« first day (2258 days earlier)      last day (2969 days later) » 

22:01
@Shashaank by the way, it does look much better now
@AccidentalFourierTransform Ok. I did not know that. I thought reposting will be be best. Nevertheless I will keep that in Mind from now onwards.
@Shashaank yeah, thanks :-)
it took me a lot of time to learn the rules of physics.SE
@AccidentalFourierTransform Yeah that's pretty much the problem with me too. I was requesting an answer from someone but he mistook it as a demand. I am a beginner probably that's why taking such a lot of time. Nevertheless Thank you . Hoping someone sees it and answers it !
22:38
anyone around?
::crickets::
hi ::blushes::
@AccidentalFourierTransform In the professor notes we keep it, that why I asked the question in the first place, cause I didn't get the difference between the case of $\vec{p}$ and $\vec{\pi}$. We keep that term and then we rewrite it in terms of the magnetic field. — Run like hell 7 mins ago
see here please ^
is $(\vec\sigma\cdot\vec \pi)^2=\vec \pi^2$ correct or not?
@AccidentalFourierTransform It depends on what the $\pi,p$ are. The second term vanishes for the canonical momentum but not for the kinematic momentum.
but why?
why doens't it vanish for both?
@AccidentalFourierTransform Because the kinematic momentum components no longer commute
It's $\sim \partial + A$, and $[\partial + A,\partial + A] f \neq 0$.
22:48
arrgh now I gotta go and tell OP that I forgot basic calculus and that he/she should forget everything I said
@ACuriousMind thanks
23:13
@AccidentalFourierTransform: Okay. By the way, how do you do the Feynman-slash / in Latex ? — Frederic Thomas 5 mins ago
lol

« first day (2258 days earlier)      last day (2969 days later) »