« first day (3436 days earlier)      last day (1486 days later) » 
01:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

3:01 PM
The true April's fools anthem is this
 
I should've expected that...
 
@ACuriousMind You know you've been on the internet too long when you can figure out the link just from the youtube URL code and context.
 
This got sent out to out physics department today
In conclusion, we have observed the 0-fs pulse for the first time, opening the door to applications of large negative pulse widths in computing and communications areas. Implications for a truly universal advanced light source have not escaped our attention. We are investigating possible violations of thermodynamics. Somebody's pulses must be getting longer.
 
@Yuvraj In November, you agreed that you need to do some work on improving your English. But I haven't noticed any improvement.
Nov 23 '19 at 16:47, by yuvraj singh
I think you are right that can be a reason, we'll I will try my best to improve my grammar, so the my comment and answer will be more understandable and clear to the reader. @PM2Ring
I don't want to put pressure on you, but I think this is important. You need to be able to communicate clearly with people who don't speak your regional language.
@AaronStevens Hey, if advanced waves were good enough for Feynman & Wheeler, they're good enough for me. ;) chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/53960338#53960338
 
3:35 PM
I am sure many of the jokes in that go over my head since that is not my area of expertise
 
3:47 PM
 
I am trying to think of a good pun
 
Yeah, I got nothing
 
The best I have is Collie-19
 
Borderline...
 
Border Collie
 
4:01 PM
@PM2Ring I am trying, and from today only after ACM said, I accelerated my efforts, but you can understand things never vanishes in a day so, yes I will take your suggestion in a positive way, and I work more more on communicating skills.
 
4:11 PM
No podcasts on physics?
in stackexchange
 
Can we discuss problems here?
 
@Vivek yes in between general chatter and jokes we occasionally discuss physics :-)
 
@JohnRennie record break! 23
 
How do you recommend reading about physics to improve skills?
 
@Student404Mus What skills, specifically?
 
4:19 PM
@YuvrajSingh... 23?
 
strength of reasoning
 
Well, thanks, I am just figuring the moment of inertia about the centre of mass of the rod, when rotated... I've done most calculation...
 
and interpretation
 
@Vivek $mL^2/12$ ?
 
You can discuss your problems and solutions more freely in the chatroom Problem Solving Strategies. John Rennie is usually there every day for several hours. — sammy gerbil 3 hours ago
 
4:20 PM
Because I see what I had learned from University is not enough
 
much detailed questions, consider it a dumbbell, irregular dumbbell
oh, sorry, wrong link
1
Q: If masses are stuck on a rod, how it's moment of inertia changes?

VivekSupposedly I keep a rod of mass 3 kg and length 2 meters on a smooth desk, such that masses of 1 kg and 2 kg are stuck firmly to top and bottom of the rod respectively. Now, the center of mass of the resultant body is changed, from what I've calculated, it has shifted 1/6 meters below the center...

 
@AaronStevens I want to know about you here on SE, are you reading all the time?
 
@Vivek the moment of inertia can be calculated about any axis. We generally calculate it about the centre of mass, because then we can easily get it about any other axis using the parallel axis theorem.
 
@Student404Mus I would say here on PSE recently I am more involved in answering questions and review processes. I don't actively use PSE to learn more physics, although I do pick up on things from time to time.
 
@Vivek an object rotating without any external forces being applied always rotates about its centre of mass. In this case your rod is on a frictionless table so it will be rotating about the COM.
 
4:25 PM
So, you have done with your studies?
 
@Student404Mus I am close to getting my PhD in biophysics
 
good.
you third year
 
Well, technically it will just be a physics PhD, but my work has been in biophysics for my graduate studies
 
5th year
since undergrad
 
4:26 PM
yes, see, that's where the trick is... since the masses are irregular, the centre of mass has shifted, and the rod is free to rotate (consider it irregular dumbbell, much suitably)... now, the moment of inertia needed to be found about the COM, isn't it?
 
user434058
Finally.....Finally, I got my first upvote!
 
5th year would be your Master grade?!
 
@Vivek yes
 
ok, thanks,...
let's see to it then, hopefully it fits
 
@FakeMod hmm, I tried to look at your profile to see what the upvote was but your profile doesn't exist.
 
