« first day (490 days earlier)      last day (409 days later) » 
04:00 - 16:0016:00 - 23:00

Anonymous
16:00
There are reduced styles such as "headlinese" which characteristically omit articles, but I think they typically would also omit those auxiliaries: "The match has been cancelled today by the organizer"
nods
Hmm... I've never thought of this kind of sentence before. Trying to come up with a similar (bad) sentence, I got this: This bread is delicious by you.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Erm.
(I was trying to think of a good way to explain the problem.)
I think now I can notice that pretty good is not a verb. :D
Anonymous
Hey, you pretty gooded that.
It's strange that I didn't notice it the first time I read the OP's sentence.
@snailboat Oh, now it's a verb!
Anonymous
16:08
Yeah, you can now it's a verb anything if you try hard enough.
:)
Now it's a verb is a verb too!
Anonymous
Hooray!
> Sales are pretty good nowadays.
*Sales have been pretty good nowadays.
I think have been doesn't get along well with nowadays.
> The match has been cancelled today.
The match was cancelled today.
?The match is cancelled today.
I think has been cancelled and was cancelled are fine, but is cancelled sounds odd.
Oh, what a big lizard!
(He just crawled across one of my walls.)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. That seems like a reasonable star.
(I'm sure Hagu will love it--having a big fat lizard around.)
Anonymous
16:14
But I'd feel more comfortable if I checked to see if it actually co-occurs with the present perfect or not.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. "The match is cancelled today" seems fine to me.
@snailboat It seems like you read this cancelled as an adjective, I think.
Anonymous
That's right, it's an adjective.
> ?The match has been cancelled today by the organizer.
The match was cancelled today by the organizer.
Having by forces us to read cancelled as a verb.
Maybe that's why I think has been sounds a little off.
Anonymous
Yeah, by does that. So "The match is cancelled by the organizer today." is odd
Anonymous
16:19
"The match today has been cancelled by the organizer" is fine.
Anonymous
2
A: Is "intelligence" a countable noun?

Esoteric Screen NameIntelligence is not being used as a countable noun in Clever Hans. There's some information ellipted; read the sentence like this: ... animals had an amount or degree of intelligence equal to that of humans. Here, intelligence is qualifiable but not quantifiable. However, it is possible to...

