« first day (3669 days earlier)      last day (1558 days later) » 

01:09
If the photon field travels at the speed of light then how quickly do the W and Z boson fields, fields with massive bosons, travel? The speed will be some number less than c. Can the speed be expressed in terms of their masses M_W and M_Z? I am trying to figure it out by using the electroweak lagrangian and looking for plane wave solutions.
01:20
@RyanParikh Uh, if they're massive particles do they not just travel at some velocity in $[0,c)$?
Their momentum will be related to their mass by $p^2=E^2-m^2$
Assuming it's just a free particle, I'm not even sure if they exist as free particles but they might do
02:00
What exactly are invariant hyperbola in $\Bbb R^{1,1}$?
 
1 hour later…
03:24
@Charlie So it would vary based on the energy of the field? I was thinking it would be different since I am not treating it as a particle but idk. Really I just wanted an excuse to play with the equations of motion from the electroweak lagrangian.
03:38
@geocalc33 would they not just be $x^2 - (ct)^2 = 1$?
 
1 hour later…
04:44
@NiharKarve Gravity and Equivalence principle alters things
@ACuriousMind LMAO! hehehehehehehehehe
05:12
Hi @RewCie, are you into CNNs?
if so, I have a challenge
05:32
@NiharKarve I'm into CNNs, but I'm a bit busy with other projects...
05:42
@RewCie no prob, but I'll tell you anyway: design the shortest 4d convolutional forward pass algorithm you can - it takes in the data tensor, filter tensor and strides, and outputs the convolved tensor. You can only use numpy and scipy at the max.
Not code golfed into one statement or anything - least number of loops/function calls, etc.
I don't use TF, Numpy Libs, I code them in C...
Using a library?
I can use a library if I need, but I hate using them. Most of the time, it's scratch.
numpy will be an order of magnitude faster than a hand-written implementation in C though
05:46
Whole of Python is high level and can never be faster than low level lang like C, JAVA, Pascal50
Can anyone judge the type of flow here i mean streamline or turbulent
@PrateekMourya streamline
Siphons should operate in Streamline flow
@RewCie I mean, only if you use something like BLAS or LAPACK from C, which is what NumPy links to anyway. If you're implementing LinAlg routines by hand, you very likely won't be able to beat NumPy
I already said, I won't be using anything more than Image Processing Libs in C, Numpy is something far away, I know, I've used it before.
Also, I've an habit of going back to assembly, I'm addcted to it. It's fast af!
06:06
@PrateekMourya the flow looks reasonably smooth, but there is probably turbulent flow near the walls of the pipe. It's hard to get laminar flow with taking a lot of care.
And I bet there is turbulence at the corners.
How do they convert streamline flow to turbulent back again?
123
123
06:24
Hi guys... Hi @JohnRennie sir
I can not upload pictures until I have 100reputations. How to increase reputation.
0
Q: Will SE block me if my questions are consistently marked as off-topic?

Srijan SuryanshWhat will happen to my account if I post off topic post quite frequently albeit not intentionally .

07:12
@SrijanSuryansh hi, welcome to the chat room :-)
thanks
Let me introduce my self I'm a 17 year old teen just love to learn anything from any subject exception with biology
I'd tried to talk on big things butt eventually due to lack of knowledge I cant express it intuitively.
I also run a channel on youtube and post about few random subjects.
youtu.be/WIra1B31lgA
07:30
cool
 
2 hours later…
123
123
09:21
How it is different in complex number. Pls explain
|z_1| - |z_2| <= | |z_1| - |z_2| |
How both sides of equality is different?
 
