« first day (483 days earlier)      last day (416 days later) » 

Anonymous
03:00
5
A: vegetation sprouting from the seams

Damkerng T.The first thing came to my mind was those small trees that grow from those cracks in the walls or pavement. Why? Because I got some of them myself! NOTE: If I don't pull them off, they will grow really fast. So, yes, they rooted indeed! I believe that seams can be used so in your sentence be...

Anonymous
Hey, that's what I pictured, too! :-)
04:03
@DamkerngT. Good morning.
 
6 hours later…
10:25
@skullpatrol Hello.
@ParthKohli Hi
@skullpatrol how're you?
@ParthKohli Fine thanks, how are you?
@skullpatrol lol, I'm "OK"
10:37
@skullpatrol OS.
@snailboat Hehe. This is the first time I answered an ELL question using my new iPad. :D
Hi @ParthKohli!
Hi @skullpatrol!
@DamkerngT. Congratulations! Air or Mini?
@DamkerngT. Hi pal :D
@ParthKohli It's Air!
@DamkerngT. That's great!
10:42
Yeah! I just realized that its camera is much better than my old one!
Enjoy the experience. :)
Thanks. :-)
Oh, which one did you have before this one?
It's an iPad 2.
Oh - you must also have noticed the screen resolution itself. iPad 2 doesn't have a retina display and is heavy as hell.
10:44
Yes, but I kinda like iPad 2 pixels too. Kinda retro. Hehe.
But iPad Air brightness is better. I mean, it's now way too bright as iPad 2.
iOS 8 is going to be announced within weeks!
Oh, I don't know that. Thanks for the news.
Apple has announced WWDC for June 2 this year.
and the iPhone 6 is coming soon
Yes, but the next iPhone is going to be announced nearly when iOS 8 is launched publicly.
Which is September-October.
10:47
Will iPhone 6 be able to fly?
faster than a speeding bullet
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Hooray! I just answered a question on my desktop computer again. Hopefully it's not missing any esses ;-)
There's something very stupid about the transparent iPhone concept design: the phone isn't gonna be hollow!
10:48
@snailboat Yay! Not missing any esses is very important.
Anonymous
It's so you can see the unreplaceable battery inside, taunting you.
@snailboat hahaha
OK guys I gotta go, see ya :-)
@ParthKohli Don't tell me that they're gonna make it transparent.
@skullpatrol No! You are my knight!
10:49
@skullpatrol See you. Have a nice day!
@DamkerngT. That's what the "leaked designs" say. That's what they say every year.
Anonymous
@skullpatrol Fare thee well, skull patrol!
There's no way to make it transparent.
Have fun and stay out of trouble
@skullpatrol I hope I do!
10:50
@ParthKohli try
It's been an adventurous week for me.
Anonymous
Oh, ELL is fun. I hope people don't mind my answers being too technical from time to time :-)
Maybe iPhone 12 will be able to do those Transformers things. :D
Oh, we can have code in bold too!
Anonymous
You sure can.
10:52
How do you format code again?
code
Aha.
Anonymous
You can't do it in chat.
Anonymous
Damkerng was referring to an answer on ELL.
StoneyB's rep is pretty good for a forum that's only in beta.
Anonymous
StoneyB is a solid contributor with a large number of answers.
10:54
Yes, he's been here ever since ELL started.
Anonymous
And he has an awful lot of upvotes for his good answers.
I'm not good with reasoning -- I just know that something is. That is why I'm not too regular with ELL.
Anonymous
Sure. Not everyone has to take a technical approach to language.
Anonymous
Knowing that something is is a great skill.
10:58
@snailboat Good to hear.
IIRC, you were there that day too.
Anonymous
I don't remember that day.
@snailboat Thank God you don't.
Anonymous
@ParthKohli Um, yippee? :-)
I'm hungry.
(Out of the blue)
Anonymous
Would you say that you need food badly?
11:00
I think I'm hungry, not starving :P
Of all of our avatars, I think only one is edible.
3
Anonymous
Um.
I think humans are edible, too.
@DamkerngT. LOL.
Anonymous
11:01
Ahem.
Wait what.
I mean the banana. :D
@DamkerngT. So subtle. Loved it.
@ParthKohli Thanks. Hehe.
Anonymous
I believe that we can come up with at least two different analyses for the sentence. If we treated "look at" as a phrasal verb, then "him" would be the (direct) object of the verb "to look at". On the other hand, if we treated "look" as a verb, and "at" as a preposition, then this "look" wold be an intransitive verb, that is, it has no object. And in this case, if we wanted to say "him" is an object of anything, it would have to be the object of the preposition "at", which is perhaps not useful for learners at large. I'm fine with either analysis. Imo, sometimes, analysis is not very useful. — Damkerng T. 20 hours ago
11:04
Oh, I wrote that yesterday.
I think the original sentence was I looked at him.
Anonymous
Look at is not a verb + particle combination, which we can tell because it doesn't exhibit particle shift (look at the bird, *look the bird at). Nor is it non-compositional, so it's not an idiom.
(Not sure about the tense.)
Anonymous
So there's no justification to apply the label phrasal verb
I think it might be used in the sense of "I studied him."
Though it's quite unlikely.
@DamkerngT. "I studied him" sounds way too intimate...
11:09
@snailboat Hmm... This is interesting. I haven't thought before that phrasal verbs would allow both patterns: V P noun and V noun P.
This person's bio is crazy.
> Physics and chemistry teacher.
I love classical music and languages.
I speak French, English, German, Spanish, Italian and Turkish; now learning Japanese.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Turn the lamp on. Turn on the lamp.
@snailboat Yes, but is it always the case (to be qualified as a phrasal verb)?
Repost!
6
A: Difference between verb+preposition and phrasal verbs

