« first day (2302 days earlier)      last day (2626 days later) » 

4:00 PM
::ahem::
 
@ACuriousMind implying Germans know how to BBQ
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform ::hands over lozenge::
 
Dec 17 '16 at 17:10, by AccidentalFourierTransform
t̥̥͇ḫa͓̘̣͜ṋ̖͔͝ͅͅk̳̻̺͉̝̯͙s̝̦͕̯ͅ
 
@0celo7 I have a pet Texan who does it for me
@AccidentalFourierTransform Touchè
 
0
A: Which body has high moment of inertia (rigid body or soft body)

Yashas SamagaThe moment of inertia of a substance is given by $$I = \int r^2 dm \tag{1}$$ The immediate conclusion you can infer from the above formula is that moment of inertia does not depend on the elasticity of the object, it only depends on the mass distribution. Intuitively, the yolk (yellow part) is...

What's wrong with the answer?
 
4:02 PM
the thing about the moment of inertia
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform ?
 
@ACuriousMind Implying they know how to either
You want a Memphian
 
@YashasSamaga I was kidding. I did not, and will not, read that post. As you can see, Im very busy with my businesses (i.e., Im watching a youtube video :-P )
 
@YashasSamaga Maybe because people find answers that say there's no answer boring. Just like proofs that prove there are no solutions.
2
 
@ACuriousMind you know, I'm a cat
 
4:07 PM
Jost came in the mail
Hurray
 
Would you BBQ me?
@Slereah pic?
 
@0celo7 That's a weird question
 
@0celo7 ACM is a vegetarian. We discussed that already...
 
4:10 PM
@ACuriousMind You're avoiding answering it
 
@0celo7 That's an astute observation
 
@ACuriousMind jesus, you'd actually eat me?
@Slereah don't you dare keep it next to those physics books
 
Well math books are two shelves down
But GR is the shelf at arm level
 
Ok, just GR books?
no QFT garbage?
i.e. lies?
 
@YashasSamaga What?
 
4:12 PM
QFT is the shelf below
 
I can see Birrel and Davies right there
 
@anonymous I was trying to explain that earlier.
 
Birrel and Davies is GR enough
It is the baby of GR and QFT
 
@anonymous that liquids which are inside a sphere are not counted while calculating moment of inertia
 
So it should have been euthanized
 
4:13 PM
@Slereah I think I read Carlip's 2+1 QG. Is this book the one that ends with "we leave it to the reader to generalise this to 3+1."?
 
Lemme check
 
@YashasSamaga -_- That is for low viscosity fluids. Yolk has high viscosity.
 
@AccidentalFourierTransform you read all of it?
 
@anonymous If you count it completely, you are cheating as well.
 
"I leave this as an exercize to the reader"
yep
 
4:14 PM
@0celo7 String Theory....Quantum Gravity....Are these really Physics books? ;)
 
Last exercize of Visser was "quanticize gravity"
 
@YashasSamaga How ?
 
@Mostafa yes.
 
@anonymous To explain that, I took another case where there is no frictional force b/w the liquid and the shell. You still kept saying the same.
 
@0celo7 no, some of it, for the lulz
 
4:15 PM
They are most certainly not mathematics
Physicists who say string theory is math do not know what math is
 
@anonymous Write the moment of inertia equation in the vector form. Tell me how you'd include the MoI of the liquid.
 
@YashasSamaga Doesn't matter whether you take the yolk as friction-less or not the fact remains the same that boiled rotates faster.
 
@anonymous It wasn't related to the boiled egg. Somewhere you started claiming that frictionless liquid would have to be counted in MoI calculation. That changed the topic and I started complaining about it.
 
@0celo7 And mathematicians who say String Theory is physics don't know what physics is.
 
@Mostafa except for the fact that mathematics > physics (clear), so mathematicians get to decide what is physics or not.
 
4:17 PM
@YashasSamaga No, I said liquid has to be counted for its degrees of freedom and energy dissipation.
 
Now, you can say that it's neither.
I could be convinced of that.
 
@anonymous for that I said, you shouldn't incldue it in MoI calculation because you'd double count the effects. You argued no, it had to be included.
 
@YashasSamaga If you want to do it accurately then you have to take moment of inertia of the liquid also. And no, it would not double count the effect.
 
