« first day (2813 days earlier)      last day (2414 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

00:00
hyperloop rejected my job application grrrr at them :P
Hehehehe 😁 don't worry I think you are in good company
I hear a lot of people from around the world apply daily to all things Elon related
Very talented people get rejected all the time I hear
probably
woot, my first tableau dashboard has been uploaded
published
Speaking of I am right at the boring company place right now. Construction in progress
boring?
Boeing?
Speaking of. Just ran accross my boy from ASU again lol
He is now holding one of those Elon flame thrower things lol
00:05
heh
almost done with work for the day
Nice
this extract is taking longer than I expected
Hehe
welp, will just let it run in the background while I leave lol
laters
So I'm having a bit of confusion. If there's a Lagrangian that has higher-order terms $L(q, q^{(1)}, ... , q^{(n)}, t)$, varying it gives a differential equation $\sum_{i=0}^n (-1)^n \frac{d^n}{dt^n} \frac{\partial L}{\partial q^{(i)}} = 0$. But we have the freedom to add a total time derivative to the Lagrangian and not change things. So wouldn't the derivative terms drop out?
If it makes a difference, I'm trying to figure out what the commenter is trying to get at on this answer and want to make sure I'm not arguing something ridiculous
Actually nevermind. That was a dumb question
00:30
0
Q: Are contravariant basis vectors and basis 1-forms identical?

Steven HattonThe reason I'm asking this is because I am trying to develop a set of notes from my reading of MTW (and Wrede, Menzel, Bergman, etc.). I represent covariant basis vectors with $\mathfrak{e}_{i}$, or if they are orthonormal $\hat{\mathfrak{e}}_{i}$. In cases where the author is explicitly usin...

The definition of infinitesimal is problematic, but the definition of tangent vector is precise, thus tangent vectors provided a way to capture the notion of infinitesimal changes
 
1 hour later…
01:35
wait, what?
apparently the Teichmüller in Inter-Universal Teichmüller theory was a nazi
Paul Julius Oswald Teichmüller (18 June 1913 – 11 September 1943) was a German mathematician who introduced quasiconformal mappings and differential geometric methods into the study of Riemann surfaces. Teichmüller spaces are named after him. Born in Nordhausen, Teichmüller attended the University of Göttingen, where he graduated in 1935 under the supervision of Helmut Hasse. His doctoral dissertation was on operator theory, though this was his only work on functional analysis. His next few papers were algebraic, but he switched his focus to complex analysis after attending lectures given by Rolf...
@ACuriousMind is this widely known in German mathematicksy academia?
02:12
it is
I think Nevanlinna is questionable as well?
Teichmuller is the go-to example of someone who was undeniably brilliant -and- an enthusiastic Nazi
I don't know how they compare, but I always think of Lenard. And maybe von Braun
02:38
Will be dropping moola on food at Costco in a bit
 
1 hour later…
03:57
Bought some dress shirts for 🏫
 
2 hours later…
06:16
@JohnRennie, Hi, can you spare a minute sometimes to explain yor comment physics.stackexchange.com/questions/417841/… , and compare your formula to the the one given in the new answer by BetaDecay? Thanks in advance
@AvnishKabaj hehe, usually tacos and milk lol :P
06:36
[Random]
A brief history of nothing
It all begins with $\varnothing$
06:57
@bolbteppa sound quality is awful
07:26
Although you get the feeling of authenticity certainly
Professor breaking his chalk in half while writing
08:21
I once had a teacher throw a chalkboard eraser at the guy sitting next to me for talking during the lecture.
@ACuriousMind @rob I just got a red review indicator for a Close queue at 64. Do you guys know if the behaviour changed in the last couple of days?
it's been higher recently without triggering any dots at all
ah
the full queue is at 100
maybe that triggers the dot?
