« first day (1908 days earlier)      last day (3319 days later) » 
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

20:00
if you derivate the potential energy you get force
so this is only in one way
Why are people speaking klingon?
3
the differential operator is not inversible
Because they can?
@privetDruzia yeah it is
you use an integral
(sinx+6) ' = cos(x)
20:01
@FenderLesPaul Which either yields a family of answers or requires the input of an additional fact (the boundary condition).
@BernardMeurer It's Russian spelled out horribly with Roman alphabet.
I can equally well define potential energy by $U = -\int dx \cdot F(x)$ or force by $F(x) = -\partial_x U$
and now the other way around
@FenderLesPaul: Which is a right inverse to differentiation, but not an inverse.
you don;t know the constant
20:01
@privetDruzia the constant is an arbitrary shift in potential energy
it isn't physical
we only measure differences in potential energy
^ That
which is the boundary condition @dmckee mentioned
wooow @DanielSank
@privetDruzia ?
20:04
@DanielSank Ooooh, that makes more sense
so u r in nanoelectronics I presume
based on u r profile?
@BernardMeurer :D I love Russian. It is the most beautiful language I know.
@privetDruzia You could say that.
that seems really crazy, especially if you are working for google I guess.
I study electronics and IT for space applications
so it s quite close
in some way
It is rather close. We put our chips in an evacuated cryogenic chamber.
@DanielSank Portuguese is enough trouble for me, let alone the German I was forced to learn. I've been considering using only grunts to prevent exhaustion from now on
20:07
In fact, our devices get considerably colder than space-bound devices :D
I am reading your phd thesis right now, what advice would you give to someone whose dream is to pursue a PhD?
@BernardMeurer Heheh. Russian is wonderful, but don't ever try to express that you're going anywhere. The system of "motion" verbs is mind-boggling to say the least.
@privetDruzia You're reading my thesis?
Uh oh.
2
yup
I am not a specialist, really. (Hence my questions about potential energy)
Ok, well, I'd like to ask you a small favor: if you find errors, please let me know.
I am just very curious
20:08
I have a list of errata which I've been meaning to add.
I mean, I will actually fix the errors.
hahahahah I will never find any, don't worry
@privetDruzia I've heard the first step to get a PhD is to give away your soul
no problem, whenever u want
I am ready to do anything
@ChrisWhite whaddup
20:09
@DanielSank When I got the bound volumes back, I flipped one open to just marvel at this thing I had made.
@privetDruzia Advice? Well... if you want to do a PhD you basically have to pick a subject you like and study your ass off.
And found a typo.
Arrrggggghhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!
@dmckee lolololol
That's why I never made any print copies.
right now actually I am trying to find a way to publish a paper/abstract I wrote
related to space mechanics/engineering
I figured I'd let it go a year and see all the mistakes, fix them, and then do a pay-for-publish service thingy.
20:10
I've always wanted to learn Russian
pay-for publish?
@privetDruzia arXiv? Conference Proceedings?
but it's very different from the languages I speak
how much does it cost
?
so I find it hard to learn
20:10
@privetDruzia You can send a pdf to some website and they mail you books.
@DanielSank We were required to do five. Two for the library, and one for the department.
It's not super cheap.
Apparently it was important that we own two bound copies ourselves.
@dmckee Oh yeah, I did those. Nobody will ever read them though ^^
True, dat.
20:11
I even kept a signature page to use when I print my copy.
conference: there are not that much conferences about the topic I am sudying
arXiv: I am having a look at it right now
@FenderLesPaul Yes, it's tricky. They do things that English and the Latin languages don't: noun declension.
how does it work, do they keep sending u feedback so that u correct your paper and once it s good enough they publish it?
@privetDruzia Well, "they" are people I harass about giving me feedback.
because you paid
mhm
20:12
@privetDruzia Oh no no no. You pay for the publishing, not editing.
@0celo7 Urs Schreiber thinks that the cardinality of the reals is $\aleph_1$
ok so it takes a lot of time before it gets published
If you want editing you'd have to pay an editor.
oh even worse!
