« first day (1917 days earlier)      last day (3310 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

00:03
@ACuriousMind I don't get it...
I mean, that means nothing to me
I get the math.
we have an SPS meeting at our university tomorrow
on the agenda is a debate over which form of maxwell's equations to put on our t-shirt
@GBeau vacuum or not?
I don't attend one meeting.....
@0celo7 Well, what it means is that the Fourier coefficients tell you how much of the frequency $2\pi n / L$ is in your function.
But you probably know that
Yes.
00:05
I really seem to not understand what your question is
@0celo7 I'm just reading the email that got sent out...
@GBeau Well, if it's vacuum, then I like: "God said the curvature of a U(1) principal bundle is harmonic and there was light."
@ACuriousMind Pretty much, and now I'm convinced it's a stupid question
@GBeau $\mathrm{d}F= 0$ and $\mathrm{d}{\star}F = {\star} J$, no question.
@ACuriousMind ahh, the hodge star operator
Or maybe just $J$, if you're one of the people who believe that current is naturally a 3-form :P
00:07
@ACuriousMind if you're gonna be fancy you might as well use $\mathrm{d}^\dagger$
$u_0 J$?
@GBeau huh?
@0celo7 The meaning $\mathrm{d}({\star} F)$ seems more natural to me than $(\mathrm{d}{\star})F$, especially in light of electromagnetic duality.
So, no, I'm not using $\mathrm{d}^\dagger$
Duality? What's that
Clearly the only sensible form is $\partial _\alpha F^{\alpha\beta } = \mu _0 J^\beta $
00:10
@0celo7 Have you slept through the zilch conversation that happened in this chat a bit ago?
$\mu_0=\epsilon_0=c=\hbar=k_B=G=4\pi=1$
@GBeau Ew, indices
If equations half book sales, imagine what they do to T-shirt sales ;P
@ACuriousMind No, I have a shitty memory.
Seriously, when will you believe me that I can't remember things?
@0celo7 The evidence for that mounts, yes
@0celo7 When you stop asking me questions and then say "I know!" when I answer them :P
00:12
Seriously, what is duality
I probably knew something about that when I read BBS
They talk about brane duality there
Maxwell's equations in vacuum are symmetric under the exchange $F\leftrightarrow {\star F}$.
But the Lagrangian is not! :O
In a vacuum?
Or in general?
And there's a "zilch conversation" and a whole lot of other conserved quantities associated with that.
Yeah yeah now I remember
I read Danu's thing
My memory is really worrying me...
I've gone back and read chat transcripts because me a year ago knew a lot more math and physics than me now...
Go to a doctor...
00:14
No money, time or car.
How much sleep are you getting?
7 hours
@guest I don't forget things in my daily life
I just completely forget things I've learnt
I'll have the same conversation with ACM because I just forget everything we talked about
Slow down.
@ACuriousMind is this wrong?
Is what wrong?
00:18
we have the same conversations over and over
I completely forget everything you tell me
For most of the things we talk about, I have no idea whether you retain them or not.
let's test it
@0celo7 I like how you threw $4\pi$ in there
user54412
Indeed, $4\pi = 1$ in my line of work.
user54412
Actually, it's more like $\sqrt{4\pi} = 1$
00:30
Guys, kill this asap.
@DanielSank Just spam flag it, enough of those will automatically delete it
@GBeau yeah I saw
I also saw a UCSB acceptance
but nothing for UChicago yet
I just worked a physics problem set while using $A=r\pi^2$.
user54412
I feel like having an anxiety attack every time you two talk to each other.
I'm pretty sure I'm losing my mind.
00:42
@ChrisWhite haha sorry about that
but I'm a lot better now than I was a couple of weeks ago
My brain has slowly come to the stage of acceptance
It took me 14 tries before I got the correct answer.
I've already applied for a few jobs
@FenderLesPaul You applied to some easier options didn't you?
surely you'll get in somewhere :s
yeah I applied to safeties but haven't heard anything from them
@FenderLesPaul Accepted to UCSB for grad school?
00:53
@DanielSank no sir
oh, misunderstood.
