« first day (2490 days earlier)      last day (2442 days later) » 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

12:08 AM
@Blue Visualization of modules:
 
 
3 hours later…
3:00 AM
@BalarkaSen I have some module doubts for when you get on
 
 
1 hour later…
4:13 AM
@JohnRennie hello
 
Morning :-)
 
Compton scat? :-)
 
@JohnRennie you have a dirty mind
 
Please, a childish mind :-)
It keeps me young.
 
4:29 AM
@JohnRennie I'm trying to do algebra and cannot
 
Don't look at me. It's 05:30 here and I can barely muster up enough brain cells to make coffee!
 
@JohnRennie Oh I am just inventing new was to procrastinate
I have decided that I should procrastinate by doing other useful things that I only dislike slighly less than what I really should be doing
 
Run a few benchmarks?
 
those just stress me out
 
Anonymous
4:50 AM
@0ßelö7 Wut?
 
@Blue you wanted to know how to draw infinite dimensional shit
 
Anonymous
Huh? But where are the infinite dimensions in your picture ? :P I can only see a badly drawn circular thing XD
 
oh, the circle is what I do when I eureka
the lines are the important bit
@JohnRennie is taping stuff to monitors and shelves ghetto
I need to tape equations everywhere like a mad scientist
 
Anonymous
:P I'm in class. Will ping you when I get back home for an explanation. :'D Btw other than the badly drawn circle there are four badly drawn lines.
 
@Blue the two that are close are really one
i had to draw it twice to absolve the doubt
 
5:29 AM
@JohnRennie it's late, halp
is $10^{24}$ = 1E24 or 10E24
 
Another predator today: This time from Madridge Publishers
action: Mark as junk and report to microsoft
 
@0ßelö7 1e24
 
@JohnRennie If I send you a GR poster will you read it?
I need feedback from people who know about such things
I doubt the audience will understand a word regardless...
 
@0ßelö7 Yes of course, though how much I can help I'm not sure.
 
@JohnRennie I'm looking for typos and formatting
the mathematical content is (for better or worse) set
 
5:37 AM
But you need to tell me who the poster is aimed at. The early version I saw looked as if it was aimed at mathematicians vaguely interested in physics.
 
@JohnRennie the average STEM person
 
@0ßelö7 the average STEM person will have lost the will to live after the first equation.
2
 
the first equation is merely the Einstein equation...
I figured everyone on SE does it, so normies must like it
Hm. Does Matlab indexing start at 1?
haha it does
 
Does anyone know if gravitational waves propagate in accordance with the Huygens-Fresnel principle?
 
@JohnRennie the general consensus of the chat is that no one knows how the Huygens principle actually works
in particular since we all imagine it in 2 dimensions, but it's false in 2 dimensions
 
5:44 AM
Huh? It gives the right predictions for diffraction patterns.
 
@JohnRennie The mathematical proof fails in 2 dimensions
It is demonstrably incorrect
So why it works is truly a mystery
@ACuriousMind @AccidentalFourierTransform and I were talking about this the other day
 
I guess that's tough for Flatlanders. Fortunately we don't live in a 2+1D spacetime.
 
@JohnRennie Well, what about water waves?
We pretty much assume they work like other waves
@JohnRennie what's a good number for the cosmological constant in SI?
 
@0ßelö7 I did calculate this in an answer. Let me search ...
 
~1E-52 1/m^2
 
5:49 AM
$ 2.036 \times 10^{-35}$ s$^{−2}$ according to this
 
that seems so small
@JohnRennie oh fuck
I have to put the c's back in my equations
@JohnRennie shouldn't it be like J/m^3?
 
That is the same as $10^{-52}$ once you put the $c$s back in.
 
