The h Bar

DanielSank

00:01

Yep, reducing the entropy of the site one question at a time.

@vzn Thanks. It's not really my work though. My contribution is all in infrastructural work.

GPhys

Shankar is out with a QFT book now I guess?

DanielSank

amazon.com/Quantum-Field-Theory-Condensed-Matter/dp/0521592100

@GPhys Not sure why you're guessing :-)

vzn

@DanielSank so are you guys getting into some kind of fabrication?

DanielSank

@vzn Uh, yes, we do fabrication. Qubit chips don't grow on trees :-)

vzn

@DanielSank is that in silicon? youre planning a lot of qubits by end of yr?

DanielSank

00:15

@vzn The materials we use as substrates are described in a variety of papers.

Silicon and sapphire are the most common.

vzn

while this is not wrong by conventional understanding, think it is questionable on abstract grounds.

> Since every state is equally important, it is not possible to simplify the prob- lem, using a smaller truncated state-space. The complexity is then simply given by asking how much classical mem- ory does it take to store the state-vector.

> Storing the state of a 46-qubit system takes nearly a petabyte of memory and is at the limit of the most powerful computers [14, 15]. Sampling from the output probabilities of such a system would therefore constitute a clear demonstration of quan- tum supremacy.

heather

hello

@ACuriousMind you around?

Prathyush Poduval

04:16

@Blue Even you too? lol :P

Anonymous

04:30

@PrathyushPoduval There's a lol overload in this chat

Anonymous

I'm looking for alternatives

John Rennie

@Flynn I still read New Scientist mainly for the news. I agree with you that the feature articles are generally not very good these days. I also read Scientific American though that's only monthly and it too seems to be headed down the same route as New Scientist.

I don't know of any print magazine that fills the niche abandoned by New Scientist. Reading web sites somehow doesn't feel the same.

Prathyush Poduval

05:04

@Blue 100 keks to you!

@BalarkaSen You watche'd the movies and/or read the comics?

Secret

06:56

in Mathematics, 25 mins ago, by Leaky Nun

Must column ranks and row ranks be equal for infinite-dimensional matrices?

Avantgarde

08:11

@Blue Lol why so serious? lol

Prathyush Poduval

@Avantgarde kek's are the new trend, not lol, lol

Sid

Nah, lol is better than kek

user685252

kok?

Sid

@user685252 that would be a typo of lol

user685252

kyk

Prathyush Poduval

08:26

@user685252 sounds like something else......

user685252

k_k

Prathyush Poduval

cock (I am talking 'bout the animal, in case some of you think something else...)

user685252

a doodle do

Prathyush Poduval

scooby dooby do, a do doodle do

Balarka Sen

@PrathyushPoduval The movies yeah

Prathyush Poduval

08:30

nice

you keep yourelf up to date?

Balarka Sen

pop culture is the staple food of a good memer

user685252

RIP Raging Bull <---best movie ever

Prathyush Poduval

@BalarkaSen do you even make memes?

Balarka Sen

@PrathyushPoduval Did you mean

user685252

That^ should be "over 9,000 keks".

Balarka Sen

08:35

@PrathyushPoduval Sometimes.

user685252

memes build on each other

Prathyush Poduval

@BalarkaSen yup , a thousand keks to you !!

@BalarkaSen show you're creations

Avantgarde

One day I walked into a room (virtual) and it was "lit" everywhere

That's when I found out that a new trend had begun

Balarka Sen

@PrathyushPoduval My memes are contextual, so they are not really one-image material

Avantgarde

Even when I go back a few years and look at my messages, I discover dat I used to typ lyk dis. It was horrific to witness

Balarka Sen

08:48

If you stick around maybe I'll make one someday in some context

@Avantgarde lol

Avantgarde

Thankfully changed for the better, I hope.

Or maybe I've just grown old

Balarka Sen

you just recovered from cancer, that's all

There are way too many cancerous trends that goes on in popular culture and leaks into the internet culture.

Prathyush Poduval

@BalarkaSen ah okay

@Avantgarde if it makes you feel better, soon you'll die

user685252

Prathyush Poduval

09:06

oooh another clickbait

Balarka Sen

If that's clickbait I am a jellyfish

my first reaction to the title is "nope"

Prathyush Poduval

💩

Balarka Sen

i should do some math now instead of shitposting

Prathyush Poduval

do you do anything else other than things starting with m?