John LawlerThere are several types of phrasal verb, and several types of verb + preposition. Not all of them are constituents, they serve different functions, they're all irregular as hell, and they're all governed by the matrix verb. Every verb has its own assortment of special idioms, affordances, prohi...

Have to go for a while; will come back later.
Anonymous
11:10
That's the main justification for calling on a particle, that on the lamp doesn't appear to form a preposition phrase
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Your earlier question did not imply this question
11:22
็Hi~
Hello
A coup A coup!!!
@SantiSantichaivekin Are you from India?
@ParthKohli He's a Thai.
Nope, Thailand. ^ ^
11:25
@Fantasier Oh - why are most of the people here Thai?
Because we planned to take over this site :)
Hahaha
well, @Fantasier invited me. =b.
A coup is happening right at this moment ^ ^. I hope I will have no school tomorrow.
A COUP?!
I THOUGHT IT WASN'T A COUP.
IT WASN'T.
NOW IT IS.
11:32
D:
It's actually about an hour ago.
I thought you knew it. Breaking news everywhere.
That's not the breaking news in India.
But I'm reading articles on it.
Earlier, it was not really a coup, right?
It wasn't.
maybe I should change is happening to is taking place, it sounds more appropriate.
I'd personally say 'we're having a coup at the moment'.
11:35
OK, I see.
Anonymous
Yikes!
Anonymous
@Fantasier That does sound rather calm. Like "There's an interesting show on the television right now."
@ParthKohli I think you read an article on martial law in Thailand.
@SantiSantichaivekin Yup, I did.
Anonymous
"We're having a coup at the moment. Maybe a spot of tea later on--oh, and the kids have soccer practice this afternoon."
3
11:36
I mean in an article about Thailand.
@snailboat Oh, I didn't realise how that sounded, but it's actually quite calm for most people.
@snailboat Hahah!
We somehow got used to it, which is not a good thing, of course.
@Fantasier me too
Anyway, I think I should refrain from talking about that from this point :-)
11:40
@Fantasier Hmmn? Why?
Anonymous
Ahh
@SantiSantichaivekin Hmm, why not? I mean, I don't think it's appropriate to talk about anything political here, let alone a coup.
Anonymous
You may talk about politics if you so desire.
Anonymous
I avoid doing so most of the time
No. I don't like it. Often leads to unnecessary conflicts.
Anonymous
11:43
I understand.
Anonymous
I avoid it, too, a lot of the time.
It's a democratic system here, but it doesn't work too well.
Anonymous
Do they ever?
lol.
Which system do you prefer?
Anonymous
Oh, I don't disprefer democracy.
Anonymous
11:46
I just don't think it works very often ;-)
I hold the same opinion. Which system works the best according to you?
Anonymous
This talking about politics stuff is a slippery slope. If we keep talking about politics, soon we'll be talking about politics! And we know where that leads.
Don't worry, I'm not a political debater. I just like to know a thing or two. :)
Anonymous
Hey, that's exactly how many things I know!
Hahaha.
12:03
@Fantasier Thanks. Bookmarked! -- digesting...
@snailboat I think I didn't phrase my question well enough. :-)
@Fantasier +1
"Do you believe in God?"
"No."
BOOM! Dead.
"Do you believe in God?"
"Yes."
"Do you believe in my God?
"No."
BOOM! Dead
I know about a handful of Hindu Gods.
Hindi = language. Hindu = religion.
Oh, I'm sorry about that.
Fixed. :-)
No offense taken, lol.
12:11
Anyway, whatever happened, I'm glad that I still have my internet connection.
Very important.
Hehe.
How's the scene outside your home? Is it chaotic or just normal?
Looks rather normal, I think.
A new announcement is coming up.
I see.
Anonymous
@ParthKohli This looks like a tough quiz!
Nothing new in the news.
12:15
@snailboat :)
12:48
RIP my cable.
@DamkerngT. Which cable?
Umm... my cable TV.
The cable television?
Oh.
Let's just hope that this is the worst caused by the coup.
I think they know that I should spend more time on ELL. :-)
@ParthKohli Did I mention the curfew?