Anonymous
I am decidedly against this analysis.
Of ESN's?
Anonymous
They have demonstrated that it's non-count by positing ellipsis of arbitrary material
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. You would use 's there
16:20
Ah, yes. TYftC!
I don't know why they gave me so much reputation points for free.
+100 on all networks.
Woaaaaa!!
Anonymous
It's called an association bonus.
Anonymous
You get it for earning, I think, 200 reputation on a single site.
@hellodear2 I think that's called a bonus. :)
Wopiieeeeeeeee
But why?
Anonymous
16:22
Look up association bonus
I have asked a question on askUbuntu and it got 40 likes
Anonymous
Then you'll have your answer.
in a day and I am rich now. :p
Anonymous
Congratulations!
16:23
Hehe. But still not rich like Snailboat Hahaa.. And I can't be that rich :-)
In any case, 777 for files and directories is not a good idea, most of the time. :D
LOL.... :-)
That was my interview question
:-)
Ahh... I see.
I was not able to answer at that time. 2 years back.
Anonymous
Hehe.
Anonymous
16:25
S'octal.
0777
@DamkerngT. why don't u join askubuntu too?
I just try to stay away from what I think I might already knew too much. :D
(Though of course, there are a lot more that I still don't know.)
you know much about ubuntu?
16:27
But, hey, I popped up in AskUbuntu chat room a few times. :D
Not that much, I think, but I think I can get by with it.
Anonymous
I know enough about Ubuntu.
What all is there in Ubuntu and all
Anonymous
Er?
like in etc , dev folders and all
Anonymous
That's not a very specific question.
16:29
I don't know much about these folders.
Anonymous
Look at hier(7)
what is there in that folders. There are too many files.
/dev is for device thingies. :D
Anonymous
If you don't know what that means, go to a command line and type man 7 hier
Which version are you using?
16:29
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think /etc is for things they don't know where else to put them into. :D
Anonymous
You are wrong
See, I'm potentially wrong. :D
Whoa!! everything is given in that. :-o
Anonymous
> /etc Contains configuration files which are local to the machine. Some larger software packages, like X11, can have their own subdirectories below /etc. Site-wide configuration files may be placed here or in /usr/etc. Nevertheless, programs should always look for these files in /etc and you may have links for these files to /usr/etc.
I am trying to make a bootable pendrive for ubuntu.
Should I?
I want to make it bootable and use it for other things too.
How can I do that?
16:31
If you'd like, I think you should try doing it.
@snailboat With enough use, everything can be made countable (uncountable nouns, adjectives...), don't you think?
I'm sure someone out there might have tried doing it.
24 mins ago, by snailboat
Yeah, you can now it's a verb anything if you try hard enough.
I think we can replace that verb with any part of speech. :D
Anonymous
@Nico Yes, you can countify nearly anything.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. It's a lot harder to coordinator something than to verb it.
Anonymous
> Could you go to the store and get me some eggs bears some flour bears some sugar bears some milk?
> Could you go to the store and get me some eggs, some flour, some sugar, bears some milk?
16:35
Oh, that's true!
So you verbed a sentence? Cool XD
> Hans the horse was bought in 1900 by Wilhelm von Osten, a retired German schoolmaster, who was convinced that animals had an intelligence equal to that of humans.
I would agree with the author if he changed equal to to different from.
Anonymous
Better than sentencing a verb
Anonymous
"Go!" ← I guess that verb was sentenced. (To what, I wonder?)
16:41
"Run!"
@snailboat You read my mind D: I thought of that a second ago.
I have changed my name to hellodear
but it is not showing here
Though I have made changes to all networks.
@hellodear2 Maybe after a little more while.
Really?
@snailboat Why "Get down!" (said by Arny) popped up in my head?
Arnold Schwarzenegger
Anonymous
16:44
@hellodear2 Don't worry, it just takes a little time.
(I think I can imagine how people feel when they have to spell my name.)
I read Arny as Army.
I spent too much time with รด.... (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_Reserve_Force_Students)
Oh, you went to รด too?
I did!
Wait, this makes you a male. :D
16:46
@DamkerngT. That sounds a little creepy. As if before that I wasn't.
lol
เขาชนไก่ (the place, not the movie) was fun, wasn't it? :-)
I wouldn't label it as fun. But it's full of memories indeed lol.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Your name is easy to spell for me in Latin letters.
Anonymous
I'm not sure about your last name.
@snailboat I can guarantee that my full name is longer than Arnold Schwarzenegger.
:)
I don't know why, but Thai people really like long names.
16:51
Because the names aren't Thai I suppose :P
That makes sense!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I have noticed this.
Anonymous
My Thai friend's last name is only 9 Latin letters long.
That is very short compared to the average Thai last name.
Let me see
Mine is 10
16:53
Hah!
For example: wuttipittayamongkol :)
Mine is 17.
@Nico That's even longer than mine. :D
I think that's one of the longest I've come across
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. And yet, us Americans seem to have a hard time remembering how to spell it. (Not me, though. I can spell it just fine. :-)
Do they mean anything?
16:55
Most Thai names will have a meaning.
@Nico Huh? You know Teepagorn?
Nope, must be someone else
I see.
Why do you ask?
Is it a name I should recognise?
Oh, Teepagorn Wuttipitayamongkol beats my name easily, so I guess he'd also have the same problem I have with credit cards. :D
16:57
@Nico No, he is not that famous. But he is quite famous in certain subculture.
Yeah, that person :)
wow! I'm impressed with Google.
That looks like a Thai name. :-)
17:01
You're lucky that you only use one surname!
In Spain we use two, the first one from the father and the second from the mother.
Ahh...
Women don't change their surname when they marry.
Oh, and how do you fill out forms and such?
17:03
Eh, they don't?
(That's an unexpected for me.)
Spanish forms have space for both surnames
My passport has both.
That's cool xD
Neat!
Oh, I think my passport is already expired!
When I book a plane ticket I have to use both. But I don't remember having problems with this.
Wait. And which surnames does a child receive from his parents?
I mean, both have two, right?
17:07
That's a really good question!
curious
Eh, my internet looks strange. Maybe it's because of the rain.
Anonymous
17:26
Huh.
Anonymous
I don't see anything wrong with sleep early.
Anonymous
I do think people generally say go to sleep early.
Anonymous
I mean, that's what I'd suggest people say, because most other people say it.
Anonymous
But sleep early doesn't seem ambiguous or wrong-sounding to me. Just my intuition talking.
Anonymous
Clearly other people disagree!
17:27
Perhaps, out of context, it can be ambiguous.
Oh, can sleep late be ambiguous for you?
Anonymous
No
Anonymous
Sleep late means "wake up late".
That question made me think that many people seem to think that reading sleep early as a "wake up early" is possible too.
Anonymous
Oh, I doubt it.
Anonymous
I'm not sure how to explain why I doubt it. I have a somewhat amorphous concept in my head which I may be able to give form to later :-)
17:31
Ah, fuzzy thingy.
Anonymous
Unfortunately, it's a picture.
Anonymous
So if I try to describe it, it'll be nonsense.
Anonymous
Sleep spreads out in both directions, so sleeping late means you woke up late, because the sleep got longer in that direction.
Anonymous
See? Nonsense :-)
No, it actually quite makes sense.
Anonymous
17:32
Hooray! I think
Actually, before reading the answers, I thought sleep early should modify the beginning end too.
1
A: A beer in hand vs a beer in a hand