4:30 PM
btw, i didn't knew until now that stack supports chat rooms, nice to meet all
 
@Student404Mus From undergrad to PhD it usually takes 5 years (or a bit longer)
@Vivek Welcome :)
 
user434058
@JohnRennie Wait, did they delete me?
 
@Vivek yes, welcome :-) We don't like homework type questions in the main site but you are always welcome to ask about them in the chat rooms.
 
user434058
 
user434058
@JohnRennie BTW that isn't an answer which I am proud of. It's trivial stuff
 
4:32 PM
@FakeMod Your chat account must be linked to a now deleted account ...
 
yes, i don't know, well, just asking for a hint, and it's still categorised as homework type, idk how it works... i mean, i never asked for full solution, or an answer though...
 
@AaronStevens you mean this is your first year in the third cycle?
 
user434058
@JohnRennie I have updated it now! :)
 
@Student404Mus I am not sure what you mean by "third cycle"
Is a cycle just a 2 year period?
 
@FakeMod aha, yes, that works now :-)
 
4:33 PM
because the system LMD deals with the two first cycles 3+2 years
License and Master degree
whereas, Doctorate degree from 3 years and more
 
I think you might be projecting from whatever system your country has onto another :P
 
anyone intersted in ionospheric science...?
 
@ACuriousMind Isn't the same in your country?
 
@Student404Mus Yeah that is not how my program is set up
 
alright. It might be different for ACuriousMind.
 
4:36 PM
4 years for undergrad, 5 years for PhD. I got my "masters in passing" just for getting past my qualifying exam.
But I didn't submit any sort of formal masters thesis or anything like that
 
@Student404Mus I'm in Germany and our system (3 years Bachelor->2 years Master->3-5 years Doctorate) is similar to what you're describing, but Aaron is in the US where there's usually just undergrad->grad, their idea of what a master's degree is is rather weird ;P
 
:)
I see.
 
@ACuriousMind Haha I mean you can get just a masters. But I guess for the program of going right from undergrad to PhD you can still get a nice consolation prize in the middle :P
 
In my day PhDs only took 3 years, but there was a lot less science known in those times :-)
 
A lot of physics programs here is just for PhD though
I remember when I was applying to graduate schools I didn't see many masters programs
 
4:40 PM
@AaronStevens Yeah, that "consolation prize" thing is what I mean with your idea of it being weird ;)
 
@ACuriousMind Yeah I honestly didn't know about it until one of my friends made me aware of it
 
Maybe few programs with good "advisers" better than many without clue what you are doing.
 
I think the only difference is that it is a "Master of Arts" instead of "Master of Science"
MA vs. MS
 
yes. you said it
or kind of discovery
 
@ACuriousMind Yeah, on my student account it says
Master of Arts Degree
School: Graduate School
Date: 8/31/17
 
4:44 PM
Well, over here we give MAs for degrees in the arts and MSs for degrees in the sciences but I guess that's just typical German formality :P
 
@AaronStevens So basically you managed to master "the art of science" instead of mastering science itself?
Sounds about as arbitrary as how they probably differentiate the two degrees.
... or do they just not offer MScs in general?
 
@JMac I think they do have a MS for physics
Which requires the submission of a masters thesis
 
The problem here in Algeria in following this system (studying only 3 years as fundamental physics then doing theoretical physics (particle physics) for 2 years) is we didn't take enough classes to be at the level of a good physicist. They focused on taking many subjects rather than completing essential courses such as CM, QM, E&M ... and homework.
 
The first scientific breakthrough due to self-isolation: arxiv.org/abs/2003.14321 Certainly equals Newton's breakthrough during his self-isolation.
 
In addition to the language, we were studying at the high school in Arabic, then we switched to French for the rest of undergrad
 
4:53 PM
@ZeroTheHero You're late - see Emilio's post on the starboard ;)
 
@PM2Ring We don't have pure T2O in our plants, only about 1E+10 Bq/kg H-3 in the water. Maybe ask a Candu guy.
 
oh dear...Another proof that I'm always behind @EmilioPisanty in everything.
 
pK_W for H2O is 14.0, for D2O 14.9 and for T2O 15.2, so pT should be 7.6; however, a pH electrode that is calibrated for pH might indicate a different value.
 