@JohnRennie should it not have units of J/m^3...
it is an energy density, no?
or do you have to convert somehow
 
The dimensions are energy density multiplied by the dimensions of the gravitational constant.
Remember the equation is $G - \Lambda = 8\pi G T$
 
@JohnRennie Yah, I think I have to fire up mathematica and compute the EFE with the constants
 
5:59 AM
This is trouble with getting used to setting G and c to one :-)
 
not exactly my ideal 2AM activity
@JohnRennie I get the feeling that this realistic Lambda will be so tiny that it won't matter
I might need to crank it up
1J/m^3 seems reasonable
 
@0ßelö7 your universe will be closed and rather short lived :-)
 
hmm, when do I have class
@JohnRennie Oh, I divide by G so there's 11 orders of magnitude for free
sadly it's still like 30 orders lower than everything else in the equations ;_;
 
I can't get the dimensions of $\Lambda$ to come out right ...
Aaaaah, it's $8\pi G/c^4 \mathbf T$. I forgot the $c^4$.
 
6:14 AM
@JohnRennie So if I want $\Lambda$ to have the dimensions of $\rho$ I need $c^2\Lambda/G$
 
$c^4\Lambda/G$
 
that's for $P$
according to wiki we have $\Lambda =8\pi (G/c^2)\rho_\mathrm{vac}$
 
That does work. I get the dimensions of $\Lambda$ to be $L^{-2}$.
 
you said it was 1/s^2
 
Multiply by $c^2$ and you get $T^{-2}$
I guess it depends on whether you write it as a mass density or an energy density
 
6:19 AM
so you want $c^6$ for the pressure term?
seems excessive
I guess the metric is dimensionless?
 
Yes, the metric is dimensionless.
 
So the constant is indeed 1/m^2
christ
 
It just depends on what units you choose for the stress-energy tensor
i.e. is the EFE $G = \frac{8\pi G}{c^2} T$ or $G = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T$
 
I guess I should assume everything can be diagonalized and just rederive the field equations
seems easier than whatever this is
so for a perfect fluid, should T have $\rho c^2$ ?
and just $P$
oh my god the Minkowski metric has a $c^2$
THEY'RE EVERYWHERE
 
:-) Just set them all to unity!!
 
6:25 AM
@JohnRennie I'm doing numerics
I want to have some idea of the magnitudes of things
 
It's surprisingly painful when you start trying to calculate real physical quantities in GR
 
I hate dimensional analysis so much
what the hell are the dimensions of $G$
@JohnRennie lmao this should be mass density not energy density
i give up
I'll give these people their money back
I can't do GR
 
The dimensions of G are $L^3M^{-1}T^{-2}$. If we take T as an energy density then the dimensions of T are $ML^{-1}T^{-2}$
Multiply these togeter and divide by $c^4$ and you get $L^{-2}$. Bing!
 
right, I think I want the energy momentum to be diag (c^2 rho, P, P, P)
So I was right, modulo some pis
amazing
time to finish this thing
 
Yes if $\rho$ is the mass density.
 
6:31 AM
@JohnRennie mhm
of course, I just realized I probably forgot some c's when I got that number from HDE
I can't really be assed to check that now
 
Christ this is hard! Or is Alzheimer's setting in early?
 
@JohnRennie you and me both, bud
 
Fortunately I have to go and check my servers now. At least I can manage that ...
 
again, my goal is to put people in comas by the second equation
they won't get to this part
 
6:45 AM
@JohnRennie aaaaaand I've been using the wrong initial conditions all along
rip
I can't do calculations
@JohnRennie Ok what's like a truly ludicrous value for Lambda
I've got everything working but I can't see effects
 
The division between "natural" and "artificial" is pretty artificial. Obviously, humans are the dominant natural process that leads to the occurence of lasers. — ACuriousMind ♦ Aug 22 '15 at 16:44
Solution: Replace "natural" with "not directly caused by humanity"
 
@0ßelö7 Well $\Omega$ is about 5 protons per cubic metre. Multiply that by G/c^2 to get the corresponding $\Lambda$. Then vary by a few orders of magnitude either side.
 
I think I made a black hole
the radius of this star is small
@JohnRennie I put 1/m^2
that might be too extreme
 
:-)
 
@JohnRennie hahahaha
it's such a powerful constant the star is exploding
this is pretty cool
if you put a powerful enough constant the radius of the star is infinite
this is pretty interesting stuff
@JohnRennie you're gonna like this poster
 
7:44 AM
Hi, everybody.
 