@privetDruzia It's up to you. I have been collecting feedback from my group members. I can buy hard copies whenever I want.
20:13
so first you loose a lot of time waiting for them to find someone who is capable to give a good review/critics about your paper
@DanielSank so I'm actually ok with noun declensions
@privetDruzia No no no.
because I know Sanskrit and my first language is Hindi
and then, as they ll always find something to say, you ll lose time correcting it etc...
and Sanskrit does that as well
but for me Russian is really hard because of the verbs
also I can't pronounce shit haha
20:14
@privetDruzia I use my colleagues as editors. I wrote a lot of pedagogical stuff in my thesis: stuff that's very useful to graduate students. Therefore, I get a lot of feedback from them.
@FenderLesPaul Well, pronounciation is a personal issue. What's hard with the verbs for you? Is it the fact that there are so many irregular ones?
ok and once you collegues tell it s ok, you send it to arXiv, so you don't waste any time?
Interestingly, Russian teachers like to claim that Russian doesn't have irregular verbs. "They all follow the rules, there are just a lot of rules".
a lot of rules that just apply to one verb...
@privetDruzia For my thesis, I won't put it on arXiv. It's already on our group website so I don't really see a point of putting it on arXiv.
like an irregular verb...
20:15
@DanielSank yeah
Yeah what?
the large amount of irregular verbs
makes it hard for me to learn it
languages are so much easier to learn in such cases when you're actually in an environment where it's used regularly
learning it in a class is just hard
I am really new to al that stuff, it s been a month now I've been looking around on the internet (SE and reddit) for people willing and able to read my paper in order to receive some feedback. Found one person so far

What would be a good place for me to publish do you think?
(I ve heard researchgate is not OK)
@FenderLesPaul Yes absolutely.
As my Greek teacher said on the first day of class (which I missed): "There's only one reason to learn a language: love. Who is here for love reasons?"
20:18
I wasn't there, but I was dating a Greek at the time...
I dated this girl who knew 4 languages
Chinese, French, Italian, and English
@privetDruzia I have no idea. What's the topic?
it was one of the coolest set of skills I'd come across
@FenderLesPaul Yep, some people knew a lot of 'em.
I wanna know more languages!
20:19
attitude determination and control systems (for satellites)
My fiancee knows English, French, and and sort of do Italian.
@privetDruzia Surely there's a journal for such things.
I took French for 6 years
and I still can't say anything
how much time does it usually take between the first invoice of a paper and the publication?
Options:
1) Travel
2) Date someone who speaks it
3) Hang out with groups who speak it
4) Dedicate huge amounts of time in class
user54412
@FenderLesPaul spending the next 4-12 hours at the airport apparently
20:20
@privetDruzia There are no rules. It's entirely dependent on the field, the journal, and the content of the paper.
@ChrisWhite :(
@ChrisWhite aww
@FenderLesPaul Wow, really? That must have been a crap class.
...or you don't like it?
can it take a year or more? Or is this really exagerated?
@DanielSank the teacher was just terrible
like wtf is this person doing terrible
@privetDruzia Again, it depends on the field, the journal, and the paper.
There are no rules.
It varies a lot.
20:23
hmm ok so no certitudes anywhere
@DanielSank in maths, a year would be short time
Correct.
ok I ll continue looking and try to send my paper in a week or so
@yuggib wow
20:24
in math phys, we are more lucky and usually get away with 7/8 months on average
but once I got the paper refused after a year and a half with a crappy report
7/8 months is pretty long.
What journal are you thinking of?
and a friend of mine in algebraic geometry got the paper refused after a year and a half because they couldn't find a referee @_@
ridicolous
@yuggib lolwut
That sounds as if he'd chosen the wrong journal
believe me, it was one of the best math journals
and his paper was really good
Or is doing crazy stuff no one else understands...
user54412
20:28
@DanielSank the idea is that a math paper can be checked line by line for perfection, so they'll do just that.
@yuggib Wow, that's kind of funny.
@ChrisWhite Oh, we're talking math?
@DanielSank the friend of mine didn't exactly used the words "funny"...
