« first day (456 days earlier)      last day (443 days later) » 

02:04
This chat is dead.
 
3 hours later…
04:51
This chat is really dead.
No it aliiive!
cue creepy mummy
It's aliveeeeeee
05:22
meow...
05:49
@WendiKidd I got your point, and I have the same feeling as you for "writing perfectly". I think "detailing" is fine in first sentence since it is actually "always detailing", but the pen is not "always writing". That's where awkwardness happened in "write" but not "detail" — CYC 11 hours ago
Reading this comment, I think CYC didn't have any problem with objects used in the active voice. It's a bit deeper than that.
You could say, "Writing perfectly, the pen left a sharp and crisp image on the paper." — Jay 9 hours ago
I think Jay got it.
reading the answers...
 
2 hours later…
07:23
@snailboat You deleted lots of comments which contain lots of useful information. :-)
Anonymous
07:33
I try to clean up my comments sometimes. I leave too many lying around
As we all know, comments on ELL are more useful than answers.
But we learn so much from them :-)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh no :-)
Anonymous
Do we really all know that?
Heehee.
Anonymous
07:35
@snailplane If this question makes no sense then why did you have to use "certain constructions" in your comment? If my question was so senseless, then why didn't you simply say "Tell is used with prepositions"? — Sandeep Dhamija 23 mins ago
Anonymous
They were getting upset and they over-interpreted what I wrote, so I felt it was best to remove my comments
I'm not sure, but I think I got a glimpse of a comment saying something about "tell that to him" vs. "tell him that" and then it was gone. :-)
I have a feeling that that question would lead to other topics (other than intransitive-transitive)
Anonymous
Like the dative alternation? :-)
(Took me a while to look that up) Yeah. And perhaps as far as phrasal verbs versus prepositional verbs.
Anonymous
07:50
I leave describing phrasal verbs to people who know how learners learn that sort of thing. I don't, to be honest
Anonymous
I wrote up a description once, but I'm not sure it was really useful to anyone here
Anonymous
And I don't want to duplicate that effort and confuse everyone again :-)
Anonymous
Avoiding the term "phrasal verb" makes sense to me, but maybe not to other people
Anonymous
(Since, you know, they're neither phrases nor verbs)
What would you call something like "look up" then?
Anonymous
07:54
Looks to me like an idiomatic verb + particle combination.
I see, so that's how.
And for "look at", You call it a verb + preposition combination?
Anonymous
Well, here I use particle to mean "intransitive preposition", so the distinction is whether the preposition takes a phrase as its object or not
Anonymous
In "Look something up", it seems clear that something is not syntactically the object of up
Yeah, I meant "look at" as in "look at me" (at takes me as its object)
so you wouldn't call it a particle, would you?
Anonymous
Yeah, I'm drawing a contrast, but I'm multi-tasking so you started typing before I could finish :-)
08:00
Btw, I think the question began to stray from where it should go when "Tell to Win" was mentioned.
I think to win there is "in order to win"?
I'm not sure. That's one logical interpretation. It's a book title.
Anonymous
So we can see an alternation between "look something up" versus "look up something", and we can see that an unstressed object can't appear after the particle "look him up" but not "look up him"--it only works if you exceptionally stress him
Anonymous
Whereas in "look at him", we have a phonologically different kind of phrase, and one which doesn't alternate with "look him at"
Anonymous
So there it's clear that him is the object of at
Anonymous
08:03
So the structure is V + PP
Anonymous
The other is V + P + NP in alternation with V + NP + P
Anonymous
And these combinations are often idiomatic to varying degrees
Anonymous
So semantically I explain their meaning as idiomatic (and point out that idioms need not be constituents)
Anonymous
But I don't want to call them phrasal verbs since the verb is still the verb, the V + P combination hasn't become a verb
Anonymous
08:05
or whatever combination you've got
Anonymous
There's another reason to distinguish particles from intransitive prepositions, though, which is that although intransitive prepositions make up the large majority of particles in V + P idioms, some come from other parts of speech
Anonymous
Another reason I find "phrasal verb" confusing is that for some people it's distinguished from "prepositional verb", but others use "phrasal verb" as a hypernym for both types of construction
Anonymous
In general, talking to someone random on the internet, I can't know what they mean by phrasal verb (or how they'll understand my use of the term)
Anonymous
Unless I sit down and ask them.
Anonymous
And instead of sitting down and asking them, it's usually easier to just say what I mean
08:10
Some learner's dictionaries use phrasal verb as the hypernym. I was once confused by that and misled.
I think the term phrasal verb is not very useful for learners.
Oh, and I think your solution (saying what you mean) is actually good and very clear.
I think I can learn English just fine without having to know it.
But I found that I've had to say "phrasal verb" more often since I joined ELL.
Yeah. Because it's easier than saying "verbs like ...."
Sometimes, it helps.
08:12
(Or "combinations like ..." to be more precise, perhaps)
I think it depends on how each learner previously learned.
But I like this: "So there it's clear that him is the object of at" (in look at him).
Anonymous
But on ELL, future users may have learned differently, so you can't assume that everyone reading what you write will have learned the same way.
Well, the way I learnt those verbs, they use the term to mean both V + NP <-> P and V + PP.
I think I was confused for a long while (when grammar still turned me off) when a teacher mentioned "phrasal verb".
I was like, "What?". I think I thought it was better to understand "look at him" as "look, at, him".
Anonymous
Some people use "phrasal verb" in a semantic sense rather than syntactic, I find
08:15
And for "look it up", it's just a two-word verb, "look + up", and "him".
Anonymous
Where I would use the term "idiom", these people use "phrasal verb" to communicate that the combination has non-compositional meaning
Oh! That could be even more confusing, I think!
Anonymous
People on ELL do it.
Anonymous
Here's an example of using phrasal verb as a hypernym that includes prepositional verbs: ell.stackexchange.com/a/21653/230
Anonymous
Here's a definition of phrasal verb meaning "idiomatic combination of verb and preposition":
Anonymous
08:21
2
A: "The front door slid open" grammar explanation

