« first day (1904 days earlier)      last day (3323 days later) » 

14:02
@yuggib Not understanding projective reps is the reason why I don't get half of what @ACuriousMind says
@0celo7 Chapter 2.7 is titled "Projective representations".
2
14:32
@ACuriousMind I've read it twice.
I don't see your point.
BBS is titled "String Theory and M Theory" but they do a shit job of explaining.
@0celo7 Well, you might say he explains it badly (and I would agree), but "not at all" is not a fair characterization.
when I was a physicist, I learned QFT on Weinberg, Itzykson-Zuber and later Fields by Siegel
by the last is a little bit peculiar as a book
Hm, Siegel
sounds familiar
Oh wait
Is he the FIELDS guy
as a friend of his has to say, it is orthogonal to other presentations
@ACuriousMind How about this: Weinberg allows you to read Weinberg, but nothing else will make sense. And then you realize Weinberg never made sense to begin with.
Yeah that one
He also wrote the Stuperspace paper
"Instinct is claimed as a basis for most discussions of quantum field theory, though clearly this topic is too recent to affect evolution"
:D
One day we will evolve with an instinct for QFT
Does anyone know what kind of function that I_\alpha is? upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/9/4/…
he is a funny guy (at least from what they told me, never met him in person)
@QuantumMechanics : Seems to be some Bessel function shit
Bessel functions, first defined by the mathematician Daniel Bernoulli and then generalized by Friedrich Bessel, are the canonical solutions y(x) of Bessel's differential equation for an arbitrary complex number α (the order of the Bessel function). Although α and −α produce the same differential equation for real α, it is conventional to define different Bessel functions for these two values in such a way that the Bessel functions are mostly smooth functions of α. The most important cases are for α an integer or half-integer. Bessel functions for integer α are also known as cylinder functions...
that's the one
Modified Bessel
Always remember all the Bessel functions
14:42
It's basically the only special function in physics
Worst music video of all time?
Thank you! :-) Getting not easier...
@Slereah Lol
I do love Roki Vulovic
Much better than Lepi Mica
15:12
The problem with doing path integrals by hand is that you have to know your infinite product rules
just derive them
15:34
@ACuriousMind @DanielSank @dmckee Does the average physicist know what an abelian group is?
QFT people certainly
And probably a few more people working with group stuff
@0celo7: Yes
@QuantumMechanics Does the average physicist know what Hausdorff is
This is a Hausdorff
3
15:37
@Slereah Any GR person, certainly
Flows are an abelian group of diffeomorphisms, after all.
Hausdorff property probably less so
@0celo7 not by heart
Hausdorff property is pretty much always assumed and not really mentionned
(in manifolds, anyway)
Anyone who reads HE knows what it is
Eh
It's mentionned but it's the kind of thing you read and forget
It's never really used anywhere
Except for the Taub NUT spacetime
15:39
It's used elsewhere.
In the Cauchy chapter IIRC.
Perhaps even Chapter 8, but I only skimmed that one.
Also maybe to prove that they all admit a metric?
Or does he throw that back on the bibliography
He uses the partition of unity, but does not show paracompactness + Hausdorffness $\Leftrightarrow$ PoU
Then again, no one shows that.
I had to show it once
I think the proof is in Lee.
During my brief stint as a mathematician
15:42
Why would you ever show that
I had to do a class in topology
Where I didn't understand anything
b/c I'm a poor physicist
And we had to pick a presentation topic
They were all awful
Suddenly
"Differential geometry!"
I'll pick that thank you
Don't you just hate when you listen to an artist and that one song is good, but all others are terrible
@Slereah should've done Stokes
It was fine.
Got a good grade on it
Unlike the exams D:
@0celo7 I'd have to look it up. And I'd feel stupid when I did that, because I did know. But it doesn't come up in my work.
I remember "abelian group" as simply the additive group of reals.
15:46
I remember it because of the joke
What is purple and commute
I think any abelian group is homomorphic to that one anyway
The trivial group is abelian
is it homo to the reals
It's homo to $0\in\mathbb{R}$
i.e. a subset
I GUESS
@Slereah what
15:47
An abelian grape
grapes are green
What is yellow and complete
(some grapes are purple)
Hilbert cheese
No
A bananach space
someone is spying on us...