Avantgarde

@BalarkaSen yes. Good to be here

Physics Meta

10:04

-1

Q: Physics, Chemistry, Biology are so AGRESSIVE :(

I have a question about my Physics Stack Exchange post: Calcuation Stress Force Why can't i ask my questions here? There's some agressive moderators and others more. I mean Biology, Chemistry, Physics are really agressive. So I'm looking for new forums which i can share my questions easily....

0ßelö7

11:39

I just slept for 12 hours

Anonymous

@Avantgarde My school friends used to mock me for NOT writing lyk dat :'D

0ßelö7

@Blue Indians kek

@Blue you think that meta post above is one of your ppl?

Anonymous

Writing well is apparently not cool among school and college kids

0ßelö7

@Blue it is an interesting cultural phenomenon

Anonymous

@0ßelö7 High chance

0ßelö7

11:49

Is it a part of a "fuck the system" mentality?

Doubtful (heh) because Indians seem very education-driven.

Anonymous

@0ßelö7 Lòoooooooooooooool.....they are only marks and money driven

0ßelö7

@Blue Are they driven by grades because of the money?

Balarka Sen

@0ßelö7 Nah.

0ßelö7

hello

Balarka Sen

They bitch about the system but do not dare to fuck the system.

Hi liquid 0celot

Anonymous

11:58

@0ßelö7 In school they are driven to get grades because of the very highly competitive education system over here. Parents scold their kids if the neighbour kid gets better grades. In college , most students only care about getting a good placement right after their UG...hence the rush for grades. Most people don't give a flying f*** about research or studying for gaining knowledge.

2

0ßelö7

@ACuriousMind @BalarkaSen There's a really confused physics student in my finite gp rep th class. He self-identifies as an analyst, thinks finite gp rep th is fundamental in physics, doesn't know what Hom means, and wants to work on string theory.

Specifically, he didn't know what the algebraic dual of a vector space was.

He did know what the topological dual was, which left us very confused.

Balarka Sen

oh well

whatever floats his boat though

Anonymous

@BalarkaSen I think some things are out of their control. You can't do anything if your family doesn't allow to take up streams which you like.

Anonymous

But yes. I partially agree with you

Balarka Sen

@Blue Sure, I didn't really mean a violent arms revolution overthrowing the education system. But if you feel trapped by the way education works, you can pull yourself out of it. For example, I think what is a more important issue than parents not encouraging their kids to take up the streams they like is the students having 0 idea what kind of things they actually like.

0ßelö7

12:04

@BalarkaSen What's even stranger is that I think he did a reading course of Milnor-Stasheff with my advisor. How can you make it through that book without learning what Hom means

Balarka Sen

Oh, that is strange.

0ßelö7

And my advisor has a good BS detector, he would know if the guy was faking it

Anonymous

@BalarkaSen Okay, I agree with that :P "0 idea" part is true. I found very very few people with an ambition/passion over here (other than the passion for getting a job at Google, Facebook,...)

Balarka Sen

@Blue Right, most students have a (economical slash social) status-based half assed idea about education.

That's not what it is bruh

The first step towards "fucking the system" is to stop being clueless :P

0ßelö7

@b

ok I need a key logger

I did NOT hit enter there

something is up with my tab button

Balarka Sen

12:08

the tab button is dabbing at you

the dab button

0ßelö7

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Ben Niehoff

you have a dab button?

remind me, what is the algebraic dual of a vector space, as opposed to the topological dual?

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff linear functions vs. continuous linear functions

but the space was finite dimensional!

so he didn't even know 1st semester Banach space stuff

Ben Niehoff

hmm...I guess for the most part I only care about continuous linear functions

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff No, you don't

I highly doubt you ever actually work on infinite dimensional spaces

Ben Niehoff

12:15

where do the discontinuous ones show up, aside from as a nifty counterexample?

no, I stick with 11 dimensions or less

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff every infinite dimensional space has one, typically

Ben Niehoff

no, 32 dimensions or less ;)

0ßelö7

on a finite dimensional space, they are all continuous

Ben Niehoff

ah, I think the counterexamples I'm thinking of are only linear over Q

0ßelö7

wot

who does linear algebra over Q?