boatsellerIn the right context, any of those could be used as there nothing specifically wrong with any of them. However, this looks a lot like the saying "A Bird in the Hand..." Which I have seen as both "A Bird in hand" and "A Bird in the Hand". "A Bird in a Hand" has a slight bit of ambiguity, as to ...

I upvoted boatseller's answer because I think Enjoy the party with beer in a hand sounds a little off.
Anonymous
I like it better with a, but I don't know that the other version is wrong
Strange. I couldn't find a good sentence of "beer in a hand" on Google Books. (But I found one "a bottle of beer in a hand".)
trying COCA...
Anonymous
Errr.
Anonymous
I misread it!
Anonymous
17:42
Beer in a hand sounds silly :-)
Yay!
0
A: Passive Extraposition

user3169 1a: He thought that supplies were running low. 1b: It was thought that supplies were running low. The meaning of these two are not the same, since 1b does not mention who thought it. You would have to say: 1b: It was thought by him that supplies were running low. As for the second pa...

Hmm...
18:01
I think sentences like this work only with certain kind of verbs. Maybe something to do with thoughts, speech and such? It is said/thought/believed...
I think it's an It-cleft, so the "by ..." part should be unnecessary.
Yeah.
0
Q: Is this archaic ? What does this "yet" mean?

user10395. The poet, that beautified the sect, that was otherwise inferior to the rest, saith yet excellently wellSource

