« first day (485 days earlier)      last day (414 days later) » 

Anonymous
13:00
So he edited the answer after your comment?
Yes.
And I didn't vote that answer, either. :-)
Anonymous
Ah, he added the word "simple".
Anonymous
It appears that I did.
Anonymous
I already forgot that I did.
Hah!
I hadn't seen that answer until he suggested it in another post (about D.O vs. I.O, I think).
Oh, I think I remember now. It was the "I looked at him" question.
Anonymous
13:03
I am not happy with his purely semantic definitions of those terms.
Me either.
:)
Anonymous
Nor do I understand the definition of a predicate as something "which does the rest of the work"
Anonymous
I'm also not happy with calling a NP inside a for-phrase the "indirect object"
That was what I really wasn't happy about.
So, I followed his link, and found a strange definition of "predicate" in that answer.
Anonymous
Traditional grammarians often call the object of the preposition to an "indirect object"
13:07
Oh! They do?
Anonymous
Yes, in sentences like "He gave [the book] [to me]"
So, they call him in "I looked at him" an indirect object, too?
Anonymous
Nope! To is special. It's Dative.
@snailboat Ahh... that one is fine, to me.
Calling that him an indirect object was what bothered me.
Hi!
What's the difference betwen dative and indrect object?
13:11
Eh? I thought there is dative in Spanish too, isn't it?
Anonymous
Dative: a grammatically distinct case characteristically used to mark the indirect object
Anonymous
But in English, we don't have a dative case.
I thought they were the synonyms
Anonymous
We used to, back in Old English.
I expected it to be something universal among Western languages.
So, it isn't, I think.
Anonymous
13:12
So a lot of people take the label dative and apply it to to-phrases where the object of to has a semantic role aligned with the indirect object role
Anonymous
The term comes up a lot. The Dative Alternation is the relationship between "I gave him a book" and "I gave a book to him"
Anonymous
A lot of other languages have an actual dative case, though.
@DamkerngT. I was taught what dative was when I had to study latin, and since then I thought it was the same as the indirect object/complement.
Anonymous
Yeah, Latin has a distinct noun form ("case") for indirect objects. As a result of its relatively rich case system, words in Latin can be shuffled around with a fair amount of freedom
13:14
nods
Anonymous
In English, there is no distinct noun form for indirect objects.
~~"£$~! I'm to slow. I can't correct the spelling of synonym.
What about Spanish?
Anonymous
Synonym is correct.
4 mins ago, by Nico
I thought they were the synonyms
Anonymous
13:15
Oh!
Anonymous
I edited it for you :-)
thx
@DamkerngT. Spanish doesn't inflect nouns to indicate their case (only to indicate if they are singular/plurar male/female).
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I think that the dative case has disappeared from (almost?) every romance language
Anonymous
Does Romanian count as having a dative?
It might
Anonymous
13:18
So you get "prepositional datives" instead, just like English: to snailboat, a Nico
@Nico Thanks!
@snailboat All Slavic languages I know do, and Romanian is strongly influenced by them, so I guess Romanian has a dative.
@snailboat Oh!
I think rogermue mentioned dative often enough.
Maybe German still has it.
I think it does, but I'm not sure.
Anonymous
It has a thing you can call the dative if you want.
Anonymous
13:23
I don't really know German well enough to explain.
Anonymous
I learned a little about it from another comparison between languages, about dative subject constructions (also called simply dative constructions)
Anonymous
Japanese has dative subject constructions. ← People hate this term.
Anonymous
I haven't figured out a term that people won't object to yet.
I know one, noun.
Anonymous
13:25
Hah! Context, silly.
2
On second thought, I think Spanish has some sort of "dative", but only for pronouns. I guess one would say the same about English. Eg she -> her
Anonymous
@Nico Well, there's no accusative-dative contrast.
Anonymous
English lost its distinctive dative case hundreds of years ago.
Anonymous
The accusative is more or less the default case for pronouns.
13:27
In Spanish there is, although some regions are loosing the distinction.
Anonymous
Used any time you don't have a specific reason to use the nominative
@snailboat What is a dative subject? it sounds like a pacific war!