J.R.I wouldn't call it a phrasal verb. In phrasal verbs, the the two words together take on an entirely new meaning. For example, when I say: Why don't you grow up? I don't mean, "Why don't you grow taller?"; I mean, "Why don't you act more mature?" However, when I say: Would you please sl...

@snailboat Oh, I stopped reading that question once StoneyB said "off-topic". :-)
Anonymous
> I wouldn't call it a phrasal verb. In phrasal verbs, the the two words together take on an entirely new meaning.
Anonymous
It's not really true, though.
^ That was what made my answer -2 long ago on ELU.
I see.
Anonymous
08:22
In many cases they do, but not all.
Anonymous
@Fantasier I don't know what you're referring to
Me either.
I think "slid open" is a rather new question.
@snailboat Defining a phrasal verb as 'idiomatic combination of verb and preposition (with a new meaning)'
Oh, I see.
Had anyone used the term "two-word verb" before on ELL?
Anonymous
Here's an answer by StoneyB describing different uses of phrasal verb:
Anonymous
08:25
4
A: How to judge a phrase is a phrasal verb?

StoneyBIn contemporary grammar the term phrasal verb has two somewhat different meanings. In one meaning the term names any idiomatic combination of a verb and a preposition or locative/directive adverb whose meaning cannot be understood from the ordinary senses of the words involved. Under this me...

Anonymous
@DamkerngT. That seems like an oxymoron to me.
Ouch! Really?
Anonymous
Well, in my personal world, verbs are by definition single words
Anonymous
So if you were to use two words like a verb, like if you started saying "I look-upped the fact", in my mind it would be reanalyzed as one word
Hah. Found the question:
0
Q: Difference between verb+preposition and phrasal verbs

Timothy LiI am reading a book on grammar. Now I can't understand the difference between the verb+preposition and phrasal verbs. For example He never thinks about(or of) other people. and put on your coat Why this book call think about a verb+preposition and put on a phrasal verb. What's the dif...