Another incomplete sentence from birdman again.
But the full sentence is so long.
Maybe we could ellipsis it properly...
> The poet, that beautified the sect, that was otherwise inferior to the rest, saith yet excellently well: [...].
I'm a little curious about that yet too, but I'm not quite ready to dig through all the dictionaries I have :\
I think it's a typical yet.
18:16
Which yet?
> 6. used for introducing a word or idea that is surprising after what has just been mentioned
Just read saith as sez.
Hmm... probably said, because it seems to be in the past tense.
Oh, actually, it was meant to be in the present tense!
It's the first word in the dictionary that I found labelled biblical
I didn't know the word, but once I read it, its sound quite made sense.
18:20
Oh, so saith excellently well in contrast to being inferior to the rest?
Yes, that's what I thought.
I think otherwise set up the contrast.
That makes sense.
I was wondering. Why is it bad to cross-post a question over sites?
Hmm... I'm not quite sure about that myself either.
But if a good question could be posted fine on multiple sites, wouldn't that mean that those sites overlap?
I think people want to see each SE stack focuses on its own topic.
Oh, I meant, for example, on ELL and WordReference.
Not on more than one SE site.
Oh, that's a different question. Frankly, I think I've heard that it's fine.
18:30
Yeah, but I seem to recall that someone thought it's bad (FF, was it?).
Oh, really? I didn't know that. :-)
And someone said the act wastes efforts of answerers.
That sounds like a fair reason.
Mmm I don't think so.
I didn't say that I agree, but I think it's fair for them.
To me, if it's a good question, then it's good.
18:33
I think the asker could receive information by cross-posting, which is usually a good thing.
Some answers are misleading; some are good. I think it's good if one has a chance to compare more answers.
It looks like all answer sites about English are like this. We can't really trust the answers completely.
Then again, most of information on these sites is invaluable.
(Hmm... strange that I thought of information as singular, and then plural.)
We can rarely completely trust anything about language, I think.
Information is always uncountable if I remember it right.
:)
I think saying sites might be the factor.
Is it raining at your place?
18:39
It was. Now it's not
Oh, it still is, here.
Poor birds. I think they can't sleep well, because of the rain.
There are several birds using trees around my house as their sleeping places, btw, which is nice. :D
I used to have something like that near my house when I was very young, I guess.
Now they are gone?
No, now I moved.
The house was sold long ago.
Ah, I see.
I didn't have this kind of thing when I was young. :D
18:47
It's nice :)
Yeah! It is!
Some of my neighbors call my garden forest. :)
I guess that's why birds like my trees. :D
Anonymous
19:16
@DamkerngT. I thought it was beer in hand, not beer in a hand
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Modern English speakers understand forms with -th and -st and such, though they don't necessarily know when to use which
Anonymous
@Fantasier At a minimum, you should tell people you're going to cross-post if you do it.
Anonymous
You can cross-post between SE and non-SE sites. The rules allow it.
Anonymous
But it is rather inconsiderate to cause people to duplicate the work of others unknowingly
I see. I'll keep that in mind.
Anonymous
19:28
Most people who cross-post between SE and other sites don't mention it
 
2 hours later…
21:19
0
Q: Usage of "against"

frankieWhat word is more preferable (or even correct) in following context: Application is locked against modifications. or Application is locked from modifications. Or, may be, both usage (against and from) are correct)?

I'm trying to find a good answer to this question.
At first I thought against is better.
Now I'm not very sure.
What I'm rather sure is it's better to rephrase the sentence.
> Application is locked against/from modifications.
I think it might be better to write:
> This application is locked, and no unauthorized modifications can be made.
Anonymous
0
Q: You can't spell 'Slaughter' without 'Laughter'

Alexander...and yet they are pronounced very differently. /ˈslɔtər/ vs /ˈlɑːftə(r)/ For those who don't read 'pronunciation': Slaw-ter vs Laff-ter Similarly: Homographs (words spelled identically but pronounced differently) run into the same issue for an English language learner. Examples: After w...

