« first day (2420 days earlier)      last day (2807 days later) » 

18:00
Technically energy level is the energy of the electron (according to Bohr's model anyway) needed to confine it to a specific shell, I guess.
But they come quantized, so you can "identify" it with the orbits.
I would take "energy level" to mean the actual energy eigenstate/oribtal, not merely the value of the energy eigenvalue.
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen It could also mean "vibrational" or "rotational" energy levels in molecules unless you clearly mention "principal energy level".
@BalarkaSen Bohr's model is discarded. I want explanation in terms of the Wave Mechanical Model
@Abcd Solve $(-\frac{1}{2m}\Delta -\frac{eZ}{r})\psi=E_{nlm}\psi$
@Mostafa yeah, I saw it
I think you're overthinking it
18:02
@ACuriousMind 'Why so many contradictions?
@0celouvskyopoulo7 I can't.
@Abcd If you don't understand the answers to the basic terminology questions you are asking, good luck with that.
@Abcd Where is there a contradiction?
"light propagation direction" only makes sense in the paraxial regime, so you can just assume that you're there
Bohr's model is the simplest model in which you'd want to understand the answers to the questions you are asking.
5 mins ago, by ACuriousMind
@Abcd The orbitals (not orbits!) are just the energy levels. Every orbital/energy level has a specific value of the principal quantum number, and a "shell" is the set of all levels with the same principal quantum number.
18:03
Imprecise terminology does not mean a contradiction
It means absence of pedantry
My answer answers your question fully and does not contain a contradiction - where do you think there is a problem?
then if there's no OAM to begin with in the source's frame there's no OAM in inertial frames
@ACuriousMind Does this apply to the new model of the atom as well?
wavefronts are just planes orthogonal to the rotation axis
@Abcd what "new model"?
18:04
I'm not sure what happens with a corkscrew beam, though
I'm not talking about the Bohr model, if you think that.
presumably nothing
@ACuriousMind Wave mechanical model instead of Bohr's model with circular orbits
@BalarkaSen Here's a pedantic question. How would I write a vector field along a curve in the $f:X\to Y$ notation?
or maybe not
18:04
@Abcd That one hasn't been "new" for quite a long time, and yes, what I said holds for that model.
actually, no, it probably does change
It's a map $\gamma(t)\mapsto T_{\gamma(t)}M$...but not a map into $TM$
@ACuriousMind I thought orbitals were s,p,d,f... not 1(K),2(L),3....
lol this conversation is confusing to follow.
if the light has OAM then that component will get red- or blue-shifted
same as circularly polarized light
18:05
The value of the map is not (point,vector), it is just (vector). But the tangent space changes
but I'm not sure what that means for the angular momentum content
@Abcd I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to say.
@ACuriousMind Alright. How do you denote an orbital? Please give me an example.
@BalarkaSen That literally scared me.
You usually denote them by their principal quantum number and the angular momentum (which historically has s,p,d,f corresponding to values of 0,1,2,3), so e.g. the orbital with the lowest energy would be denoted '1s'.
@Abcd s, p, d, f etc are subshells of 1(K), 2(L), 3(M), ... corresponding to the azimuthal quantum numbers. We are talking about the principal quantum numbers, how does that apply?
@0celouvskyopoulo7 Um, sure it's a map to $TM$? $X : [0, 1] \to TM$ given by $X(t) := X(\gamma(t))$?
18:10
@BalarkaSen a point in $TM$ is an ordered pair $(p,v)$, $v\in T_pM$
Fine, $X(t) := (\gamma(t), X(\gamma(t))$ you pedant
But I only want the $X(\gamma(t))$
I don't get it. What is that you are looking for?
I described a vector field over $\gamma$ as a path in $TM$. Is that not what you are asking for?
Not quite
the pedantry might cause a singularity
I have a path $W$ in $TM$
This projects to a path $\gamma$ in $M$
But now there's a vector field along $\gamma$.
With 100% pedantry, I don't think it's quite right to say that vector field is $W$.
jesus man. hm.
18:14
I bet one has to talk about the pullback bundle
Anyway, it's not important.