When we were introduced to books you find yourself need English
 
@AaronStevens Makes a bit of sense I guess, in that the programs have different requirements. Still pretty weird though since presumably you did more of the "sciences" than the "arts".
 
4:54 PM
The ionization problem sounds correct. The isotopic power of T2O should be about 36 W/kg, so it would be quite warm.
 
@JMac I guess the idea is that if you get the PhD then the masters distinction is irrelevant
 
But the advantage is you have a small background in every theory in physics
 
@ZeroTheHero Ah, I had ignored that earlier because I figured it would be something way over my head about superconductivity... That is definitely a novel approach.
 
If only we could fit university administrators in there... and refrigerate them.
 
and this gives the choice to do you Master thesis easly.
Almost.
 
5:02 PM
@Student404Mus I mean I took the same classes I would have whether or not I did a MS or MA
 
@ACuriousMind but do you not still give PhDs, i.e. Doctor of Philosophy?
(although some German university give Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) )
 
@ZeroTheHero Sure (though we don't call them PhDs, but Dr. rer. nat. in the sciences and Dr. phil. in the other subjects), but these are a distinct step after the Master's
 
it is universal in Germany to NOT give PhDs in the sciences but Dr. rer. nat instead?
 
I think so
 
5:06 PM
@ACuriousMind Do philosophical doctorates come with their own TV show?
 
but I also think in these international times many will "translate" them as PhD in international contexts
 
yeah I think there's no confusion.
 
Wait, in Germany would Dr. Phil be "Dr. Phil. Phil (McGraw)"?
 
A friend of mine couldn't fathom getting a PhD - i.e. a formal Doctor of Philosophy degree - and can't understand why some many countries confer a degree with such a name.
 
@ACuriousMind How you choose theoretical physics after you just start Bachelor degree?
 
5:10 PM
@ZeroTheHero It took me longer than I care to admit to realize that "Doctor of Philosophy" was not exclusive to people who actually studied Philosophy, and that PhD was short for it.
 
in principle it could be natural philosophy: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_philosophy
 
@Student404Mus what makes you think I did?
 
I like Dr. rer. nat. better. More impressive on business cards.
 
@JMac yep
 
I mean according to your system of education in the university
 
5:14 PM
@JMac Have you met Dr. Phil. Dr. Phil?
 
but usually in all not extremely formal contexts both the 'phil.' and the 'rer. nat.' are omitted. Business cards and name plates are one of the few places you'd really expect to see them
@Student404Mus We don't have to choose a specialization during the Bachelor
 
during Master
 
You said "after you just start Bachelor degree"
The start of the Bachelor is at least three years away from "during Master" :P
 
I shouldn't ask you that question, because It's the same system anyway.
 
Well, I'd (probably) be happy to answer the question if I had understood what the question was...
 
5:19 PM
Thank you.
it's not what I meant.
The question would instead be, how may hours you took in QM per week?
during your first year in QM
We took 3 hours as lecture, 1.5 hour to do problem solving all per week.
I want to compare the amount of time we learn QM
 
That's a bit hard to say. The first QM lectures were one experimental (3h/week lecture + exercises) and one theoretical (3h/week lecture + exercises), but I can't rightly say how much time I spent on the exercises - just that it was much more than 1.5h!
 
Alright.
We didn't take any of these quantum experiments at all.
 
("experimental" here is not a lab - it's just a lecture that focuses less on the theory aspects)
 
you mean applications?
If you could explain in general what you did in the experimental part?
 
@Loong Thanks. So that makes it slightly alkaline. For some reason, I assumed T2O would be a little acidic.
 
5:34 PM
@PM2Ring Actually, it's neutral since still c(H+) = c(OH-).
 
@Loong Ah, right. So its corrosiveness isn't due to it's pH...
 
user434058
Is it wrong to make these kind of comments?
 
at least not H+ alone, but also radicals such as HO or HOO
 
@FakeMod Why would it be wrong?
 