7:54 AM
hello
 
8:23 AM
[Chemistry]
Annoying thing about deleting PBS pro jobs from cluster:
Often when the number is large, there's a 10-30s delay, and that count towards service units deducted from budget
 
9:12 AM
0
Q: Classical mechanics

Shawn Dypx I have a question about my Physics Stack Exchange post: Classical Mechanics

 
 
1 hour later…
10:19 AM
Hello fellow struggling scholars!
Are there any Post newtonian approximation experts or enthusiasts currently perusing the chat room?
 
 
1 hour later…
11:28 AM
Sigh, another rainy morning
 
11:56 AM
0
Q: What does "temporarily deleted" mean?

stafusaI can't find in the help, or by googling, the meaning of "temporarily deleting" in I'm temporarily deleting this in accordance with our homework policy. Please don't post complete answers to the underlying problem in homework-like questions. To me it sounds like it's deleted for now, but wi...

 
 
1 hour later…
Anonymous
1:14 PM
@SirCumference You don't like the rain ? I love cold rainy mornings as otherwise mornings are usually very warm here.
 
@Blue Er, rainy days are usually hot and humid
But worse, they make waking up a pain
 
Anonymous
Hot?
 
Entire sky is dark
 
Anonymous
That's strange
 
@Blue Yeah. I remember in high school earth science we learned the process of cloud formation
Warm air rises and collects water molecules, then cools and forms a cloud
So warmer days are more humid
 
Anonymous
1:21 PM
That would imply rainy days are cooler. The rain originates from a much cooler region compared to the land. Also the precipitation should reduce the temperature near the ground. Rain occurs below a certain temperature called dew point iirc.
 
Anonymous
Lemme find a source
 
Anonymous
I can agree that rainy days are more humid...so you might sweat more
 
Anonymous
Huh...lol...this seems more complicated than I expected. In places where it is usually cold there rainy days are warmer but in places which are usually hot the rainy days are cooler.
 
Anonymous
That's why we had different perceptions of rainy days :P
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference The reason for rainy days seeming warmer in cold places isn't the one you gave. The preceding nights are usually cloudy. So the long wave IR rays are not able to escape into space (sounds like greenhouse effect ?). Hence the following morning seems warm. However this reasoning is not correct for tropical regions.
 
1:33 PM
@Blue I've never heard that. To my knowledge, the fact that warm air rises means it should carry up the water molecules until it condenses.
Cooler air won't rise as much or pick up as many molecules along the way
 
Anonymous
If warmer air rises...then the surroundings near the land should cool down. :P You need to think about this.
 
@Blue Huh? Why? They're still getting loads of sunlight (until it rains)
 
Anonymous
Sunlight on rainy days ?
 
Anonymous
It's cloudy !!
 
Anonymous
By that logic non-rainy days should be even more warmer since sunlight enters directly with much lesser cloud density
 
1:36 PM
All right, so I'm gathering that cloudiness keeps in heat
Which makes more clouds
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
See the first quora link
 
@Blue That link starts with the sentence "I don't think the presumption is always true"...
 
Anonymous
See the second answer
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
I could present this ^
 
Anonymous
But well...i don't need to. I stay in a tropical country and I can say from experience that rainy days are cooler over here.
 
> Cold air has a low capacity to contain moisture
@Blue That...doesn't seem possible
At least not from my Earth Science classes
 
Anonymous
1:41 PM
Okay. We can ask a question on physics stack exchange regarding this.
 
There's an Earth Science SE
 
Anonymous
Oh...then there
 
Actually, you should probably ask here. It's more active
 
Anonymous
1:55 PM
@SirCumference I'll surely ask a question on the main site once I'm done with my work today. Let me summarize my points: 1) In tropical places : On normal days the sunlight enters directly and heats up the land a lot. On rainy days due to the cloud cover much sunlight can't enter and it feels cooler. 2) In cold places: On normal days the sunlight entering is anyway low and the night are colder! But the cloud cover prevents heat loss in form of long wave IR and hence keeps the region warm.
 
Anonymous
That is why rainy days feel warmer in such places.
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference I suppose @JohnRennie can help us with this. :)
 
I don't think rainy days feel warmer in the UK.
 
↑ that
 
Anonymous
I guess it depends very much on the place, isn't it?
 
