« first day (2889 days earlier)      last day (2339 days later) » 

user280247
18:10
Is there any easy way to see that buoyant force is shape independent?
user280247
I mean, it is easy if we admit archimides principle, but how did he realize it?
By shouting Eureka in his head over and over until he got there?
user280247
o_0
user280247
I think possibly he didn't say anything about buoyant force but only about equal volume displacement
18:31
@santimirandarp well, you can calculate the force explicitly and show it comes down to the volume
the origin of various principles/concepts from antiquity is, alas, one of those things which lies beyond the veil of history
@Semiclassical Hi Semi :D
though Archimedes' "On Floating Bodies" does survive: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_Floating_Bodies
hi
I had a midterm on E&M today
neat
how'd it go?
18:41
Think I nailed it
Which is never a good sign
First question was on linear dielectrics, so I was kinda prepared for that :P
Second question was a bit more challenging
Given a sphere of radius $a$ centered at origin and with constant polarization $\mathbf{P} = P_0 \hat{z}$ and angular velocity $\mathbf{\omega} = \omega \hat{z}$, find the magnetic field at the north pole on the sphere
user280247
@Semiclassical I'm not saying it doesnt exist, I'm saying I couldn't find the argument over the web
user280247
@EmilioPisanty didn't get what u mean
18:49
@Lozansky yeah, that seems pretty tough
getting the electric field is tedious enough
user280247
@EmilioPisanty I've done that for simple shapes...
I guess the idea is that you'll have bound surface charge on the sphere and this rotating charge gives rise to a magnetic field
finding the former isn't bad
but i'm not sure how hard the latter is
You are on the right track indeed
I can't remember really anything about polarizations
lol
(Or, at least the same track I ventured on)
18:53
you'll have a surface current on the sphere, to be specific
Hello everybuddy!
Probably you can make some arguments from axis-symmetry and draw an ampere loop and be done with it :P
I was wondering if a tesla coil (with alternating current throught it) does not kill a human because the voltage is very high, but the current is very low? (conservation of energy, tranformers...). This tesla coil will produce an alternating magnetic field around it and when we bring a light bulb for example closer to the tesla coil, the alternating magnetic field will induce alternating current in the light bulb and that's why it lights up. Is this true?
@enumaris Ehh... doubt it
eh. not sure you'll be able to get away with Ampere's law here
18:56
Also in the end, in order for a tesla coil to not kill a human, the input supply power mustn't be high enough to kill a human, and from there, whether you'll use a transformer to level up the voltage and lower the current, it doesn't matter?
Biot-Savart will definitely work, and is probably necessary
The local velocity is proportional to the surface current
@Semiclassical That's how I did it
well, no clue, but it feels like it could be one of those "haha, there's this trick everybody missed" kind of problems
maybe I'm just paranoid...
More like: there's this trick - but then there's this integral.. :(
19:00
Ew Biot-Savart
@Semiclassical Could you please if you have some time help me with my understanding of tesla coil?
@Semiclassical Ok, sorry.
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany Sounds okay
Anonymous
19:05
As long as the load current is low, it shouldn't matter (shouldn't be sufficient to kill)
@Blue Oh, thanks. I asked my quesitons a bit up in the chat.
Anonymous
The power is the constant quantity, in transformers. You're right about that
@NovaliumCompany en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_coil#Health_hazards seems like tesla coils can kill someone
quote: "Even low power Tesla coils could exceed these limits, and it is generally impossible to determine the threshold current where bodily injury begins. Being struck by arcs from a high power (> 1000 watt) Tesla coil is likely to be fatal."
Anonymous
"high power" being the keyword
I think the take away is don't mess with it if you don't understand it lol
19:09
@Blue I got 100 answers + qeustions though i know you dont care an iota about numbers ^^
but for me it's like it means my life's over i can't post any more question nor answer
Got it, thanks. So is there any difference between high voltage/low current strucking the body or low voltage/high current stucking? I mean, if they are the same power (P - const) is there any difference to what damage can be done? (Will a person feell more pain in high voltage/low current or low voltage/high current)?
@Blue @JohnRennie @ACuriousMind bam.
single-self-answer HNQ
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany $P_{supplied} = V\times I$ and $V = IR$. If power is same and the body resistance is same, then current and voltage automatically get fixed
and all it needed was a little bit of clickbait in the title
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Hah, so you cracked the HNQ secret
Anonymous
19:12
:D
I think the complication will be that the human body probably doesn't act like an ideal resistor
@Blue on occasion, at least
I still think it's a scourge and it should be heavily reformed, if not done away with
but since it's there, I'm not above gaming a couple of its aspects to get material I think is important in front of a wider audience
wuut? you got a nobel prize @EmilioPisanty???
Anonymous
@Semiclassical That's true. Once the initial resistance is overcome by the current, it rapidly reduces
or did i misunderstand
19:14
@coniferous_smellerULPBG-W8ZgjR what?
no
not at all
Anonymous
@coniferous_smellerULPBG-W8ZgjR Watch the news :P
I wrote a Q&A about a Nobel prize
wow we've got a nobel laureate woooow
19:15
6
Q: What is Chirped Pulse Amplification, and why is it important enough to warrant a Nobel Prize?

