« first day (2868 days earlier)      last day (2360 days later) » 
02:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

02:27
@enumaris sorry I was asleep after I got that thing rendered as it was 5:00 this morning. When you have countable things, each thing is nested countably many times, then you basically have a tree with countable branches countable levels deep. This gives $\aleph_0\aleph_0\cdots =\aleph_0^{\aleph_0}=2^{\aleph_0}=\beth_1>\aleph_0$ so uncountable
@Semiclassical
02:43
i'll take your word on it
03:24
:)
 
2 hours later…
05:04
So, you only need 7 photons to make a BEC
That's a research type that the fundemental aspect is more interesting than its potential applications
06:03
I also went to bed around 4 to 5 am and couldn't fall asleep for a period and feel sleepy now at 2 pm.
I found time passes especially fast during wee hours; from 12 to 5 o'clock is like a transient interval.
 
5 hours later…
10:41
Dear Emilio
1- My *question* is worded carefully for asking for mainstream physics answer .
At not point do I imply that "I know that it is directly contradicted by established evidence but I still have that theory." for the simple reason that my question is asking for that evidence because I dont know it.
2-The duplicate links have been updated with more relevant link. Thanks to who did that. At first glance, the most appropriate duplicate is "What is the experimental evidence for a quantized EM field?". By clicking on that link you will find that the selected answer to that question conta
10:54
4-John Rennie himself who closed my question, posted an answer in the duplicated link he provided (self promo ?) titled "Do photons truly exist in a physical sense or are they just a useful concept like i=−1−−−√ ?"
This quote from his answer also goes along "my theory", so I believe I'm not far from the mainstream :
"The only time we really see light behaving as a photon is when it exchanges energy with something. So when an excited hydrogen atom decays a photon is emitted. Likewise a photon can be absorbed by an atom and excite it. As the light propagates to or from the atom it is rarely
@EmilioPisanty, in case the reply to bugged please check my above 2 posts
@ManudeHanoi the question does show improvement
But from what I can see, it's already answered in the multiple existing duplicates (and the links therein).
11:13
If you feel that the existing answers are insufficient, then, as in the rest of the SE network, you of edit your post to explain in detail why.
@EmilioPisanty @EmilioPisanty sadly no one mentionned the Quantum Non-Demolition measurements of serge haroche in the duplicated answers :D.
@EmilioPisanty not so clear who's most mainstream between you and me now :D
@Secret that's extremely interesting. Photon BECs are brand new. I remember seeing Bob Nyman give a talk on the project saying "right now it's just me and an empty optical table, and it's only been done once, and I'm looking for PhD students for this". That was probably in 2014. It's great to see them doing something this crazy after one heck of not a lot of time at all.
@ManudeHanoi You asked for my views and I told you. I don't see how you think that a comment like that is constructive, but let me assure you that it is not.
Keep in mind that you do not need my involvement at all to get your question reopened.
I do have a stronger vote than most users, so if you were to fully fix your post then that might be a shorter route, but I don't see it at all. There's a ton of existing duplicates that ask basically the same question and the onus is on you to make it clear why your question is new. Otherwise, I wish you good luck convincing a quorum of other users that your question should be reopened.
user351417
11:37
@EmilioPisanty You think it's likely that they'd be able to implement similar gold-badge powers for non-mainstream closed questions? Like if you have a gold badge for a tag, you can single-handedly wield the non-mainstream closehammer? The only obstacle I see is that the non-mainstream close reason is a Physics SE thing, not a network-wide issue.
@Chair I see extremely thin chances of that.
user351417
Why?
user351417
Impracticality?
user351417
@EmilioPisanty I don't think it's the kind of thing which can be misused too easily.
simply because there's not been any movement in any related front for a long time
take e.g.
138
Q: What privilege should 30k users get?

Jon EricsonThe last time we lifted the level cap was in 2015. In 2014, we added a unilateral close-as-duplicate power for gold tag badge holders, but no new reputation level. So we've been thinking about giving users more reasons to keep playing. (I've answered this question with some circumstantial evidenc...

asked in 2015
lots of interesting alternatives
none of them implemented
121
Q: Help us identify micro-privileges for top users

Jon EricsonAre you familiar with tapas? These are little appetizers invented in Spain that people enjoy while talking and drinking in the cool of the evening. What makes them so great is that you get a wide variety of tastes without getting fed up. Not long ago, I asked for suggestions of a new 30k...

ditto
109
Q: Empowering tag-badge holders part II - let's look at silver?