@FenderLesPaul I got into UC Irvine :<
don't give up dude
@FenderLesPaul didn't you say you'd call your adviser out on something if you don't get in anywhere?
idk
can't recall
hmm
01:10
@FenderLesPaul no rejections yet though, right? :3
but no email at this point basically means rejection
wtf is A36 structural steel physics homework
@FenderLesPaul most of the places you applied to haven't even really been sending out yet
@0celo7 a code name for engineering homework?
maybe
I need the tensile strength
it's not given in the problem -.-
§A36 steel is a standard steel alloy that is a common structural steel in the United States. The A36 standard was established by the standards organization ASTM International. == Properties == As with most steels, A36 has a density of 7,800 kg/m3 (0.28 lb/cu in). Young's modulus for A36 steel is 200 GPa (29,000,000 psi). A36 steel has a Poisson's ratio of 0.26, and a shear modulus of 75 GPa (10,900,000 psi). A36 steel in plates, bars, and shapes with a thickness of less than 8 in (203 mm) has a minimum yield strength of 36,000 psi (250 MPa) and ultimate tensile strength of 58,000–80,000 psi (400...
Aha!
01:39
@Danu doing another 11D system
haha fucking singular matrix
I'm this close to getting internet connection on linux on my calculator
@BernardMeurer Someone in my class did that with a TI-84, not with your fancy thing
@ACuriousMind They're shitting you
I've tried
@BernardMeurer I have seen him access google on it
I don't believe that for a second.
01:53
The guy was a magician when it came to computers
You're such a bad liar.
Of course, the thing couldn't actually render the sites it accessed.
So it was rather useless
Well he must've been because that thing has no RAM whatsoever
And the processor is shitty
@BernardMeurer You can play Megaman on it
as well as the display isn't a TFT one so I have no idea how he got linux to use it
@ACuriousMind that's easy
01:55
@BernardMeurer It wasn't linux
Why are people believing him?
Self-written program
Hmmmmmm...I might be misremembering it, but I definitely remember him plugging his TI into a Ethernet socket with a self-made connector and doing something with it
Where did he do this?
01:57
In school
Was he able to drug you and implant memories?
@ACuriousMind Bullshit German schools do not have ethernet.
@0celo7 wat
Not all do, but ours had sockets to access the school network in every room
Germany is the third world, I've never been in a German school that had computers except for the dedicated computer labs.
Well..there weren't computers for them, but at some point they planned to put computers in every room and so they installed the sockets
Hmm...
I cautiously believe you on that...
Maybe your friend could solve this bridge problem for me?
02:00
The thing is, he could've done a number of things with an ethernet port
The matrix is non-invertible for some reason.
@0celo7 Haven't seen him in years
but on a TI-84 connecting to the internet wasn't one of them, just the protocol would flood the CPU
He should be an electrical engineer by now
and probably ram too
02:02
@ACuriousMind I need to find the two linearly dependent rows, don't I?
Or columns.
To do what
Maybe I can get another equation...
@ACuriousMind Figure out why this matrix is singular. It really shouldn't be.
@0celo7 Well...that means the set of rows/columns as a whole is lin. dep., not that two of them are
@ACuriousMind magic
@ACuriousMind Uh, yeah, that.
It's not obvious where the fault lies.
@ACuriousMind What do your $\gamma$s look like?
02:08
@0celo7 wat
user54412
^^ Is that... innuendo?
@ChrisWhite If he wants it to be, sure.
@ACuriousMind When you write $\gamma$, what does it look like? What's unclear?
Oh my god what is that
02:15
Math.
Or a crudely drawn porno, it's hard to tell.
::squints::
Porno
Oh, Bajoran, you dirty boy.
@BernardMeurer That's $\gamma : I\to Y$ in my handwriting from two years ago
that's what I read it as ^
nice handwriting
why is the $\gamma$ being oppressed
02:16
How can you tell from five symbols?
I've started putting random periods in my math like my analysis prof
