« first day (1895 days earlier)      last day (3331 days later) » 

14:07
0
Q: Does the question belong in Physics?

linuxfreebirdI wrote a program that computes the fast insert_name_here transform of a matrix. I am at a loss of what its application is, what its proper name should be, and find an existing algorithm for it. I posted this question in Computer Science, and one of their members suggested it might be better serv...

14:24
Whoever just flagged that message; don't be childish, flags aren't toys
cooool. a reflag for the very same message again,...
@JohnDuffield watch the language, and tell others to do so too. please.
FWIW, @Flagger replies like this are probably in jest
that said reflagging the same message over and over is flag abuse, which is punishable by extended bans
@Vogel612 they're probably not...
(if the flagged reply was the removed one)
yea the flagged one is the removed one.
sadly, it's not just in jest
urk :/
damnit now I can't delete my message anymore
14:32
@KyleKanos Haha...at least one ranking in which I'm ahead of you!
I really like how all the room owners here are mods...
eh well. flag police out
I salute you with this song
@Slereah It means cluster decomposition doesn't make sense ;P
that was reminded by me by the word jest
@Vogel612 : please tell Kyle Kanos to do the same. Follow the link back, he called me a crackpot. I'm not.
14:34
Well yes but I assume that experiments aren't really influenced by events at infinity, either
it is probably valid under some other demonstration, I suppose
Probably by the decay of gauge fields or some shit
@JohnDuffield how about just flagging them then instead of stooping to that level?
Well, I never really understood what's so great about cluster decomposition, sooo...no idea
But...what has it to do with ladder operators?
Well apparently under pretty broad conditions if the Hamiltonian is written in ladder operators
Then you get cluster decomposition
@Vogel612 : I've tried that before, and got warned to stop flagging, then before I did anything else I got a week-long break.
Which makes sense since that means the field is free!
14:37
@Slereah I thought it was just that if I examine a correlation function of localized operators and then send them apart, the amplitude factors into the product of their individual expectation values.
Pretty much, yeah
I don't really see what that has to do with ladder operators
@Slereah that's not an immediate consequence
$S_{a+b+c+..., \alpha + \beta + \gamma + ...} = S_{a,\alpha} S_{b,\beta}...$
if sufficiently far
Well apparently it's easy to prove if you can decompose things into ladder operators
Weinberg does not state it like that. He chants some alien ritual
14:39
@Slereah Well...that does mean it is necessary for the theory to have ladders in oder to have decomposition
@0celo7 Well, yes, it's Weinberg :P
Weinberg is a tad dry, yes
Although after reading some Jaffe, I have warmed up to Weinberg
I assume it is still valid even for interacting theories, though
@Slereah I think one often quietly postulates the validity instead of checking it
Because I don't think the next galaxy influences results that much at CERN
I guess that has to do with the inverse square law form of the forces involved, though
14:42
@Slereah ladder operators does not mean free theories (if it's Haag theorem you are thinking about)
@JohnDuffield depending on who told you that you shouldn't really care whether they like the flags or not. Offensive and insulting messages should be removed. If it doesn't happen with regular flags, I think your mods should be able to clean the mess up and hand out suspensions as necessary
If the forces were $r^2$ instead of $r^{-2}$ I guess they'd be a bit more influential!
@yuggib Yeah I am exagerating a tad
@Vogel612 Mods told him to stop flagging. This whole situation is under observation from several mods (not only ours) and has been brewing for some time.
Once brewed it will be delicious
@ACuriousMind hmm. okies, I'll just keep my head out of the line of fire
thanks for the heads up
14:46
@Slereah Eccch, I prefer a cold beer everyday
@Slereah It would taste of stubbornness, with a hint of boredom
But revenge is a dish best served cold
Eccch is not an English expression
user54412
^^ I always have to stop and think if that's an original Klingon saying or not.
You some kind of foreigner ::furrows brow::
14:49
@0celo7 Well, duh, Sherlock.
@ChrisWhite Well it is from the Klingon poet Shakespeare
@ACuriousMind What, I'm not British
Does anyone know about the LIGO gravitational wave rumors?
Are the aliens finally coming
Or did a truck pass close by and set off the detectors
15:00
Ayyyy
Lmao
Can you guess which one is most likely to be related to gravitational waves
another type of alien
@0celo7 He's asking which of the aliens might be coming :P
@Slereah Illegal immigrant stampeding past the LIGO detector, obviously.