Tim PostNot long ago, we gave folks that have a gold tag badge the ability to instantly mark a question as a duplicate of another. This has worked out exceptionally well in practice. While there have been some disputed closings, the process is completely transparent and community oversight has worked jus...

it also wouldn't be very useful.
There just aren't all that many gold-tag-badge holders around
particularly ones that are active in moderation
and in addition, close-as-off-topic, with non-mainstream being just one example, is too open to individual opinions to leave it to non-moderator individual users
user351417
11:45
Oh oops
user351417
Caps lock is annoying
user351417
Owie
the current status quo with a five-user quorum is a good thing
what we need is better review queues
easier to handle, easier to filter, and with a lower threshold for the red-dot indicator.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty So you think that a demonstration of knowledge in a particular field shouldn't be a major indicator of the ability to decide how mainstream stuff is?
user351417
Strange
11:47
@Chair eh
I think it would be more trouble than it's worth
dupehammers are already confusing beasts as it is
user351417
@EmilioPisanty I actually don't like the suggested edits one too much. The kind of post which is being edited isn't obvious enough. And it even gets sticky when people correct obvious factual inaccuracies which were very likely to have been accidents.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty What makes them messy?
it's easy for it to take you by surprise, i.e. you don't realize that your vote is going to be binding
user351417
@EmilioPisanty I still get that with edits sometimes.
user351417
I love this one so much: meta.stackexchange.com/a/253687/392547
11:55
@EmilioPisanty - Hi. If I am not mistaken you had mentioned sometime in the hbar that your bachelor's/master's thesis was on Nuclear Structure something?
@TheDarkSide Nope.
My BSc thesis is on quantum optics.
Oops.
Sorry.
My MRes dissertation is on strong-field ionization.
though really there's no reason at all for anyone to read that MRes dissertation. Read the PhD thesis instead.
Why did I get that impression. Let me think.
... which is also on strong-field ionization.
12:02
how many pages is your PhD thesis?
:^)
@user2646 238 if I remember correctly
indeed, i just found it :-)
@user2646 not the hardest thing to find on the internet ;-)
may i compliment you on your detailed user profile
13:05
@EmilioPisanty, let me lay it out *flat*. My question is an exact duplicate of this one
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/148642/how-to-rebut-denials-of-the-existence-of-photons

So closing it is fair.

I find the "mainstream" criterion you invoqued earlier ridiculous, and that's why I made fun of you. What's the name of that scientist who got burned at the stake for developping heliocentrism against the heavy handed *mainstream* moderators ?

This mainstream thing is nothing more than the Argumentum ad populum fallacy ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum ) . And
@ManudeHanoi have you visited the tower of Hanoi?
@ManudeHanoi May I suggest that you do not have enough experience with the site to understand the problems that the non-mainstream policy exists to solve, and that such an understanding of the underlying issues is not a waivable requirement to talking about either the problem or the existing solutions?
8
user351417
13:22
Luboš Motl just posted something for the first time in 10 months. Any idea why he was inactive for a while?
user351417
It's strange, when I look at posts listed by activity and start from the oldest, practically all of them were last modified by him
@Chair it is my understanding that he spends a good deal more time in PhysicsOverflow than here since that site took off.
user351417
@Chair link?
user351417
@EmilioPisanty To the answer? Or to the evidence that he was the last modifier of almost all old stuff?
13:25
the latter
@Chair that's a fluke of the sorting, mostly
user351417
user351417
@EmilioPisanty How so? A similar pattern shows up frequently enough
13:28
cherry-picking, pure and simple.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Nah, I bet that if I looked, I could find boatloads.
does physics overflow have a chat room?
@Chair boatloads of what?
@user1732 you'd have to ask them.
user351417
@Chair wait
is that...
other users that are not Lubos?
user351417
13:29
@EmilioPisanty Boatloads of instances where the screen is filled with last-modified-by-lubos stuff
user351417
The second image I sent is also on page 2507
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Eh obviously there are other people about. But more than half of it is Lubos.
@Chair last-modified is a bad metric
user351417
And he represents way less than half of the community's population.
you can get that record by just doing a bunch of edit campaigns
user351417
13:31
@EmilioPisanty I just realised that. THe first picture I sent looks like a bulk edit. All are within 2 minutes of each other.
and just hoping that enough of them get left in peace after you're done with them
user351417
He probably found something wrong in a bunch of his posts and decided to fix em all in quick succession.
but yeah, I don't know why you find it surprising
he was extremely active during the first years of the site's existence
he was #1 on the rep leaderboard for ages
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Well, I wasn't around back then, and there doesn't seem to be anyone of that level of activity. Except maybe Qmechanic's edit stuff.
Q is awesome
13:34
@Chair John Rennie only topped his rep in 2014
right around when Lubos was winding down his participation
@EmilioPisanty What is the logical order of a thesis presentation?
Is it : background -> problem statement -> your idea -> works done
or should I include a short explanation about why I chose this subject at the very beginning
why not start with motivation?
@lılostafa depends on the country
@user1732 It seems a little strange to me to start talking about my motivation before introducing the subject (the background part)
92
A: Welcome to Academia.SE!