Anonymous
08:26
But if you said "I looked up the fact" or "I looked the fact up", the verb to me seems to clearly be just look
Anonymous
John Lawler analyzes V + P as a constituent, but Huddleston & Pullum do not
@Fantasier I guess that you've already deleted the answer. (I have not enough rep there to see deleted answers, so I couldn't see yours.)
@DamkerngT. I deleted just a while ago. It was too bad an answer.
Anonymous
I don't know how much reputation you need there. 10,000?
08:30
@snailboat Bookmarked
Anonymous
At one point I set a long-term goal to get to 3000 reputation on ELU, but I don't know if I'll ever get around to it
Anonymous
I have 2733 right now
Anonymous
I don't know if being able to vote to close is really very exciting to me there
@snailboat Really!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, I did use a question mark :-)
Anonymous
08:31
I'm not active on any non-beta sites
You are particularly interested in beta sites (because they are beta), or it's just what happens?
Oh, it looks like 10,000 rep points indeed.
Anonymous
I'm mostly interested in Japanese.SE
Anonymous
The programming sites aren't particularly interesting to me
Anonymous
Enough people come to me with tech problems already without me looking for more
08:34
It's only 2,000 rep points here. Maybe that is why people could be so aggressive about the points sometimes.
Anonymous
And I've never been in a situation where I've had a problem I couldn't solve and needed to ask about on a Q&A site
I think I feel the same way about those tech stacks.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Hmm?
Anonymous
Also, looking at answers on SO puts you in constant facepalm territory.
Anonymous
Usually maybe 1 in 10 is a good answer.
Anonymous
08:36
So it's kind of depressing.
Anonymous
Most of the questions are brain-hurting, too.
Oh, I haven't really looked into them. Is it that bad?
Anonymous
Maybe Q&A sites are doomed to have a certain level of brain-hurting facepalm.
Indeed.
Anonymous
08:37
I mean, people who ask questions on Q&A sites most often do it because they're confused or don't have access to the resources they need, right?
I guess so.
Anonymous
If everyone were thinking perfectly about their problems with perfect access to information, they probably wouldn't ask as many questions.
Anonymous
And that's okay.
Anonymous
I think it varies a little by topic.
08:39
and subject too
But you were talking about answers, not the questions.
Anonymous
Sure. Don't ask me what the difference is between topic and subject, by the way.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, I was talking about both.
I see, I see.
Anonymous
Here on ELL, you've probably noticed that a lot of people just make up their answers out of whole cloth.
Anonymous
08:39
That's okay, sometimes.
Anonymous
Among people who've tried to learn some basic linguistics, you have the problem that different people have different "basic linguistics" :-)
Anonymous
Natural language is fuzzy, anyway.
Anonymous
And besides being fuzzy, it's hard.
logic can be fuzzy too :-)
Anonymous
Hah.
Anonymous
08:41
Hey, nima_persian has 2023 posts on TheFreeDictionary forums.
True. We have fuzzy logic.
Anonymous
107 questions on ELL.
I've noticed another trend.
Anonymous
08:42
41 on ELU.
@DamkerngT. What trend?
Some users posted a question here, then waited a while, and would post the same question elsewhere.
Maybe because the first answer was not very satisfying.
Anonymous
How did you discover this trend?
> Damkerng is everywhere!
I usually spent time reading questions/answers.
And sometimes some answers got me a "Whuh?"
08:44
(Just kidding, of course)
So I searched. :-)
You are well rounded :-)
@Fantasier I can't do that physically, I think. :-)
Thanks.
It's not really a bad thing though, this trend.
Anonymous
The other thing is, the more popular a SE site, the less it seems votes are correlated to quality.
08:45
true dat^
Anonymous
Most of my highly upvoted answers on ELU weren't especially great, but the questions got promoted one way or another, so they got lot of views.
Anonymous
Some other answers I felt were better got pretty much no upvotes.
I felt that very often. (And not only for my answers.)
Anonymous
As ELL becomes more popular, the same thing has been happening here, I think
Anonymous
Not to the same extent, yet, maybe
Anonymous
08:47
I wrote this answer on my phone in about 30 seconds as I was falling asleep:
Anonymous
24
A: "I'm a large." (Seinfeld)

snailplaneIt's a clothing size. He wears a large. His joke anticipates clothing, given as a gift, being re-gifted to Jerry.

Oh, I remember that!
I'm an M.
But hey, sometimes I needed an XL.
Anonymous
My most upvoted answer is on a question that got lot of views because it had sex in the title:
Anonymous
14
Q: Real English, Cleaning Meaning Sexual Intercourse

Bary LuJust read a tweet, My fantasy is having two men at once. One cooking. One cleaning. Is it a word play in wich 'cleaning' refers to a sexual intercourse or, actually, 'cleaning' is there intended having its literal meaning?

That's very likely.
Anonymous
08:49
This is my most upvoted answer on ELU:
Anonymous
48
A: Polite alternative to the term "bitch" when referring to a female dog

snailboatI think the obvious answer (the one you already know!) is the best: You can refer to a female dog as a female dog. You can refer to a male dog as a male dog. Of course, if you really need to specify that they're adults, you could do that: An adult male dog could be referred to as an adult m...