My primitive high school level chem is failing me. :) But I guess its radicals react a little slower, due to their higher mass.
 
user434058
5:39 PM
@AaronStevens Like, I had heard that it is frowned upon to ask for upvotes and accepts.
 
user434058
@PM2Ring the bond strength order is : O--T>O--D>O--H. At least that's what i have been taught
 
@FakeMod That comment isn't asking for anything. It is informing the user that if a post has answered their question that they can select that answer as the accepted answer
 
user434058
And thus acidic strength follows : H2O>D2O>T2O
 
I sometimes say a comment like that
 
user434058
@AaronStevens Right! So implicit forms are allowed?
 
5:41 PM
I say "Please make sure to up vote any useful answers and to accept a post that sufficiently answers your question"
 
user434058
Like even the OP knows I am asking them to accept my answer.
 
user434058
@AaronStevens That looks good! I will use that from now on!
 
@FakeMod It's considered bad etiquette to beg for upvotes or accepts. But it's perfectly fine to educate new members about accepting a good answer. ;) I usually include a link to meta.stackexchange.com/q/5234/334566
 
I feel like if the OP has explicitly told you that your answer is sufficient, then I don't think there is an issue in telling them to accept it, as that helps future readers
the comment I leave tries to leave the choice to the OP, especially if I am not the only one answering
 
user434058
@PM2Ring I would surely do that from now on
 
5:43 PM
But I only leave a comment like that if the OP comments on my answer like they did there
 
user434058
@AaronStevens Yeah, so that's the kind of comments I wish to make. And i suppose those are appropriate which they are, so ....Thanks!
 
user434058
@AaronStevens Oh! But I usually would do that if the OP kees the question unattended for 1 week or more....
 
user434058
Is that ok?
 
@FakeMod Eg,
@n88b : Excellent! In that case, feel free to accept my answer. :) — PM 2Ring Oct 29 '14 at 9:46
 
user434058
@PM2Ring This reply is also a good one! But it kind of directs the OP to accept your answer which i would avoid...
 
5:51 PM
I sometimes post a similar comment under the question encouraging the OP to accept one of the answers, when my answer is ok but there are other answers that I think are also good. Or even on questions I haven't answered. But I mostly do that after checking the OPs profile & seeing that they've asked several questions but have accepted very few or no answers.
FWIW, a lot of people feel that the "accept" system is flawed. But in any case, it's an integral part of the Stack Exchange "brand", and it's not going to go away anytime soon.
 
user434058
@PM2Ring Hmmm.... So it's not really tabooed to ask for accepting.
 
user434058
@PM2Ring no it works fine. It is just an unnecessary addition. It isn't detrimental as such.
 
It's main flaw is that quite often the OP is the least qualified contributor to a page to decide which is the best answer.
 
user434058
@PM2Ring I just usually ignore the accept mark and read the most upvoted answer first.
 
@FakeMod If Martijn Pieters, a Stack Overflow mod with 800k+ can do it, it must be ok. ;)
 
user434058
5:58 PM
@PM2Ring Yeah! BTW I suspect Jon Skeet has a rep minting machine :P
 
Once you've written good answers to a lot of questions your rep keeps growing by itself. My SO rep is under 50k, so a tiny fraction of Jon's or Martijn's. I don't think I've answered any SO questions in the last 18 months, but in that time I've earned almost 3k on SO from votes on old questions.
 
@JohnRennie Could you explain how could the absence of pressure cause attraction between proton and electron?
 
6:14 PM
Follow has now been shifted to the right of edit and to the left of close.
 
user434058
\begin{align}
\hat a | E_0 \rangle & =0 \\
\left(\frac{1}{b\sqrt{2}}\hat{x}+\frac{ih}{\hbar \sqrt{2}}\hat{p}|E_0 \rangle & =0 \\
\langle x \left|\frac{1}{b\sqrt{2}}\hat{x}+\frac{ih}{\hbar \sqrt{2}}\hat{p}|E_0 \rangle & =0
\end{align}
 
user434058
Why does this MathJax not work?
 
user434058
What's wrong with my code?
 
user434058
It's saying misplaced &.... But I haven't misplaced any &
 
user434058
Plss...give meh teh codez
 
6:20 PM
Hey chat
 
Well I think the problem might be with & and //
 
user434058
@JohanLiebert But where?
 