WrzlprmftAcademia varies more than you think it does Academic customs and procedures vary greatly across countries, universities, fields, subfields, workgroups and so on. Therefore always consider that what you assume to be general in your question or answer is not. It is very helpful if your question i...

@lılostafa depends on how much time you have available.
But really, it primarily depends on the local expectations. The person to ask is your supervisor.
13:38
@EmilioPisanty Take US for example, and 30 minutes max
@lılostafa unless you have a full hour, I would recommend that you go straight to the point.
but again, this is something you should work out in consultation with your supervisor.
14:08
Jesus what does it take to get some good weather?
@SirCumference living in Spain?
@SirCumference xkcd 1245 or 1606?
Anonymous
@SirCumference I just waded through knee-deep muddy waters to get back home from uni :P
@Blue Ok I can't really compare with that ._.
Anonymous
14:13
Also, cars are not running on the roads today
@Blue are they doing more of a casual lounging?
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty lol
Anonymous
Well, there are trucks
Anonymous
But the shorter cars with lesser ground clearance would get waterlogged
btw @Chair how in the hell did this one escape the HNQ radar?
I reckon it was within one or two upvotes of completely exploding
user351417
14:24
@EmilioPisanty Ah yeah, I remeber that there were suddenly 5 answers within just 35 minutes of posting it. And it seems naive enough hehehe.
user351417
14:39
@EmilioPisanty Strangely enough, though the favorites came in pretty quick, there weren't many votes (up or down).
user351417
@Blue Heh in Bangalore we don't need rain for that. We had this thing called a Bandh (hindi for 'closed', if I remember) to protest against the fuel prices, so they decided to close all schools and workplaces for a day. I had 2 major tests postponed. I'm getting bored as hell just sitting around at home.
Anonymous
@Chair We had a bandh here too, yesterday :P
user351417
@Blue Where?
Anonymous
Kolkata
user351417
Oh yeah, now that I think of it, our bandh was yesterday too. I was supposed to have the tests yesterday, and today was supposed to be off for me anyways. I guess it gets confusing when I have every alternate day off because of my tests.
user351417
14:47
Eh whatever it's damn annoying.
Anonymous
I. on the other hand, love it
user351417
Why on earth would you love it?
Anonymous
I get to stay at home and sleep
Anonymous
Home is cozy, and nice and lovely XD
user351417
Ah of course. :P
Anonymous
14:51
What test are you having now though? School half yearlies?
user351417
@Blue Not exactly. I'm doing the IB so we have a pretty unusual schedule. Our summer holidays are June and July. We had 11th grade year-ends in May, and now we have a series of tests called Mock tests, which are based on exactly the same stuff as year 1 because reasons? At the end of these tests, the school gives us something called a predicted grade, which is essentially a prediction of what we'll get in the IB finals, which are next May.
user351417
Using those predicted grades, I apply for college in November and December.
@Blue Kaumudi was saying there was a strike in Kochi so college was closed. It's OK for some! :-)
user351417
@JohnRennie Odds are the stuff was organised for the whole country.
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Haha. It seems that a lot of places had a strike yesterday! BTW any news from Kaumudi about the Kerala floods (and how the recovery work is going)? It was a terrible situation last month (a large portion of Kerala got heavily flooded and it was declared as a national emergency)
user351417
14:59
Over the last 30 minutes I have seen 4 NAAs by new users. What's going on all of a sudden? physics.stackexchange.com/questions/348598 physics.stackexchange.com/questions/78416/… physics.stackexchange.com/questions/297652/…
@Blue I asked her if she was flooded out, but it turns out her family's apartment is on the 17th floor :-)
Anonymous
Lol, that's....good to know :P
She did say the floods were really bad in Kochi and a number of people had been killed. The college was closed because it was being used to house people displaced by the floods.
@Chair humans have an enormous capacity to perceive random events as non-random?
Anonymous
"a number of people had been killed"....eeeeh :/
user351417
15:02
@EmilioPisanty Me in particular. I love looking at the phase portraits of double pendulums with small amplitudes too.
@Blue yes, a thoroughly unpleasant business :-(
Anonymous
It's sorta unprecedented, yeah
btw, re: this, arXiv links don't rot.