Emilio PisantyThe 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics has just been announced, with half going to Arthur Ashkin for his work on optical tweezers and half going to Gérard Mourou and Donna Strickland for developing a technique called "Chirped Pulse Amplification". While normally the Wikipedia page is a reasonable place ...

well congrats either way @EmilioPisanty ^^
Anonymous
@Semiclassical lol
upvoted from my part. just read the qestion
@Semiclassical who's the "we" in that statement? o.o
Anonymous
Photonics/Optics should remain a hot area for the nobel prize winners in the coming days too
19:16
physics stack exchange. (i was not being serious)
Anonymous
It's one of the most useful areas
Anonymous
and has dem....APPLICATIONS
@enumaris the wider community of physicists
we actually got three
Anonymous
Any fields medalists on PSE?
@Blue as in, they have accounts?
19:18
@EmilioPisanty But there's a nobel prize specifically for physicists...so every year we get 1...(or 2 or 3)...
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Yes (and a couple answers maybe)
Anonymous
Who are the 3 people (Nobel prize winners on PSE) tho? I know only T Hooft
@enumaris I stand by the truth of my assertion, though I make no claims of non-banality
hmmm...
19:21
@Blue So in the end, does it matter if high voltage/low current hits the body or low voltage/high current, where P is constant? Will the person still feel the same pain?
but he doesn't have a PSE account
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Yeah. Everyone knows him on MO :P
Anonymous
There actually may be more fields medalists on MO using anonymous accounts
Anonymous
And likewise for PSE (as for nobel)
Anonymous
[avoiding the limelight]
19:23
bam! rep-cap.
::grin::
Anonymous
@NovaliumCompany The current passing through your body is ultimately what hurts. SemiC mentioned an important point i.e. if the initial voltage is not high enough, then it might not even overcome your body resistance (the resistance of the body only goes down once the current gets a low resistance path to flow)
Anonymous
So you should probably use a high voltage if you want to kill
@Blue Ha, thanks :D
I'mma go to bed now, I have school tommorow, have to wake up at 6:15AM :( Thanks everyone for the help.
Anonymous
6:15 am school ;_;
Anonymous
I will shed some tears on your behalf
19:29
@Semiclassical We have Gerard T Hooft
@Blue I barely even know who or where I am when I wake up :D My legs just start doing their thing and taking me to my Six Cruel Hours Of Our Life.
Anonymous
lol
19:39
hmmmmmmm.
@Qmechanic, I notice you have a bunch of Announcer badges
do you regularly post Share links outside of SE?
or is this answer inaccurate?
9
A: Do shared link to ANSWERS also count for Announcer, Booster, Publicist badges?

Rebecca ChernoffNo. These badges are specifically for linking to questions like the description says. The link must be clicked from outside the network in order for it to count for this purpose.

19:55
@EmilioPisanty I have 58 announcer badges and I know that I haven't posted 58 links with the bit identifying me as the origin of the link outside of it.
@ACuriousMind hmmmm.
13
A: Announcer badge spike

FloernThis is caused by the switch to HTTPS. Stack Overflow changed to HTTPS on May 22, and guess what happened. Here are the awarded Announcer badges on Stack Overflow: This has a technical reason. Visitors coming from within the Stack Exchange network didn't count towards the badge as they were f...

^https is the culprit
or maybe not, see the comments, but Announcer is definitely not working exactly as it should
@ACuriousMind huh
that reminds me, though
20:11
0
Q: The mainstream-physics close reason has a link to meta with the user ID of a moderator. Can it be removed?

Emilio PisantyBasically, what it says on the tin. The mainstream-physics closure dialog, which is accessible on the closure dialog as well as on closed questions (example), contains a link to the mainstream-physics site policy which contains the user ID of one of the elected site moderators, i.e. the same link...

20:22
0
Q: The mainstream-physics close reason has a link to meta with the user ID of a moderator. Can it be removed?