@FakeMod you didn't close \left
 
Nevermind. That's the problem I usually get when I use being align
 
Actually, you didn't close it twice :p
 
user434058
6:21 PM
@LucasHenrique Exactly!! Thanks it works!
 
user434058
@JohanLiebert same bro!
 
Chat, I'm a math student, so I usually struggle with physical intuition.
 
user434058
@LucasHenrique But what if there's only one of the (
 
When does the claim "the net electrical field inside a closed conductor is 0" hold?
 
user434058
@LucasHenrique As long as it's an ideal conductor.
 
6:24 PM
@LucasHenrique Hi
 
@FakeMod \right and \left are meant to be paired. To be honest, I know it could be useful to have a big "|", for example (specially in physics with this bra-ket stuff), but I'm almost sure that would need a workaround
 
@FakeMod If you need unbalanced brackets, use a dot for the missing bracket. See tex.stackexchange.com/q/151941 I assume it works in MathJax...
 
@LucasHenrique You can literally write \big|: $\big|$ :P
 
alright. What does "inside" mean?
I'll explain what I mean: real life stuff have thickness (obviously we can usually ignore that when, in fact, we can). Does the "inside" part mean the "thick" part or the interior of the surface (a compact region of $\mathbb R^3$)?
 
$\left(test\right.$ Looks good to me.
 
6:31 PM
I've searched in a bunch of sites (Physics SE too) for a proof (I think there's one if you can define formally what being a conductor means)
 
user434058
This edit made me so tired.
 
user434058
Yes! I again exhausted all my flags.
 
user434058
I am not able to see the motivation behind this edit. Can anyone please enlighten me?
 
7:05 PM
@LucasHenrique this is true only when the system is static. For example it is not true if a current is flowing.
 
@FakeMod I number equations where it seems useful, it makes it easier for someone answering a question to refer to the original post if they can just reference an equation number rather than "in your X equation" or "in your Xth equation".
 
user434058
@Charlie How were you able to ping me using just @fake?
 
idk
I guess it autofills or something
 
It pings the first match in alphabetical order among all currently pingable users
 
user434058
@Charlie Yeah, but I didn't see any references, and I have been advised to not do any trivial edits like centering equations. But yeah that was not at all an unwanted edit. Keep on editing :)
 
user434058
7:09 PM
@AC that's nice...
 
user434058
@ACuriousMind Did that ping you?
 
I really just change anything that makes it clearer, if someone has a full equation typed out in the middle of a sentence I think it makes answering easier if the equation is given it's own line, centred and numbered
 
No, I think it starts at three letters or something :P
 
0
Q: How can one solve this differential equation? (Optical fiber with a tanh(x) index)

Samuel WaltonThe differential equation for a optical fiber with a refractive index $n(r)$ is given as $$\nabla^{2}_{\perp}A(r,\theta)+(k^{2}n(r)^2-\beta^2)A(r,\theta)=0.$$ which is separable in cylindrical coordinates, $A(r,\theta)=R(r)\Theta(\theta)$. The radial DE follows as $$ r^{2}R''+rR'+[r^{2}(k^{2}n(...

 
To be honest as a reviewer I would have rejected an edit that just adds numbers to the equations as "no improvement", but it seems the author of the post found the edit helpful
 
user434058
7:11 PM
@ACuriousMind Now I am starting to think that you are making it all up :P
 
@ACuriousMind I have done that to a few suggested edits...
 
user434058
@ACurio Does it work?
 
I guess it is a trivial edit really
 
@FakeMod Yes.
 
user434058
Wooohoo
 
7:12 PM
@tpg2114 The "rejecting" or the "adding numbers"?
 
The rejecting when it only adds numbers
 
Can someone use the ping @joh as it would ping both me and John Rennie . Let's see if it works.
 
In the post I linked above is it not helpful to have eqn numbering in instances like that though? I feel like it's unnecessarily hard to reference a particular equation there unless there is some sort of indexing
 
user434058
@Joh
 
@JohanLiebert that pinged me
@FakeMod so did that
 
user434058
7:14 PM
@JohanLiebert There's also a third person....... mystery intensified
 
@FakeMod me too!
 