I said "If you assume that only the shell rotates and the liquid slowly starts and tries to damp the shell's rotation. You shouldn't include the liquid in the moment of inertia."
You said "The liquid MI matters a lot."
 
@Slereah are you gonna start reading?
 
4:19 PM
howdy
 
@anonymous Firstly, the liquid is not rigid. You cannot calculate the moment of inertia.
 
Fugg I'm sick and I woke up at 6 AM
 
user228700
@JohnR: What is uup?
 
Ain't got head for analysis today
 
@Slereah Cold?
 
4:20 PM
Either you have to assume that the liquid moves in sync with the shell or it doesn't.
 
yeah
 
If it doesn't, then you cannot calculate the moment of inertia.
 
Dang, same
 
That will teach me to go and meet people
 
@YashasSamaga You can, experimentally with some error.
 
4:20 PM
People are full of germs
 
@anonymous huh, you added the experimentally term now...
 
some guy is doing online gambling in physics lecture
seems like a good idea
 
He's getting a physics degree, isn't that a thrilling enough gamble of his future for him
 
@Kaumudi.H the brother's mother in law (my aunt in law?) has just phoned to say her computer is bust. So as the family computer nerd I now get to drive 200 miles to Somerset to fix it!
 
@Slereah this is engineering physics
@JohnRennie what? can't you say that you can't take off from work?
 
4:22 PM
Literally just phoned, she phoned about ten minutes ago.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Oh, that sucks :-( (If it does, I mean. Are u going to enjoy it?)
 
that's what my parents do when I ask them to visit (I cri evrytime)
 
@YashasSamaga I thought you are intelligent enough to understand that. Obviously I don't expect you to calculate MI sitting on your couch with just pen and paper without knowing the physical properties of the yolk.
 
@0celo7 she knows I can work from anywhere there's an Internet connection :-)
 
@JohnRennie dammit man why did you reveal that!?
 
4:23 PM
@Kaumudi.H I'll use it as an excuse to visit family. My niece has been nagging me to install a bluray drive in her laptop so I'll do that at the same time.
 
huh?
how does a blu-ray drive fit in a laptop
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Cool :-)
 
@0celo7 ??? you can get laptop bluray drives
 
@JohnRennie how thick are they?
how is there room in the laptop
 
For example this one.
 
4:25 PM
god, ebay
 
@0celo7 Maybe in the future popular-scientists can take care of it.
 
You have to be careful though as laptop optical drives come in thicker and thinner forms. A lot of the cheaper laptop blurays are the thicker version that won't fit all laptops.
@0celo7 that's the one I bought for my niece
 
@JohnRennie my laptop doesn't even have a CD drive
how should it fit in there?
 
Jobs had this obsessive hatred of optical drives. I don't know why he felt that way.
 
and why does one need blu ray anyway?
@JohnRennie Because one doesn't need them?
 
4:27 PM
But he managed to get the optical drives removed from almost all the Apple range.
@0celo7 because my niece has a large collection of films on bluray
 
tell her to get a TV with a bluray player
 
user228700
..? Won't that cost significantly more than a drive?
 
70 inch curved TV
 
She has a TV with a bluray player, but she wants to watch films in her room with her friends and Mum won't allow her a TV in her bedroom.
 
@0celo7 mine has a DVD drive. I have used it only once or twice (bought it in 2011)
 
4:28 PM
@Kaumudi.H cost shmost
@Mostafa agreed. I bought an external one that I have used exactly once in two years
 
@Kaumudi.H bluray drive £25, TV £500 :-)
 
What good TV costs 500?
 
user228700
@0celo7 I'm literally broke. Oh, hang on, yep, almost; I've Rs. 20 in my purse.
 
@0celo7 The better of the Samsung budget TVs cost around that
For £500 you can get a pretty good 42" or thereabouts TV
 
@JohnRennie why will mum allow a laptop but not a TV?
I made that argument to my parents constantly and they never budged
Ridiculous, really
 
4:31 PM
You're asking me to explain my sister in law's logic?
 
yes
you're old
rather fatherly
 
Yes, but I'm a nerd and believe that all children of any age should have large quantities of laptops, phones, etc, etc
 
How viscous is egg albumin relative to honey?
 