Ben Niehoff

12:17

by which I mean, f(ax) = af(x), for a in Q

0ßelö7

R, C, or bust

Ben Niehoff

ah, but you can come up with wonky functions which satisfy that and are nowhere continuous

for x in R

that's kinda necessary

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff Yes but that's not what linear means.

Avantgarde

@Blue Damn, they must be so cool

0ßelö7

If $f(ax)=af(x)$ and $f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)$ for any $x,y\in\Bbb R^n$ and $a\in\Bbb R$, then $f:\Bbb R^n\to\Bbb R^k$ is continuous.

Ben Niehoff

12:20

but this fails in infinite dimensions

is that your point?

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff Yeah

That's not to say the discontinuous ones are uninteresting, in fact they are quite intriguing and important

A second course on functional analysis looks at discontinuous linear functionals

Ben Niehoff

I'm also a bit mystified how someone would get the idea that finite group representations are the secret to physics

although there are certainly some interesting connections with this monstrous moonshine stuff

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff The professor keeps saying it too!

He's one of my favorite people so I don't have the heart (or balls because he's a famous guy who can write my recommendations) to tell him he's wrong

@BenNiehoff yeah but that's hardly fundamental, but I'm no string theorist...

Ben Niehoff

is it an older famous guy?

0ßelö7

yeah

Ben Niehoff

12:27

I know a few of those who have some pretty weird ideas lately

0ßelö7

nah he's not like that SMBC comic

Ben Niehoff

hopefully someday I'll be famous enough that I can go full crackpot

it'll be great

0ßelö7

I just don't think he's paid attention to physics much but heard that from someone and ran with it

...as a justification for his course on module theory

@BalarkaSen I think Springer printed my book at 150% size i.gyazo.com/1c1afcce34bfe77f332173ebbf0863a9.jpg

Ben Niehoff

from my point of view, Lie groups are way more important, but I'm not sure what qualifies as "fundamental"

0ßelö7

@BenNiehoff Yep, and the theory of finite groups is completely different.

Ben Niehoff

12:35

So I picked up Lego Worlds a few days ago, it's a lot of fun

Balarka Sen

12:46

@0ßelö7 Fantano staples himself to death

so now it's an experimentally proven fact that melons bleed

0ßelö7

lmao

Mithrandir24601

13:16

@BenNiehoff I'm not saying they're the secret to physics (although for all I know, they could be), but it's surprising how useful they are

Anonymous

Does an atom (as a whole) have any spin? Are spins of elementary particles (neutrons/protons/electrons) additive?

0ßelö7

@Blue they are additive in a sense, see www2.ph.ed.ac.uk/~ldeldebb/docs/QM/lect15.pdf

Anonymous

@0ßelö7 I see. Thanks!

0ßelö7

13:31

@b

wtf

it keeps doing it

@Blue I think this is important in baryon physics, where one can distinguish various "seemingly identical" quark combinations by their total angular momentum

for instance, the $\Delta$ has the same quarks as a proton, but a different spin

Anonymous

@0ßelö7 Exactly...I was reading about distinguishing between identical particles using their angular momentum. By the way, I was a bit confused what they mean by "distinguishable" and "indistinguishable" in the context of statistical mechanics. It seems even among identical species, unless we can measure the location of a particle accurately (like in classical mechanics), they will be termed as "indistinguishable".

Anonymous

Apparently they assume He atoms at low temperature to be indistinguishable. I'm not sure why.

Anonymous

I didn't find any specific limit, which helps to determine if a particle (atom/molecule) follows classical laws or not.

Anonymous

I think bigger molecules can be distinguished by position (or at least assumed to be)....and that's why we apply Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics for them.

Anonymous

@ACuriousMind Were you able to clear your confusion regarding that ensemble derivation thing?

Anonymous

14:02

Anonymous

cstheory.stackexchange.com/tags

Anonymous

How are these two sites different? ^

Anonymous

They seem to have largely overlapping scope

heather

cstheory is the sort of math overflow to cs (math)

Anonymous

@heather I see. Each of those are low-traffic sites. I wonder if it was a good idea to split that.

Anonymous

14:06

My question on CS SE went unanswered...perhaps I should ask it on CS Theory

heather

what was your question?

and probably not; crossposting is discouraged regardless of site.