12:51
Ah, this is English related.
@SantiSantichaivekin Oh, you didn't. Well - that's bad.
National Peace and Order Maintaining Council
@ParthKohli actually not so bad, just at night.
Anonymous
I feel like I should be able to find a pattern in all of X versus all of the X, but I can't, so I withdrew my answer for the moment.
Anonymous
At least in the OP's case, both seem just fine.
13:04
PEU explains it adequately, I think.
Entry 36.
Anonymous
Oh, does it?
Anonymous
Just a moment.
Anonymous
Yeah, that seems all right.
Anonymous
It says that both are possible. I didn't consider the pronoun case separatelyy.
Yes. So I wonder about the reasons GrammarMonster gave.
Anonymous
13:10
I edited my answer.
Anonymous
I've seen other iffy advice on GrammarMonster.
Anonymous
They sometimes give "baby rules", sometimes saying at the side that they're not actually "rules"
Anonymous
This is one of those cases
Anonymous
And also, this is my first time citing PEU, ever! I knew I got that book for some reason! ;-)
13:14
Yay!
Anonymous
Michael Swan's Practical English Usage
Anonymous
It's a pedagogical grammar.
Oh, I've heard of that book!
My main grammar book. :-)
Anonymous
13:16
I usually refer to reference grammars, which may be why my answers end up with random jargon :-)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Thanks for the pointer!
Anonymous
I flipped through CGEL but I couldn't find it.
No problem. I was looking it up because of Maulik's reply.
Anonymous
It may be in there somewhere. It's hard to find stuff sometimes.
I'm sure it is in there. :D
Anonymous
13:20
Hey, Quirk et al. has some finer-grained rules.
Anonymous
They say all of the is strange with time-reference nouns:
Anonymous
> ? all of the day/hour/week
Oh! Interesting!
Anonymous
> I haven't seen him all day / the whole day / *all the day / *all of the day.
A little curious, is whole day (without the) possible?
Anonymous
13:24
Not generally
nods
I think I must be confused by the sound of all day in some dialects.
Anonymous
All day is fine. Whole day is strange.
Anonymous
Whole comes after a determiner like a or the
Anonymous
All is a determiner
@snailboat That's what I'm used to too.
I don't know where that sound "whole day" in the back of my mind came from.
Anonymous
13:29
Cool Hand Louis owes no allegience to any terminological nation.
Anonymous
He just said that gold 1) is an adjective 2) is a modifier 3) can act like an adjective 4) is a noun adjunct 5) is an attributive noun
What made you say that? :-)
Anonymous
All in one paragraph!
Ah, thanks for the clarification.
@snailboat do you teach?
Anonymous
13:31
Whatever, I upvoted it. +1 for making my head explode.
@snailboat Wow! That's an awful lot!
Anonymous
@AwalGarg I'm just a snailboat.
Um... I don't understand why the other answer was deleted.
@snailboat a snail is not a boat, the vice-versa as well is untrue. The combination of the two, well... its kinda oxymoron. I know you must be a teacher. And your students must be brilliant :)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I don't know why J.R. deleted it.
Anonymous
13:37
@AwalGarg Janthinidae are boatlike snails with brilliant violet shells. They fashion rafts out of bubbles and use them to float on the surface of the ocean
Anonymous
@snailboat see, as I said. It is kinda oxymoron. To quote you to yourself: "They are boat- like structures..."
@snailboat oh such a beautiful snail that is :) I wish I had one at home.
@snailboat how do I get one of that at my place?
I think technically, "How to ..." or "What to use ..." is not a question.
But it's common to see such questions.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, it's common to see such interrogative clauses
Anonymous
13:53
@AwalGarg I'm not sure. I don't have any sea snails.
Anonymous
I have no idea.
Sounds like parallel computing.
My best guess: MU = multi-user, SU = single-user
Somehow I think multiuser looks fine, but singleuser doesn't.
Anonymous
That's because multi- is a prefix, but single isn't.
14:03