What's wrong with me
user54412
@ACuriousMind Your gamma. It's drowning! Only two stubby arms above the bottom line, and not for much longer.
@ACuriousMind You're left handed?
@ChrisWhite It'll survive for as long as it needs to
@0celo7 Yes
How can you tell?
My theory is that you draw your arrow head counterclockwise. I think a rightie wouldn't.
But that's a theory.
(I'm a leftie.)
I draw it clockwise, I think
02:20
uh
I do too
I'm retarded
It looks like the bottom part is thicker...
I think I press a bit more right before I lift the pen?
I dunno
Huh, that's not normal.
Back to homework...
Aug 9 '15 at 12:35, by ACuriousMind
Perhaps my left-hand fingers are more agile because I am left-handed, but I have no problem at all hitting either capslock, shift or ctrl with my pinky
Ah, that's how I knew.
See, you don't forget everything
Just important stuff.
I don't see the difference.
Sometimes you just forget how you know it :P
02:25
@ACuriousMind Analogy that came to mind: You might have syphilis, but at least you're not a hooker!
I have syphilis either way.
Or in this case, a bad memory.
Syphilis actually leads to mental degradation...
I know.
I don't think I have it.
@ACuriousMind Suppose I have water pushing up against a wall
The total force of water against the wall is easy to calculate
But at which "point" does it act
Center of mass?
wtf
that makes my life so much harder
@ACuriousMind Actually, it's not easy to calculate :P Would it be the average of the pressure along the wall? Like if the wall is $H$ high, would it be $\frac{1}{H}\int_0^HP(y)\mathrm{d}y$?
@0celo7 found a song you'll like youtube.com/watch?v=XpSOWfFtKJE
02:35
@GBeau yeah but caltech sent out everything today
so it's not a good sign
@ACuriousMind Apparently it will act at the height $H/3$ o.o
@0celo7 Uh, If the pressure is not constant, I think you also get torque.
Yeah, I'm trying to calculate the torque.
But I have no clue what the lever arm is
Apparently it's $H/3$, but that's not at all obvious/clear.
Then you actually need to sum up the infinitesimal torques
And you determine the point about at which the force acts by $\tau = x\times F$ - you can calculate $\tau$ and $F$, and from that determine $x$
Yes.
I'm trying to figure out what the torque would be...
We have $dP=\rho g dy$ if memory serves
hmm
02:44
@0celo7 Just integrate $x\times\mathrm{d}F$
what exactly am I doing here
@ACuriousMind wtf is dF though
dF=PdA?
$P=\rho gy$
$dA=Wdy$
$W$ is the width of the wall
@0celo7 whatever you integrated to find the total force $F$
So $y\mathrm{d}F=\rho g Wy^2\mathrm{d}y$$?
Then $\tau=\frac{1}{3}\rho gW H^3$?
holy shit ACM you're a madman genius
looks alright, doesn't it?
yes, thanks
Now I need the center of mass of a trapezoid
Can I cry...
02:50
No, sounds just like homework so far
The hint is to divide it into a rectangle and a triangle
Now I have to find it for a triangle...
Oh, I only need the component normal to the thingie
Oh jesus that's wrong too
03:06
@ACuriousMind I calculated the center of mass, I am proud of myself
this is the most difficult calculation
THE ANSWER IS THE RIGHT ORDER OF MAGNITUDE
user116211
0celo7 is the rarest Homo sapiens in the world; he should be put under hammer : P
@user36790 Are you skillpatrol
user116211
A bit /
@3507 take the right triangle with one vertex at the origin, one at $(a,0)$ and the other at $(a,b)$
Then the triangle is defined by $y=\frac{b}{a}x$
The centroid in the $x$ direction is $$X=\frac{\int_0^a x\mathrm{d}A}{A}$$
Some fun calculus shows this is $2a/3$.
@user36790 what does this even mean
how am I the rarest
@user36790 why the multiple accounts
user116211
03:53
Huh?? Multiple accounts??? How????
04:27
@ChrisWhite so what is the fourier series really
04:42
@ACuriousMind I get a Puritan sermon as a bed-time story :)
I love my lit class
04:59
@FenderLesPaul hello
@FenderLesPaul skype
05:33
> He will crush out your blood [...] He will not only hate you, but He will have you in the utmost contempt
Not cool, God.
Absolutely no chill.
 