Anonymous
@Nico What's... what's a pacific was?
Anonymous
Oh :-)
an oxymoron
Anonymous
13:30
So, in Japanese, you have nominative, accusative, dative, ablative, instrumental, reciprocal, allative, etc.
:S
Anonymous
The nominative is the case that is typically used to mark the subject of a clause. Likewise, the accusative is typically used to mark the direct object.
Anonymous
And so forth.
Anonymous
The form referred to as the nominative is given this name because it's the way subjects are most typically marked.
Anonymous
Nominative 〜 subject.
Anonymous
13:31
But, the concepts aren't inextricably linked.
@Nico Does :S mean confusion or were you doing a snake tongue? :-)
Anonymous
Sometimes the nominative is used for things that aren't subjects. Sometimes the accusative is used for things that aren't objects.
@DamkerngT. it meant horror
@DamkerngT. I've tried to imagine this expression in real life.
:p (and this is me kidding!)
13:32
:)
Anonymous
Sometime the ablative is used for something other than expressing a starting point for motion!
Oh, ablative is new to me! Thanks for a new word!
Anonymous
Sometimes you can even use more than one case. Sometimes you can use either accusative or nominative with no change in meaning. There are also alternations between nominative and genitive, between dative and nominative, . . .
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Some of the less common cases have excellent names.
@snailboat These cases have been all but outsourced to prepositions in English, though.
@snailboat With the obvious exceptions of personal pronouns
13:35
In this case, my first language has no cases.
Anonymous
I'm particularly fond of perlative.
@snailboat And the arguable exception of genitives.
Anonymous
Yeah, English largely lost its case system over the last thousand years
Oh, I'm guessing that if we give it another thousand years or so, it'll re-emerge.
Might not be around for that, though :P
Ah, language has its own cycles.
13:38
Indeed.
@jimsug That's still not absolutely definite yet.
@DamkerngT. That I won't be around, or that English'll regain cases?
Or both?
Gotta go, BBL.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. See you later!
@jimsug Both, possibly!
13:39
@DamkerngT. cya :)
Hi again @Damker. ;)
Thank you very much for your great help
14:05
@A-friend No problem. :-)
I think some "batman" and "bad man" sound really, really close to each other. If I cut them out of a sound clip and listened only to the word, I think I couldn't tell some of them. Maybe a lot of them!
Anonymous
14:29
In AmE batman typically has a shorter first vowel and a glottal stop for /t/
Anonymous
(Pronouncing the /t/ as [t] sounds very unusual!)
15:16
Inspired by an English proverb, "Venture a great fish to catch a small one." ;-) — Damkerng T. 25 secs ago
Hey, I just invented a new proverb!
15:40
How to - - -strike out- - - the text?
"Venture a great fish to catch a small one" what does that mean?
~ เอาปลากะพงไปตกกุ้งฝอย
To strike out, you can use three dashes.
"Risk big things for small ones? "
Sonuds sucks great!
Whatda Thanks! :)
15:46
By the way, I don't know the proverb เอาปลากะพงไปตกกุ้งฝอย either =b.
It's the reverse of what we typically say.
ขี่ช้างจับตั๊กแตน (Ride an elephant to catch a grasshopper) ?
Yes, that's similar, too.
Oh I know that one^^.
16:05
2
Q: The authors would thank

zoriIs this a normal sentence in english? The authors would thank XY for his support .... For me as a nonnative speaker it sounds like there needs to follow a negative part .. if XY hadn't screwed up something else. Personally I think this is correct, 25.000.000 to 100.000 google hits see...

I think this question is interesting.
Seems fine to me.
I thought that too, but I think it's an unusual thing to write (or say).
It sounds formal. Maybe should is more common--should thank...
16:22
It does sound formal. This answer, ell.stackexchange.com/a/24136/3281, hints that it might be archaic.
Well, it might not be that archaic.
16:38
Mmm Interesting
17:13
finally my exams are over.
@DamkerngT.
Accept my BIG HELLO everybody!!