@JohnRennie the Queen just rang, she wants her euphemisms back.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Meh pasted comment template. It's still not nice to have bald links just sitting around. But good to know.
@EmilioPisanty As a staunch republican I regard all euphemisms as the property of the people!
15:05
@JohnRennie ah, got it.
@Chair or to put it another way: if the arXiv stops resolving links, the internet has bigger problems
ditto with DOI links
@JohnRennie but the edit was good, though.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Yeah but dois are made for that reason right? Because they don't disappear?
@EmilioPisanty edit?
@JohnRennie physics.stackexchange.com/posts/425907/revisions v2. (duh. replied to the wrong message.)
Anonymous
@Chair That sounds quite different from the CBSE and ISC systems! Did you decide which universities you're going to apply to?
@Chair yep.
15:09
@EmilioPisanty ah :-)
@Chair still, if there's a formal journal reference it's always better to include that too.
One of these days altmetric will get their act together and DOI links from SE will be good for authors.
user351417
@Blue Kind of... I need to expand my list a bit, but largely yeah.
Anonymous
@Chair Nice. So, are you looking forward to....physics?
oh wow
chrome v69 is awful
it just decided that the .m. in the Wikipedia url isn't worth displaying
user351417
@Blue Yep. Definitely. I'm not particularly sure about the theoretical vs experimental thing, but I'm presently interested in high-energy physics and nonlinear dynamics.
user351417
15:14
I guess it doesn't make a difference for the first couple of years of undergrad anyways, but having an interest in a particular field would probably help me find fun research positions.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty What exactly is the purpose of the .m? I've seen that it gives you a pretty different layout, but I couldn't find much about it. Probably because I had no idea what to search for...
@Chair it's the mobile site
en.wikipedia.org automatically reditects to en.m.wikipedia.org if your device requests a mobile version
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Ah. It still looks prettier than the normal version on my laptop though, and I have a pretty high-res screen.
user351417
Looks like a lot of physics SE posts link to that.
@Chair regardless
it's bad form to link to the .m. domain. If clients need it they will automatically redirect there.
Anonymous
15:18
@Chair Cool :) Yeah, true, no matter how hard you try, you wouldn't be able to know now what would interest you in the long-term (at least not now). When I first joined my engineering course I thought I'd end up being an experimentalist, but then I realized I suck at it and also that it seems pretty boring to me. Later my interest shifted towards some of the pure math-y stuff, and now I'm finding myself more interested in computer science. And all that happened over the span of a year :P
what's unbelievable is that chrome is displaying a different URL than the document it's actually showing
Anonymous
It's certainly a good idea to try out as many fields as you can while you're in college.
user351417
Okee I gotta go study. See ya!
Anonymous
Bbye
Anonymous
I'm slightly scared though that I might end up becoming a COBOL developer, after getting bored with everything else in life :P
user351417
15:20
user351417
Shit. What have I done?
Anonymous
QMech took mercy on ya
user351417
@Blue s/he was going easy. I'm sure.
Anonymous
That's what I meant ^
user351417
Couldn't be true otherwise.
15:28
@Chair you need a hundred times more edits to displace Qmechanic on the all-time tables.
hmmmm. On the other hand, it seems that @DavidZ and I are neck-to-neck there.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Bah I'm ahead this week only because I'm supposed to be studying for a Business Management test and that's the most wuss subject I've ever seen. But you gotta do gen-eds and it is technically interesting enough.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Looks like you overtook him today. Congratulations! You are now #2 on the one tab on the users page which absolutely nobody looks at :P
user351417
(Except for me: I just looked at it)
Anonymous
DanielSank - 2018 edits. Coincidence?
Well you made me look at it too. There's a user on the top rep leaderboard that I'm pretty sure I've never seen physics.stackexchange.com/users/26969/floris
Anonymous
15:39
Everyone knows Floris!
Anonymous
Really knowledgable guy
user351417
@Blue Yeah. You look at an answer and you can just tell he's the guy who wrote it. He has this awesome approach to everyday-life stuff
I recognized pretty much every user there except him/her. Maybe I don't look at enough questions
user351417
@danielunderwood I don't think he's very active these days.
Anonymous
14
A: Why does paper cut so well?