15:50
@0celo7 Most certainly not (and not even to subgroups of it)
@ACuriousMind whaaaaat
like what
What would $Z_2$ be homo to
@0celo7 $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$.
@ACuriousMind o
Hmm, did we have this discussion once
I recall $\mathbb{Z}_n$ coming up recently
@0celo7 if by $\mathbb{Z}_n$ you mean $\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$, you should know the former is ambiguous
but it's not too much of an issue since it's normally obvious from context, unless you're intending to refer to $\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z}$ with the notation, then it's just confusing
15:58
What's the difference between $Z_n$ and $Z/nZ$
I think one is p adic integers or something
Which one is just a cycle of n elements
@Slereah $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is also used for the p-adic integers
$\mathbb{Z}/n\mathbb{Z}$ however is unambiguous.
What's a p-adic integer
15:59
Aren't p-adic numbers specifically a completion of $Q$
You don't want to know
And would have the same integers
It's unambiguous because I don't know what they are.
@ACuriousMind Isn't the canonical projection $\mathbb Z\to\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$ a group homomorphism?
@Bass It is
16:01
I'm so confused
@ACuriousMind So $\mathbb Z$ is homomorphic to $\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$. Which means, $\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$ is not a counter-example for your statement that not all abelian groups are homomorphic to a subgroup of $\mathbb R_+$.
@Slereah Well, they are. But you can also define the p-adic numbers without any metric: The p-adic integers are the elements of $\varprojlim_{k\in\mathbb{N}} \mathbb{Z}/p^k\mathbb{Z}$. Then $\mathbb{Q}_p$ is just the quotient field of this ring.
They are "integers" because just like the rationals are the quotient field of the integers, the p-adic numbers are the quotient field of the p-adic integers.
On mobile, no clue what \varprojlim is o.o
A projective limit, obviously ;P
Is this all standard algebra stuff?
16:06
PhD level algebra
Wau
It might snow some more
Define "standard". Projective and injective limits are something that comes up in algebra, but you don't need them for everything
I'll never have algebra again
So the professor didn't do the paperwork and I'm not an employee. Great.
Pretty sure Al-Khwārizmī would say "what the fuck is all this"
3
Time to email him and swing by his office like a parasite
16:19
@ACuriousMind What's an example of an abelian group that is not homomorphic to a subgroup of $\mathbb R_+$? I cannot think of one. Finitely generated abelian groups are homomorphic, since you can project onto the subgroup of one generator (which is homomorphic to $\mathbb Z$ or $\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z$), and real/complex vector spaces are homomorphic too, by projection.
@Bass I think you took "homomorphic" to mean the wrong thing. I'm pretty sure 0celo7 and Slereah we talking about being isomorphic, because "being homomorphic" is not a thing.
@ACuriousMind Oh I see. IMO they are pretty different things. Is "homomorphic" used that way often?
@Bass No. One doesn't say at all that two things are "homomorphic" (but coming from topology, one might confuse that with "homeomorphic", which is the topologist's "isomorphic")
The only context I've ever seen someone say "homomorphic" is when wants to say "homomorphic image". One might say "$G$ is the homomorphic image of $H$" to mean that there is a surjective homomorphism $p: G \to H$. This is awkward and undesirable. If this is what you mean, a more natural phrasing is "$H$ is a quotient of $G$"
Just realized that there exist trivial homomorphisms between every pair of groups. So all groups are "homomorphic" to each other in that sense.
16:24
Oh.
I meant it in the sense of: Isomomorphic $\Leftrightarrow$ there exists an isomorphism. Homomorphic $\Leftrightarrow$ there exists a homomorphism.
But the latter is a tautology.
Yes, there's always the zero homomorphism.
@FenderLesPaul see grad cafe for ann arbor
interview, dated today
@yuggib Hahahahahahahaha "talks are usually good"
@yuggib I'm technically a student of both.
o.O
why?
@Danu come to see my talk on the 3rd of February, and then you can judge :-P
16:31
@yuggib Whose seminar?
Siedentop?
no
duerr/pickl/etc
@yuggib It's a feature of my study program.
@yuggib Link or something?
I actually know siedentop as well
Oh Duerr is this Bohmian guy right
@yuggib Okay.
duerr seminar
16:32
I don't like him :P
@yuggib I'll be there.
and I don't like bohmian shit too
I've been invited by Pickl
About the Nelson model?
yes
not gonna talk about the Nelson model much however
:D
16:34
I think there is little chance of me attending, since that is my finals week.