Emilio PisantyBasically, what it says on the tin. The mainstream-physics closure dialog, which is accessible on the closure dialog as well as on closed questions (example), contains a link to the mainstream-physics site policy which contains the user ID of one of the elected site moderators, i.e. the same link...

hmmm
@EmilioPisanty : No, rarely.
20:38
Does every meta post automatically get linked in here?
it would appear so
reading Woit's blog and got to IUT again...fun times...
@danielunderwood I took a deeper look, and gensim is explicitly only for topic modeling using LSI or LDA or other such models.
Inter-universal teichmuller theory
that 1000 page thing the Mochizuki published in 2012
@enumaris ...
20:49
That sounds a bit out there
It seems Mochizuki is quite protective of his theory
notably, woit didn't post anything about the whole Atiyah thing (and indicated that his doing so was deliberate)
And aha! I got you to do my work for me. I was actually planning on figuring out something for topic modeling though, so that sounds like a good start
which in retrospect was a respectable choice
20:50
going so far as to accuse SS as such: "on the part of SS, of their profound ignorance of the elementary theory of heights, at the advanced undergraduate/beginning graduate level."
@danielunderwood lol, yeah, I mean the basics of topic modeling is very similar to low-rank-matrix factorization used for collaborative filtering
or PCA
Gensim just makes those algorithms more accessible
It's unsupervised so you don't run into the same problems you do in sentiment analysis like inter-annotator agreement
@Semiclassical who is woit?
peter woit
mostly notable as a writer/blogger
u woit m8
clever
this website is great
so
y'all wanna talk abt something
21:10
What is my (real/physics) mass, if my weighing scale says I weigh 70kg?
@enumaris String stheory?
And I should probably look more into PCA. I hear data people talk about it a fair bit. I think it's a lot like SVD?
@Qmechanic so the Announcer badge is broken then?
oh well
21:41
hi
if Higgs boson is the responsible factor which generate masses to other bosons, after the SSB where is goes ?
vzn
vzn
21:55
speaking of Tao just discovered from offhand blog comment hes lately working on a numerical/ number crunching Riemann attack terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/09/06/… michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/… reddit.com/r/math/comments/9jy1ai/…
@danielunderwood the two are highly related
I suppose PCA may work if there aren't singular values or the arrays aren't square? (I think you can actually get singular values of non-square arrays, but I haven't messed with that)
@danielunderwood in particular, SVD decomposes the original data matrix into 3 matrices - one of which will correspond to the matrix of eigen-vectors of the correlation matrix that PCA decomposes.
Singular values decompose the data matrix X
PCA decomposes $X^T X/(n-1)$
I mean, for normal matrices, the singular values are actually just the absolute values of the eigenvalues so that should tell you how similar they are
Our mechanics professor mentioned PCA when we were doing inertia tensor stuff and I wrote down to look into PCA...that was over 2 years ago I think
heh, for the inertia tensor, I suppose PCA will find the principle axes
22:09
Well we did SVD stuff and he mentioned that PCA was an extension of it used in data analysis or something to that extent
I suppose in physics we mainly just deal with normal matrices though
yeah
Although I don't really think "hmmm is this a normal matrix?" every time I come across a physics problem with a matrix
Hermitean matrices are Normal so
so are symmetric matrices
erm
sorry I mean symmetric real matrices
it's not quite true that the only matrices we care about in physics are hermitian, but it's definitely true a lot
unitary matrices as well...
vzn
vzn
22:13
@Semiclassical it seems strange woit would write so much about ABC but zilch )( about Atiyah. 2 cases seem similar to me.
Unitary, Hermitean, skew (anti) Hermitean, real orthogonal, real symmetric, real skew (anti) symmetric...
@enumaris "unitary matrices" are probably the big exception to "physics only cares about hermitian matrices"
yeah, they are normal too though
since $e^{-itH}$ is unitary but very much not Hermitian
so...that's a pretty wide class :P
22:15
Yeah
mathematicians would disown you if you said "singular values are just the absolute values of eigenvalues" though
22:31
Well that's better than what I thought. I thought singular values were exactly the eigenvalues if you had a square matrix
But I only had 1 class that mentioned singular values as a thing and we only did square matrices in that class anyway
I didn't have any classes where singular values were a thing
just eigenvalues
looks like gensim will be actually pretty useful in the future...
maybe even if I don't do topic modeling...just for some of its preprocessing features
I think my numerical analysis professor briefly mentioned it while doing SVD. I don't know why we didn't actually do anything with non-square matrices in that class. We also went over QR factorization, which I haven't used but feel like it should be useful somewhere
I'll probably mess around with gensim a bit once I get back around to messing with tweets
it can do bag of words pretty easy
and then bag of words to TFIDF
It might have saved me a bit of time from writing my own TFIDF algorithm lol
but I mean it was only a few lines long so maybe not that much...
plus my version has a tf-idf threshold hmmm

« first day (2889 days earlier)      last day (2339 days later) »