That I am not sure, but I do read a lot of results that said CTCs breaks unitarity, I might have overlooked a spacetime one among the numerous nonrelativistic quantum ones. The Quantum computing guys love to quote that result as they really want those advantage in computing that arises from CTCs
yeah because we cannot foilate spacetimes into space like hyersurfaces in any spacetimes that contains a CTC, that prevents assigning a unique time stamp for each slice in an ordered fashion
@JohnRennie The Cauchy problem with $H^1_0\times H^0$ Cauchy data for the wave equation $$\Box u-mu=f,\quad m\ge 0$$ on $(\Bbb R\times \Sigma, g)$ satisfying the Fundamental Regularity Hypothesis and $f\in L^2(T)$, has a global solution $u$ with $u\in E_1(T)$ for any finite $T$.
@DanielSank I'm reading about the Kerr effect and trying to figure out what properties are necessary for a Kerr media to have in an optical photon quantum computer.
so i'm trying to figure out how all the topics you've listed are connected - looking at the wikipedia article on anharmonic oscillators seems to lead to the example of the electric dipole moment which i think relates to the dielectric function, but the whole thing is rather confusing to me, i'm afraid.
If $| \alpha \rangle$ is a coherent state and $\hat{n} = \hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}$ the number operator, would it be true that $e^{-i \omega t \hat{n}} | \alpha \rangle = |\alpha e^{-i \omega t} \rangle$ ?
@JohnJack You have to expand, apply the number operator (which you should probably know how to do on a coherent state) and then put the sum back into a nice form.
Just use the expression for how the number operator acts on the coherent state, or equivalently the def. of the coherent state in terms of $n$-particle states.
In mathematics, a super vector space is a
Z
2
{\displaystyle \mathbb {Z} _{2}}
-graded vector space, that is, a vector space over a field
K
{\displaystyle \mathbb {K} }
with a given decomposition of subspaces of grade
0
{\displaystyle 0}
and grade
1
{\displaystyle 1}
. The study of super vector spaces and their generalizations ...
"complete misunderstanding" suggests that the user has misunderstood something. In this case, yes, the user did misunderstand something. However, I think communication works better when the content of the post is criticized without bringing the user's brain into the picture.
@DanielSank Thanks for voicing your opinion. I still disagree but I do appreciate the contact and the tone and I hope you'll do it again if you see a similar example.
I am pretty sure that most of the professors who publish in Nature, Cell or Science have some collaboration with professional designers. The thing is that I have never seen it mentioned. Is it a service offered by the journals? Or do the PIs pay for those services and outsource them?