did you dig this hole?"
@CopperKettle Jargon is quite alright, when we know what it means. I think
Anonymous
I won't really understand what that footnote means until I do some further research
Anonymous
17:45
I can point out that people still often say all the more
Anonymous
All that happened when I tried to look it up is that I confused myself :-)
Anonymous
We could certainly call it an idiom, though, and leave it at that.
@snailboat The more the confusing-er!
Oh, tem is indeed the instrumental case of the demonstrative pronoun THAT
Anonymous
17:49
That's weird.
So the English construction "the more the merrier" is like the RUssian "chem bolshe tem veselee", with "the"s the remnants of pronouns. Cool. Now I understand it.
@Ilan - what is your question? Sorry for having delayed you.
Anonymous
It's not even clear to me which of the examples that footnote applies to
@snailboat There're examples just above the footnote: "The more input we have, the better our conversations." etc.
Anonymous
I'm looking at the actual book
Oh, I've just notices that this question dates back to November. (0:
Anonymous
17:58
The examples on that webpage are not given in the book
@snailboat ah, I see
Anonymous
So, apparently some people construe the in all comparative constructions as an adverb
Anonymous
From OE þȳ

« first day (714 days earlier)      last day (185 days later) »