« first day (2536 days earlier)      last day (2690 days later) » 

15:00
I think so. It should be the surface area of the unit sphere.
correct
Hm, that's the integral $\int_{x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1} dx dy dz$
And if I convert it to spherical coordinates I do get that it's $\iint \sin(\varphi) d\theta d\varphi$
So I don't even have to evaluate the integral by hand. OK
So everything boils down to $4\pi \int r^2 f(r) dr$
That's all.
Anonymous
Ya, it's just that weird shaped area of the element $rd\phi$ and $r\sin(\phi)d\theta$. We sum all those weird shaped areas to get surface area of the surface which is $4\pi r^2$
Anonymous
So, yes, it makes sense now!
Anonymous
Anonymous
15:05
Weird shaped area? No it's not, you just pull a tiny piece of the surface of the unit sphere back to standard coordinates using spherical parametrization
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Yeah, that's what I called "weird shaped" :P
Anonymous
I think I get it now
Anonymous
Thanks a lot
You made me recall spherical parametrization and compute it's Jacobian. I hope you have those $5000 prepared to be paypal-ed
Anonymous
15:09
@BalarkaSen You can come one night and rob our house. I give you permission
Anonymous
You won't find anything expensive here though =P
I live in Stalingrad. I am a Russian thug
Anonymous
Uh oh. Then you need to buy the plane tickets yourself :P
just drive
it's not that far
Anonymous
Or just swim
Anonymous
15:11
and walk
swim?
do you need a geography lesson?
Can't, I'm in 1950's. That's why I called Volgograd as Stalingrad.
Anonymous
I never mentioned "shortest route" ;)
India is barely Independent
Come on, flagging political statements?
where is the freedom of speech
15:14
What was flagged?
@BalarkaSen "India is barely Independent"
lmao
that was a time machine joke
Anonymous
Freedom of speech is not a part of SE culture XD
India achieved independence in 1947
I am in 1950
Anonymous
Even that will be flagged now ^
15:16
what was flagged?
@Blue that is flagged now
That was unnecessarily provocative
lol Balarka
Anonymous
I will convert my messages to a combination of binary, octal and hexadecimal to avoid it getting flagged from now on.
Anonymous
15:18
Perhaps even then...
let us move on.
@Blue 01001001 01110011 00100000 01101001 01110100 00100000 01110010 01100101 01100001 01101100 01101100 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101111 01110010 01110100 01101000 00100000 01100100 01101111 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00111111
is renormalization group a good technique?
@Mithrandir24601 the temptation to convert that to ascii is strong, but ... well ... not that strong :-)
15:33
@JohnRennie That is ASCII, or do you mean 'convert from ASCII'?
Or am I totally missing the point of what you just said?
@Mithrandir24601 Not really
@Mithrandir24601 01000100 01101111 01101110 00100111 01110100 00100000 01100010 01100101 00100000 01110000 01100101 01100100 01100001 01101110 01110100 01101001 01100011
Anonymous
@Mithrandir24601 01011001 01100101 01100001 01101000 00101100 00100000 01110111 01100101 00100111 01110010 01100101 00100000 01100011 01100101 01110010 01110100 01101001 01100110 01101001 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101110 01110101 01110100 01110011 00100000 01101110 01101111 01110111 00101110
@JohnRennie But how can you not be pedantic when working in binary? :P
@Blue 01001001 00100000 01110100 01101000 01101111 01110101 01100111 01101000 01110100 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100001 01110100 00100000 01110111 01100001 01110011 00100000 01101111 01100010 01110110 01101001 01101111 01110101 01110011 00100000 01111001 01100101 01100001 01110010 01110011 00100000 01100001 01100111 01101111 00111111
oh crap I forgot about the Teriyaki
I have to go buy the sauce
15:43
----- .---- ----- .---- ----- .---- .---- .---- ----- .---- ----- .---- ----- .---- ----- ----- ----- .---- ----- ----- ----- .---- .---- -----
Anonymous
@lılostafa !^^^^#@##!22332!!%
So I just realized that I have a Klein bottle shaped mug and that I haven't used it in years
Non-orientable goodness
@Mithrandir24601 01010100 01101000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100011 01101111 01101110 01110110 01100101 01110010 01110011 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101000 01101001 01101100 01100001 01110010 01101001 01101111 01110101 01110011
@CaptainBohemian a good technique for what
Anonymous
@Slereah 01100011 01110101 01110100 01100101 00100000 00111101 01010000
15:51
@JohnRennie Well, I think it was unintelligent on part of the flagger - if the flag was genuine - to get hashtag triggered at the statement, especially because it was not a political statement, but just a joke (I feel it is in part because of historical illiteracy). I was dwindling between lack of intelligence and simply troll-flagging, but since my message got flagged even after it was sent to the trash, I am thereby forced to conclude that it is troll.