@yuggib Certainly not.
...but it is kind of funny...
well, yes
more sort of ridicolous
user54412
Unlike experimental science where we can always retain doubt about the results anyway
user54412
20:32
Speaking of which a paper came out today that dedicated an entire appendix to refuting a paper of mine...
nice guys...
@ChrisWhite If there's one thing I learned about academia/science in grad school, it's that when people get upset about your results it means you done good.
20:50
@dmckee He apologized to the undergrads for his panicked emails. He won't be able to pay me for 2 weeks because he has to do the finances formally :/
But I do have a job now
@0celo7 Well, that's something. The trick now is to figure out the summer. If your finances can stand it you might look seriously at the question of lab work for course credit.
He said he can do 20 hours per week over the summer
But he said to look into a university funded research summer
Then I could get more hours during the spring
user116211
@Secret: well; I asked but the response was disaster:P So, you said, if I rewind at 50, the sequence would be 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50. Wouldn't that mean $v(50)= -v(0); v(40)= -v(-10)$ etcetera? But, I thought in time-reversal, $v(t)= -v(-t)$ that would mean $v(50)= -v(-50); v(40)= -v(-40)$, isn't it?
Can anybody give a succinct answer to this?
0
Q: What is a symplectic bundle?

Beyond-formulasAS THE TITLE SAYS: What is a symplectic bundle? I have googled this but only ended up with fiber bundles, but nothing was said about symplectic bundles? Those bundles appear when we deal with supergravity. Any intuitive answer is welcomed.

21:07
@yuggib huh?
he said that in a comment...
is it wrong?
let's say it is not right
so what if he thinks the continuum hypothesis is right
he knows way more geometry/topology/etc. than you
notice "anal set theory" was not on my list of topics :)
@JohnDuffield: Yes. Indeed, anybody could give a succinct answer to that.
21:12
::makes popcorn::
@0celo7 I am just saying that people doing geometry/topology/etc. should know set theory
@MikeMiller : please do before the question gets closed by a bunch of guys who can't.
No, I'd rather see garbage questions closed.
@MikeMiller so what is a symplectic bundle
@MikeMiller : bah, you can't answer it.
21:13
bundle that is also a symplectic manifold?
Without further context one would assume they mean to say symplectic vector bundle, which is a vector bundle in which each fiber has the structure of a symplectic vector space.
@0celo7 It's just a bundle that's fiberwise symplectic
ah, ok
@yuggib is something like Arnold considered "mathematical physics"?
There's not really a good reason to consider bundles of symplectic manifolds where the base has no extra structure.
@MikeMiller Doesn't mean physicists aren't doing it ;)
21:17
@0celo7 in which sense?
@yuggib the Italian sense
I'm just making a list of things I could possibly write a senior thesis on
@ACuriousMind Why? In what context?
@yuggib: But the continuum hypothesis is more or less obviously true, my friend. :)
yes, arnold is math phys
@MikeMiller Well, I don't know. I just meant I wouldn't exclude it.
@MikeMiller many contemporary logicians consider it obviously false
:-)
21:19
oh, they have a counterexample?
Logicians have a concept of "obvious"? oO
ahahah apparently
if it hasn't been proven, it's obviously false
sadly, I don't remember in which book I read it
once it has been proven, it's obviously true
21:20
@yuggib Yes, but I am not a contemporary logician!
it has been proven to be independent of ZFC
You're...a logician from the future?
Therefore, because contemporarly logicians consider it obviously false, I consider it obviously true.
@MikeMiller why?
what's your intuition?
I am genuinely curious
That sentence was a joke, since one doesn't follow from the other.
21:21
obviously $\mathbb{R}-\{0\}$ has cardinality $\omega-1$
@0celo7 $\omega -1$ is not a cardinal ;-)
@yuggib proof?
In any case, I don't have any. I'm just being pointlessly contrarian.
It's great fun.
@MikeMiller :-D
when I do that I just get called a "troll"
21:23
Alternatively: "Every second-countable manifold is either countable or cardinality $\Bbb R$. Everything that exists is a second-countable manifold. Therefore..."
