« first day (5043 days earlier)      last day (184 days later) » 

07:49
Quanta magazine
Mathematicians Prove Hawking Wrong About the Most Extreme Black Holes
"The Third Law is dead."
08:05
Aha. On Sunday afternoons after lunch I relax by reading my favourite science blogs, and I'll be reading Quanta. So I'll enjoy reading that article later today.
 
1 hour later…
09:18
it is considered unacceptable to harvest the organs of a healthy person to save the lives of 10 people. this is a variant of the trolley problem
it's really odd how morality works. it is a mystery
09:32
this variant of the trolley problem is formulated for a doctor who has to decide this
10:05
Learning Quantum Mechanics With A Zombie Cat
I guess, being a zombie is not the same as having life and death superposed. This is a bad analogy.
10:17
14
Q: Can I infer that Schrödinger's cat is dead without opening the box, if I wait a thousand years?

AllureSay I have Schrödinger's cat in a sealed box. It is neither alive nor dead. Given that cats have a lifespan of ~20 years, if I wait a thousand years, I should be able to infer with 100% certainty that the cat is dead. But if I can say with 100% certainty that the cat is dead, then I have "collaps...

also see this @DannyuNDos
10:47
@user20458579510081670432 Ryan has always asked chat in the past to not discuss his real life here too intensely, please respect that.
11:35
@MoreAnonymous hi
12:21
Is there any policy against web archive links in a post on SE?
@Mr.Feynman nope, not as far as I know
12:42
see Vanilla Sky
it is about coping with sudden accidents
it also has some twists
13:03
@RyderRude hey!
 
2 hours later…
15:08
@MoreAnonymous Hi Uncle
@LuckyChouhan uncle?
16:13
@RyderRude is this a novel?
@MoreAnonymous hehe
Btw @MoreAnonymous why you migrated to Canada?
@LuckyChouhan to live a better life
Dirac equation reduces dofs of the Dirac spinor by half, while KG equation doesn't. I have two questions: what if we add interaction terms? That changes the EOM. Shouldn't it mess with the number of dofs in general, given that we define on-shell dofs?
Modulo gauge invariance, how do we analyse number of dofs for free higher spin field equations?
16:49
And also I didnt quite understand what does 1st order nature of Dirac equation has to deal with its reduction of dofs? I just know that boosting to the rest frame and using explicit form of gamma matrices projects out half components of spinors. But what does this have to do with 1st order nature?
17:47
If the following is the pdf of a qho in a coherent state:
$$|\Psi(x; t)|^2 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi} x_0} \exp\left\{-\frac{[x - x_0 \sqrt{2} |\lambda| \cos(\omega t - \phi)]^2}{x_0^2}\right\},$$
where $x_0=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{m\omega}}$.
When the mass becomes large, the standard deviation on the expression would go to zero
As such the pdf becomes a delta-function x=Acos(\omega t - \delta)
Can anyone explain to me the gaussian with vanishing width?
In wikipedia te explanation I found is quite complicated
 
1 hour later…
18:53
@imbAF I don't know what you want to know, but you can use a limit of a sequence of functions, the limit can involve a discrete or continuous parameter: I usually like to use the following family of functions: $$ \delta_n(x) = \sqrt{\frac{n}{\pi}}e^{-nx^2}, n = 1,2,3,...$$ in fact you can easily see that $\int_{\mathbb{R}}\delta_n(x) = 1$.
Now you just have to prove that $\lim_{n \to \infty}\int_{\mathbb{R}} \delta_n(x)F(x) = F(0)$ for a generic smooth test function, which you can assume to be limited
anyways, many rigorous proofs of what you are searching for exist online: for example take a look at this very elegant one
19:15
So, which is better to refer the ODE by Arnold-springer publication or the ODE by Arnold-MIT Press.

Is there much difference?
The issue is, the MIT Press has 36 pages less than the springer one, and the order in which it covers is also a bit different
 
2 hours later…
21:05
what type of cathode anodes were used in CRTs?
And how did Thompson use the CRT to establish a charge to mass ratio?
 
1 hour later…
22:09
@MoreAnonymous it's a movie

« first day (5043 days earlier)      last day (184 days later) »