FlorisPaper contains filler particles. These are microscopic “knives” - see for example this picture (Precipitated Calcium Carbonate, from this paper) When paper is freshly cut, such particles (CaCO3, TiO2, ...) are exposed on the edge. They act like any serrated blade, cutting and removing small am...

Anonymous
15:43
One of his recent great answers
user351417
Looks like he hasn't been doing as much since July 2017
24
Q: The User, The Myth, The Legend

AccidentalFourierTransformUser Floris has recently become the third user to obtain the Legendary badge, which is one of the less awarded badges out there. Being one of the most prolific contributors to this site, I just wanted to say thank you. Thank you for those amazing ~2.300 answers, thank you for the detailed yet int...

this guy?
user351417
user351417
There's a pretty sharp drop after july.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty I loved his meta SE post about the pi rate hat.
user351417
15:45
67
A: A Moose, Some Silly Putty ... And A Desperate Plea For Help

FlorisHow about a pi-rate hat: Materials: warm hat, sharpie (black and silver), paper, scissors, tape. A pirate hat might be awarded for having an answer accepted after another answer was initially accepted. In other words - "stealing" the green tick. Or an upvoted answer that has double r in at l...

Did he make someone mad on Aug 27?
user351417
Except he used partial differentiation signs because???
Anonymous
@danielunderwood A bounty perhaps?
user351417
@danielunderwood User was removed
Anonymous
Ah
user351417
15:47
Somebody who voted on his posts had their account deleted.
ahhh is that why suspended accounts have rep 1?
Anonymous
That's different
user351417
@danielunderwood I don't know so much about this, but I think that the votes of suspended accounts don't get removed.
user351417
User removed refers to cases where the user is deleted entirely.
@Chair eh.
15:48
@Chair $\pi$ is a function of position as well as time. Come on, everyone knows that :-)
everything on that thread at score $\geq$ 25 is over-rated.
ohhh I get it
pi-rate
user351417
@JohnRennie Except me, apparently :P technically you could say it's a trivial funciton of time becasue $\pi (t)=\pi \times t^0$
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Yours is awesome
@Chair $\pi$ was 3 in Indiana in 1897.
2
15:50
Like all of Indiana?
The Indiana Pi Bill is the popular name for bill #246 of the 1897 sitting of the Indiana General Assembly, one of the most notorious attempts to establish mathematical truth by legislative fiat. Despite its name, the main result claimed by the bill is a method to square the circle, rather than to establish a certain value for the mathematical constant π, the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter. The bill, written by amateur mathematician Edward J. Goodwin, does imply various incorrect values of π, such as 3.2. The bill never became law, due to the intervention of Professor C....
Is it discontinuous at state lines?
user351417
@JohnRennie Maybe they had too many engineers there
@JohnRennie Ah yeah, Numberphile has a good video on it
How exactly does one introduce a bill about a number?
15:53
btw now that we're starring things
↑ is amazing
user351417
@danielunderwood ask them
Anonymous
@danielunderwood The STEM communities have had their fair share of cranks and trolls since time immemorial
So what I've gathered is that all stars are peas in a gigantic cosmic garden
Or a really big bowl of pea soup