@ACuriousMind ugh one of your countrymen was supposed to send me an email
actually, two were
Germany is going down the Klo
no reliability anymore
@0celo7 sum of ordinals or cardinals is defined, but not their difference afaik
but $\omega -1$ should be defined in surreal numbers
@yuggib fine then $\omega+(-1)$
@0celo7 $-1$ is neither an ordinal nor a cardinal
ordinal is?
21:25
@0celo7 Maybe they were exiled from the fatherland because they aren't punctual enough to be true Germans :P
sets that take ordering into account
@ACuriousMind there's another German prof and he does functional analysis/operator theory
he might just be pedantic enough to write on time...
@FenderLesPaul Michigan Ann Arbor, says email date was Jan 13
I could have told you that
@yuggib wat
ordinals are numbers that represent set together with their (well) order
so they're much more than the cardinals
21:46
@GBeau oh that's the early admission one
anything for regular admission?
@FenderLesPaul no I mean an additional one was added, today, that was dated from then
right
but like any email sent out today for UMich?
@FenderLesPaul the forum has one on Jan 21
yeah I noticed that one
@FenderLesPaul and an interview Jan 22
21:49
yeah my friend also got an interview from UCSB
apparently it was mainly just to gauge how well they knew their own research
his is in AMO
I'm dreading possibility of an interview
not that I don't think I could do well, but like
that's so much pressure
k,,,,,lop90-
:p
I'll take anything over silence haha
@MikeMiller why?
@yuggib Does it show the review or just the article title? The review is amusing.
22:01
I have subscription
yeah it's amusing
I am surprised that cahiers de physique is indexed by mathscinet
:-D
I have to say that I am less caustic in my mathscinet reviews
also, I have not been assigned very shitty papers yet
I tend to believe that such harsh reviews are not common.
:-D
one of the infamous authors is from my alma mater
he did not have a very good reputation also there to be honest
What do you study?
(Completely unrelated to previous discussion.)
22:09
math phys/analysis
More specifically?
semiclassical analysis for infinite dimensional systems
non-linear systems of PDEs (but not too difficult stuff)
self-adjointness problems
Ok, now I sort of understandish.
@FenderLesPaul places that sent out on tomorrow, last year: UC SD, UC SB,
@yuggib does it give you the paper too?
22:17
@GBeau I've given up on UCSB I don't stand a chance
no amount of connections will help me haha
@0celo7 no, it's too old and who knows the journal how ended up
oh ok
I see the review too
@FenderLesPaul so far schools have shown (overall, for the most part), consistent dates with when they sent out last year, down to the exact day
@FenderLesPaul but I have to convert the day to align to the day of the week, not the day of the month
so, Jan 27th last year is Jan 26th this year, because Jan 27th last year was Tuesday, and tomorrow, the 26th, is tuesday
and that conversion has been pretty accurate as far as predicting dates
fuck I have to give a talk tomorrow haha
worst day to send out emails
@FenderLesPaul Thursday the flood begins and doesn't stop until the season ends
22:27
yeah
what does your methodology give for MIT?
@ACuriousMind still no email .-.
"I'll email you the paper right away"
3 hours later...
"right away" from a prof means "if I remember" :P
I have to give a summary of it in the next group meeting D:
22:59
@ACuriousMind what's an appropriate amount of time before I remind him
@0celo7 I'd say that depends on when the next meeting is
omg Joan Baez is coming here
in a couple of months
so excited
I have no idea who that is
Unless you mistyped and meant John Baez, the mathematical physicist :P
no Joan Baez, she's a legendary folk artist
she's John Baez's cousin
ironically he's the unknown one compared to her
@ACuriousMind Montag
23:12
then I'd wait till tomorrow at least, I think
@FenderLesPaul 100 hours
until 5 pm west coast friday
23:39
Hi, everybody.
@DanielSank hello
I'm reading your thing again.
@GBeau for MIT?
@FenderLesPaul no, until 5 pm on the west coast on friday
ohh
do you know when MIT typically sends out stuff though?
00:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (1908 days earlier)      last day (3319 days later) »