Is there a prefix that means single used as opposed to multi-?
Wait, I missed the last announcement.
But I think schools are closed now.
That's for sure.
Did they say for how long?
I didn't catch it either.
Anonymous
@Fantasier uni-
14:05
Oh my friend tweeted; it's '23-25 May'
@snailboat I see!
Anonymous
Uni- : multi- :: mono- : poly- (more or less)
In this case, I think uniuser sounds weird.
Anonymous
That's because single user is the set alternative to multi-user in computing
Anonymous
14:08
And also because uniuser sounds funny.
Anonymous
Things that sound funny often sound weird as a consequence.
Anonymous
It works the other way around, too.
:) True, that!
Hmm... many of my tweet feeds are dead now.
Well, they're not dead as in RIP, but nothing new on the feeds for a while already.
Huh, mine still goes like crazy.
(Oh well I follow 305 people :P)
I'm sure we monitor different feeds. :D
14:20
We're actually watching the same feed. Because I'm behind you right now!
(No, actually.)
(That'd be real creepy)
Oh, now there's a rumor that the net will be gone at 10pm.
Before there was a rumour that it would be gone at 8pm.
Probably at 10pm there will be another one saying it will be gone at midnight.
LOL
I think it's much more difficult than the old days, when we still didn't have the Internet.
14:30
What is (much more difficult)?
The actions needed. When I was young, radio and TV stations were enough. :-)
Hmm... I think sometimes, we couldn't use phones too. (Mobile phone didn't exist yet, of course.)
So it was very different back then.
Hmm. I see.
Is there a good alternative to 'I see'? I can't think of any :-P
I think I see is fine. :D
Hey, this is my fifth, so I've got some experience, I think.
@DamkerngT. Me too.
But I'm just looking for other ways to say it.
@Fantasier I can think of an alternative: "I can imagine that."
14:38
@DamkerngT. Oh, that works, I think.
Oh, I don't know the word (in English) for this thing, the text that runs at the bottom of TV screen. Does running text work?
I forgot what it's called.
Moving text? Seems just as weird...
Anonymous
A news ticker, sometimes called a "crawler" or "slide", resides in the lower third of the television screen space on television news networks dedicated to presenting headlines or minor pieces of news. It may also refer to a long, thin scoreboard-style display seen around the front of some offices or public buildings. The news ticker has been used in Europe in countries such as United Kingdom, Germany and Ireland for some years, and they are also used in several Asian countries and Australia. In the United States, tickers were long used on a special event basis by broadcast television sta...
Ahh... Thanks!
That's the word I was looking for!
Actually, I should've known it; stock tickers are common.
But ticker didn't come up.
In another post,
Odd; this is certainly less detailed than snailplane's answer, but how is it incorrect or downvote-worthy? — Alexander 17 mins ago
I think he has a point. But maybe "This is one of those circumstances and being in written form does not change this." got him a downvote.
I think I might need to look up some style guides I can access.
Anonymous
14:55
I don't know. I just upvoted because it looks fine to me :-) — snailplane 28 secs ago
Oh, if my internet was gone, how could I access my 34-thousand books?!
Anonymous
That's a large number of books.
Yes. I know I won't be able to read all of them. :D
Anonymous
I wish I had more books. I miss some of the books I accidentally parted with last year. :-(
Anonymous
My books are there for me, though, internet or no.
Anonymous
14:57
I love paper :-)
Now I can see one advantage of paper books over ebooks. :-)
Anonymous
I can access Martin 1975 on Google Books. I can only read randomly selected passages there
Anonymous
But I can use it as a search function then retreat to my paper copy :-)
Ah, that's a good way to search paper books. I will borrow this trick of yours. :D

« first day (483 days earlier)      last day (416 days later) »