Well, I can say that if you want. A vector field along $\gamma$ is a section of $TM$ pulled back to $\gamma([0, 1]) \subset M$.
That's probably better.
Oh, that reminds me
Did you understand the comment in do Carmo about angles around corners when he defined a parametrized surface?
Sorry. Power cut.
@ACuriousMind So 2p and 2d have same energy?
@ACuriousMind Are energy levels 3 dimensional?
@0celo I don't have doCarmo with me. Do you have a snapshot?
@BalarkaSen Not on this operating system, no.
18:18
I'll check it out later
Anonymous
@Abcd There's nothing like 2d orbital....
I always thought it was a strange comment because I always assumed I was working away from the boundary. I think one can do that
The variations are supposed to be small, after all
Anonymous
You have 1s; 2s,2p; 3s,3p,3d; ....so on @Abcd
Anonymous
I think the second paragraph of this Wiki article answers your question:
Anonymous
18:20
A quantum mechanical system or particle that is bound—that is, confined spatially—can only take on certain discrete values of energy. This contrasts with classical particles, which can have any energy. These discrete values are called energy levels. The term is commonly used for the energy levels of electrons in atoms, ions, or molecules, which are bound by the electric field of the nucleus, but can also refer to energy levels of nuclei or vibrational or rotational energy levels in molecules. The energy spectrum of a system with such discrete energy levels is said to be quantized. In chemistry...
Jesus
The internet is bad tonighty
@Slereah I just got GitHub for PC, why aren't my respositories showing up?
They seem to show up on github.com
Did you add the repository?
I guess I have to add it manually
Yeah I just did
Is something wrong with the SE chat today?Any bugs? i am unable to send messages properly...
18:25
there's only losers on it
@Blue Sorry, my bad
Windows
Platform Version Type Size How to install
XP/Vista/7/8/10 2.12.4 Installer 32.4 MB download and double click on the installer exe
XP/Vista/7/8/10 2.12.4 Portable (.zip) 42.5 MB download and unzip the zip
wot
why is the portable larger than the .exe
@0celouvskyopoulo7 possibly the exe radios in for even more data?
@Blue Alright. Checking...
@Blue Alright. Checking...
"no latex distribution was found on your computer"
Anonymous
18:27
@Abcd Umm, try refreshing the page...
@Slereah halp
@Abcd what do you mean by three-dimensional?
@Blue It does not. It compares energy level to an "orbit"
@0celouvskyopoulo7 Install a tex distribution
Anonymous
@Abcd Principal Energy Level=Orbit=Shell.
18:28
@Slereah I don't know what that means
@EmilioPisanty Here, non circular like in orbits i.e. having 3 dimensions
@Abcd what?
@Blue But orbitals are 3 dimensional so how can orbits be 2 d.
Sorry.
Typos.
Anonymous
I can't understand what your question is. Are you asking what orbitals are?
windows defender doesn't like TeXLive
what is going on
this is so easy on OSX
18:30
Yeah I was thinking about the rotational Doppler effect
(a light beam with helical phase fronts when reflected off a rotating surface will be red or blue shifted, as in http://science.sciencemag.org/content/341/6145/537?iss=6145)
@0celouvskyopoulo7 ::makes malware joke::
@EmilioPisanty But I don't think (temporal) frequency affects the angular momentum
Anonymous
@Abcd I never said "orbits can be 2d". What are you even saying? I just said that "2d" orbital doesn't exist. For n=2 only 2s and 2p orbitals exist.
@Blue I want to get a concrete explanation of these 3- energy level(aka orbit aka shell), orbital (aka subshell) and principal quantum number(n)
@Blue I know. I am sorry for my mistake.
For example, intrinsic OAM simply $l\hbar$ for a Laguerre-Gaussian beam independent of $\omega$
18:31
@Abcd that's some misidentifications there
@0celouvskyopoulo7 get miktex
Texstudio or texworks are only text editors
the latex to pdf compiler you have to get independantly
@Blue SE chat is malfunctioning so I am making such errors...