3 hours later…
08:20
Hello peeps
 
2 hours later…
10:43
0
Q: Redirecting questions related to basic definition/misunderstanding of entropy and black holes

Bruce LeeEvery 2-3 days a question pops up on the site related to basic definition/misunderstanding of entropy/black holes. In the process of searching for related questions, I find that there are many answers covering many interesting and valid points. The number of such posts having quality content is s...

Hi,

what is the significance of assuming photon energy is much less than electron rest mass energy in the context of compton scattering? Is it essentially saying that we are neglecting the effects of SR?
0
Q: Are questions related to physical aspects of engineering supposed to be closed?

Bruce LeeIn the question Why is UHF so much more popular than other frequencies for radio? the problem was supposed to be solved by applying basic physics, even though it was inspired by electrical engineering. I don't understand why the question was closed. What are the exact boundaries of engineering on...

@Jacobadtr It means you can ignore any process relating to pair production, I think
11:17
@Slereah Well I wouldn't know how to take that into account, so it's just as well I can ignore it!
@Slereah I think i'll work out my problem using both SR and without, and just see if SR plays a significant role. My photon undergoes a 180 degree recoil, so it experiences it's maximum change in energy, making me think SR might be significant
 
1 hour later…
12:48
There's a lot of questions on meth making on chemistry SE
13:08
0
Q: Suggested edit by OP in the review queue?

E.P.I just saw this edit in the Suggested Edits review queue over in Physics, and I'm rather confused as to what's going on. The suggested edit is attributed to the OP - same username, same identicon, same user id (though it seems to have kept the OP's rep and badges at the time of asking on the l...

@Jacobadtr : if it's a 180 degree recoil the photon energy doesn't change.
13:37
@JohnDuffield That doesn't seem right. For a 180 degree recoil, the photon wavelength shifts by twice the compton wavelength of the electron, and by the relationship between wavelength and energy, the photons energy must change
(Duffield does not actually know physics)
13:56
^ @Jacobadtr I'm not saying he's wrong, but take anything he says with a large grain of salt.
@0celo7 noted
14:15
hello let's talk about physics
What would you like to talk about?
about static electricity
this quantum class is going really slow
:<
Ok, is there something in particular with this topic?
yeah u can say i'm referring to richard feynman
14:19
I don't understand, do you mean you're studying electrostatics with Feynman's notes?
no, i got a problem and I asked that in this site but that was not fully cleared .
What's the problem?

Do you have a link to it?
sure just wait
@Slereah Does that surprise you?
here u go and pls see the edits done by anubhav goel. pls clarify me physics.stackexchange.com/q/230440/94536
ok @ACuriousMind did u find the fact which i'm not understanding?
14:30
@ffahim I don't understand what your problem is. You charge the sphere. It then has an excess of electrons on it. You ground it, and the excess electrons leave through the grounding wire. What is your problem with that?
no no i didn't charged it. i just shifted electrons from left side to right side.nothing else.
What do you mean by "bringing a negative charge to the conductor", then?
Are you just holding a charged sphere close without actually touching?
yeah yeah
This seems to be the setup - have you read and understood this page?
yes i alredy did that
14:33
@Jacobadtr Ahhhhhh
@ffahim: It is not at all clear to me from your post that you were talking about that situation
And I'm still not sure what the problem is - if you agree that the electrons will "stay away" from the charge as far as they can, what troubles you about them moving into the ground, which is undoubtedly farther away?
no that conductor has still a net zero charge
the electrons r pushed to the other side by induction
ok then let me tell u that this is related to potential
@ffahim Yes, and when you touch a grounded wire to the sphere, they are pushed into the wire by induction - the sphere and the wire can't tell they are different objects once they are connected.
As long as they are connected, they are "one big conductor"
The whole trick is to make the electrons move into one part of a conductor which you can then detach
So, bringing a charged object close to the conducting sphere causes a separation of charge on the sphere. The like charges will move to get away from your external charge, and the opposite charges will move closer. This sets up a potential difference on the sphere. (If you take the external charge away, they will redistribute evenly)

Now, you take a grounding wire, which is at zero potential and touch it to your now 'charged' sphere. The excess charge flows to ground and you remove the wire.