09:00
Also the phone rings during the lecture
user351417
@EmilioPisanty In an interesting coincidence, I came across this article :researchgate.net/publication/… while reading about wavemeters... it's the source for the diagram in that mirrors question. I threw together a sloppy answer now; I'll go about fixing it up tomorrow.
user351417
It looks like a wavemeter's probably a bit too expensive for a school lab to procure; I thought I'd need one for the photochromism stuff I'm working on now.
Anonymous
@user1414 Happened in our class too, but the teacher missed the target :P
@user1414 lol
I thought it only happens in India
@Blue he actually nailed the guy right in the face :-/
Anonymous
09:13
Must have been a memorable day for him ;)
@Abcd aggressiveness is universal
Anonymous
Boring teachers are universal too :P
Anonymous
There are some classes in which sitting quietly and listening to the teacher in itself is a torture XD
@Slereah you say all of that like it's a bad thing :p
09:18
how was your first day of uni? @Blue
Sound was ok for me
@bolbteppa well it is part of the professor aesthetic
But it's not good quality yeah
Yeah it sounds like it was filmed with an old camcorder
Sound is like SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
There's a few scattered perimeter lectures on it too with way better quality but I'd say those ones are better
09:19
plus the indian accent is quit thick
'course
The lagranyan
Anonymous
@user1414 Going well so far :) The digital logic class was interesting
Anonymous
@Slereah lol
cool :)
@Loong do you really think Croatia would have won without the video reply?
@Chair it's a nice answer
it'd be nice if you can give a summary of how the device works
(I can mostly see it, but it'd be nice to have it on the record)
I'm tickled by your surprise that the paper is "free", though
@user1414 I didn't say that.
09:27
it isn't - it's just that one of the authors has set up a homepage on an academic social network and posted the pdf there
the "real" home of the paper is at doi.org/10.1119/1.19335
user351417
I have no idea... I didn't need to scihub it
user351417
I'm not too familiar with the whole concept though, to be honest.
@Loong I know, but it was the turning point...
user351417
I just visited that researchgate link and clicked download because I know researchgate's a reliable place...
user351417
And it worked
09:29
> researchgate's a reliable place
well....
up to a point
Let me put it this way
Researchgate is basically a blog
It's as reliable as the person
if a paper has a free eprint on the arXiv, I add a link to the arXiv
user351417
I guess a lot of the resources I've been needing lately have been on sciencedirect/elsevier... and those are always paid access/institute axis.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Sure, that'd be great
if a paper has a free eprint on a university repository like e.g. spiral.imperial.ac.uk, then I add a link to that version
user351417
09:30
I wasn't really looking for that article... it's a strange coincidence. I wanted wavemeters, and then I sudedenly saw a familiar-looking image
if a paper's only free version is on researchgate, then I might use it to get access, but it's not suitable for inclusion on a reference in a publication
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty The pre-print can sometimes have a lot of errors compared to the actually published version though :P Some authors never care to update the arXiv version after publication
user351417
Eh whatever... I have the name of the article, along with the authors' namess, so it can't be too hard to find.
@Slereah to be fair, researchgate is less terrible than academia.edu, whose T&Cs are absolutely catastrophic
I'm not touching that with a ten-meter pole
vixra is best, 'course
09:33
@Chair well, there comes a point where being able to find it isn't enough
Also really
How often do you end up on academia.edu
I don't think I've ever googled a thing and ended up on academia
At least for physics
Sometimes I do for humanities stuff
you might also care about e.g. writing a citation that ensures that your readers will always be able to find the resource you're pointing to
@Slereah when academia.edu sends me spammy emails
"your paper has been cited X times!"

"pay us $20 and we'll tell you where!"
has it
absolutely despicable stuff
user351417
Also, the answers to the same question on quora are incredibly terrible
user351417
user351417
Quora actually has several measures which almost encourage people to write about things they don't know.
5
@Slereah On the other hand, researchgate was the first to pick up this citation researchgate.net/publication/…
which, frankly, I'm over the Moon about
I thought that paper was dead and buried and nobody was ever going to read it
Who's that dork
@Slereah that's a younger me
used to be my PSE profile pic, too
neeeeeeeeeeeerd
09:37
meh
but anyways @Slereah is arxiv.org/abs/1807.04052 your kind of stuff?