@EmilioPisanty I need help. Can you explain the necessary stuff?
ok getting miktex
@Abcd An orbital is a complex-valued function of position $\psi:\mathbb R^3\to\mathbb C$, which is often (but not always) visualized through the contours of constant $|\psi(\mathbf r)|^2$ (which then form 2D surfaces in 3D space).
Anonymous
@Abcd Ok so you basically want to know what "orbit" is, and what an"orbital" is ? (I already said that principal quatum number essentially denotes the principal energy level in which the electron exists.)
18:33
Orbitals have well-defined energies.
@EmilioPisanty what are the chances of an 11th grader knowing what $\psi:\Bbb R^3\to\Bbb C$ means...
@0celouvskyopoulo7 well, @Abcd can give a shout if that is confusing
@0celouvskyopoulo7 Beware that installing MikTeX and all the packages takes ages.
@JaimeGallego I have a fast computer.
@EmilioPisanty It's confusing. Hope you don't mind.
18:34
same it took like 3-5 mins to install.
@Slereah What is this missing packages on the fly thing? Presumably I should let it do that silently, no?
@Abcd I don't, so long as you're honest about what you do and don't get
@0celouvskyopoulo7 yeah that's best
Especially if you need a lot of packages
@Abcd orbitals are the 'wave' aspect of matter
it's just a function that takes in positions and spits out complex numbers
Installing packages by hand is a pain
18:36
these are diagrams of orbitals
each orbital describes the probability distribution of the electron in a given state
@JaimeGallego that took two minutes
you're impatient
"and all the packages"
riemmann curvature tensor: Is the part $\nabla_u \nabla_v-\nabla_v \nabla_u = [\nabla_u,\nabla_v]$?
@JaimeGallego I think it did everything?
that is what $[,]$ means, yes
18:38
ok
Guys
MikTeX or TeXLive?
Ok, now how do I get TeXStudio to work @Slereah
Define "to work"
How do I get my .tex into it and start editing?
It's F5 to compile
18:39
@Mostafa yeah, but if the beam power is constant then the photon number changes, no?
Open your .tex file with it
It will open a window for it
Where you can edit
$R(u,v)w = ([\nabla_u,\nabla_v]-\nabla_{[u,v]})w$ wow that's really compact notation
the .tex files in our repo are not .tex
they are text
Wot
There's a Spacetime.tex
And Causal theory.tex
18:41
ah, there it is
the extension is hidden
stupid
lmao
it says F6 is compile
F5 is "view and build"
F5 compiles it and lets you preview it
this is too fucking complicated
@0celouvskyopoulo7 you never used TeX before?
18:43
@EmilioPisanty I use it hours a day
I prefer to use F5
I like to view the result
on a Mac
where things are 10 times easier
@0celouvskyopoulo7 ah
@0celouvskyopoulo7 The interface is bloated, yeah, but you just need to know a few things
The rest is typing
Error, package missing...
18:44
Which one
what do you need yfonts for
ams already has fraktur
I have no clue
I've been using it for 4 years
I must have needed it at some point
yfonts is \textfrak
But you can just use \mathfrak from AMS
I use \mathfrak
Ok, deleting
18:46
yeah delete and see if it compiles
package error
esint not found
Did it not install packages?
Normally it's supposed to ask you to install missing packages
I said to just install them without asking me
Maybe I clicked the wrong thing
what do I do?
18:47
wot
Ahhh
I wanted to do lots of integrals
@0celouvskyopoulo7 you've got MikTeX?
@EmilioPisanty si
open the admin MikTeX package manager
find the package
right click
then install
Ok, now it doesn't like tikz-cd. I definitely need that one.
18:49
oh right the package manager
@0celouvskyopoulo7 You'll need to fiddle with the MikTeX settings. You can tell it to either install-on-the-fly directly, or to warn you first
@EmilioPisanty On Mac, I just installed every package. Can I not do that here?
that's the standard mode
@0celouvskyopoulo7 you can
it'll take a while, though
I'm doing it.
@0celouvskyopoulo7 installing everything?
