« first day (2559 days earlier)      last day (2669 days later) » 

Anonymous
18:00
@Sid the whole grading system is a scam
@BalarkaSen I have read and enjoyed all the Sandman series and the followup Lucifer. Also V for Vendetta and Watchmen.
V for Vendetta is really good. I read the comics after watching the movie (which left me a bit underwhelmed but curious enough to explore nonetheless)
And all of the Hellboy comics.
I haven't read those
@BalarkaSen they are highly entertaining, if rather frivolous.
18:02
lol
Someone I know might allegedly have copies as CBRs ..
@Blue many of the graduate classes at my school are automatic As. As a result
hooy shit what is wrong with my phone today
I mean holy heck of course
you might enjoy this
As a result they don't like undergrads taking them
Anonymous
@0celo7 Automatic? ORS sheets ?
Anonymous
18:05
@0celo7 At least be happy they allow you to take graduate classes. Here they don't allow us :/ I need to visit the postgraduate department professors after class hours to learn new stuff
Anonymous
It's waaay more shitty here
@BalarkaSen Excellent :-)
Anonymous
However, our profs seem to be lenient with the grading. I don't need to worry much about GPA apparently
What they do here is heck you during the year and then apply a massive curve at the end
So you really never know how you're actually doing
@Blue what?
Anonymous
@0celo7 What did you mean by automatic
Anonymous
18:12
Are the test questions not subjective type?
You get an A for showing up.
Anonymous
Oh. Strange
This seems wrong to me. Is it just me, or is it wrong?
0
A: Particle definition

safesphereThis means a set of qualities localized in such a way that they stay together regardless of from which frame of reference you look at them. For example, a static electron has an electric field, but a moving electron also has a magnetic field. While these properties changed because you now looking...

Why? Studying for exams might be the greatest waste of time ever. Homework makes sense, but exams are stupid.
Anonymous
@0celo7 I meant A for "just showing up" is a bit too much. Also, homework can be copied. I prefer regular viva and small tests instead of a bulk-type test at the end
18:16
Is the transformation that takes an orthogonal co-ordinate system to another the Lorentz transform?
Because I'd like to speed some things up if so
@Blue no one cares about grades
Classes are for learning, not taking exams
Anonymous
@0celo7 Sure. But one should care about learning stuff well (since they are putting effort into the course). Regular tests ensure that you don't slack
In engineering exams make sense
if you can't keep yourself on track without tests you shouldn't be doing a STEM graduate degree
Anonymous
@0celo7 I wish people had that mentality :)
Anonymous
I agree with you
Anonymous
18:19
But the reality is quite different
well thankfully I'm somewhere with sense
18:34
AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
this in infuriating I'm trying to troll people and the pseudo-physicists are out in force
claiming that proper acceleration of g leads to "reaching c in 7 years"
@Phase is that wrong?
Yes
Sid
Sid
@Blue you are lucky....
@Phase why?
@0celo7 well why do you think it's right?
18:38
v=at
@EmilioPisanty Could you tell me what the first response was?
god damn it ocelot
What?
That's the laziest bait I've ever seen
from someone who understands SR and GR
Acceleration in SR is one of those things which I never remember how to do right
it's nothing terribly sophisticated
18:45
Me neither. I was hoping @Phase wouldn't be a dick and would tell me about it.
wait
I thought you were being sarcastic
apologies
I mean, obv. it can't just be a=dv/dt
Understanding GR has nothing to do with acceleration. There's probably a gamma in there.
since then you'd be able to exceed the speed of light if you kept accelerating
I can barely do it to the standard I get the right answer reliably, I mess up with a lot of the summations etc atm but this is a good link lecture-notes.co.uk/susskind/special-relativity/lecture-6/…
18:46
And that messes up the integration.
something something proper time
i'm not sure constant acceleration even makes sense in SR, though
constant force, yes. but not constant acceleration
SR is so counterintuitive.
QM is easy to get a feeling for, despite what Reddit says, but SR is impossible.
well, in QM there's stuff which is just "nature works this way, get used to it"
but SR seems like there should be more intuition available since it's all geomtric
18:50
Nah, QM makes sense to me pretty much. It's all just waves.
@Semiclassical We don't have intuition for Lorentzian spaces.
exactly
i mean, there's still those three dimensions of space. so some of the Euclidean intuition is still reasonable
but not all of it, and that's where it gets confusing
that's where I'd point to for the source of the confusion
@0celo7 Well, yes. But...
that said, it is rather cute that one gets the result v = c tanh(at/c) (under the condition which Baez specifies in that link)
But you are an exceptionally motivated learner and are constantly testing your own mastery. So you don't quit before you know it. Most of your peers are not like that.