2:03 PM
More humid days feel warmer because sweating doesn't cool you as effectively ...
 
Anonymous
Maybe SirC lives in a very cold place
 
Anonymous
In Kolkata rainy days are usually much cooler
 
Anonymous
And we wait for it to rain during summer months
 
Anonymous
@JohnRennie Yeah, that might be another point! Does my reasoning ^ seem correct, though?
 
Sid
@Blue even if SirC is in US, they will surely be southern to JR
 
Anonymous
2:05 PM
9 mins ago, by Blue
@SirCumference I'll surely ask a question on the main site once I'm done with my work today. Let me summarize my points: 1) In tropical places : On normal days the sunlight enters directly and heats up the land a lot. On rainy days due to the cloud cover much sunlight can't enter and it feels cooler. 2) In cold places: On normal days the sunlight entering is anyway low and the night are colder! But the cloud cover prevents heat loss in form of long wave IR and hence keeps the region warm.
 
Sid
And by simple logic, in a place warmer than JR
 
@Sid Alaska ...
 
Anonymous
No. Check Alaska's average weather.
 
Anonymous
That logic is completely wrong.
 
Anonymous
Being south doesn't mean it will be warmer.
 
Sid
2:08 PM
Being South means it will be closer to equator.
 
Anonymous
@Sid Did you check the average weather?
 
I hadn't realised, but Chester is indeed farther north than the northernmost part of the USA (excluding Alaska). Well, well, you live and learn.
 
Anonymous
There are many more factors than closeness to the equator.
 
Sid
@Blue closeness to the equator is perhaps, the most important factor
 
Alaska belongs to Russia you imperialist swines
 
Anonymous
2:11 PM
@Sid Altitude...
 
@Sid I'm only a bit south of him
Well actually now that I'm back in college, I'm quite a lot farther south
 
Anonymous
In which city do you live? @SirCumference
 
Anonymous
Maybe we can check out the weather reports
 
1 message moved to trash
 
Anonymous
lol
 
Anonymous
2:13 PM
:P
 
@Blue Came from New York
 
@sid: be nice!
 
@Slereah Russia belongs to America tho
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference I'd say the opposite :P
 
Sid
But but... It's true. :P
 
2:14 PM
@Blue Yes, actually very true XD
 
Anonymous
Duh..I should be studying thermo now...:P
 
Anonymous
Too much procrastination
 
Anonymous
Cya! :)
 
Sid
@Blue yes, altitude matters but if you compare places at similar altitudes but at different distances from the equator, the average temperature will vary quite a bit
 
Can anyone recommend some good rock music?
 
Sid
2:16 PM
Actually, the max and min temperatures will vary a lot too
 
Preferably soft rock
 
@SirCumference there are many thousands of soft rock bands
Give us a clue. What bands do you know and like?
 
@JohnRennie I mostly listen to Billy Joel, Van Morrison, Cat Stevens, John Lennon, etc.
Not really that many bands
 
The following is a list of notable soft rock bands and artists and their most notable soft rock songs. This list should not include artists whose main style of music is anything other than soft rock, even if they have released one or more songs that fall under the "soft rock" genre. (Such songs can be added under Category:Soft rock songs.) Artists which have released music of various different genres throughout their career including soft rock as one of their main styles, may be included together with their notable soft rock songs. == 0–9 == == A == == B == == C == == D == == E ...
 
@JohnRennie Of course, not all of them are going to be good :P
That's why I'm asking for recommendations
 
2:23 PM
Good bands: The Eagles.
 
@JohnRennie Favorite song from them?
 
Hotel California of course :-)
 
@JohnRennie Oh, right XD
 
Bread - fave song Guitar Man
Fleetwood Mac - fave song Albatross
Genesis - everything up to And Then There Were Three is excellent.
 
Can I shoot an irrelevant recommendation which might or might not be up to your taste?
 
2:25 PM
@BalarkaSen Sure :)
@JohnRennie Already love it :)
 
The Beatles are far better than you think, especially the later albums.
 
@JohnRennie I dunno. They're good, but I really haven't heard any of their songs that I love per se
 
@BalarkaSen mooooooodules
 
@0ßelö7 I need to run right now though!
 