Anonymous

@heather This

Anonymous

@heather I'll delete and re-ask

Anonymous

Discouraging cross-posting is silly imo....SE has so many overlapping sites

Anonymous

Especially for CS and programming

heather

14:09

> It's surprisingly hard to find a proof you're looking for. Knuth has a pretty clear one in TAOCP, v.3.

It seems you already have a (partial) answer...

let me look it up

Anonymous

14:20

That book is on libgen but it's a pain to search in that book.

Anonymous

I'll have a go at it again...sometime soon

ACuriousMind

14:45

@Blue Not yet, but I haven't gotten around to writing it into a coherent question, either

@0ßelö7 Finite groups do appear in condensed matter a lot

Sir Cumference

Quick question. When people in non-North American countries describe how heavy something feels, do they usually state its mass or weight?

Prathyush Poduval

@SirCumference kg/g in india

ACuriousMind

@SirCumference Mass (in Germany and as far as I know the rest of Europe)

Sir Cumference

Huh. Here in the US most people don't even know what our unit of mass is

ACuriousMind

Although the UK might deviate

Sir Cumference

14:54

We talk exclusively in pounds

Prathyush Poduval

@SirCumference Isn't it pound?

ah okay

Anonymous

@SirCumference Most people don't even know the difference. :P

Prathyush Poduval

Is there any country which uses weight (Kg.wt or newton seems like a wierd unit)

Sir Cumference

@PrathyushPoduval I genuinely have no idea. I've heard ours is called a "slug" and that "pounds" is a unit of force. But I've never once heard anyone say "slug"

ACuriousMind

@SirCumference the pound is both a unit of mass and a unit of force

Sir Cumference

14:56

@ACuriousMind I've also heard that...

ACuriousMind

Or rather, there are two units, one for mass and one for force that are confusingly named the same :P

Anonymous

Gravitational metric system

The gravitational metric system (original French term Système des Méchaniciens) is a non-standard system of units, which does not comply with the International System of Units (SI). It is built on the three base quantities length, time and force with base units metre, second and kilopond respectively. Internationally used abbreviations of the system are MKpS, MKfS or MKS (from French mètre–kilogramme-poids–seconde or mètre–kilogramme-force–seconde). However, the abbreviation MKS is also used for the MKS system of units, which, like the SI, uses mass in kilogram as a base unit. == Disadvantages... ==

Sir Cumference

Slug (mass)

The slug is a derived unit of mass in the weight-based system of measures, most notably within the British Imperial measurement system and in the United States customary measures system. Systems of measure either define mass and derive weights or define a base weight and derive a mass unit. A slug is defined as the mass that is accelerated by 1 ft/s2 when a force of one pound (lbf) is exerted on it. 1 slug = 1 lbf ⋅ ...

No idea what this is then

Prathyush Poduval

seems like slug(mass) is in terms of pounds (force)

and there is another pound(mass)

Secret

Shotgun slug

A modern shotgun slug is a heavy projectile made of lead, copper, or other material and fired from a shotgun. Slugs are designed for hunting large game, self-defense, and other uses. The first effective modern shotgun slug was introduced by Wilhelm Brenneke in 1898, and his design remains in use today. Most shotgun slugs are designed to be fired through a cylinder bore or improved cylinder choke, rifled choke tubes, or fully rifled bores. Slugs differ from round-ball lead projectiles in that they are stabilized in some manner. In the early development of firearms, smooth-bored barrels were not...

Sir Cumference

14:58

God this crap is confusing. Back in classical mechanics, anyone who gave a non-metric answer would be laughed at

Our prof explained it was because we are a "backwards third-world country"

@PrathyushPoduval Now, what's interesting is that back in the day, we would get some questions saying "An object weighs 50 Newtons"

Anonymous

edition.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02

0ßelö7

@SirCumference I had a lbm vs slug question on my heat transfer exam and it'll probably be the most missed question

Sir Cumference

> NASA lost a $125 million Mars orbiter because a Lockheed Martin engineering team used English units of measurement while the agency's team used the more conventional metric system for a key spacecraft operation

Prathyush Poduval

@SirCumference yeah, we did use to get those in school. Moreover, the mass-weight thing used to be a very bad trick question

Sir Cumference

@0ßelö7 Which is our unit of mass?