"The area found by Goodwin's rule is ​pi/4 times the true area of the circle, which in many accounts of the Pi Bill is interpreted as a claim that pi = 4. However, there is no internal evidence in the bill that Goodwin intended to make such a claim; on the contrary, he repeatedly denies that the area of the circle has anything to do with its diameter."
dat last clause
wowza
Anonymous
lol
16:02
Small circle same area as big circle? Makes sense
Obvious crank or secret prophet of GR
you tell me
welp...gotta do employee training now...fail
Anonymous
Feed them first ;)
@Blue I think he's being trained, not doing the training/feeding :P
Be sure to do what they say so you get treats
Anonymous
16:05
Ah, ask your trainer to feed you something nice first, then :P
Anonymous
Bad link. Lemme find a better one for you
@danielunderwood Suspended accounts simply always are fixed at rep 1 (for reasons that are not entirely clear to me, probably as a sort of punishment like "If you misbehave, you don't get to show off your rep"). Loss of reputation due to "user was removed" is entirely different: When a user account is deleted (not suspended!), all its votes are, too.
@ACuriousMind maybe it's a simple way of removing rep privileges?
1 down 6 to go
if you read SE source code, I'm sure the 1 rep rule will make sense
16:11
Deletion may also happen as punishment, especially for sockpuppet accounts, but it's also regularly triggered by the users themselves for various reasons (which they don't have to explain to us). For users with a really large number of votes, a CM has to do the deletion manually in order to preserve the votes since a loss of many votes to many users would be too disruptive to the reputation model
@Semiclassical Also possible. I simply don't really know and never cared enough to ask :P
So if John Rennie wanted to delete his account, he can't?
@ACuriousMind presumably (and hopefully) that latter scenario doesn't happen often
@Semiclassical From his obituary:
> As years went on and he saw the child of his genius still unreceived by the scientific world, he became broken with disappointment, although he never lost hope and trusted that before his end came he would see the world awakened to the greatness of his plan and taste for a moment the sweetness of success. He was doomed to disappointment, and in the peaceful confines of village life the tragedy of a fruitless ambition was enacted.
Anonymous
@enumaris He can. But he'd need permission from a SE dev
@enumaris I think ACM meant accounts that have awarded a large number of votes
Anonymous
16:12
Because of his high rep
hmmm
i.e. when the account is deleted lots of of users would lose votes
Test it out, for science?
:P
@enumaris All users can delete their account. But the deletion of accounts with a large number of votes cast has to be done manually, so it is not automatic.
I lost about 2000 rep when accounts were deleted during a big outbreak of sockpuppetry!
16:13
so it's a votes cast thing, not a high rep thing
rep awarded vs. rep received etc
Anonymous
They're correlated
hmmm
@JohnRennie Ah, sockpuppets are of course not protected by this - they are deleted and all their votes reversed regardless of the quantity.
@danielunderwood Not on that scale. I daresay that we're pretty good at catching them in earlier stages ;)
16:14
And when you say sockpuppets, you mean users with multiple accounts?
@danielunderwood this was an usually large scale attack! :-)
@ACuriousMind not quite. Past a certain threshold, the votes are retained.
@JohnRennie precisely to prevent this
@EmilioPisanty I think there's a manual element on the CM side involved in the preservation of such votes, though I might be misremembering
too many m's
I'm confiscating 2, so here you go: hmmm
16:16
1073
Q: Don't throw away all votes when a user is deleted