1 hour later…
10:33
Suppose z₁ = 0 and z₂ = 1. Then |z₁| - |z₂| = 0 - 1 = -1 while ||z₁| - |z₂|| = |-1| = +1.
Did you mean |z₁| - |z₂| <= ||z₁| - |z₂|| or |z₁| - |z₂| <= |z₁ - z₂| ?
10:47
Hi, I have a problem with derivatives, appearing from thermodynamics. At some point I take the divergence of some vector field and a gradient of S appears, S is a scalar valued function that can depend on x, T, P, etc
I am wondering how to evaluate $\nabla S$. Is the gradient like a total derivative here? or simply the derivative with respect to position?
by total derivative, I mean, it would be a sum of partial derivatives of S with respect to all variables
for example if S depends on x and T. is grad(S) =dS/dx)_T + dS/dT)_x ? or just dS/dx)_T ?
11:29
Is asking for a reference to an experiment a resource recommendation question, or a specific reference question?
I want to know if any experiments have been conducted on quantum logic, and if quantum logic makes any predictions which differ or extend regular quantum mechanics. Since this is a particular aspect of rather small field of study, I am learning toward the specific reference tag, but I'm aware that the number of correct answers will likely grow with time as more experiments are conducted over the years. (This points toward using the resource recommendation tag instead).
11:42
I'm going to bed now, but please ping me if you have a suggestion to how I should tag my question, so I can read it tomorrow (its not lost in the chat) if one arrives.
 
2 hours later…
13:40
@user400188 I'd say specific-reference fits the bill a bit better
don't worry about choosing incorrect tags
if they need to be changed then the question will be retagged and that's it
but I can answer some of your questions here
> whether quantum logic makes any predictions which differ or extend regular quantum mechanics
quantum logic is a strict subset of quantum mechanics
> if any experiments have been conducted on quantum logic
what does "conduct experiments on logic" mean?
 
1 hour later…
123
123
14:42
Thanks a lot @JohnRennie
 
1 hour later…
15:48
Is there any limit to angular velocity?
Probably just the speed of light no?
Does Einstein contradict with his own statement related to expansion of universe
Can anybody tell me why?
16:14
Can you post the statement and contradiction?
16:25
@Charlie specifically no. of rotations per second
@SrijanSuryansh Try reading here
thanks @Charlie
@Charlie And nobody has corrected that terrible "100m at 300K rad/s" yet?
16:45
@JackRod No, Einstein made the Field Equation without kappa term. The expansion was observed lateron, that's why correction kappa term was added later
$\kappa g_{\mu\nu}$
MathJAX doesn't supports capital kappa
$\Lambda$
Okay, my fault, it's capital Lambda, not kappa
$\Lambda g_{\mu\nu}$
^that term
anyways you get my point, that's enough
123
123
Yo..
16:59
why i see math jax code only?
Look in the top right to find the mathjax plugin
31
A: Any chance of MathJax in chat?

Ilmari KaronenAs a workaround while this request is pending, there exist several client-side workarounds that can be used to enable LaTeX rendering in chat, including: ChatJax, a set of bookmarklets by robjohn to enable dynamic MathJax support in chat. Commonly used in the Mathematics chat room. An altern...

@Charlie its tedious
@SrijanSuryansh do you use Chrome?
17:04
yes
@RewCie A capital kappa is just a K.
TeX only has commands for the Greek letters that differ from the Latin alphabet
Oh okay...
Once you've installed it MathJax renders automatically without you having to do anything.
@JohnRennie a great relief thanks
17:06
@SrijanSuryansh yes :-) I use that add-on and it saves a lot of hassling installing scripts.
@JohnRennie its working
17:55
Hello people!
What pre requisites do i need before starting Lagrangian mechanics?
 
2 hours later…
19:33
@JohnRennie What is it called when a plasma channel is manipulated to form letters and numbers? And what is it called when that plasma channel is controlled?
@JohnRennie I ask these questions because I attempted and succeeded in controlling plasma in mid air by manipulating the preferred path for the plasma channel using lower and higher pressure in any given space in air. It wasn't in a chamber it was simply in air and not done in a chamber.
 
2 hours later…
21:36
@satan29 decent knowledge of Newtonian mechanics and multivariable calculus
that's about it

« first day (3669 days earlier)      last day (1558 days later) »