'cause I've got no idea what's really going on there =P
I'm not great at SUSY
you're probably more in tune than me =P
Sure but so's a monkey
it'd be nice to have a sense of what they're actually doing and how the truncated harmonic oscillator fits into it
@Slereah well, I mean, I couldn't even have told you that it was a SUSY paper
You can tell from the $\mathcal N$
They love the big N
09:41
ah
(it's the number of SUSY generators)
also probably the fact that they call a 2012 paper "recent"
Well yes
it's rare for a paper you reference to be less than a decade old
heh
yeah, I guess formal quantum optics doesn't move that fast anymore
though partly that is because the central core of the subject is pretty mature
10:33
If I have a two spring i n series with one of them connected to ceiling and other attached to a mass then why is the total force experienced by the mass equal to their combined spring force instead of just the spring force of the spring attached to the mass
Can somebody help me on this
Looks close to newtwon's third law
11:01
@ACuriousMind Hi :), let me know if you're around in the chat today.
Anonymous
@user929304 If you have a question for him why not write it down now instead of waiting for him to come online? :P Saves both of your time(s) in that way. Chat doesn't necessarily have to be in real-time!
Anonymous
@Abhinav The force gets exerted by a single spring only (the one directly connected to the body). However there's another spring pulling it from above. Draw the FBDs.
Wow! @Loong it looks like no World Cup champion has had less ball possession than France?
11:26
I think the ball possession statistic should be divided into having the ball on your half of the field compared to having it on the opponent's half.
@Blue indeed, good idea :)
@ACuriousMind I'm looking for a post, I admit I may be mistaken, but I think it was answered by you, on the topic of how to correctly explain what is meant by spacetime curvature, as opposed to the common misconceptions where one gets the impression, the manifold is curving into "something else". Any chance your remember which post it was?
@Blue yea...the upper spring is also pulling the lower string with spring force.And since the springs are massless they are equal in magnitude. Thanks for the help
 
2 hours later…
user351417
13:34
When do you formally study hamiltonian mechanics? Maybe second year of undergrad or something?
user351417
I've been working on it lately, but I'm not really getting anywhere... Does anybody know of a good resource for that?
Anonymous
@Chair Probably depends at what level you want to learn it. There are some basic undergrad level classes, yes, but also a lot of graduate level classes possible. If you're a beginner maybe get a basic idea first :). It's something I've been tearing my hairs over for a while (the grad level course) :P
Anonymous
@Chair For a basic introduction, see Goldstein chapter 1, 2 and 3
Anonymous
@Chair Also Balakrishnan has some good undergrad lectures. See his CM playlist
user351417
13:55
@Blue It's not a common undergrad thing? Then what all's there in undergrad? Presumably an introduction to calc-based physics, because we do algebraic in school... that'll have separate electromagnetism and mechanics components presumably. What else?
user351417
Maybe lagrangians?
user351417
I'm quite sure that would come before more specialized modern physics (20th century) stuff.
user351417
@EmilioPisanty Rollback, please.
Anonymous
@Chair You have some of the topics covered in undergrad courses like - action principle, Hamilton's principles, action angle variables, Poisson brackets, solving some mechanics problems using those two formalisms etc. But that's not all of it. There's a lot more to CM which isn't covered in undergrad courses
user351417
@Blue Sounds fun. Thanks!
Anonymous
14:11
@Chair "Sounds fun"...wait till you reach the principle of least action. It seemed like complete nonsense to me at the beginning (combined with the fact that the unknown lagrangian basically appears out of thin air)...and sort of still does :P There are some nice PSE answers on it though by joshphysics and QMech btw
user351417
@Blue From what I've read about action as a quantity in general, it seems pretty random. But apparently it's got some important applications in quantum mechanics so whatever... I've been working with a nonlinear dynamics prof in a nearby university over the summer, and one of the things was to make a simulation+phase portrait generator for a double pendulum. He told me that the principle of least action would come in handy, but eventually I gave up on that and used the lagrangian.
