@SirCumference Really, everyone? Aren't you being a little to dramatic?
user54412
01:05
Indeed. Moreover, it's sci-fi/**fantasy** for a reason -- the science is a plot device to explore the human condition in the aggregate (as opposed to individuals doing mundane things, like the 19th century English novel)
@SirCumference So Flatland also should not have been written? Because right now you seem to be claiming that fiction is at fault for people taking it for real.
@ACuriousMind OTOH he said he'll teach a course on spinors in GR / minmal surfaces / whatever I think is interesting if enough other people think is interesting
@SirCumference Economics is actually quite important in explaining many things in ecosystems, such as the population dynamics of some species over a period of time and how they interact
@0celo7 The "trivial" class might just the the most straightforward one, not the trivially easy one. Unfortunately, this meaning is only understood on the level of class cohomology.
@ACuriousMind In particular, they love to put the term "tachyons" to pretty much everything, to the point that the presence of this word defines how scifi it is (unless you are dealing with hard scifi)
Oh, forgot. How about teaching that mass = amount of matter in something?
Personally, I learned that mass = something's "resistance toward going at the speed of light". Not sure if that's correct, but it seemed to make sense.
I am usually not very interested in people (reminds me too much about corruption), unless they can be viewed as a non human entity. For example, to consider the society as a system of some sort, and analyse that without referring too much about people
For example, finance does not interested me in the past (because money->corruption->bad->headache to think about) Until just last year, a professor managed to taught it by reducing it into just a bunch of abstract concepts (hence chunky non human entities) and then I start to get interested in it as a study of how something called money flows in a system
@BernardMeurer So the bottomline is: It is possible to make me interested in a subject as long you can make it so that it does not remind me of people (except psychology, which I am interested because of self protection)
@ACuriousMind Back in 2014 and earlier when I was still scientism (please do not confuse this with scientology), I had the same kind of idea that science=truth. Until some time during that year, someone told me that science is just a model to try to understand and predict phenomenon, I then became an agnostic and can view science in the way you mentioned
user54412
@BernardMeurer It's there to remind you to stop idling in chat and answer some questions :p
The Flying Spaghetti Monster (FSM) is the deity of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster or Pastafarianism (a portmanteau of pasta and Rastafarian), a social movement that promotes a light-hearted view of religion and opposes the teaching of intelligent design and creationism in public schools. Although adherents describe Pastafarianism as a genuine religion, it is generally seen by the media as a parody religion.
The "Flying Spaghetti Monster" was first described in a satirical open letter written by Bobby Henderson in 2005 to protest the Kansas State Board of Education decision to permit...
@0celo7 Me neither, Some time when I saw a question that I thought I can answer, it turns out the answer is not perfect enough and then I give up writing it up because I don't know enough to address all possible loopholes that one can find
When I wrote an answer, I have a tendency to scan for all possible followed up questions that can be produced from the answer, and my aim often is to ensure my answer to be able to answer as many of these follow up questions that may pop up in the future
There are several proofs which sound more like "proofs by picture" than rigorous proofs, but contain enough information to construct the rigorous proof. It takes a bit to get used to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_superposition Hmm... So states can superimposed because they are solutions of SE and SE is linear. SE is linear because the evolution is linear.
So that means, in order to explain why superposition arises is to explain why evolution of a system is linear at atomic scales...