15:02
Where is LIGO
No idea :D
The border
probably
Louisiana, apparently
What if an alien ship has a nonzero quadrupole moment but they can't be detected by any other means
user54412
And Washington
user54412
so Canadians perhaps
15:03
We need to build a wall to the north
1) keep the damn Canadians out
2) let LIGO run in peace
Canadians eh?
Speaking of which, what happened to Jim?
Probably got his legs taken off by a mine at the border
abducted by aliens
user54412
@Jiminion They've been brewing for a couple months:
user54412
15:06
Nov 12 '15 at 23:19, by Chris White
3 or 4 times in the last couple weeks I've heard rumors of LIGO having found something
are they substantial rumors, though
today everyone brews
Who cares? Will this raise GDP
Or were people like "Oh nevermind I accidentally stepped on the detector"
LIGO is at the Hanford complex in Wash. State (former nuclear energy facility)
What would detecting grav. waves mean?
15:10
Do grav waves raise GDP
not much
Just confirmations of GR
Say, @ACuriousMind, how does Mass Effect actually work
Also maybe doing some g waves astronomy
So we won't ever have g wave cell phones
Do you really want to have to rotate your cellphone to have quadrupolar momentum
15:11
Put a spinning dumb bell inside
might be a bit awkward to use
neutrino phone would be more practical
Signal everywhere...
15:25
@CuriousOne and @Qmechanic Good catch on that 35th thing.
15:41
Do we have the new design yet
Why have I been summoned?
...you have?
i got beeped about an event
and me
@MikeMiller Ah, yes, chat session is starting soon
15:49
@0celo7 no
10 minutes to the chat session
The system is never wrong, I must be needed here - but for what?
Hi everyone, chat session time! Who's here?
I always ask that but I'm not sure what the point is given that you all were just talking about being summoned :-P
Hellooo all...
Hey, is anyone familiar with any of the (likely very small) number of papers proposing alternative color charge scenarios for quarks, e.g. mixes of color and anti-color? Glashow mentions one at least, but that was like in the 1970s!
(This is called intentionally priming the pump with a physics question...)
16:05
Cool, I approve
David Z, hello, happy New Year!
Same to you!
I see some new (to me) icons. How are you folks? Happy New Year to you also.
0
Q: Generalizing the homework policy

David ZIn our last chat session two weeks ago (sorry for the delay), we had a discussion about updating the homework policy and homework close reason. I'm making this post to summarize that discussion and solicit feedback on how to proceed afterwards. The current status According to the homework polic...

5
Anyway, not to take away from color charge, but we do have some other things to discuss today. There is ^^that
and also the rumor of a gravitational wave detection at LIGO: theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/12/…
16:10
I hope the rumor proves true! I still recall Webb's fascinating and fully sincere "finding" back in... jeepers, the 1970s? I still find his data baffling. Reminds me also of the infamous Valentine's Day monopole finding, also decades ago.
user54412
So I've just heard rather specific rumors (yes, more than one).
@DavidZ I still strongly favor "lazy is bad" with instantiations in (1) don't calculate for others, and (2) chide folks, nicely, when they don't bother to do a basic Google search first.
@ChrisWhite wow, that would be fantastic if they finally nailed something!
@TerryBollinger yeah, I think you were pretty consistent with that last time
@DavidZ I like it because there are times where homework produces really profound misunderstandings of issues, and those seem like fair game here. Lazy is... well, lazy.
user54412
The nonspecific rumors: certain key LIGO people seem rather happy, and they've been inquiring about the timeline for getting into the next decadal survey (the place where astro makes a coordinated report to Congress to petition for funding).
16:13
Hi @0celo7!
Happy New Year!
@ChrisWhite hmm. Funding timing always bugs me. String theory always comes up with fantastic new ideas shortly before funding decisions, they have it down to an art.
user54412
The more specific: 7 NS-NS mergers. Also, one very high sigma BH-BH event with not only inspiral but also ringdown.
That's very specific indeed
user54412
Of course, if I were directing LIGO I would intentionally spread all sorts of false rumors to different sources, thus diluting the truth with noise and tracking the leaks.
I just read in the Nature News article that LIGO has a group which can fiddle with the mirrors to fake a detection :-P
user54412
Yes, and they've done this before.
16:19
@ChrisWhite what? are you suggesting that research sometimes includes game playing?? actually, the false rumor method is also great for tracking leaks...
@ChrisWhite did you have an online source for that deep-dive specificity?
user54412
@TerryBollinger no
user54412
it's not clear whether that should increase or decrease your belief in its credibility
Anyone: Any rumors of actual publication anytime soon? They did say "months" of rumors, so perhaps the time is getting riper?
user54412
I also heard "end of January" thrown around...
user54412
But, even if that's more than a rumor, when has a publication ever obeyed a schedule?