Anonymous
14:27
@Chair Interesting :). BTW where/how did you use the lagrangian? (And what's the professor's name, if you don't mind saying?)
quantizing the double pendulum seems like it might make for an interesting test-case of constraint dynamics
Anonymous
BTW I should mention that Goldstein's chapter 2 has a lot of mistakes in the 3rd edition. Get a hold of the more recent editions if possible. Here's the errata page: astro.physics.sc.edu/Goldstein
after some digging, it doesn't seem like the proper quantization of the double pendulum is actually known
14:46
Few important definitions. Energy :ability to do work. Work: transferee energy
I am out of energy
I am unable to do work
sounds legit
Transfer of*
15:06
@Chair oh, definitely not.
That's a liiiiiiittle too visibly associated with my IRL name now.
There's a number of considerations that apply when you do the right thing and participate with your real name instead of a pseudonym
user351417
@EmilioPisanty I'm going to put up a question on the main meta once I muster my guts... "Enforce rollback of profile pictures".
user351417
@EmilioPisanty I guess mine isn't a real pseudonym... my full name's on my about-me stuff, and mods can see my previous profile name since I changed it recently.
rob
rob
@EmilioPisanty I think you're right that the dot is triggered by the size of the entire review queue, rather than just the items that you personally can review.
@Chair mods are obliged to keep your personal info confidential.
rob
rob
A database person would probably explain that computing the size of your queue is too expensive an operation to perform in the header of every single page you view on the site.
user351417
15:11
@JohnRennie Yeah, but I guess it's not confidential if I have it on my about-me for anyone interested/jobless enough.
user351417
I think I just wanted to evade google searches for my name, and apparently it works
it's a sort of security-through-obscurity
which is always a bit shaky: if someone wants to learn something obscure, they usually can do so
It has never occurred to me to keep my name secret. Aside from the unfortunate incident of the goat and the watermelon I have nothing I wish hidden from the public gaze.
rob
rob
@JohnRennie I didn't realize you were Welsh?
I'm not exactly unknown---I've said enough about myself over my time here that someone could work it out without much trouble---but I just prefer the nickname.
15:17
@rob in fact my mum's family is Welsh, though they left Wales (and the sheep) several generations ago.
@rob isn't there a Sherlock Holmes story called something like that?
rob
rob
@JohnRennie That is a very Conan-Doyle title, isn't it? Perhaps that was intentional.
"What was curious?" "That the dog didn't bark."
user351417
@Blue I used the Euler-Lagrange stuff... Took both pendulums' angles as my generalized coordinates. It was simplified because I got to consider 0 dissipation forces. Then you just do the $\frac{d}{dt}\big(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}}\big)=\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}$ for each of those. You can simplify for second time derivative of each angle, then I approximated with $0.00001=dt$. I was hoping that I could do the runge kutta 4 or something but it got a bit too confusing.
rob
rob
"The Adventure of Silver Blaze", one of the 56 Sherlock Holmes short stories written by British author Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, is one of 12 in the cycle collected as The Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. Doyle ranked "Silver Blaze" 13th in a list of his 19 favourite Sherlock Holmes stories.One of the most popular Sherlock Holmes short stories, "Silver Blaze" focuses on the disappearance of the eponymous race horse (a famous winner) on the eve of an important race and on the apparent murder of its trainer. The tale is distinguished by its atmospheric Dartmoor setting and late-Victorian sporting milieu...
(it's a nice literary example of where the absence of a certain event serves as evidence for a hypothesis)
rob
rob
15:22
@JohnRennie I know essentially nothing about Wales, but in the same year I happened to read two novels set in Swindon
The one I linked above, and one of Fforde's Thursday Next novels.