@Kaumudi.H How much is that in $$$
 
user228700
@0celo7 No man who buys 2 laptops a month is qualified to be known as "sane" and "fatherly" :-P
 
4:32 PM
@YashasSamaga far less
 
I have been battling for the last 15 years to persuade my brother and sister in law to let me give computers to my niece.
 
I am freezing a bottle of honey atm
 
@JohnRennie my 5 year old nephew got an iPad
 
Good for him!
 
to see if the frozen honey rolls down faster than the unfrozen one
 
4:32 PM
Because he was being bullied on the bus for not having tech
 
user228700
@0celo7 $0.3
 
A friend of mine's daughter was using an iPad at age 1
 
Back in my day we played with sticks, until I almost took out Marvin's cousin's eye
 
And was pretty good with it.
 
@JohnRennie Oh, my other nephew (2 or 3) was using an iPad as an infant
I'm saying the other one has an iPad
 
user228700
4:34 PM
I used to be an expert at building a house using lego blocks.
 
Good - I approve whole heartedly
 
like he takes it to school and stuff
 
How does one use an ipad as an infant
You can't breastfeed an ipad
2
 
@Kaumudi.H :(
 
@Kaumudi.H I used to build houses with Lego :-)
@Slereah eh?
@Kaumudi.H: anyhow, I'm going to set up a shiny new PC for my aunt in law rather than trying to fix her old one. I did try and persuade her to have a laptop but she was insistent she wanted a PC.
 
user228700
4:36 PM
x'D Awesome! Has she ordered a new one?
 
No, I'll give her one from my pile of PCs.
 
ok, I never said john was sane
he is clearly not...
 
user228700
U have a pile of PCs as well?! What the hell...
 
user228700
@0celo7 Yeah, OK x'D
 
@BalarkaSen Does "affine diffeo" mean anything to you?
 
4:38 PM
@Kaumudi.H no-one wants PCs these days (except aging aunt in laws) so I have a stack of unwanted ones. I sold some on ebay a while ago and got £5 each for them!
 
nah man. perhaps a diffeo which preserves the affine structure?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie £5 each?!
 
@BalarkaSen By "affine structure" do you mean "connection on frame bundle?"
 
@Kaumudi.H Yes, that's all anyone would pay. Though admittedly these were fairly old with slow CPUs by modern standards.
 
user228700
...OK, I see.
 
4:40 PM
@JohnRennie Hmm.
I want a PC
I need a monitor
Something to get me started
 
@0celo7 for what application? Serious number crunching? If you just want a big screen why not just connect a screen to your Macbook?
 
@JohnRennie gaming
I have to play the witcher 3
 
HAVE
 
4:41 PM
@0celo7 Ah OK, so you need something that you can stuff with a mofo graphics card?
 
@0celo7 I think it's having a flat connection. The definition I know of is a smooth manifold where the transition maps are affine maps
 
$\mathfrak{HAVE}$
 
aka translations
 
user228700
@0celo7 Can't even read that.
 
@Kaumudi.H do you have the extension?
 
4:42 PM
@JohnRennie Yes. I have more than enough money from my job to buy one. But I don't want to commit $1500+
I don't think I'll get that much use out of it.
 
user228700
@YashasSamaga Oh, yep, I have MathJax, thanks :-) The font sucks is what I meant...
 
@BalarkaSen By affine diffeo I mean one that preserves the connection
But if you don't know about those, never mind
 
I got that
 
I have a claim that any two cylinders, tori, Möbius bands, or Klein bottles are affine diffeomorphic
 
@0celo7 The only PCs I know well are the Dell range. In your place I would look for an Optiplex 7010 or 9010 with a big i7 in it. Those PCs have a slot for a graphics card. You should easily get one for < $500, though you'll then need to buy the graphics card.
 
4:44 PM
shrug man
 
@JohnRennie Yeah, I don't know if I should do the whole thing custom or get part of it premade and then insert a permium GPU
I probably don't need a $400 CPU, but I might be wrong.
 
user228700
@JohnR: They cleaned my tank all too well--the water now smells excessively of bleaching powder >.<
 
@0celo7 If you want it on the cheap buy a second hand PC on ebay.com and buy the card separately.
@Kaumudi.H bleach? dysentery? Bleach isn't so bad :-)
 
user228700
:-) Well, yeah, I suppose.
 