18:50
Yes.
why not start with the ones you need right now and then do the rest?
to each their own, I guess
Because this is simpler?
hard drive space isn't much of a concern these days
"downloaded bytes"
especially for latex packages
18:51
Is that really a good unit of measurement?
it's the fundamental unit
the best unit
don't you mean bit?
You can't affect a single bit on a modern computer
Individual bits don't have memory addresses
@Slereah surely you can read the byte and rewrite it with a one-bit change
if nothing else
Well usually you do a bitwise logical operation
With an AND mask
or OR mask
18:53
@EmilioPisanty so... the change in the number of the photons causes a change in the total angular momentum of the beam (not per photon)
@Mostafa possibly
but I'm not too sold
it's the same with linear momentum, though, and that's probably easier to think about
I think
@Mostafa Only happens if the message is deemed star worthy, otherwise, it has singular number of stars
That exotic smooth structure GR book defines spacetimes as $\text{Riem}(M)/\text{Diff}(M)$
I mean, the beam state is fixed by the source, right?
spacetimes?
18:55
what if you start with a single-photon state?
He did not think this through
Since when are spacetimes Riem
Yeah that seems wrong
Exotic smooth structures are hard because the important part is the smooth structure but in no case do we have expressions for the smooth structure
but then, we don't have matrix valued stars, so...

$$★^{\begin{pmatrix}0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0\end{pmatrix}}$$
what
18:57
(Carry on folks, nothing to see here...)
Can we?
the energy can't change in that case.
the frequency shift is (typically) not large enough to change the number of the photons
@Mostafa hmmmmm
this might actually be way harder than it looks
photon numbers change in non-inertial frame transformations
this is Unruh-effect territory
I'm probably out of my depth
@JohnRennie That may be, but Cambridge was 2nd in 2015, 3rd in 2016, 4th in 2017 and 5th in 2018... So it's not really doing that well compared with the past few years :/
ok this is actually taking forever
ctan servers are shit
19:05
@Mithrandir24601 All of them pesky Americans are catching up
@JaimeGallego :'(
Sid
Sid
Does anyone even care about rankings?
Sid
Sid
Ha!
@0celouvskyopoulo7 You caught me. :P
19:07
anybody know what this link does?
from the doi I just posted
halfway through a paper on not aluminum I realize I've been reading about aluminum
what is going on
@EmilioPisanty Could you not be bothered to make a nice circle?
@0celouvskyopoulo7 freehand circle is exactly as intended
@Sid Not to the individual places extent, but if any of the universities that I've been at dropped by a scale comparable to where they are, I wouldn't be overly happy. I wouldn't be like 'oh no, this is terrible', but I wouldn't be happy about it
404
A: The Many Memes of Meta

TheTXIMeme: Freehand Circles Originator: TheTXI Cultural Height: TBD Variation: during Winter Bash season, some members substitute the freehand circles for freehand hats. Unlike the hats, they won't disappear after Winter Bash is over. See Also: Here, and Here as answer to this post

@EmilioPisanty I know it's a meme
If there were a meme about drinking bleach, would you do that too?
19:09
@Sid What I am more concerned about is the REF rankings as that affects things like funding
@0celouvskyopoulo7 meh
in any case
why does the official EPL page have a broken link to a nonexistent arXiv id?
Emilio Pisanty Labs?
@0celouvskyopoulo7 wish it was
Europhysics Letters
Emerson Palmer and Lake
huh, there are nuclear engineering tex packages
19:11
@EmilioPisanty ಠ_ಠ
Does that mean I have to learn QFT on curved spacetime in order to do research on angular momentum of light?
@Mostafa apparently?
Yes
Hope you like functors
@Mostafa take it from the man 'imself
plenty of GR there
...
is that in word with TeX equations?
and triple integrals
who actually lets that get published?
@0celouvskyopoulo7 don't think so
pdf marks Producer: MiKTeX pdfTeX-1.40.14
19:15
@EmilioPisanty I don't see any GR in there
am I missing something?
sarcasm?