Anonymous
The one who actually solved the OP's problem had their answer converted to a comment
Umm... "..."
Anonymous
My answer didn't really add too much of value, though it was well-intentioned :-)
Sex will always sell.
Anonymous
08:51
But I think most of those votes are again from views due to a shocking, scandalous question title
> You can refer to a female dog as a female dog.
I think it sounds very Zen-ish.
Anonymous
Yes! I am full of wisdom.
a she-dog
Anonymous
When I have gone over answers on SO, I've often found that there are very good answers without any upvotes whatsoever.
Anonymous
Meanwhile, there are okay-ish answers with 150+ upvotes.
08:53
I think it's the same here, or at least it's becoming.
Anonymous
SO has a lot of people contributing, so the core of really helpful users, small though it may be relative to the size of the userbase, is still much larger in absolute terms than, say, here
Anonymous
Look here, by the way: ELU is #5! stackexchange.com/sites#traffic
I remember that! (from the Hats season)
Anonymous
Though note the disparity between 8k questions/day and 52 questions/day :-)
I can't see the stats. (Or I looked in a wrong place?)
Anonymous
08:56
Ooh, ELL is doing pretty well.
Anonymous
Um.
Wow. The difference between SO (#1) and SU (#2) in terms of traffic is ginormous.
Anonymous
I see lots of stats. stackexchange.com/sites#traffic
I see. I need to click on that windy icon first.
Anonymous
Today I learned that some people wear gloves when they play guitar: originalguitarfingers.com
08:57
For real?!
Anonymous
Isn't that strange?
Anonymous
I've never heard of this, and I've been playing guitar all my life.
speechless
Anonymous
Someone said they go through a pair once a month.
Anonymous
> Its no longer necessary for calluses to form to enjoy guitar playing.
08:59
I think calluses are necessary.
Anonymous
I know forming calluses is different for everyone, but I've never really known anyone who had a problem with it
Anonymous
Say, did I link to this in here?
Anonymous
-2
Q: Japanese "verbal nouns [suru verbs]" ("suru-meishi")

ShakaiI am participating in a Japanese-English translation, and 've come across one of many loose boards. This question ONLY pertains to a word index. In accordance with my Japanese principal's teaching method, for who I am doing this translation, there is a special class of nouns called "suru-meishi"...