:D
Nobody here... :'(
Hello. Nice to meet you. My name is Nobody!
@Fantasier
this is for you on this sentence.
How dare you read that as a joke! It's the truth.
How dare you read my image as a joke? It's the truth.
Even if your image weren't a joke, my statement still applied well :)
17:18
People can be so dumb, I never knew. :D
LOL
go went gone?
@Fantasier with the exclamation mark or without it?
@AwalGarg Have you ever seen a name with a punctuation mark?
@Fantasier This one might be first?!
who knows?
How do I say in word - "It is extremely obvious but it is wrong!"
@hellodear2 don't try to be a troll, cos I know u are not one
@AwalGarg what is the meaning of troll?
@hellodear2 something that you are not, and you don't wanna be one :)
no what is meaning of word troll?
@hellodear2 I didn't understand the question.
17:40
What is the meaning of the word "troll"?
@hellodear2 First, capitalize the first letter of the first word of your last question.
What is the meaning of the word "troll"?
!!wiki troll
Why are so strict?
you have good reputation points. :)
@hellodear2 Again, I didn't understand the question.
1 min ago, by Awal Garg
@hellodear2 First, capitalize the first letter of the first word of your last question.
17:43
Are you gone mad?
You need something to understand the questions here. Ok?
Go and have that thing which can make you to understand the question.
@hellodear2 It should be - "Have you gone mad?" :P
I am speaking in English which any stupid can understand.
@hellodear2 sorry, I was trolling :)
Irritating!!
Damn irritating!!
Pissed off!!
btw, you have more rep than me on ELL!
17:44
you have 1.2k
I have 185
@hellodear2 its my SE network rep, not ELL rep
It from a variety of communties on SE network I have joined..
mainly from chem.se
Can anyone see cumulative score?
> Irritating!! Damn irritating!! Pissed off!! really?
of all websites related to SE?
Yes, I was damn irritated at that time.
@hellodear2 yes, one can, like I see your total rep as 364
@hellodear2 I deserve a badge for that :)
17:47
I am also a baniya.
:p
You can't irritate me. LOL
@hellodear2 wtf? how did u know that?
kaise pata chale tumhe?
I know about 90% users of this website.
> Tu chali gayi, jaise zindagi chali gyi………
> Chanda se chandni aur suraj se garmi chali gyi…….
> Mere jeene ka nazariya badal gyi……..
> Jaate jaate kuch le gyi to kuch hme de gyi……
> Mujhe apni yaadein aur khud meri jaan le gyi……..:’(((
but being a baniya is something not everyone (well, none can) can see
This is my written shayari.
how's it? ;)
@hellodear2 how old are you?
@hellodear2 superb amazing :)
17:49
I am 19.
I am 16
Your English is better than mine.
and I have gotta be 17 fast
@hellodear2 it doesn't matter, its completely waste to be good at english
such a shitty language it is
You think that.
It's is not right at all.
You must be good at it.
@hellodear2 every good english speaker thinks that
17:51
I am not good speaker.
I can understand English well.
@hellodear2 I think you are good enough to not worry much about it
I can write English well.
I can't speal well.
which city?
delhi
you?
Lol.
Delhi
:p
where in delhi?
17:53
Pitampura
you?
near anand vihar :P
> Pitampura is a residential area in North West Delhi district of Delhi, India. It is a planned neighbourhood developed by the DDA in the 1980s, and Pitampura TV Tower, was built in 1988. Dilli Haat Pitampura is also situated near the TV tower. ...
Don't you know where Pitampura is?
@hellodear2 no, its hot these days
@hellodear2 ofcourse I know. I know every bit of Delhi
17:55
It is very famous place
@hellodear2 sure it is
which subject did you take?
I am Mittal.
great.
is your first name "Aman" by any chance?
17:56
Yes. My parents affectionately call me Aman
@hellodear2 see, I am magical :)
How did you guess?
@hellodear2 just a wild guess in the night forest lol
@hellodear2 leave it, tell me, what subjects did you take? (I am no studies encourager, i hate them, just asking)

« first day (485 days earlier)      last day (414 days later) »