16:22
(we now have two Chris's, my brain is overwhelmed easily...)
@ChrisWhite all in all it sounds encouraging... what was that about funding, though? when is that deadline?
Hi guys, in case anyone's interested, I put the ChatJax script into a greasemonkey script, so I don't have to click on "start chatjax" every time. The script starts the ChatJax stuff automatically when I'm on the chat page. If anyone wants the script too just ask.
@Bass Post a link and I'll star it.
@Bass That would be nice if you could post it somewhere
@DavidZ the danger in all of this is that this is very, very delicate detection work, and so many tiny things can go wrong. I appreciate that they are trying to validate. Just look at the last couple of years for examples of what can go wrong, e.g. superluminal neutrinos.
@DanielSank @DavidZ gonna put it in a gist and post the link.
16:26
@Bass that would be great!
Can you post it somewhere?
Yeah, I do get the sense that people are being more cautious now. I would expect that that attitude is part of the reason LIGO has this "detection drill" procedure.
user54412
@TerryBollinger So every 10 years, the Important People in astro put together a report prioritizing all the upcoming proposed projects. The next will be released in 2020, but I'm not sure when they start writing it. You really don't want to have the case for your project be made in 2021.
@ChrisWhite 2020 is a good date, hmm, it shows up more broadly in US federal in fact. That makes me feel better about the timing, too. It's "we have this fantastic finding!" exactly one month before the committee make the funding allocation that makes me nervous for any type of research. Years, no problem.
(just remembered to activate ChatJax...)
Happy New Year @JohnRennie!
Ironically no math yet
@DavidZ Thanks for the meta post.
16:31
@DavidZ I noticed, a bit rare that.
@TerryBollinger And to you :-) Sorry I'm late!
@JohnRennie, any rumors from your parts about the gravity wave possible finding?
@DanielSank you're welcome... it turned out to be quite tricky to wrap up the previous chat session into a meta post, but I figured better to get something up by the time we started today than to keep putting it off
@DavidZ I meta post in a field once, it was holding up a fence...
*groan*
16:33
I think you did a good job. My previous post was a yes/no question but yours encourages folks to actually draft the new policy. Good next step.
@TerryBollinger I would guess there's one rumour and it's spread. I've seen comments all over the web, but I bet they can all be traced back to a single source.
(sorry, that was good work you did!)
@TerryBollinger oh boy...
@DanielSank Agree!
@DanielSank GreaseMonkey script to automatically activate ChatJax: gist.github.com/bassup/93f78c0fac2a7be25086
3
16:34
@JohnRennie Lawrence Krauss says he has independent confirmation, but I don't know what to make of that
@JohnRennie rumor pedigree tracking is an interesting art in its own right...
Please give it a try to see if it works for you.
@DavidZ I do like that Krauss is standing firm...
My earlier rumor about LIGO has been confirmed by independent sources. Stay tuned! Gravitational waves may have been discovered!! Exciting.
Interesting, the feedback he's getting on Twitter seems quite critical
@DavidZ cool. Krauss has a reputation to maintain. Doesn't prove anything, but it does indicate he's seen something non-trivial.
16:36
For anyone else who was interested (I forget who they were):
Must be a chat session
Anyone here know how to DIY dentistry
I have a painful spot on my gums by my molars and want to check it out
^ Bad things are about to go down.
@0celo7 got some good pliers??
16:39
Not operate just see what it looks like
user54412
^ Famous last words
@0celo7 You could say that's a cavity in my knowledge.
No I think it's a cut
I was at the dentist's last week and got an X ray
@0celo7 I can get you a skype dentist appointment if you wish hahahaha.
This is not something that needs to be discussed in a chat session :-/
16:40
@BernardMeurer Are you by chance familiar with Scala?
user54412
@DavidZ Wow, the rage is real.
Yeah, that's the internet :-P
@DavidZ you could build me a cool mirror to look back there
@ChrisWhite ::Eats popcorn::
user54412
I can only hope to one day be important enough to have the internet rage at me.
16:42
@DanielSank I've heard of it and read some of the documentation but haven't really gotten into it. Was wishin to, functional programming seems beautiful
@0celo7 Not sure if this link will work ...
I does.
I've never had a cavity or anything bad
user54412
why did I click that link?
ewwwwwwww
But I think I got a cut on my gums
16:43
@0celo7 speaking of mirrors, did you know that the electrons at that reflect light from metal are at the top of the Fermi sea, and hot enough to kill you with X-rays if they suddenly fell to ground?