@JohnRennie I might be getting $4,000 this summer...hopefully...I will start considering it if that happens
 
4:47 PM
@0celo7 I can look on ebay.com to see if there's anything I'd recommend ...
 
@JohnRennie I've been told not to trust Russians or ebay
 
russians are good
 
That's a serious mofo CPU in that box.
 
That's pretty expensive just to look at it
 
only 8GB
@JohnRennie where does it say?
 
4:50 PM
Memory is cheap
 
I have a 300$ PC with i5, 8GB DDR3 RAM, 1TB
custom built
usually custom built PCs turn out to be costly
 
@JohnRennie The case is tiny
AFAIK modern gaming GPUs are bricks
 
@0celo7 it says the CPU is an i7-3770
@0celo7 yes, it only takes half height cards so it wouldn't be any use for you to game on. I just couldn't believe such a powerful PC is going that cheaply.
 
user228700
I'm off. Bye, everyone :-)
 
You want a CPU like that in a tower case.
@Kaumudi.H Bye
 
4:53 PM
that's my computer
decent and simple
no dedicated GPU
 
@Slereah Actually you can. However, I doubt that will be of any nutritional value to the ipad :P.
 
@JohnRennie ok let's think seriously about this over the summer :)
 
wtf
 
Though that will be more expensive.
 
4:54 PM
how is that so cheap?
$350?? Isn't the CPU that much
i7-4770
 
That's the starting bid. I'd guess it will sell for nearer $500.
 
@JohnRennie Do people have bots that snipe bid at 0:01 ETA
 
if a processor costs 1000$ on the retail market, you'll get it for 200$ at a wholesale market
 
ahahah
 
you'll get it for 100$ if you buy it from a manufacturing hub
 
4:56 PM
@YashasSamaga was tricked by the dollar signs
 
@0celo7 Allegedly there are bots that will do that, but I always bid manually and I bid with about 5 seconds to go.
 
good god
 
It's all quite exciting really :-)
You should see my ebay feedback. I must have spent £50 grand on ebay over the years.
Not all for me - I used to buy computers for my company on my own ebay account.
 
Yo folks
anyone know how to download the source for this one?
I'm curious to know what "plain TEX file" means on an arXiv eprint from '96.
 
5:03 PM
@JohnRennie yeah, but then what?
it downloads as a file without an extension
normally one adds .tar.gz and it opens right up
 
It's just a text file. Open it with any text editor.
 
this one's not working, though
 
Rename it to .txt or maybe .tex since it's TeX source code.
 
@JohnRennie ah, so it is
duh
I thought it'd be a gzipped tex file as in the description
 
+1 nerd points for me then :-)
 
5:04 PM
7zip wasn't having none of it
 
First thing I always do with an unknown file is open it ina hex editor.
 
@EmilioPisanty I see TEX code in the source file.
 
@YashasSamaga yeah, I got it
and yes, it is roughly as horrifying as I thought
thank goodness for non-bare-TeX LaTeX
and yes, Leslie Lamport, by goodness I do mean you
          %BEGINNING OF PAPER


\hfuzz = 0.5in
\def\label#1{
\ifundefined{#1}
      %define new macro whose expansion is eqnumber.
\expandafter\edef\csname #1\endcsname{\the\eqnumber}
\else\message{label #1 already in use}
\fi{}}
\def\(#1){(\csname #1\endcsname)}
\def\eqn#1{(\csname #1\endcsname)}
↑ not what I would normally consider to be equivalent to \begin{document}
 
@EmilioPisanty Damn
 
@ACuriousMind What is the moral difference between a hypothesis and a technical condition?
 
5:13 PM
This is what they used to have to deal with?
 
I'm confused. What's the issue?
@BalarkaSen Yummy
 
@JohnRennie Hello there! I had a question: In Bremsstrahlung like interaction do the high energy electrons ever collide with the nucleus ? What happens then? Does it combine with a proton or something? Is this situation even possible?
 
Remember that electrons and quarks aren't like hard spheres.
 
@JohnRennie Why not use bots?
 
@JohnRennie Okay? So?
 