But, in addition to being teachers colleges are also certifiers of preparation: governments and employer expect the credential to mean something, and they expect colleges to be able to say 'We know it means something becuase..."
There are schools that don't do grades. You;re not done with a class until your tutor signs off that you have mastered the subject.
I'd love to teach like that, but it is muchos expensive because the teacher:student ration is much lower than in schools with grades.
How much do you see that model in the US?
18:59
Question
nevermind
The sort of research we should put behind us!
@JohnRennie there butt for the grace of research go I
worse kinda-sorta-not-really-a-pun: I guess you could say they're really interested in the posterior distribution.
Semiclassical that joke was too good
I can't even think of a {Re_buttal_}
well, sit on it a while and maybe you'll come up with something
Now you're really being cheeky
19:08
yeah, i do feel like i'm just pulling these jokes out of my butt
God damn it
went to edit it to give it nice font
screwed it up
now edit isnt available
that's just cruel
re-butt-al
huh, yeah
that's only okay
lol, my rebuttal got flagged
@dmckee Thanks but I'm talking about mathematics graduate students, not my peers.
19:17
wait
you got flagged for that?
Wtf
Anonymous
There should really be a system to flag flags
What did I get flagged for now?
If I get banned, goodbye.
Anonymous
I think semic got flagged
Not you, Semi
What happens if I flag Shog
Wtf
Everyone loves @Semiclassical
3
19:20
do i cease to exist?
Anonymous
@Phase lol...he will kick you "forever" probably :P
Anonymous
(I'm joking)
What's a joke?!
[flags]
get b& blue
How do you tell when you're flagged anyway
i'm a 10k user
What is flag? Mods don't hurt me, no more
19:21
so i can see when flags go up....including on my own posts, weirdly
Sid
Sid
@Phase you need to be a 10k user.
Anonymous
@Phase You should really pull off that stunt someday XD (Give us your email address beforehand)
when they go up, i get a little alert that asks me to mark the flag as valid/invalid/not sure
and as a matter of course if my own message gets flagged I mark it as "not sure"
Anonymous
@Semiclassical Can you invalidate flags on your own post?
Anonymous
Then I should get 10k fast
Anonymous
19:23
I'm just lazy to write answers
I don't know. it seems like I can, but I don't use that option
also, I don't think it's just one person who the flag goes to
I think it goes to all(?) 10k users online, and asks them to judge it as valid/invalid
so presumably it's not just my vote that decides it
In that case I'd vote invalid then
Since it's just asking all the high rep users if they believe it's inappropiate
if you wrote it, chances are you don't and it's asking for your vote anyway
true enough. but it feels like it's a bug so I don't use that option
Anonymous
You're too honest
Anonymous
Rather too innocent/good
Sid
Sid
19:26
I am only 3k away from 10k....
ANyone willing to give me a bounty? :P
i'm a strange mix of innocent and cynic
Anonymous
@Sid I can give you...lol
Anonymous
I'd have to take a vacation from SE then. Won't have rep left to chat
19:51
@0celo7 Ah. Grad students are a more select bunch.
My grad classes spent less time on tests and often made them take-home.
@Abcd the link is in my previous comment
Any tips on how to deal with academic pessimism?
It's getting harder and harder to believe I really have any shot, and idk if anyone else has had the same problem and can recommend any tips, tricks, methods or resources
@Sid Because I don't actually know I shall guess: Stanley's were popular around the turn of the 20th century, so I'm going with Stanley.
Anonymous
@Phase Shot at what?
@Phase Search term: imposter syndrome.
19:55
Imposter syndrome doesn't apply though
If I was like you guys then sure, you guys are demonstrably good at Physics and nearly all are postgrad
I'm undergrad
There's still the chance I just haven't been weeded out yet
Anonymous
@Phase What ? Many are undergrads...like me
@Phase Sure it does. You're wondering if you are really good enough.
Yeah but imposter syndrome implies that it's known that I am
Anonymous
I'm just a freshaman. 0celo is an undergrad too
@0celo7 isn't undergrad he's postgrad in undergrad skin
He's a spooky arcane being
Anonymous
19:57
"postgrad in undergrad skin" XD
Anonymous
I dunno...when I feel pessimistic I just eat a lot of junk food
Anonymous
Everything gets better from then onward
Anonymous
Food is your best friend
Anonymous
Some say music :P
I don't really enjoy food anymore
Music is good but I like stuff like Radiohead and Elliott smith so it hardly fixes anything. I'd rather find a more solid solution
was just wondering if anyone had any advice
Anonymous
19:59
Okay, but you'd have to state your exact problem first for others to be able to help you :)
@Phase if I'm a spooky arcane being what is @BalarkaSen
He's 14
well
If you're being honest: a Shog9 level entity
if not
Anonymous
@0celo7 He's a 1950's Soviet mathematician
well shame on you
Anonymous
@0celo7 Well, 17 XD
Anonymous
20:01
An year younger than me
@Blue no wonder he boils my blood
@BalarkaSen ::shakes fist::
I am become Stalin, destroyer of proletariats
I mean dostroyer of capitalists
Damnit
Dostoevsky of Capitalists
Freudian slip
GULAG i say
do not criticize the comrade
20:16
@ACuriousMind @JohnRennie is Balarka allowed to threaten putting my in a work camp?