0ßelö7

15:01

@SirCumference you should ask him why he doesn't move somewhere else

@SirCumference slug

Pound mass is the unit such that 1 lbm gives 1 ft/s^2 of acceleration due to gravity

You need to take some engineering classes

There are wonderful units like W/ft or inches of water

Sir Cumference

@0ßelö7 Bah, I'm not planning on being some applied physicist

0ßelö7

Oh, just jobless.

7

Ok

Nvm then

Sir Cumference

Ok fair...

vzn

@Blue (lately interested in this also.) wikipedia has a fairly thorough writeup. (in)distinguishability very much relates to QM measurement. iiuc its almost defined as whether you can measure them as distinguishable or not.

Anonymous

That was smooth =P

Sir Cumference

15:04

I guess I'll look into some

vzn

Identical particles

Identical particles, also called indistinguishable or indiscernible particles, are particles that cannot be distinguished from one another, even in principle. Species of identical particles include, but are not limited to elementary particles such as electrons, composite subatomic particles such as atomic nuclei, as well as atoms and molecules. Quasiparticles also behave in this way. Although all known indistinguishable particles are "tiny", there is no exhaustive list of all possible sorts of particles nor a clear-cut limit of applicability, as explored in quantum statistics. There are two main...

0ßelö7

The reality is that some people think that feet of water is a legitimate unit of pressure and you have to deal with that

Sir Cumference

@0ßelö7 What...?

Anonymous

@vzn Yes, I read that up sometime back. I get it now, more or less.

0ßelö7

@ACuriousMind Is steam acting strange for you right now?

ACuriousMind

15:06

@0ßelö7 Strange how?

0ßelö7

Like it keeps telling me I have no internet connection, then when I try downloading something it randomly stops or gets very slow. My actual connection is fine.

When I restart the download it seems to get fixed for a few minutes

ACuriousMind

@Blue I think it is better to think about this as them being classical. You apply M-B statistics for classical gases and F-D or E-B for quantum ones. Distinguishability seems to me to be sort of a red herring.

0ßelö7

Or not

ACuriousMind

Steam behaves normally for me

0ßelö7

I need a new PC.

Anonymous

15:08

@ACuriousMind "Classical" by definition implies "distinguishability" I suppose ? There's no HUP there.

ACuriousMind

@Blue What has the HUP to do with distinguishability?

Two particles are distinguishable if you can distinguish the state where particle 1 is in state A and particle 2 is in state B from the state where particle 1 is in state B and particle 2 is in state A. Otherwise they are indistinguishable.

Sid

@0ßelö7 your PC is messed up, pal

Anonymous

In classical mechanics we can distinguish particles by position which is not possible in quantum mechanics. That's what I meant. " As long as the position of each particle can be measured with infinite precision (even when the particles collide), then there would be no ambiguity about which particle is which."

ACuriousMind

@Blue Well, you can also quantum mechanically measure the position of each particle with arbitrary precision.

Distinguishability is just what I said above, it doesn't really have to do with classical or quantum or with position, except in so far that quantum many-body states are naturally indistinguishable due to the way they are built from bosonic or fermionic creation/annihilation operators.

Anonymous

@ACuriousMind I see. I'll have to read more about this thing. Thanks though

0ßelö7

15:24

@Sid I'm going to light it on fire

Sid

@0ßelö7 that would overheat it. :P

0ßelö7

@BalarkaSen interesting (perhaps still open) problem: do the exotic spheres admit metrics of positive curvature

Certainly not positive constant curvature, else they wouldn't be exotic...

Balarka Sen

16:14

@0ßelö7 Beautiful question. I have no idea; ask Mike

Mithrandir24601

16:31

Hopefully quick question: I've got a secondary supervisor, who's an associate professor in America, for my PhD. In my first e-mail to him, should I be more formal or informal? Here (UK) I'd say more formal for the first e-mail, then informal after, but USA could be very different...

0ßelö7

@Mithrandir24601 what does formal mean to you?

Anonymous

@Mithrandir24601 Perhaps it depends on what you mean by informal...

0ßelö7

Don't pull a Germany and call him by his 7 titles

Anonymous

Based on my experience of mailing a 100 professors in 3 days' time I'd say a polite formal tone is better. They might creep out if you talk to them like you would talk to a friend. :P

0ßelö7

Why would you email 100 professors??