5:25 PM
Electrons and quarks never collide in the sense that classical particles do. The electrons interact with quarks and at low energies are simply deflected by them. This causes radiation as the electron is accelerated.
At higher energies you start getting particle production and it gets a whole lot more complicated!
 
How do you smash two protons together? As two protons get closer, wouldn't their potential energy hit infinity?
 
Protons are bound states of quarks
They are not rigidly defined solid objects any more than atoms are.
At high energies the proton just behaves lie a bag of quarks and gluons, so the proton-proton collisions in the LHC are actually quark/gluon collisions.
2
Two colliding quarks never get to zero separation, so the energy is never infinite.
 
The bag of quarks still have a net positive charge, right? As another bag of quarks gets closer, they should repel and increase their potential energy.
 
@YashasSamaga Who's VeryCuriousMind? xD
 
No particles ever go at zero separation
 
5:28 PM
@Mostafa Oh! You are spying on my imgur profile?
 
@YashasSamaga Yes indeed.
 
How does the collision work if they don't get to zero separation?
 
Conclusion? Is that a phone autocorrect of collision? :-)
 
@JohnRennie Oh I see. They can get very close but a head on collision like classical particles is not possible. (It is difficult to visualize electrons as waves. :P)
 
5:31 PM
I answered a question on this somewhere in the PSE. Basically as the interaction strength gets large energy gets transferred into other quantum fields where it appears as new particles.
 
@JohnRennie In LHC also does the same situation occur ? Do the quarks/gluons just get deflected at very close distance without head-on-collision ?
Are quarks also considered as waves or something?
 
@Danu I think that was the least of their troubles at the time
1996 sounds late enough that you'd have postscript drivers and you could see your work on screen, but for a number of years the only way to see whether your code was working was to print it
 
@anonymous At such small scales particles don't have well defined trajectories. The collision is calculated as the interaction of two plane wave excitations of the quantum fields (say John oversimplifying horrifically :-).
 
@JohnRennie Interesting :) "Basically as the interaction strength gets large energy gets transferred into other quantum fields where it appears as new particles" Wow!
 
Question: this has a broken link to the old astronomy site, but it's closed. Is it worth editing?
 
5:34 PM
@JohnRennie I am happy with the simplified version :D
 
@anonymous Yes, that's how Higgs bosons get created. Did you think it was magic? :-)
 
Listening to all these weird physics stuff, I have concluded that people with extreme commonsense can never be physicists.
 
@JohnRennie Well, I still consider it magic :P
Quantum Mechanics is magic for me !
I read about Higgs boson last year sometime. It was pretty interesting! I bought a book on it also!
 
@EmilioPisanty The link to the astronomy site works for me :/
 
@Mostafa and does it lead you to a question with the same title as in the url in the original post?
http://astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/948/what-exactly-is-the-definition‌​-of-motion-and-its-relation-to-machs-conjecture
leads you to
4
Q: How does a Bahtinov mask work?

ArneFor focusing the image of a telescope, one can use a Bahtinov mask. How does this mask work, and how did Mr Bahtinov get the idea to cut such a peculiar shape? Is it possible for me to design my own focusing masks?

 
@EmilioPisanty ah, no :)
 
@Mostafa ;-). See here for more details.
meh, let's just edit it.
 
@0celo7 The hell?
 
@BalarkaSen What?
My advisor said I should read this
I'm scared to read anything by Gromov
 
5:54 PM
@JohnRennie One more question: In this graph is the pinch off voltage same for all frequencies of incident light ?
(Photolectric effect)
None of my books seem to clarify this point
(Pinch off voltage=voltage at which current saturates)
 
I'd guess there will be a small effect of frequency because high frequency photons will eject electrons with a higher kinetic energy. However I'd guess this will be a very small effect and maybe immeasurable small.
 
@JohnRennie can I teach you about balls please
 
@JohnRennie Aha! That was what I was thinking. Thanks for the clarification :)!
 
Photoelectrons get ejected with a spread of energies and in random directions so you need a voltage high enough to make sure all the photoelectrons get to the collector.
If you have higher energy photons shooting off sideways you might need a higher voltage to collect them all. But I have no idea how big the effect would be.
 

« first day (2302 days earlier)      last day (2626 days later) »