so no advice? RIP
Anonymous
17 mins ago, by Blue
Okay, but you'd have to state your exact problem first for others to be able to help you :)
i mean
I just dont want it to come across like I'm compliment / reassurance fishing
I'm just asking for general advice
Anonymous
Don't worry. We won't pat you on the back. :P
Still, it's pretty sickening to read over what you wrote and realise it comes across like that
What is this letter?
g or phi?
20:25
scri
It means null infinity
Wot
Scri?
What language is that from
It's part of the mathscr script in Tex
It's a fancily written I
Anonymous
Letterlike Symbols is a Unicode block containing 80 characters which are constructed mainly from the glyphs of one or more letters. In addition to this block, Unicode includes full styled mathematical alphabets, although Unicode does not explicitly categorise these characters as being "letterlike". == Symbols == == Chart == == Emoji == The Letterlike Symbols block contains two emoji: U+2122 and U+2139. The block has four standardized variants defined to specify emoji-style (U+FE0F VS16) or text presentation (U+FE0E VS15) for the two emoji, both of which default to a text presentation....
$\mathscr{I}$
jesus
it looks nothing like an I
it looks like a g
20:30
by comparison
$\mathscr{G}$
@Phase could be worse
consider $$\LARGE \mathfrak{x}$$
is that an r?
@Phase nope
Anonymous
x
20:31
...
@Phase exactly
$\mathfrak{x}$
...that's messed up
$\aleph$ why don't we just take more hebrew ones like this
At least they make some sense
Anonymous
That's what mathematicians and physicists do when they have too much time and too less symbols XD
rather than just "screwed up x"
20:32
Please
It's in Fraktur
That used to be a standard script
^ there it is in action
super clear, no?
madre dios
$\mathfrak{X}$ is commonly used to denote the set of all vector fields
@Semiclassical yeah
took me six months to realize what the squiggles are
$\mathfrak{x}$, $\mathfrak{X}$
20:34
plus, that's one of the standard references for band theory in solids
Which one is that?
@Semiclassical Blount, 1962
hmm, okay
Formalisms of Band Theory
a bit hard to come by, though
thing is, at least upper-case X in Fraktur makes sense
the fraktur page on Wikipedia is inconsistent on lower-case x: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraktur
in most places it looks like a lower-case version of $\mathfrak{X}$, but in the German typescript examples it's indeed $\mathfrak{x}$
20:41
hmmmm
$$\Huge ⅏$$
ooooh, it worked
$$\Huge ⅏⅏⅏⅏⅏⅏$$
that's unicode for "telephone cable", also known as "if you're feeling down, call the samaritans"
evidently Fraktur typscript had an ideological component in Germany up until WWII: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiqua%E2%80%93Fraktur_dispute
OK, almost. There's all sorts of weird shit in unicode.
it's interesting that I know about Fraktur but not Antigua, or at least not under that name
Antigua won out so completely that we don't even remember that it used to be a point of controversy
The one in common use here is of course the telephone operator
$$Γ = ☎^{-1}ΨΨ^-$$
$\fbox{ } ⅏\fbox{ }$
hrm
i wanted to make a spring
$\msquare$
$\fbox{$\phantom{5}$}\big{⅏}\fbox{$\phantom{5}$}$
lateeex
Anonymous
20:56
Looks like it's break Latex time ;)
Anonymous
@BernardoMeurer should have been around
@Blue $$\Large 🎉🎊💃🏽🕺🏻$$
$$\blacksquare ⅏ \blacksquare$$
huh
was totally sure $\blacksquare$ was a thing
hey it is
what in the name
it doesn't enlarge specific things
$\large{\blacksquare} \huge{⅏⅏⅏} \large{\blacksquare}$ Hooke's law ftw
5
that's a fine spring
I need to use $\mathfrak x$ in a talk
@0celo7 if you do, then the gods of notation will murder you in your sleep
> * Units are needed unless quantities plotted are dimensionless. The ideal format for units in figures is to set them in parentheses, following the quantity being plotted. Alternatively the units can be included in the figure caption.
goddammit, Phys Rev A
didn't you see that we pulled the Get Out of Units Jail Free card?