2:27 PM
It's kind of sad that there's no good soft rock nowadays
Every one I see is from the 60s-80s
 
That's because soft rock is mainly rubbish
And people finally realised it
 
@JohnRennie :(
 
It's true though. NB I didn't say it was all rubbish - just most of it.
 
The fact that it's been replaced with pop and (c)rap is disappointing...
Hell, heavy metal is just loud noise
 
@SirCumference Tell that to Crimea
 
2:29 PM
@SirCumference not true
 
@SirCumference wrong
 
In my experience it's just been a lot of people screaming
 
@SirCumference and that was just the people forced to listen to it
 
2:30 PM
@JohnRennie But many of the most popular songs in history are soft rock
 
There's no accounting for taste
 
@JohnRennie ?
 
(says the man who likes Hawkwind :-)
 
I have been listening to black metal a lot recently and I really like what I hear
 
I dunno. Everything on the radio now is just repeated pop songs from a year ago
 
2:32 PM
Pick any earlier Ulver album
 
I swear I've heard despacito or however it's spelt a million times
 
@BalarkaSen you don't look like you're leaving
 
@SirCumference Mainstream US radio is not noted for being innovative
 
@Slereah no comments section?
 
the popular songs nowadays is mostly hip hop or trap for some reason
@0ßelö7 about to
 
2:34 PM
@JohnRennie Yet apparently some people like hearing the same annoying songs over and over...
 
2 mins ago, by John Rennie
There's no accounting for taste
 
@JohnRennie But why...?
 
@0ßelö7 Not yet
I shall do it later
 
@SirCumference How on Earth would I know? I struggle to understand how many of the people I meet from day to day manage to tie their own shoelaces.
 
@JohnRennie Just started with Down and Out. This doesn't sound like rock :/
Hey @ACuriousMind
 
2:40 PM
@SirCumference ACM likes soft rock. Ask him for recommendations :-)
 
@JohnRennie K, thanks :)
 
@0ßelö7 It's a "don't count on replies on any sort of regular schedule" absence :P
 
@ACuriousMind So...have any recommendations for soft rock?
 
@SirCumference Down and Out? From Bugsy Malone?
 
@JohnRennie No, it's the first song in the Genesis album
 
2:42 PM
Oh, from And Then There Were Three?
 
@SirCumference Try this.
2
 
I would have said that was soft rock.
 
@ACuriousMind ...
 
@ACuriousMind :-)
 
I have that abomination in my Youtube history now. Thanks
 
2:43 PM
@SirCumference JR may have misled you about my musical preferences :P
 
Just a bit ...
 
Anonymous
Aaahhh...I clicked on ACM's link with loudspeakers on. My mom thought I was studying in my room...but..lol
 
Anonymous
I should be careful while clicking links :P
 
@SirCumference: Dire Straits?
 
2:47 PM
@JohnRennie I'll check em out
 
Sid
@Blue lol
That's why you should always keep earphones connected. :P
 
Oh! Weird, why would it not be available in the US?
 
Anonymous
The uploader might have some grudge against ....
 
Anonymous
2:49 PM
Use a proxy
 
Anonymous
:P
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zLfCnGVeL4
Try this guys. Hotel California is also good in soft rock genre.
 
@Blue I didn't know you could cherry pick countries
Youtube has weird features
 
Anonymous
I think you can. I'm not very sure if that feature exists
 
Sid
I have a pretty easy question on Python that I am struggling with. Someone help?
 
2:51 PM
@QuamosM87 That doesn't really sound like soft rock
 
Anonymous
Go ahead
 
Sid
X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.8475 - Basically we have to count the no. of lines that start with this, extract the values and find the average.
(Values as in the floating point values)
 
Though if I make a recommendation (assuming anyone likes my type of music), it would be this or this
 
Sid
Now, it's obvious I have to do a find() and then,basically slice the decimal part out. But, I am not sure what to find for, here.
We simply don't know what the values in floating points are..
Well... @blue any idea?
 
Are the lines always:
>X-DSPAM-Confidence: <number>
 
00:00 - 15:0015:00 - 00:00

« first day (2490 days earlier)      last day (2442 days later) »