Anonymous

16:35

@0ßelö7 For research internship...lol

0ßelö7

Why email? It's much easier to deny you via email

Anonymous

About 10 out of the 100 responded

0ßelö7

Go in person and look especially skinny

ACuriousMind

@Blue You might want to read this academia.SE post.

Anonymous

@ACuriousMind Oh, I read that

Anonymous

16:36

I didn't spam

Anonymous

I mailed only once

0ßelö7

Lmao

Anonymous

And all of them were Indian professors

0ßelö7

@Blue is a stereotypical Indian spammer :'D

Anonymous

@0ßelö7 kek...well, at least my mission was accomplished

Anonymous

16:37

:P

Anonymous

I've made good relations with the profs who replied

ACuriousMind

@Blue Shotgunning 100 people with a mail in the hope that at least one replies does sound like very traditional spam to me, tbh.

Anonymous

@ACuriousMind Oh, and thank god I'm not from an Indian Institute of Technology

0ßelö7

@ACuriousMind that's what I said

My phone is acting very strangely

Anonymous

@ACuriousMind True. But none of my mails were unrelated to the field in which the professor were working. I spent a lot of time on that. It's not like I mailed an astronomer about "solid-state" research.

Anonymous

16:41

Professors get annoyed only if the emails are un-related to their field of work.

0ßelö7

@ACuriousMind Do you understand conformal mapping?

(Complex analysis)

ACuriousMind

@0ßelö7 Depends on what you mean by "understand"

0ßelö7

I think I need to map the exterior of an ellipse to a disk

Balarka Sen

Something something $z + 1/z$

0ßelö7

@BalarkaSen that maps the disk to a plate...maybe z+k/z will stretch it

Balarka Sen

16:48

Yeah

Oh wait, it maps the disk to the inside of the ellipse, right?

You want the other way around?

Just take the holomorphic inverse

0ßelö7

Yeah I might need the inverse

Gotta draw some damn pictures. Ugh

@BalarkaSen no I need az+b/z

Balarka Sen

ic

0ßelö7

z+a^2/z takes the exterior of the disk of radius a in the uhp to the uhp

So I'm thinking if I modify both terms I can adjust the major and semi major axes

Mithrandir24601

@0ßelö7 @Blue formal would be more "dear ..." and would include phrases more like "is there any particular date that would be convenient to you" while informal would be more "hi," and contain phrases like "when would suit you"

0ßelö7

My first advice is to avoid the Nigerian Prince @Blue's advice...

Anonymous

17:02

My advice would be to go with the first option. But as @0ßelö7 says, don't take my advice blindly. :'D

Mithrandir24601

@0ßelö7 What if his advice is to ignore your advice?

Aw, it's not - that would have been so fun

Anonymous

I did mail a couple of American professors at UW Washington. They did reply to me quite fast. (I had used a formal tone...like you mentioned)

0ßelö7

The fact that he said mail and not email is a flag

I think he's a bot

Anonymous

@0ßelö7 I can transform into a bot in times of crisis ;)

Anonymous

@Mithrandir24601 No one takes his advice seriously anyway. So I didn't mention it. :P

0ßelö7

17:08

My advice was to not spam. If that's not good advice, delete my account.

@BalarkaSen ew, this algebra isn't working. Maybe I should transform the elliptical disk into a circular one, then compose with z+1/z

rob

salutations, all

Secret

I felt like next time when vzn is on, I might be asking him an actual theoretical computer science question

as currently I am trying to construct all ordinals between $\omega_1^{CK}$ and $\omega_2^{CK}$

but the issue is that there are uncomputable ordinals and I know nothing about turing machines to make sense of them

Mithrandir24601

@rob greetings, Earthling

0ßelö7

If you're not from earth we have an issue @Mithrandir24601

Anonymous

17:23

I'm done with earthlings. I'd like to meet some extra-terrestrials now.

Prathyush Poduval

first keks, now earthlings...... what has become of this place?

ACuriousMind

@Blue "The best proof of extraterrestrial intelligence is that they haven't contacted us." - Bill Watterson

Prathyush Poduval

independence day should actually happen

0ßelö7

@ACuriousMind so edgy

ACuriousMind

@0ßelö7 ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Secret

17:29

earthlings are "boring"

but aliens will melt your brain

Prathyush Poduval

Independence Day 1996 - Nuce Scene

►

Transcript for