Now you have reduced the net + or - charge on the sphere leaving you with an overall net charge
u re again saying the charged conductor
The object you bring to your sphere is charged
14:40
yeah but the sphere is not charged
The net charge on your conductor is zero to begin with, but you separate the +ve and -ve charges to create regions on the conductor where there is an overall charge.
it just have the separation of charges.
oh.. ok and the sphere will have a negative voltage
hope u've read the edits on that question.
I have, but I am still unclear about precisely what you don't understand
ok i do not understand from here
wait i'm giving it
−kq/(r−R)+kq′/(r/R)=−kq/(r+R)−kq′/(r/R) how this equation is right?
pls explain me that
Without the context to that, there's nothing I can do.

I suggest that you draw a diagram, label clearly all the necessary quantities and ask a clear question.
Is this from a textbook?
14:50
no it was from my question's answer in this site.
pls read the edit no 3 from top
@ffahim There is no "edit no 3 from top"
Do you mean the second answer?
Are you referring to these redactions?

http://physics.stackexchange.com/posts/230514/revisions
yes
now see the edit jan 23 at 4:47
Why did you accept the answer if you do apparently not understand it?
(I don't really either, it's not particularly clear to me what that answer is going on about)
firstly i didn't see that thing properly. u can say that i didn't read attentively
but after a few days i noticed that
pls if u understand it then pls clarify me
14:57
I understand neither the calculation in that answer (i.e. I don't know what it is trying to do) nor what is unclear to you abou the situation in the first place, I'm afraid I can't help there.
o i know that he made a mistake initially which obliged me to make another mistake in that calculation
but just ignore it and concentrate on the equation which is not clear to me
hi @dmckee
what things do you think are important to find out when I'm visiting universities I got into and deciding between them?
@ACuriousMind there wasn't even a quiz on that gripping sermon
I think that might be the greatest sermon I've ever read.
15:24
@0celo7 ...so?
15:41
@ACuriousMind I don't understand
user116211
15:59
@ACuriousMind: Would you mind if I make a query on that issue here?
@user36790 If you're referring to the ergodic thingy, not at all, go ahead
16:14
Hey @ACuriousMind
@BernardMeurer Hey
Whats up?
@GBeau The most important thing, IMHO, is that the culture of the department is one you can live with (you don't have to be thrilled, just content). Quality of the faculty comes second (because you won't get the most out of the faculty if you don't get along). Then the number and variety of ongoing research projects (Especially those that might have some work for an undergrad).
Alas, none of those are really easy to judge during a campus visit, because the school will be trying to sell their program to you as much as you are trying to sell yourself to them.
But you should ask some other people as well, right now you have the opinion of one eccentric. You might prefer to know the consensus of eccentrics.
You know "Four of of five oddballs prefer ..." sort of thing.
16:46
@Danu Ok, I was able to solve that 11D system by hand...but it was hell.
@dmckee Undergrad? He's applying for graduate programs.
Uhm. Well. That's changes some of it.
The culture thing is more important still, but you care most about the group you'll be working with, and here the quality of the faculty is also much more important (possibly overtaking the culture). Finally you don't care about the breadth of research, but the value of the research that you can get involved in.
@ACuriousMind The definition of a "non-degenerate critical point" in the sense of Milnor is coordinate independent because a coordinate change just multiplies the Hessian by $\mathrm{GL}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ matrices, right?
@GBeau rejection from Caltech
essentially
@FenderLesPaul Did one of your profs not send in the recommendation or something :/
@0celo7 Correct
00:00 - 17:0017:00 - 00:00

« first day (1917 days earlier)      last day (3310 days later) »