for quantum gravity, which is my biggest interest, and also for quantum field theory, some parts of which interest me.
Well yes, you are gonna need renormalization groups for that
Notice that my message was not directly meant to be publicly offensive at anyone, since the flag system keeps the flagger anonymous. But I wrote what I believed, not to provoke anyone. That's an unfortunate side effect.
Well
@heather 00111010 01000100
15:53
You don't necessarily need renormalization for quantum gravity
it depends on what quantum gravity you're doing
but as Motl will tell you only losers do quantum gravity with a discrete spacetime
@Slereah my original interest is for asymptotically safe gravity, but if I can't find a position for it, I may consider quantum field theory.
@BalarkaSen calling someone a troll is grounds for flagging
Anonymous
So, there's some good news. A professor at my uni (physics department) has agreed to teach me mathematical physics. I'm excited.
Anonymous
It's a bit difficult to self-learn these stuff. So atleast that'll keep me focused
I'm sure @0celo7 will have strong opinions on the mathematics dispensed
15:55
@Mithrandir24601 01101000 01101111 01110111 00100000 01101000 01100001 01110110 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01100010 01100101 01100101 01101110 00111111
@0celo7 Unfortunate, because I am going to call trolls out if I feel they are so.
@Blue That's pretty cool
@Slereah I worked on general relativity in my MSc, but there are not many research groups in classical gravity.
yeah it's pretty rare
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen I was quite surprised to know that he has a PhD (in particle physics) from Cambridge but is teaching in JU. Weird guy
especially if you're not doing experimental stuff
15:57
@Blue Oh wow
These days people only want GR for gravitational waves and cosmology
@Blue Mathematicians and physicists use the term "mathematical physics" differently
What is he teaching you?
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen This prof
Anonymous
@0celo7 He said he'll teach QM,GR, QFT etc
Anonymous
Whatever I want to learn
Anonymous
15:59
But he is very busy
Anonymous
So he won't give me much time
Anonymous
But that's okay
Anonymous
I just need some guidance
@heather Not too great, unfortunately :/ I've currently got what I'm hoping is an infection and have just started on a course of antibiotics, so I'm coughing quite a bit, have a sore throat (especially when swallowing), am short of breath in the evening, keep wakening up at night (fortunately not short of breath, otherwise I'd have to go to hospital), had a massive rash the whole of yesterday and so, haven't been that great for the past few days, but am hopefully improving
(I'm not as bad today as I was yesterday)
@Blue That's not math, that's all physics!
16:01
@Mithrandir24601 ick, I'm sorry! hope you start to feel better.
@Slereah but my MSc isn't regarding gravitational waves and cosmology. It's some formaulations. I am actually only intetested in the formulations in gravitational wave, not the way of actually detecting it.
What's your master on?
Anonymous
@Slereah Well, that's what I need :P He also said he'll help with the necessary math. I'll visit him on Monday. Let's see how it turns out
@Blue lmao he's a coauthor of Indranil Biswas
You can also ask here
16:01
@heather Yeah, hopefully should be at least a bit better by Monday, thanks :) If not, then the GP's going to have to figure out what to do with me...
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Who's that?
There's enough GR and QFT people to help
Anonymous
Anyone famous?