I think, saying is locked is already good enough. Now, if we want to say more about who or what we don't want to allow access...
Anonymous
It's funny—it was really hard to convince my brain they overlapped in spelling
Ahh... pronunciation again. :D
Anonymous
Yeah, putting it in another clause is good
21:24
To be exact, homographs again. :)
@snailboat My intuition told me it should be against, but I found a lot of from in use.
@DamkerngT. How about "This application is locked to prevent modifications"?
That sounds good too, but I might drop s, or maybe add any.
(Saying about dropping s, I dropped (incorrectly) an s myself. :-)
"This application is locked to prevent unauthorised modifications"
Oh, this is weird. I think this one is fine without any.
(What kind of language model do I have in my brain?!)
As a learner, I think one good way (it works for me) to avoid the trap is to learn English by Listening/Speaking, rather than Reading/Writing. (As a result, I don't really map the spelling directly to the sounds, I just know "this is how a word would sound like and it should be spelled like this or that" which is helpful in all four tasks: LSRW.) As for why, I usually don't bother to find the reasons, given that there are some. — Damkerng T. 51 secs ago
Maybe useful, I hope.
Oh, I should have mentioned "correction". Someone else will soon, I think (and hope).
Anonymous
21:42
@Nico That's good
From another question of the same OP...
... if someone only listens and speaks, how can they learn to read and write?
> Editing is available only in embedded mode.
@Nico Oh, it can be read like that indeed. What I tried to say was "to focus on the Listening/Speaking".
Or enjoy the L-S phase for a while, before getting into the R-W phase.
Anonymous
@Nico Well, you can't.
Anonymous
But you can do one before the other.
Anonymous
21:47
At some point, doing both together is good. I think a popular choice for language learners is Harry Potter. You can get the audiobooks and the paper books, and listen while you read.
Ahh... audiobooks are good.
Anonymous
I think this is better than silent reading practice for language learners, because you want to develop a sense for the sound of everything as you read it
Anonymous
You want to acquire the melodies of the language you're learning. Every language has different melodies
So true^
This reminds me...
21:49
I find difficult to memorise sounds that aren't close to my L1. Spelling helps me remember. Specially, with languages with a more regular spelling than English! :p
Obviously, Harry Potter is in there too!
If I could put it bluntly, I would say English's spelling is a mess.
But it's what we all have. :)
Oh really? Listening to David Beckham to learn English?
Eh, I can't find David Beckham in the infographic.
Oh, I saw it!
Except for Barack Obama, I haven't really taken a look at the rest four.
Well, it's better than Sir Alex Ferguson:
:D Mr Bean is in the list, too!
I'm not sure if he says anything much in his series. :D
I don't know if Sir AF will come to Thailand or not.
Maybe he already did.
22:03
I have to say that the infographics lists nothing that helps with speaking
(to consult on coaching courses with Thai Premier League teams)
@Nico Perhaps not really, but it has "Harry Potter". :D
I think I fall into the same category with those people in the 34% category.
I'm not sure if it was snailboat who said it before, but I find that watching movies with subtitles helps me more than just listening to radio.
I think she said that.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yeah. It's not at all a shallow orthography. But for most people, that's fine.
@Nico I came up with my own technique, which when I explained it to snailboat, she mentioned Shadowing. Though it's not identical to what I do, I think Shadowing works. You might find it interesting.
Anonymous
22:11
@Nico Yes, in-language subtitles are a good thing
What is Shadowing?
looking for a link about it...
Anonymous
Repeating what you hear as soon as you hear it, or if you can, while you're hearing it. (This last requires repetition, of course!)
2
Speech shadowing is an experimental technique in which subjects repeat speech immediately after hearing it (usually through earphones). The reaction time between hearing a word and pronouncing it can be as short as 254 ms or even 150 ms. This is only the delay duration of a speech syllable. While a person is only asked to repeat words, they also automatically process their syntax and semantics. Functional imaging finds that the shadowing of nonwords occurs through the dorsal stream that links auditory and motor representations of speech through a pathway that starts in the superior tempora...
Very similar to what I do in my own time.
Though I went into another direction, I guess.
Thx for the idea.
G'night. Going to bed now.
22:19
Hazard a guess is a nice expression!
@Nico It's from snailboat. :)
Good night! See you soon!
Thank you to u2
No problem. :D
04:00 - 16:0016:00 - 23:00

« first day (490 days earlier)      last day (409 days later) »