@FakeMod nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
 
user434058
@JohnRennie He who shall not be named.....
 
:-)
 
user434058
I wonder if he's watching all this and sitting in a corner crying?
 
7:16 PM
sorry, it's not the first match but all matches unless a few other conditions apply, see meta: meta.stackexchange.com/q/234029/263383 and its links
@Charlie If there's only two equations in a post I think "your first equation" and "your second equation" are not particularly hard to understand references...
 
Fair enough, I will no longer do that unless there is something else to add
 
user434058
Can you put a gif as your avatar? meta.stackexchange.com/users/273931/ndugger
 
And if any answerer feels the need to add such numbering because they want to use it many can do so on their own anyway (since >2k users can edits without review), so I in particular don't see the need to do it in a sort-of preemptive suggested edit
 
@FakeMod wait who? Lord Voldemort? Well I used to believe that I killed him at the battle of Hogwartz. This means that a hocrux is still left. I have to search for it.
 
28
Q: Animated avatars in user profile and newsletter

Shadow Wizard is Ear For YouFirst, to make it clear Stack Exchange does not allow animated avatars, the Can I have an animated profile picture? feature request has been declined by SE staff back in 2016. However, as of today, users who upload animated gif as avatar have the animation showing in their profile, e.g. this use...

 
user434058
7:20 PM
 
So the policy says no, but they've broken that when making changes before
 
user434058
This is super funny!
 
user434058
@tpg2114 Hmmm... Thanks!
 
user434058
@JohanLiebert ToMmArVoLoRiDdLe
 
@FakeMod I've let somebody know about it. We'll see if they can do something
 
user434058
7:23 PM
@tpg2114 Right! So are they gonna take down those gifs
 
No idea. They either need to fix whatever changed to allow it to happen, or they need to update the policy saying it's allowed. But -- those who make those decisions will hopefully get my message to them!
 
I have observed (many time in YouTube comment section) that people alternatively capitalize the words in the sentence. WhAt Is iTs pUrPoSe?
 
user434058
@JohanLiebert To SoUnD dUmB imo
 
it's a reference to a fairly old meme now
 
@FakeMod really?
 
user434058
7:25 PM
@Charlie It was definitely a meme....I knew it!
 
This image was taken from a mother meta post on Gifs in Profile picture.
 
Figure 1
 
user434058
@JohanLiebert rofl!!!
 
I haven't seen that gif in ages, I can't remember the video it's from, something realllly old on youtube
 
@FakeMod well they said that they don't want such gifs in profile picture.
 
user434058
7:29 PM
If i were running SE, I would keep them.....and that's probably why I am not running SE.
 
Twitter used to allow gifs, they removed it at some point but some people still have them
or if they didn't allow them officially some people found workarounds
 
Used to convey sarcasm or mockery across the internet. Can also be used to purposefully mislead and create humour
 
user434058
<reverse>!thgiNdooG</reverse>
 
Also what is the matter with the 'unicorns'? People on Stack Overflow seem to love them. Is that some insider joke?
437 new cases and 10 deaths in India.
 
7:44 PM
@ACuriousMind do unicoins still exist?
Also thanks for sharing the link.
 
8:06 PM
Watch at 4:00. You would get pain in stomach.
 
I understand that @Qmechanic had to close physics.stackexchange.com/q/540932/123208 as non-mainstream, and it does look like a classic crank theory post, but I think the OP is referring to the new negative mass dark fluid toy model proposed by Oxford cosmologist & astrophysicist Jamie Farnes.
 
8:34 PM
@PM2Ring : Perhaps. I added a comment below the post for starters.
 
@Qmechanic Thanks. I'll add a comment about Jamie Farnes.
 
9:40 PM
@bolbteppa Do you know where to find a proof that the holonomy of a connection is ~ the wilson loop
 
What's a holonomy
 
@Slereah what do you think there is to prove?
 
@ACuriousMind The equality
 
Do you have a definition of a holonomy that is not $\exp(\oint A)$ and you want to prove it's that?
 