@Mithrandir24601 This sucks
Anonymous
Indranil Biswas (born 19 October 1964) is an Indian mathematician. He is professor of mathematics at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai. He is known for his work in the areas of algebraic geometry, differential geometry, and deformation quantization. In 2006, the Government of India awarded him the Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar Prize in mathematical sciences for his contributions to "algebraic geometry, centering around moduli problems of vector bundles." == Biography == Biswas is an Indian citizen. He received a Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of Mumbai. == Selected ...
16:02
@BalarkaSen Welcome to my life :P
Anonymous
Oh
Anonymous
Nice
@Blue Oh man he's an algebraic geometer in TIFR
that guy writes a million papers a week
just look up his name in arxiv
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Woah. Lol
@BalarkaSen PUBLISH OR PERISH
Anonymous
16:03
I'm lucky then =P
I'm guessing the university dean holds him at gunpoint in his office
Anonymous
I basically wrote to him the woes of an engineering student who wants to study physics XD. He melted and gave in :P
@Slereah I dunno man but he writes so fucking much
@Slereah Kaczynski reference ?
No, that's just a common academical saying
My Kaczynski joke is the usual
16:06
@Slereah I just saw an open position in PhD in strong coupled quantum field theory by renormalization group and Monte-Carlo simulations. I am not sure if that's position suitable for me. That's why I asked if renormalization group is a good technique.
The usual Kaczynski joke
that is what the humanities people refer to as a euphemism
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Soooo many papers XD
16:07
@CaptainBohemian Sounds interesting enough
@Blue I clicked "Next 25" five times now
I give up
Anonymous
Me too
Anonymous
Klelk
I tried reading Kaczynski's papers but it was in a field I really didn't care for
its in complex analysis right
16:08
@Slereah what? but I feel they want to recruit someone to do nonanalytical work.
The beamsplitters have arrived
Hurray
now I just need thems lasers
I hope they send it
it feels pretty fishy
For a moment I read it as "The unabombs have arrived"
Sorry, my terrorism is laser based
I'm gonna blow up the white house with a giant laser, Independance Day style
3
Anonymous
Flags incoming
lololol
16:13
It's a 250 mW laser so it might take a while
One thing I need to do is to build some metal arms for the interferometer
There's some metal arms at the local hardware store but they don't seem to have like metal things to hold onto it
Not sure of the name
Like you have a square metal beam and then a little square metal thing to slide onto it
with a screw to hold in place
I am not great at english words for hardware
...
Do you mean a long, thin metal rectangle that has a sleeve it can slide into and a screw to lock the sleeve in place ?
Anonymous
16:30
@0celo7 I found his RG profile just now. Looks more of a math guy
Anonymous
So, I hope he'll be rigorous :)
Don't hope for rigor
Rigorous math is awful for physics
Do you really want to have to worry about the domain definition of the Hilbert space operators
He's an algebraic geometer
Anonymous
@Slereah I do want to. I don't want to be illiterate
Anonymous
Just that life is too short to learn everything :P
16:32
Life is too short to be an analyst @Blue. Learn from my mistakes
Anonymous
I will have an engineering degree anyway =P I can fall back on that. You too can make bombs and earn money
Anonymous
You're a nuclear engineer
Anonymous
Rest of the time I'll spend learning those math stuff
Anonymous
Lol
nerd
16:34
@BalarkaSen Jesus. Are these meme papers?
Some researchers just do minimal variations on the same paper
2
He isn't single author on any of those
Does he just slap his name on everything?
@0celo7 hehehe
So that they can show that they published a whole bunch of papers for more money
Look at me
i'm a valuable asset of your university
No, not really. He actually spends 24/7 thinking math.
I have seen that guy. He's crazy
Anonymous
16:36
@BalarkaSen Where? Workshop?
I was in TIFR for a month or so
@Slereah YES
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen For what? Research?
Nah, learning algebraic geometry
TIFR is a fort of algebraic geometers
Anonymous
I mean how did you get a call? Personal contacts?
Anonymous
16:38
Strange that they called a high schooler at TIFR. It's RARE
@Blue Well no someone whom I knew invited me after becoming a faculty there
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen I see. Awesome contacts you have =P
meh tbh i didn't enjoy my time there
it was all algebra
@BalarkaSen teach me algebraic geometry
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Umm, didn't you say you want to do your PhD there?