Mad ScientistCurrently, when a moderator deletes a user all of the user's votes are removed along with the user themselves. I was pretty surprised at this behaviour when I first heard about it, and I don't think it is a good idea to throw away all of the votes just because the user is deleted. Votes are lock...

that appears to be it
> If either threshold is exceeded, deletion is held up until someone reviews it. Otherwise, deletion proceeds and any votes are discarded.
> If, during review, it becomes apparent that the user is or ever was involved in voting fraud, the votes are discarded as they would normally be.
but for clarity, that's to prevent things like this:
Do you guys read papers multiple times? Like run through it quickly and reread if it's interesting or something?
I've read Wald like 6 times
@danielunderwood That's my standard mode of reading
(not all of it though)
huh maybe that's what I need to start doing. I take ages to get through anything, but I try to process it all as I'm reading
Anonymous
16:22
Btw are deleted accounts really not recoverable? What is the precaution against a mod getting ummm...*possessed* and deleting multiple user accounts at random ?
I'm sure the devs have backups they could use if really needed
SE sites are periodically backed up on 12 Million 3.5" floppy disks
@Blue The account is not recoverable, the content associated to it is, cf. meta.stackexchange.com/a/283926/263383
16:26
@danielunderwood that whole page is lies, we all know the storage is all on floppy disks
@danielunderwood If you really want to understand a paper, it does take ages. That's normal. The quick reading phase is just to determine whether I want/need to invest that kind of time.
@enumaris nah man. it's little gnomes in your computer manipulating miniature abaci
@EmilioPisanty So is that saying that I should sit down for hours and understand everything?
> Can you put coffee in a humidifier?
or do that
uh...
did your comedy detector break down?
Anonymous
@ACuriousMind "By restore content, I mean that posts (questions and answers) and comments which were connected to the previous profile would be attached to a new profile that must be created. " - that's fair enough!
16:31
Evidently my comedy detector had the sensitivity set wrong
I detected a slight bit of comedy, but wasn't sure
> To avoid interruptions from cellphone calls, I made sure it was 1999.
actually, forget it
I was going to quote the few bits that are most obviously comedic
but the whole thing is plastered with it
@EmilioPisanty tbh what immediately pops out to me is the fact that the sidebar showing 'top-ranked articles in Careers' has "Ph.D. students face significant mental health challenges" at the top
Anonymous
@danielunderwood I took over a month to read my first XD
I just asked my adviser for the gist of the paper
let him do the heavy lifting
mmmhm
@EmilioPisanty I thought the whole thing was serious and just his writing style. But then I also find serious things funny at times, so who knows
Anonymous
16:37
@enumaris My advisor was/is a PhD student who had/has absolutely no clue about the contents of the paper :P And his advisor only spoke to us once in two weeks .... and that too about unrelated topics. The other paper I worked on, however, was easier to go through since I could directly interact with the authors (who were from my uni)
Oh no SE is written in C#
My advisor just handed me a stack of papers and books when I started and I had no idea what to do. I suppose the reasonable thing would have been to ask him how to read them
Anonymous
I sort of realized that the papers are mostly way too "dense". They assume you already know a lot of things! (which is fair, if you expect only experts to read them)
only experts in your field who have done similar research on similar topics using similar methodologies
Anonymous
Review papers are a bit easier to get through, tho
Anonymous
@enumaris Yeah :P
16:40
I write papers expecting only my adviser to ever read them
Anonymous
lol
well, not true
my adviser and my cowriter
my co-writer understands more about what I write than I do
Speaking of papers, I hear about dozens of theory papers on arxiv the day after an experimental result. Are those people throwing those papers together in a day or is it usually something they've been working on for a while and just waiting for an experimental reason to release them?
Does your co-writer not write them with you?
Anonymous
I'm on the other end. At the beginning of the summer vacation, I had 5 other undergrads working with me. Gradually, over the month they started vanishing one-by-one :P Now only 2 are left and none of them are writing anything substantial. I'm having to write up their parts too. I guess this experience has made me believe that undergrad group projects almost always end up being unproductive, especially when you don't have a stern supervisor
@danielunderwood Before the release of an experimental result you can usually hear rumors about it, so many of them probably have had longer than a day to prepare. Also, right after such a discovery they are more willing to publish material that they wouldn't consider quite polished enough otherwise, in order to establish primacy if their idea turns out ot be good.
16:48
@danielunderwood I provide the first draft, my adviser and co-writer revise my draft to be publishable
incidentally, my co-writer knows way more about what I'm writing than I do
Has physics always had theory work popping up like this (at least per scientist or so) or is it a new thing? I guess we don't really hear about the failed theories of the past for the most part
U gotta be the first to publish
so ppl don't steal your ideas
also, you gotta be secretive with your work before you publish it
otherwise people will steal it
You could use that naming principle. Let someone else publish it first and you'll get your name on it
I have no idea what that effect is called at the moment. The one where the person named for a work isn't the one originally responsible
@danielunderwood My impression is that this is to a large part because many theoretical fields don't have unexplained results around you can do something with. Sure, we have dark matter and so on, but without further results there's hundreds of possible directions you can go in.
My wholly unfounded impression is that In the past the situation was rather in reverse: There was a plethora of rather specific experimental results that demanded explanation, like the heydays of particle physics when the experimentalists found new particles faster than the theorists could explain them :P
@danielunderwood Stigler's law
Experimentalists just need to figure out how to materialize equipment without needing money!
And that's the one. I couldn't even figure out what to google to find it
16:53
I just remembered the name, otherwise it would've taken me longer to find it
Pretty sure Einstein's Field Equations are named after the first dude who found em
Alberto Einstein - cousin of famous physicist Albert Eintein
Einstein figured out so many things that they couldn't name everything after him
well it helps that 4 separate famous physicists arose from the Einstein clan
the aforementioned Alberto and Albert Einstein as well as Alonzo, and Alfonzo Einstein
Could you imagine what it must be like to be a relative? "Einstein...so you must be a genius right?"
02:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (2868 days earlier)      last day (2360 days later) »