Anonymous
They re-asked their question on ELU after it was closed on ELL
Oh, poor thing.
I had to replace a gas dispenser valve today, too! Almost $90!
Anonymous
09:07
They actually changed the question slightly when they re-asked.
Anonymous
They inserted the line "(p.s. must maintain the noun.)"
Anonymous
And they rewrote one sentence, adding "I think maintaining the 'to do' nuance is important as a temporal cushion, or something!"
I think it might work only in the literal translation context.
Anonymous
There's really no way to translate Japanese literally into English.
Anonymous
With some closer languages, it works a bit more often than with that language pair
Anonymous
09:09
But for example, discourse particles like yo and ne don't have any literal translations available in English
Anonymous
And those are super common
I think ne might work in Thai. I don't know about yo.
Anonymous
My personal feeling is that you have to start by learning how to express stuff in your target language.
Anonymous
As it's normally expressed, not as it's translated from your source language
In the context of learning, I think literal translation could be a bad idea.
Anonymous
09:11
But some reliance on your L1 is probably inevitable.
Anonymous
In the short-term
Anonymous
I assume this person means temporary when they write temporal
I think of such reliance the same way I think of the 3rd and 4th wheels of a bike.
Anonymous
I didn't understand that earlier when they wrote this comment:
Anonymous
Thank you both, however in the case of "Benkyou Suru" the meaning is not truly "study," but "to do studies." A difference of nuance and temporal semantic difference. This is my difficulty. — Shakai Apr 21 at 7:44
Anonymous
09:12
Oh! Those are called training wheels
Ah, thanks for the word!
Anonymous
By the way, I think for me, I have no problem with a lot of questions, including a lot of relatively confused ones
Training wheels (or stabilisers in British English) are an additional wheel or wheels mounted parallel to the rear wheel of a bicycle that assist learners until they have developed a usable sense of balance on the bicycle. Typically they are used in teaching very young children to ride a bike, although versions for adults exist. The term "training wheels" is commonly used in the United States, Canada and Australia to describe the stabilisers' role in learning to ride bicycles. Learning to bicycle Training wheels that prevent the bike from leaning also prevent countersteering, so that, as...
Anonymous
But they don't really keep my interest
Anonymous
So maybe I'm just personally not compatible with a lot of those questions.
Anonymous
09:17
Like ZZ's questions--they seem like good enough questions, but I'm probably not going to answer them
Anonymous
I answered a question today!
@skullpatrol Thanks for the photo!
Anonymous
It was one that had already been answered, though :-)
@DamkerngT. we all need them :-)
I haven't checked out ELL questions for a few hours already, I think.
@skullpatrol In the beginning, yes.
Oh, it was from The Matrix!
Anonymous
09:20
I don't think I ever had a bike with training wheels. But I did have a child's tricycle, which may amount to roughly the same thing :-)
If learning a new language were riding a bike, some folks would seem to stick with training wheels, some would stick with a tricycle! :-)
You can adjust the height of training wheels...
Anonymous
I still use bilingual dictionaries sometimes.
Anonymous
For a while, I was only using monolingual dictionaries
Anonymous
Then I realized that bilingual dictionaries offer a sort of resource monolingual dictionaries don't
09:22
I usually use bilingual dictionaries for completely new words. It's much faster.
Anonymous
At least in the case of the Japanese-English pair, bilingual dictionaries have lots of example sentences
Anonymous
Monolingual Japanese dictionaries, even good ones, tend not to
Anonymous
Usually the actual definition part is less useful in bilingual dictionaries, though
Maybe monolingual Japanese dictionaries will include more examples, sooner or later.
Anonymous
It's the sentences where I find gold :-)
Anonymous
09:24
@DamkerngT. I have some large monolingual dictionaries. They're great for certain kinds of examples.
Anonymous
They tend to focus on historic examples, kind of like the OED
Anonymous
Large dictionaries that focus on the modern language tend to have examples for each sense too, but usually not nearly as many as I can find in bilingual dictionaries
Anonymous
I'm not sure why that is.
Oh, you can make a best seller by writing a Japanese dictionary for learners!
Anonymous
Hah
09:26
It sounds like something not existing yet, right? :-)
Anonymous
Maybe that's the thing. There aren't really any Japanese monolingual dictionaries designed for learners.
Anonymous
It's really different from English, perhaps because there are so many learners of English
Anonymous
We have lots of learner's dictionaries these days. OALD, CALD
Yes. I also particularly like Macmillan's.
Anonymous
Collins and M-W have learner's dictionaries.
Anonymous
09:27
Yay, Macmillan!
Dictionaries are like training wheels, imo.
Anonymous
But, but, I use English dictionaries all the time! ;-)
Longman also has a good one. I don't know if anyone heard about before: Longman Language Activator.
Anonymous
You'll never take my dictionary collection away from me!! sobs
@snailboat Me too :D
09:29
I think I use dictionaries in my slow mode.
When I read something fast, I tend to not to use dictionaries.
Anonymous
I think dictionaries are especially helpful when you're already familiar with a word but you find you don't know precisely how it's used.
You get a sense of "stability" knowing the definitions.
But in slow mode, I have my chances to get to know the words more.
Dictionaries also help me a lot on my pronunciation!
that too^
Anonymous
That doesn't mean looking up every word you don't know right when you see it
Anonymous
09:31
Unless you have a pretty large vocabulary and really don't mind doing so ;-)
etymology etc.
Anonymous
Oh, yes! That, too.
Also that!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I have a pronunciation dictionary for Japanese on my electronic dictionary
Anonymous
It's been helpful :-)
09:33
Yay!
Is there any way to follow the activity of a particular user?
ie get up dates when they answer or ask questions
Just click on his or her profile.
Oh, you mean passively? I don't know.
Subscribe to the user's feed.
like following a tag
Anonymous
101
Q: A "friends list" on Stack Overflow would be nice

Chris PietschmannI think it would be nice to have a "friends list" on Stack Overflow. This would allow us to be able to follow the questions and answers that are posted by users that we want to watch/monitor. I suggest it be implemented in the same fashion as DotNetKicks.com; where you can add someone to your "f...

09:37
Does "user feed" include things like comments, etc.?
Hmm, I ain't sure.
@DamkerngT. Do you follow AmE or BrE?
Anonymous
They mention RSS there but no way to follow them on the site itself
I tend to mainly use AmE, but I'm sure my English is a mixed one.
@snailboat thanks
I see. I see that you used a full stop after etc.
09:39
Ah, I see. I didn't notice it myself. Hehe.
@DamkerngT. Oh I just got an almost complete set of the Buddha's suttas.
Wow! Really? In English or some other language?
I wish I could have one too, but I don't have it.
Let me give you the link.
You can get all the books cheapest on amazon.com.
This is a set of 6 books.
My valve delivery guy has just arrived. BBL.
@JasperLoy How much in US dollars did the set cost?
Anonymous
09:55
@DamkerngT. I didn't notice either.
Anonymous
Is it normal to let the question mark "absorb" the period in "etc."?
etc? or etc.?
@skullpatrol About 190 USD.
Anonymous
Yeah! To period or not to period, that's the question I'm askin'.
@snailboat It is not about the question mark.
In AmE, full stops are usually present in abbreviations.
In BrE, they are usually absent.
09:59
@JasperLoy That's not too much.
Anonymous
Oh, I see

« first day (456 days earlier)      last day (443 days later) »