16:51
@0celo7 So, suppose you have a ring $R$ and look at $\text{Spec} R$ with the structure sheaf
That's an affine scheme
what is Spec R?
brb gotta eat
you don't want to know
you just want to know it's an affine scheme
that's all
@Blue I do
@BalarkaSen I am currently worrying about decay rates in weighted Sobolev spaces. I can handle whatever mess you throw at me
It's a nice place; you get nice food there.
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Lol. Food is a good reason to join that place
Anonymous
16:53
Plus it's Mumbai
I don't like Mumbai
Anonymous
You can direct some Math-based Bollywood movies
2
Anonymous
Actually someone should do that
Anonymous
Mainstream movies are meh
16:56
dude i need to watch the movies this math major shane carruth made
apparently they are hippie as hell
he directs, produces, writes, composes and acts on all his movies
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen 0o
@Blue I can recommend you some Bengali hipster films but maybe I shouldn't
well, at least, directed and acted by Bengalis
Anonymous
I'm procrastinating a lot nowadays...so maybe you shouldn't X'D
procrastination is good, but that was not my concern
google "director Q"
Anonymous
Anonymous
17:05
Hippie...I don't even doubt that
lol
a lot of the people who are into underground films love him but i kinda think he's boring
he's just making Indian movies based off of the schlocky 60's American movies
Tarantinoesque, I guess
bolly-sploitation?
exactly
@b So what is Spec R?
@0 as a set, it's just the collection of prime ideals of R
but it can be given a topology
17:14
prime ideal?
an ideal I of R is prime if ab \in I implies a \in I or b \in I
(6) is not a prime ideal of Z, but (2) is
hm, ok
why does one care about those things?
which things
prime ideals?
if X is an algebraic variety in k^n, i.e., cut out by polynomials f_i(x_1, ..., x_n) = 0 for i = 1, ..., m, then X is called irreducible if it cannot be written as union of multiple varieties. If I is an ideal of k[x1, ..., xn] consisting of polynomials vanishing on X, then I is prime
so prime ideals are like irreducible algebraic varieties
17:22
@BalarkaSen If I don't care about varieties, will I care about algebraic geometry?
prolly not
but it does make me question about the world if people does not care about zero sets of polynomials
Really?
I think they're uninteresting
I imagine most analysts feel the same
i respect that but find it hard to imagine how they can be uninteresting
i understand everyone has different tastes
I don't dislike it, I just don't like it
ah ok
That clarifies
Anonymous
17:26
@BalarkaSen The set of original movies and bollywood/tollywood movies are mutually exclusive. That's a law of nature.
@BalarkaSen My anecdotal view is that hardcore analysts are indifferent towards abstract algebra, but hardcore algebraists genuinely dislike analysis
I am not including people who cross the line in there
@Blue Well Q is not Bollywood, he's an independent filmmaker.
But I still find him boring
@0celo7 Hm, could be true
I have only majorly interacted with the community who lie in between those extremeties
@BalarkaSen My rep theory class is mostly hardcore algebraists
I was genuinely surprised when a person whom I knew as a dynamical analyst piped up a conversation about sheaf cohomology in the middle of a talk
Incidentally that's the same person I am learning ODEs and dynamics from now
Like number theorists and combinatorialists
speaking of, I have more god-awful algebra homework
17:31
I think number theory is not really hardcore algebra but it's difficult to draw the line
algebraists love examples
what is up with that
@BalarkaSen We have a dynamical systems guy who is a wizard at most things
I was talking to him about some functional analysis thing and he ended up writing heat kernel asymptotics from memory
how the heck does that even work
@BalarkaSen It was about Sobolev spaces
This was a year or so ago before I knew this stuff well
And he explained to me how i could derive what I wanted without Sobolev.
I should probably know what a Sobolev space actually is
17:37
Heat kernel asymptotics can be derived 3 ways from sunday
there's usually a number of different ways to obtain asymptotics in general.
though some are easier to develop further than others.