What
@0celo7 If it's worth ten bucks, just buy a mirror.
@TerryBollinger That's pretty cool.
er, hot
How do I use that from my perspective
The endoscope I used was only about $10
@JohnRennie yep, little mirrors on sticks are cheap and available at any pharmacy.
Our talk is resonating around a cavity. We have created a resonance cavity...
16:46
I don't have a cavity!
@BernardMeurer For what it's worth, Scala's not just for functional programming. It fixes other annoying stuff from Java.
@0celo7 I imagine you have several cavities, just none in your teeth.
@0celo7 I speak metaphorically! Sounds like you have a cut... or a lot more ominously, possibly an infected root, sorry but it's a possibility...
@JohnRennie Nope
@0celo7 ...how do you speak, or eat, or breathe, then?
16:48
@TerryBollinger Is there a screaming noise? Yes - you may have an infected root. No - you don't have an infected root.
@ACuriousMind Dunno, how do you
@JohnRennie that's a nice binary!
@TerryBollinger It could be a piece of popcorn exacting its revenge
@DavidZ: Feature the HW policy post, maybe? We want as much input on this as possible, right?
@JohnRennie Ever heard of a resorption? I had that. Zero pain. So weird.
16:49
Ah yeah, good idea
Is getting your wisdom teeth out terrible
@JohnRennie no
@ACuriousMind if it's kind of itchy-annoying, yep. A rubber pointy poker jobber can help.
@0celo7 meh
@0celo7 depends. Oral surgery: yes. Regular extraction: no. Popcorn: Don't do anything drastic!
16:51
Regular extraction?
I need my bottom two out and the doc recommended I get my top two taken out as well.
^ Separate chat room?
@DanielSank uh, biophysics
@0celo7 Or any of these?
A body cavity search is either a visual search or a manual internal inspection of body cavities for prohibited materials (contraband), such as illegal drugs, money, jewelry, or weapons. Body cavities used for concealment include nostrils, ears, mouth, navel, penis (urethra and foreskin) or vagina, and rectum. It is far more invasive than the standard strip search that is typically performed on individuals taken into custody, either upon police arrest or incarceration at a jail, prison, or psychiatric hospital. Often the procedure is repeated when the person leaves the institution. Body cavi...
Never had one of those either
16:54
@DanielSank if people were interested in talking about the replacement-homework-policy or gravitational waves, I would enforce that. But apparently not :-P
Ok, uh... I think we should rename the homework policy and modify the tag and close reason. Also we should modify our behavior.
@DavidZ The trouble is that the homework question is hard to chat about.
@DanielSank lol
I really want to sit down and write an answer to your question to help get my view straight.
@JohnRennie yeah, that's okay
16:56
Most of what I think is explained here.
There's the obvious aspect of not helping people cheat, and that stays the same.
So I'll focus on a related sub-issue here in this chat.
But apart from this I think my main concern is I don't want to be taken advantage of.
@JohnRennie ooh, right. Actually I forgot to include a section in the question about what our goals should be with the new policy, specifically those that carry over from the current policy.
@0celo7 btw, I really liked your carbon nanotubes reponse!
16:57
If a beginner asks a simple question and I believe they really want to know then I'd probably answer
I think there's a lot of "off-topic" voting that goes on here because folks don't want to say that a question is too broad, or unclear.
@JohnRennie I think I know what you mean, but to be clear: in what sense don't you want to be taken advantage of?
@DanielSank I was aware that it fixed a lot of things people hate about java, in addition to being functional. Why do you ask though? You think it could be an interest thing to learn?
We were having such a nice discussion about teeth...
@TerryBollinger o.0 link
I know nothing about carbon nanotubes
@BernardMeurer I'm learning it. I like it. There are a few things I don't understand so I was checking the possibility for discussion on those things.
16:58
@DavidZ if someone is genuinely interested and don't know how a calculation is done then I'd probably be willing to show them
@0celo7 it had some bite, didn't it? something to chew on?
Wtf are you talking about
@DanielSank could be, although I wonder about the motivation for that. Why would people be reluctant to say that a question is too broad or unclear?
(I do know those close reasons themselves are not especially clear)
@DanielSank I'll certainly pick it up then, I've been wanting to learn something functional for a while, and Lisp is giving me shivers.
@DavidZ If I think someone could work ouit the answer but they consider it easier to ask me then I probably wouldn't answer

« first day (1895 days earlier)      last day (3331 days later) »