The holonomy is generally defined as$$\left\{ P_{\gamma} | \gamma \in \Omega M(p) \right\}$$
For the parallel transport operator on a loop
All math people define it like that and all the physics people use $\exp \oint A$
Where is the link!
I assume it is related to the algebra of the fiber bundle, since exponential, but why is the integral in the exponential
 
9:49 PM
It's a Dyson series, essentially
Infinitesimal time-evolution is $U(t)$, the physicist writes $\exp(\int U(t)\mathrm{d}t)$ for the finite time-evolution operator
 
Ah I see
 
Infinitesimal parallel transport is $A$, the physicist writes $\exp(\int A)$ for the finite parallel transport
 
So you're asking about what Peskin and Schroeder call 'the comparator' in defining a covariant derivative expressing the comparator as the exponential of a line integral of the gauge field between the two points in the comparator, which becomes a wilson loop at the same point, also called the holonomy
 
Tiny parallel transports
 
10:00 PM
The comparator seems to be what people call a parallel transport map, they set up the comparator straight-fowardly then just state the exponential of a line integral of the vector field obviously satisfies the properties of a comparator - it's a good point to try find a general proof for all connections not just the EM field as a connection
I'm not even sure parallel transport is not just a distraction of a concept
 
I'm not sure it is even true generally
It's probably true for small enough loops?
 
@Slereah No, it's always true but you need to understand the integral as the "path-ordered integral" it is - it's a limit of $\exp(\int_{[0,1/N]} A)\cdot \dots \cdot \exp(\int_{[(N-1)/N,1]} A)$ and not just the exponential of the integral of $A$ along the loop.
That's why some people always write something like $\mathcal{P}\exp(\int A)$ for some mysterious path-ordering operator $\mathcal{P}$
 
Is it actually meaningful?
Like
Can you calculate $\exp \oint A$ separately, and then apply $\mathcal{P}$ to it
 
I don't think so :P
 
Well then it is a LIE
a lie group, that is
 
10:06 PM
that's what mysterious about it - it's not really an operator
 
Is it true in a normal neighbourhood, at least
 
I don't know what a normal neighbourhood is
no GR in gauge country
 
path ordering only matters in non-abelian cases right
 
::hiss::
@bolbteppa Yes, in the Abelian case it's just a straight-up exponential
 
I think the proof that it's an exponential in general is that it satisfies the ode an exponential satisfies $y' = Ay$
 
10:17 PM
@PM2Ring FWIW I would say in cases like that, where a question concerns some very new or little-known topic, it's the OP's obligation to give appropriate references and phrase their question in a way that makes it clear that it is mainstream (i.e. published and peer-reviewed) physics. Of course they can get help, I'm just saying an argument along the lines of "it shouldn't be closed because they meant well" wouldn't fly with me.
 
10:49 PM
If anybody has a copy of Mathematica (or some other tool -- like their brain -- that can do math better than I can) -- is there an expression for the inverse Fourier transform of |sinc(fx)|?
I know the box filter in space (or time) gives the sinc in spectral space. But that has properties I don't like. A triangle filter in space (box applied to a box) gives sinc^2 in spectral space, which is positive so that's great, but it's narrower than I'd like.
So ideally, something would exist that could give |sinc| in spectral space...
 
11:08 PM
@tpg2114 Let me see
Wait, what is fx?
 
11:31 PM
I put in inverse fourier transform of $|\text{sinc}(\omega)|$ when I first replied. It still hasn't spit anything out, so I am not sure if there is a nice function for this
 
11:44 PM
Yeah, that's kinda of what I was worried might happen
That... makes me sad :/
f*x would be a wavenumber corresponding to the low-pass filter and x would be the spectral wavenumber... I was sloppy with the notation
 
0
Q: Comparator operator in QFT

VangiIn Peskin and Shroeder, for a local $U(1)$ transformation, the comparator operator is expanded as: \begin{equation} U(x+\epsilon n, x) = 1 -ie\epsilon n^{\mu}A_{\mu} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2) \tag{15.5} \end{equation} for $\epsilon\rightarrow0$. I am not sure how one arrives at this expression, a...

 
01:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (3436 days earlier)      last day (1486 days later) »