The cleverest way is the old Indian method
The most common anymore is the $\psi$do method because it's so general
@Semiclassical Do you want me to tell you?
$H^1(\Bbb R)$ is easy enough
@Semiclassical So you start with $L^2$ (all on $\Bbb R$) and wonder what it means for an $L^2$ function to have a derivative
Am I right to think this has something to do with "can i integrate by parts and ignore the boundary term?"
17:41
Yeah. So any distribution has a derivative via the rule $$T'(\varphi)=T(\varphi')$$ for $\varphi\in C_c^\infty$
What's T here?
Don't u mean $-T(\varphi')$
But $T'$ might actually be some bad object. Classic example being the step function, for which $T'$ is the Dirac measure
@Semiclassical A distribution
mkay
then i'll second Slereah's point re: the minus
@Semiclassical Any $L^2$ function defines a distribution via integration
17:42
convolution right
@Semiclassical meh, it's just a sign
@BalarkaSen No, literally $$T_f(\varphi)=\int f\varphi \, dx$$
@0celo7 do you want me to give you -1000$
17:43
@Semiclassical the point is that you want to generalize integration by parts somehow
right.
and you want to be able to work in settings where that integration by parts doesn't generate a boundary term
Yeah. I think that sign is a convention
I'm double checking
hm
in integration by parts, it's not a convention
it's a consequence of $u\,dv = d(uv)-v\,du$
The distributional derivative is just the negative of the usual one then
Confusing, but less signs
I might be wrong, one sec
Ok, everyone uses a minus. Whatever
@Semiclassical So back to the step function. The distributional derivative of the step function is not a function.
17:46
the evil within 2 came out weee
hell ya man
@Semiclassical Well we can require that the distributional derivative is itself in $L^2$.
So that means it's a function and the derivative doesn't get too wild.
actually, have to go for now
back in a bit
k
@Slereah so did you get MTW?
Not yet
Lemme check the package tracking
It hasn't been shipped yet
Lazy bums
18:03
did you buy it used?
Or do you not have amazon prime
I bought the spanking new one
It says that it should arrive between the 25th and the 11th
So I guess I can't even bitch yet
18:47
when citing a title that doesn't capitalize stuff, should one fix the capitalization or leave it as in the source?
Obviously supersymmetry in 4-D is just the Wigner-Inonu contraction of the orthosymplectic algebra's isomorphic representation as an anti-deSitter algebra
I'd cite it as is
Urgh, the orthosymplectic group
@0celo7 back
Now it's Urgh, the superconformal group...
"ugh, super-shit"
19:02
Why would 'nature' do this to us:
In theoretical physics, the superconformal algebra is a graded Lie algebra or superalgebra that combines the conformal algebra and supersymmetry. In two dimensions, the superconformal algebra is infinite-dimensional. In higher dimensions, superconformal algebras are finite-dimensional and generate the superconformal group (in two Euclidean dimensions, the Lie superalgebra does not generate any Lie supergroup). == Superconformal algebra in dimension greater than 2 == The conformal group of the ( p + q ) {\displaystyle (p+q)...
@0celo7 hmm, this answer seems appealing: math.stackexchange.com/a/453159/137524
0
Q: Ping/Reference a user in the core text of a question

DanielCOne more question. Is it OK to reference a particular user in the text of a question (right at the end of the post with an @), just to be sure that that user gets to read my question (he receives an inbox message, I believe) and increase the chances to extract a thorough answer from him/her? It i...

Why is $dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - dt^2 + dw^2 = r^2$, with $|w| \sim r$, infinite in the time direction, and finite in the spatial directions, while $dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 - dt^2 - dw^2 = - r^2$ is finite in the time direction, and infinite in the spatial directions?
sbp
sbp
19:59
Hey a question asks that a mass $M$ slides along a wire defined by $z = 2(x^2 + y^2)$. The wire rotates with angular velocity $\Omega$ about the z-axis. Now it asks that for what value of gravity $g$ acting along negative z-axis does the mass maintain a constant nonzero height.
@bolbteppa I think it's because t and w have the same sign

« first day (2536 days earlier)      last day (2690 days later) »