Swindon isn't in Wales ...
rob
rob
@JohnRennie Next you're going to tell me that it isn't a gleaming megalopolis, either?
And that the library system doesn't employ armed enforcers who hunt down overdue books?
This is what I get for learning things from fiction.
@rob Swindon is near where I grew up, in the West Country. That's how I know where it is :-)
Anonymous
@Chair Cool, I see :)
rob
rob
@JohnRennie That's my trouble: it's nowhere near where I grew up :-)
15:38
Can you raise the pressure of a gas without heating it, anyone?
do you mean: without any heat being transferred, or without the temperature of the gas changing?
both are possible, but they're not the same process.
(At constant volume)
Sorry forgot to mention constant volume
not for an ideal gas, you can't.
@Semiclassical nothing as such has been discovered till now?
Anonymous
It's less about discovery and more about theoretical impossibility :P
I mean temperature should change as a result of changing pressure not the other way round
Anonymous
Why not?
Pressure shouldn't change because of temperature change
Anonymous
$PV=nRT$
@Blue I am asking a question
15:42
Don't tell ideal gases what to do.
3
You are not getting my question
Anonymous
If $n,V$ is constant, if you increase $P$, $T$ increases
I am asking how will you increase P to do that
If you hold the volume, temperature, and the moles of an ideal gas fixed, there is no way to change the pressure.
Do you know any such mechanism?
@Semiclassical Exactly
1 min ago, by Blue
If $n,V$ is constant, if you increase $P$, $T$ increases
But its not a thermodynamic impossibility
15:44
Okay? That means that you can't raise the pressure of a gas at constant volume without changing the temperature.
17 secs ago, by Abcd
But its not a thermodynamic impossibility
Anonymous
@Abcd It's a bi-directional property
4 mins ago, by Abcd
@Semiclassical nothing as such has been discovered till now?
Which means we havent discovered anything to do this till now
1 min ago, by Semiclassical
Okay? That means that you can't raise the pressure of a gas at constant volume without changing the temperature.
To the extent that PV=nRT is a defining property of an ideal gas, it is impossible to change the pressure of such a gas without changing at least one of n,T, or V.
There's nothing to 'discover' there. It's simply a feature of what it means to be an ideal gas.
Anonymous
@Abcd Yes, physically increasing $T$ would be the cause and increase of $P$ would be the effect
15:47
@Blue Ya. so I want physically increasing P to be the cause and Increase in temperature to be the effect
That's not hard, really. Consider a balloon rising through the atmosphere, under the assumption that the temperature surrounding it remains the same.
@Semiclassical then the volume isn't constant
point. hmm
that's not the best example
Anonymous
@Abcd I don't think that's physically possible
I think I got myself backwards there.
15:49
@abcd if you have a sealed volume of gas then the only thing you can transfer in or out of it is heat i.e. change its temperature.
@Blue Why ??
By forbidding a change in volume, you're forbidding work to be done.
I can't think of any way to make a change in pressure the cause and a change in temperature the result.
@JohnRennie we can even excite its molecules through EM waves
@Abcd that's just another way of adding heat
15:50
Ergo, any change of internal energy must be due to heat.
@JohnRennie I don't know whats wrong with my laptop , suddenly too many 3333333333s get typed themeselves when I am not even touching it. Why is it so?
Evening gents
@Abcd faulty 3 key?
Try tapping the 3 key a few times.
Actually, there is one system which comes to mind: a metal undergoing a superconducting transition
15:52
it works fine , the 3 key
since then you can have work done by an external magnetic field
Anonymous
@Semiclassical That's not an ideal gas?
sniiiped :)
Anonymous
@Abcd If you have a closed container, the only way to increase pressure is to forcefully compress it or add more moles of the gas. How else do you increase pressure directly without heating? Even theoretically, I can't think of a way
Anonymous
Let's go back to the basics
Anonymous
15:54
@Abcd What is pressure of a gas?
@Blue even I cant think of a way thats why I was asking
I think the question is really: If the internal energy increases, is it due to work or to heat?