@FenderLesPaul and UCSB interview, also dated today
Topology is on the 5th
just saying for info
Thanks for the invite :)
@MikeMiller you're in germany?
16:36
@MikeMiller You will? :P
Americans, I have a question; why is it that so many people hate on Cornell?
I thought it was a joke, however
you may never know
@BernardMeurer Do they?
AFAIK it's pretty respected, but I'm not an American ;)
I've never heard of that, @Bernard.
@BernardMeurer I don't know where you would get that impression
16:37
@Danu @MikeMiller Recently I've met quite a few people who disliked it
an anecdote does not a pattern make
Not as in they are bad academically, but just rated the college badly somehow
Some dude from Rensselaer Polytechnic even went on to brag about having a better physics course some while ago
So I wondered if it was an actual thing or I just met weird people
that feel when your advisor comes over and opens emacs but you use vim
16:41
@GBeau I almost have a convulsion when too close to emacs
I guess I need to find a new advisor
how could you do without auctex?
@GBeau I'm still doubting whether to start using either
emacs+auctex+orgmode
what else?
just use notepad : - )
16:45
@Danu emacs has a significantly smaller learning curve if you're serious
I'm definitely much faster/happier than I was using other editors though, and I use it for everything
@GBeau I'm still on texstudio
But I spend a lot of time typing
so maybe it's worth it to try and get just a little faster
I like Atom
And use VIM when on the terminal
Emacs seems nice but the learning curve is ginormous
@Danu I (somehow) managed to learn LaTeX without ever using one of the IDEs
keeping around old example files, probably
What are IDEs
"integrated development environment"
16:50
@Danu It's the sign that you've become weak
that's a severe case of lmgtfy bro
On a serious note it's a text editor on steroids
well that's just because you haven't seen how much time people have put into vim and emacs extensions, or, hell, the default client
@MikeMiller No, I tried that first.
Try googling "IDEs"
Of course, "ide" does work ;)
the integrated development environments of marhc
16:52
@Danu Uh...the third and fourth hit are the German and English Wiki articles about IDE for me.
but hugs all around in any case.
@ACuriousMind Oh, not for me...
I get pretty US-oriented stuff on my googlz. :(
This is a higher-ranked hit:
Ides may refer to: == Calendar dates == Ides (calendar), a day in the Roman calendar that marked the approximate middle of the month. For March, May, July, and October it is the 15th day of the month (Dictionary.com). For other months it is on the 13th (Dictionary.com). Ides of March, a day on the Roman calendar that corresponds to 15 March; it was marked by several religious observances and became notorious as the date of the assassination of Julius Caesar in 44 BC == People == Saint Ides, an Irish saint == Acronym IDES == Intrusion Detection Expert System SAP AG's IDES, Internet Demonstration...
Interesting, that's not even on my first page
I have my google apps/work account set to administratively disable all search customization for all accounts in my "organization", and otherwise my first hit is Illinois Department of Employment Security
followed by @Danu's wiki article
(google apps used to be free...and still is if you have an account from when it was)
@Danu but if you're looking to try something, I'd probably recommend trying emacs over vim since you'll get usable with it a lot faster
(that is, reach workflow parity with your old solution much faster, and probably a lot faster before you'd get to the same place with vim)
@GBeau yeah I saw
no emails for me
fucking sucks ugh
17:02
ditto
I want an interview from UCSB :(
but...it's only 11 am so maybe
idk if this means my chances are over or if I still have a chance
if more people start posting about UCSB then I know I'm fucked haha
my friend at UCSB said they hadn't sent out any rejections or acceptances yet yesterday
and a post-doc friend of mine said the same for Caltech
but they didn't say anything about interviews
:<
dude look at the stats of the guy that got the UCSB interview
990 PGRE and 4.0 GPA
990 PGRE ughhh
if that's what they're looking for then I'm kissing UCSB goodbye
17:05
stop
Just chill man, I know it's tense and scary etc etc but perhaps just take stock when the day is over :P
@Danu but that's not for like 6 weeks
it's an emotional roller coaster :p
do you have things to learn? focus on those
remember that your future grad school will like you better if you'd gotten a lot done this semester
@GBeau I've been through it too; but just filling this whole chat up with the emotional rollercoaster is maybe not the best thing ^^
17:08
fine :3
@Danu takes it to another chat
Is physics pedagogy on topic in physics.se?