21:11
units are the worst
> we use atomic units unless otherwise stated
boom, units sorted
lol
I don't even remember what all the various atomic units are
i tend to just remember eV and such
There's a.m.u
~ 1 GeV/c^2
wai
Oh I see, E/c^2
21:14
E=mc^2
that's a unit for mass then
@0celo7 sniped right at ur face
or just 1 GeV if you say "screw you speed of light"
I have seen physics bruv
21:15
more precisely, it's 0.931 GeV/c^2
@BalarkaSen that was a response to you
Screw you speed of light
you know
One thing I wonder is
In classical physics with EM
What happens to a bounded atom approaching the speed of light, or going over it
@Semiclassical because E = mc^2 is just an approximation, and it's really E = mc^2/square root of somefing?
radiation
Since the system isn't Lorentz invariant, the EM field can't simply be assumed to work the same as in the rest frame
Is the atom still bounded?
Since there's gonna be a "lag" between the atom and its EM field
21:16
@BalarkaSen nah. it's an empirical result
which is only propagating in the ether frame
E=mc^2 is empirical?
no, but 1 amu = 0.931 GeV/c^2 is
In the Lorentz ether theory, you had $E = 4/3 mc^2$
there's no physical reason (outside of full QCD, I mean) why 1 amu ~ 1 GeV/c^2, that's just what it happens to be
21:17
This was due to the self energy of charges, assuming electromagnetic mass
I have no idea what that even means @Semiclassical
What do you mean it's empirical
Both sides are a mass
What theoretical basis could there be
??
I feel like we're talking past each other
@BalarkaSen I was responding to this
@Slereah Amen
and explaining that the fact that 1 amu ~ 1 GeV/c^2 isn't some approximation of E=mc^2/\gamma
How is amu defined
21:22
I'm actually forgetting now
I do have to wonder, how much easier would a math major be if Newton never came along
"It is defined as one twelfth of the mass of an unbound neutral atom of carbon-12 in its nuclear and electronic ground state and at rest,[2] and has a value of 1.660539040(20)×10−27 kg, or approximately 1.66 yoctograms. "
Atomic mass unit is like
It's based on carbon mass, I think?
One carbon atom is 12 amu or something
21:23
one day there will be a unit called omg
and 1 omg will be something terrible
@Slereah three lines up man
Well there is the Oh-my-god particle
The Oh-My-God particle was an ultra-high-energy cosmic ray detected on the evening of 15 October 1991 over Dugway Proving Ground, Utah, by the University of Utah's Fly's Eye Cosmic Ray Detector. Its observation was a shock to astrophysicists (hence the name), who estimated its energy to be approximately 3×1020 eV or 3×108 TeV. This is 20,000,000 times more energetic than the highest energy measured in electromagnetic radiation emitted by an extragalactic object and 1020 (100 quintillion) times the photon energy of visible light. Therefore, the particle was an atomic nucleus with a kinetic energy...
@Slereah This is beautiful
Carbon-12 is more-or-less 6 protons+6 neutrons
so 1 amu should approximately be the average of the proton and neutron masses
21:26
up to some binding energy
HARRO EBURRINYANYAN
proton is 0.938 GeV/c^2, neutron is 0.940 GeV/c^2, and 1 amu is ... 0.931 GeV/c^2.
i guess that binding energy is big enough to make a difference
okay, yeah, the binding energy of Carbon-12 is 0.092 GeV
so that's definitely enough to make a difference in the definition of the amu
@BalarkaSen mass of carbon 12 div by 12
that said, the main reason why the amu is nearly 1 GeV/c^2 is because protons and neutrons both have masses which are almost 1 GeV/c^2
but absent hard calculations in QCD there's no way you'd get that result. in particular, there's no deep relation between 1 GeV/c^2 and 1 amu.
and most of the protons mass is the binding energy from the strong force, sooo yeah
21:43
hello
what is the use of unitary transformation in physics
fucking github deleted everything again
I can't keep doing this
hey there please respect us
Anonymous
@Student404Mus Did you search anything yourself?
Anonymous
I see 100s of pages on that topic
22:02
@BalarkaSen haha. These pronunciation make it less serious.
22:18
@BalarkaSen
looool that thumbnail
lmao what did i just watch
@BalarkaSen the seat is a heck machine
what?
22:33
oh.
lmaaoo
what the frick is this TV show man
@BalarkaSen literally the greatest show ever
@BalarkaSen Sir, what is $\int f(r) d^nx$ in terms of the radial integral?
what's the overall factor
$\omega_{n-1}$?
How much
that's what happens when you hit Enter instead of backspace.
I was gonna ask: how much should a new first year know to be a good student

« first day (2559 days earlier)      last day (2669 days later) »