We're forbidding mechanical work here.
But are there other ways to do work on a gas?
For an ideal gas, the answer is simply no.
@Blue F/A
Anonymous
@Abcd The key point really is: temperature and kinetic energy are more fundamental than pressure for an ideal gas. (Hint: kinetic theory of ideal gases)
Anonymous
Pressure is always necessarily a side effect of the molecules hitting the walls (more the KE, more forceful the hits)
Anonymous
15:57
And the KE is a result of T
extracting data dun dun dunnnn
The main point is that an ideal gas is a very simple model. It doesn't have a lot of variables to play with
As such, the only ways to have transfer of energy are by particles entering/leaving the system, by mechanical work, or by heat transfer.
Anonymous
@Abcd I'm precisely trying to explain why physically trying to increase P and thereby increasing T, as a result, doesn't make any theoretical sense. Not really a matter of "hasn't been discovered till date"
Anonymous
P is an averaged out property of the (rate of) gas molecules hitting the walls
Now, you can consider systems with other mechanisms of energy transfer. But such a system is by definition not an ideal gas.
(you can find some discussion online about a classical ideal paramagnetic gas. in that case you can do work on the gas without changing the volume. but that's not what one typically means by an 'ideal gas')
Anonymous
16:06
@Abcd I just cooked up an analogy: When you're hitting a football, the cause of it flying away is the force you exerted on it, and the distance if flew is the effect. Now does trying to increase the distance of flight of the football in order to increase the force the force of your kick, make sense? :P
Anonymous
Anyhow, I gotta leave now
@bolbteppa given our discussions re: Bohmian mech, you might find this paper interesting: mathreview.uwaterloo.ca/archive/voli/1/oltean.pdf
it purports to give an account of path integrals from the Bohmian pov, including a derivation of the Feynman path integral from such
...i dunno how I feel about it yet
(the expression they give for the 'de Broglie-Bohm path integral' only makes sense if (q',t') and (q,t) fall along the same trajectory. but the feynman path integral is supposed to be valid for any pair of spacetime points...)
@Blue yeah
16:24
(I think I know the fix for it, but I’m not convinced I like it...)
Anonymous
@Abcd What?
17:20
any native speakers around?
I need a more formal version of "reckon", as in "we reckon that our work is innovative"
something that's safe to put in a cover letter to the editor
I'm reluctant to replace "reckon" with "feel"
@Semiclassical @JohnRennie
"we believe that our work is innovative" is more formal but also seems a bit wishy-washy in the vein of 'feel'
though in any case you're giving an opinion
another one would be "we're confident that our work is innovative"
@Semiclassical oooh, nice
@Semiclassical well, that's a given, no?
it's why it's in a cover letter and not in the manuscript
sure, i'm just saying that there's no way around that
oh, sure
i imagine you're also giving reasons why you have that opinion in said letter
17:25
it's not the opinionness of "feel", it's the washiness
@Semiclassical I kinda wish I could say "nope, this is the entirety of our cover letter" =P
true enough
but we do
lol
so you can easily frame this as "we're confident in our work being innovative, and here's why"
for better or worse, there's little room for ambivalence in that
@Semiclassical well, it's the concluding paragraph
> Given the above, we are confident that our work is innovative ...