I hope one day there's a metaphysics.se
isn't there a philosophy se?
meh
it's the crucial difference between metaphysics.se and meta.physics.se that's funny
@MikeMiller is metamathematics on topic in math.se?
17:19
Not sure what that is, but my money's on no.
@FenderLesPaul waiting for college apps is THE emotional rollercoaster
graduate school or not
well that and when a girl invites you to a movie with just her but her best friend crashes
such a struggle
also, mad max
@FenderLesPaul ::hugs::
@BernardMeurer d'aww <3
17:26
There should be a support group for waiting for applications
@ACuriousMind Ohhhhhh
@FenderLesPaul Wow
Did you hear my James Bond story?
17:43
@0celo7 I did not
what happened?
17:57
@FenderLesPaul I went to see Spectre and her SJW roommate came along
I got to hear all about how the series promotes misogyny and Bond is a rapist
+her constant sighing and huffing during the movie
I mean it's true that the old bond movies were very misogynistic but the newer ones are better
progress is obviously happening
@0celo7 In my experience that one is like 50/50 in terms of known the definition. However, I'd be surprised if explaining index notation requires talking about abelian groups.
@DanielSank In fact, I think the two are quite unrelated ;)
Also, what do you think about this claim: One should always capitalize words derived from names (in scientific writing) in order to avoid confusion (e.g. Abelian, Abelianization, etc.).
18:12
Ehhh, no opinion.
I think having a standard and sticking with it is important though.
@Danu Either always do it or never do it, but be consistent
Maybe I'll have an opinion later.
Ha, see that? +2 for consistency.
@ACuriousMind Of course.
@DanielSank But that's a no-brainer.
On a tangentially related note, people always ask me why I insist on making all my pictures in TikZ...
@Danu I recently used TikZ for a circuit diagram. That was cool.
I recently used it for...
18:15
FOR?!?!?
@Danu: If no-brainers didn't need to be stated then people wouldn't still be doing the opposite.
@Danu dude TikZ is awesome
@MikeMiller This particular one did not need to be stated in this particular conversation :P
especially since I don't have to learn an entire external drawing program
18:16
@Danu Rose petals...
@FenderLesPaul It is.
You call that physics?
@DanielSank Hah, who cares about physics when you can do algebraic topology? ;)
Makes for much nicer diagrams ;)
@Danu Not a lot of algebraic topology on phys rev kaleidoscopes
@EmilioPisanty That's what you think ;D
...but this is just for some course I'm taking.
18:18
@Danu would be happy to be proven wrong.
It's a pretty objective claim.
I think I'll soon start working on my thesis: It will probably be on 2-dimensional SUSY ;)
@Danu Well, I never thought about it like that.
Physically physicsy physics :)
What have I been doing with my life?
Anyways, hope you're impressed by the diagrams ;)
18:20
^ Am impressed.
Thanks :)
How complicated was your circuit diagram? Did you need the "full power", or was it pretty chill?
@Danu Relatively chill.
We had beers after.
good
18:37
@DanielSank Oh, I just realized my definition of vector space includes "abelian group"
@DanielSank There's a partial new paragraph I added at the end
Is it superfluous?
"End" being right before your comments
So it's on the second page (I think)
19:16
Every time I see "Raman spectroscopy" I ask myself why someone is measuring spectroscopic response of noodles.
@0celo7 Ehhh what was that link again?
My dedicated h-bar computer seems to be en-route to death
I don't think it's handling @0celo7's messages too well
2
20:04
my old computer was named nike because all it did was win but then it died
ironically, my new primary computer is named styx
20:17
Hi guys I just asked a question related to finding an electric field in a certain type of capacitor. It's not a homework question, rather it's for my job. I work in a lab and I need this electric field. My question was "put on hold" for being too "off topic" or something. I really was just asking for what books I could look at to help me solve my problem because I am genuinely at a loss as to where to start.
20:56
@DanielSank I emailed it to you for future convenience.
@DanielSank Oops, I sent that to your work email...I don't have your personal. Hope it's not an issue.

« first day (1904 days earlier)      last day (3323 days later) »