@0celouvskyopoulo7 me being sloppy
anyways
@Mithrandir24601 have Cambridge ever been as a high as second? On a reputable ranking? In the last few hundred years? :-)
I thought the US universities had the top few places sewn up.
Anyway, all that matters is beating Oxford :-)
@Abcd ask me tomorrow. I'm going to bed now!
0.88
Mbps download
77.6
Mbps upload
Something is wrong with that
Are you sure you didn't switch these two?
Yes.
My download for these packages is super slow all of a sudden
Did a speed test
Anonymous
19:22
That happens usually on Apple devices. Check your router settings.
@EmilioPisanty Miktex is configured to download missing packages on the fly, btw
but it's not doing it
gtg but this is annoying
@EmilioPisanty I think I'm gonna do it ::forehead runs with sweat::
@Mostafa go for it
I wish the question were better formulated
then it'd be worth plonking a substantial bounty
as it is, it just frays around the edges
@EmilioPisanty I think it is suppose to either find the paper or search the author, but what it does (at least for me) is go to a failed search.
Presumably the webmaster at IOP is the person to notify about it.
@dmckee yeah
I can't be bothered at the moment though
19:25
Not that [email protected] has been a reliable contact address for about two decades.
@EmilioPisanty But in the first chapter (Supporting Theory) he only mentions special relativity (no GR), and some QED
@Mostafa I probably misrememberd just how much GR is in there
Any way, I dropped by to whinge and moan.
I was probably thinking of the sections on zilch generalizations and Noether theorems, which are about equally technical
I have a on-line course this summer because my wife is expecting our first child in July.
19:27
@dmckee you were looking for kids to shout off your lawn?
And one of my students wrote today that she is having trouble keeping up because she has two other classes this summer.
@dmckee congratulations
Who the hell tries to take three classes in the summer?!?
Who lets them?
Argh!
this is a full-time course?
@dmckee since you're here, though
why does this work
 echo "Starting calculation. `date`" | tee -a ${logfile}
@EmilioPisanty Five semester units. In eight weeks.
19:28
but not this
 echo "Finished. `date`" | tee -a ${logfile}
in the same file
WTF? It should be none or both just on general principles.
Sid
Sid
@dmckee Maybe your student wants to shore up her CV?
@Sid But two Ds and an F aren't going to shore up anything.
I saw two simultaneous summer courses crush one of the most promising students I've ever had the pleasure of teaching.
@dmckee I know
Sid
Sid
crush?
19:31
She squeaked through with two Cs.
And ended up crying in my office.
Nothing worse than a crying student. Especially when you know they are a good, hard-working, smart person.
Sid
Sid
That sucks..
Mind you, that was intro physics and 2nd semester o-chem, but she was hella competent.
@EmilioPisanty Both work fine when I run them from the command line in bash.
Is there some sneaky change being made to the environment between the lines?
@dmckee possibly
there's obviously a calculation in between
ah
duh
^ The sound of progress.
5
there's a cd in between
how do I make $logfile be an absolute path?
i.e. append stuff onto pwd
19:38
An alternative would be to use pushd and popd for directory navigation rather than cd. That way you can reliably get back to where you started.
Takes bash or some other advanced shell. I don't think it is in POSIX /bin/sh.
@EmilioPisanty I used to know that, but can't recall right now.
@dmckee it's good
SO to the rescue
I swear
I'm just a human version of stacksort every now and then
20:02
@EmilioPisanty ok how do I get miktex to work now?
oh, it seems to work now
but for some reason it is failing to find a package not in the document
fml
(not important)
@EmilioPisanty realpath, but I suppose you found that already
20:38
hi. can sb help me w my question?
is that right to say metal has positive charge in normal position?

if not, so why does electricity pass through my body when I touch the doorknob?

why does some stuff have extra electron or some others have positive charge? like when I put my foot on rug it conducts electron to my foot, and my foot gives the extra to the earth through my body, if the whole charge of the earth is neutral, why does some parts or some stuff on it are not neutral?

and in the end, why do I get electrical shock? is that a huge number of electrons pass through my body?

« first day (2420 days earlier)      last day (2807 days later) »