Or you could just drop the believe part entirely
and just go with "Our work is innovative"
17:54
Might have to actually dress up professionally and nice tomorrow for a face to face with some big fat giant ceo. He wants us to meet in his office, I want him to meet me at Starbucks , I told his boy by text that it's Starbucks or nothing lol
come to think of it might show up in my shorts
jk , will be professional but
he has to come to Starbucks if he wants my code
lolz
extracting data is so boring
sit here and watch a number tick up
lol
My evening plans are to clean up and normalize a bit of data...I'm so excited
I've spent more time on handling the data than I have on actual analysis
lol
I thought you did software dev
18:11
Well this is a Kaggle competition I'm doing in my spare time. My work also wants to do data stuff, but at the moment it's just creating software/devices to collect the initial data
I see
It's actually kind of thrilling to work with data again, especially compared to endlessly writing api code
kaggle kernels are so shite
limited to 1 hour of computation time...easy to lose your work...easy to have computation interrupted...yuck
lol I don't really look at the kernels much. I figure I have a better chance of figuring it out on my own than from a good number of them
Ahh that. I don't really use them either
some competitions force you to use their kernels though
18:14
I have a home server that I was running jupyter on, but I've preferred just using pycharm and writing code the normal way
Ahh I haven't run into any of those. Although most competitions I just join then never do much with. There is one from CERN on there now that I really want to try to do, but the data is quite a beast
18:34
I write python on Sublime text and then run it off command line...
I tried Visual Studio
but it was super slow for some reason
VS likes to be slow. I usually use pycharm/other jetbrains ides for most things. I also use vscode some, particularly for stuff with platform.io
suuuuper slow
like took my 3 minute run time and spent an hour without terminating lol
Ahh I never had an issue with runtime slowness, but vs itself being slow. Like taking 5 minutes to load a project. Though I never tried using it with python
I see
vzn
vzn
@danielunderwood which kaggle competition?
vzn
vzn
wonder if kaggle is going to chg somehow now that google owns it, so far seems to be no chgs techcrunch.com/2017/03/07/…
Their tos probably changed in some sneaky way. And I imagine that they'll eventually try to push the usage of GCP for analysis. I think google had a competition on there at one point when they did that
Don't know if that was before or after buying it though
vzn
vzn
@danielunderwood thats very cool have heard of a CERN/ LHC kaggle prj awhile back & blogged on it but didnt know if they were continuing those, really great to see it continue & have sizeable prize money.
18:54
welp, that tableau dashboard is finished
time to go back to working on my deep speller mmmhmm
Can I ask what kind of structure that has? My initial thought would be a word input, some type of nn, then an output covering a corpus...but that seems like quite a large output space
gotta eat lunch, will explain later
Although I suppose it may be a smaller output space than some image stuff
My lunch includes beans. Thought you of all people may like to know
Is there a way to see that the Aharanov-Bohm effect isn't weird by arriving at the infinite solenoid from a non-infinite one and then taking a limit?
19:35
@danielunderwood it's a character level Sequence to sequence model. It inputs a phrase, encodes that phrase character by character, and then decodes + spell corrects that phrase character by character. So the input and output spaces are pretty small actually.
@danielunderwood also, what kind of beans?
I am unable to understand how a current carrying loop is a dipole, what's the best way to understand this concept?
@DanielSank what do you mean by "isn't weird"?. a finite solenoid would have to include edge effects which would be extremely hard to calculate.
Huh that sounds neat. Looks like that's dependent on RNN, which I haven't looked at yet but was planning to in the next couple of days.

And pintos. I was going to just cook beans, but I had some unused veggies and kind of ended up with a vegetable bean soup type thing
hmmm
And for those of you that use pdf textbooks, how do you manage them? Just stick them in mendeley with papers?
19:41
always good
It's a deep LSTM network :D
I've seen LSTM a lot, but haven't actually made it to what it is yet lol
"least squares tangent manifold"
It's a RNN cell that has memory so as to alleviate the vanishing/exploding gradients problem
Long-short-term memory
Hey it looks like an RNN is basically what I thought it would be. A node feeding backwards into the net it looks like
basically yeah
it takes the output and feeds it back into its inputs
hence recurrent
does require a bit of care when doing back prop on that though
Yeah I figured that's what recurrent would mean. I have no idea how you'd train that off the top of my head though. Looks like tf has some rnn contrib stuff, so I guess just let that do all the hard work
19:56
well TF does the backprop for you yeah
I'm talking about at a theoretical level the backprop is a bit complicated - it's called back propagation through time
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (2813 days earlier)      last day (2414 days later) »