« first day (2369 days earlier)      last day (2577 days later) » 
01:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

10:00 PM
Hm
I think so?
Is a geodesic of the spacetime a geodesic of the hypersurface?
There are spacetimes which are geodesically complete but have incomplete curves, but since those are accelerated curves, I don't think that matters for a spacelike surface
 
10:12 PM
@Slereah No
 
yeah probably not
 
Are geodesics in $\Bbb R^3$ geodesics on the sphere?
 
You can foliate Minkowski space with hyperboloid
I think it's probably true, though
 
So I have a symmetric guy $K_{AB}$ and a metric $\gamma_{AB}$. I want a function $f$ and a one-form $\Phi_A$ with $K_{AB}=f\gamma_{AB}+\Phi_A\Phi_B$
Surely this must be possible
 
what is a symmetric guy
 
10:14 PM
symmetric tensor
 
Decompose the tensor into the diagonal and the off diagonal terms, mb
should be easier to show
 
eh, $\Phi_A\Phi_B$ has both diagonal and off terms
wtf why is this so hard
 
Maybe just consider this at a single point
is the dimension of the space of symmetric matrices equal to that of $f$ and $\Phi$
I think it may fall short
 
Wait, this is a two dimensional manifold.
I can probably just write everything down.
 
In 2D that may work
 
10:24 PM
In 2D there are 3 dimensions of symmetric matrices.
 
yeah
Hence why it may work
 
$f\gamma$ generates one
I guess the dyads generate two?
 
I think so yeah
 
Linear algebra is awful.
@Slereah why?
 
In 4D I think that would be $10$ versus $5$
Gut feeling?
I don't have a better reason than "it is described by three numbers"
"Causal structure | an infestation of closed timelike curves"
 
10:30 PM
where is ACM when you need him
 
At this hour, probably in bed
The Germans are big on punctuality
 
what's "harmonic" in French?
harmonique?
 
yes
 
So this is probably stupid
Suppose I just pick any old $\Phi$
And I suppose $K_{AB}-\Phi_A\Phi_B=f\gamma_{AB}$
And I then have $f=\gamma^{AB}(K_{AB}-\Phi_A\Phi_B)/2$
That probably doesn't work...
 
Well it's three equations,
$$a = f \alpha + k^2$$
$$b = f \beta + p^2$$
$$c = f \gamma + pk$$
 
10:45 PM
How about this
 
Gotta check if this has a solution for all values
Diagonalize the metric, find the eigenvalues?
I dunno
 
$$\begin{pmatrix}K_{11} & K_{12}\\ K_{12} & K_{22}\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} f+\Phi_1^2 & \Phi_1\Phi_2\\ \Phi_1\Phi_2 & f+\Phi_2^2\end{pmatrix} $$
 
Gauss coordinates?
 
I already diagonalized the metric
just set it = identity for now
$$K_{11}K_{22}-K_{12}^2=f^2+f(1-K_{11})+f(1-K_{22})$$
not great
 
Consider $K_{11} = K_{12} = a, K_{22} = b$, then $\Phi_1 = a/\Phi_2$, so $f + \Phi_1^2 = a$ and $f + \Phi_2^2 = b$, so $\Phi_2^2 - \Phi_1^2 = b-a$, or $\Phi_2^2 - 1/\Phi_2^2 = b-a$, $\Phi_2^4 - 1 = (b-a) \Phi_2^2$
for $\Phi_2^2 = x$, does $x^2 + (a-b) \Phi_2^2- 1 = 0$ have a positive root
for all values of $a$ and $b$
I assume the matrix has to be real here
The determinant is $(a - b)^2 + 4$, so... yeah I guess it has a positive root
Dang it
@ACuriousMind Do you know if it's a true property or not?
So that I don't waste time trying to find counterexamples
you could prove it with three different values for each components of $K$, but I don't know how to solve cubic roots off the top of my head
 
10:59 PM
0
Q: Decomposing symmetric tensor field into sum of metric and tensor product

0celouvskyopoulo7Consider a symmetric tensor field $K_{ij}$ on a 2-dimensional Riemannian manifold with metric $g_{ij}$. How does one show that there exists a (smooth) function $f$ and one-form $\phi$ such that $$K_{ij}=fg_{ij}+\phi_i\phi_j?$$ I tried raising the $j$ index (so the metric becomes the identity) and...

 
If you're hard up for the solution really just solve it by hand, and do special cases for the zeros
 
upvote brah
 
updooted
 
So what one needs to do is put an inner product on the symmetric 2-matrices.
Then compute the component of $K$ along the orthogonal direction to $g$
and show it's a dyad
 
11:35 PM
Sorting my quantum papers
Where the hell do I put all the papers by that guy about the Hilbert bundle
do I give him his own crazy folder
 
Howdy, Sir $2\pi$? :-)
 
Howdy :)
@peterh I think you forgot $r$ :P
 
@JohnRennie Sad. I think the result will be only trivially calculable. What if the gravitational interaction of two, enough big BECs is measured?
 
01:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (2369 days earlier)      last day (2577 days later) »