« first day (1881 days earlier)      last day (3344 days later) » 

00:00
yes
The $k$-volume of that parallelogram is equal to the square root of the sum of the squares of the $k$-volumes of the projections of that parallelogram onto the various $k$-planes in $\mathbb{R}^n$!
Page?
I forget.
Anyway, $\sqrt{\text{det}(J^t J)}$ is that $k$-volume.
I think.
That's why that expression shows up all over the place.
Hmm.
Yeah, so @ChrisWhite perhaps now you share my distress.
How, for example, would we do the problem if instead of a 1D ring in 2D space, we have an $n-1$ sphere in $n$ space?
I feel like we need a procedure to rewrite the probability distribution in a way that allows integrating over the variables.
00:08
"These are turning points of the Lagrangian which, in the Euclidean approach to QFT, correspond to maxima of the Lagrangian instead of the minimum. At first sight, they do not correspond to a normalizable state of the system. On a second look, one finds that they do not make sense at all."
:D
Using the machinery I described above, we may be able to write $T_{\delta \circ f}: \phi \rightarrow (1/2) \int_{f^{-1}(0)} \phi(s) / \left \lvert \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} \right \rvert \, ds$.
How do we "integrate out $y$" here?
Perhaps as this is already a 1D integral, it doesn't make any sense to integrate out $y$.
If that's the case, then is there any way to express $\delta(x^2 + y^2 - r^2)$ such that we can integrate out $y$?
Finally, @ChrisWhite, yet another approach is to Taylor expand $f$ about the points where it's zero. That idea is explored here.
00:59
Anyone know how the third step of this proof multiplies out the bracket?
@AngusTheMan You need the formula for evaluating a 2-form.
I.e. use the definition of $\wedge$
@AngusTheMan something like $(\alpha\wedge\beta)(X,Y)=\alpha(X)\beta(Y)-\alpha(Y)\beta(X)$ modulo an overall number
@0celo7 Gotcha! :)
01:29
it's finally snowing.
01:44
it's finally cold
yuss
 
3 hours later…
04:50
@0celo7 Okay, I took your advice and looked into some calculus. I think I'm now pretty good with differentials
05:00
@SirCumference Learn all of calculus.
It will open doors for you.
@NeuroFuzzy What is a four-force? I am habung trouble imagining this.
I imagine, @0537. Everything cool I want to learn requires it
GR, QM, etc.
@SirCumference Personally, I have found tom apostol's Calculus Volumes 1 and 2 most helpful in learning calc
That + wikipedia is a hard combo to beat
@StanShunpike Holy...it's $200+
05:13
Uh.....library?
Ain't got none near me
I gotta get one online
I also suggest reading books by David Griffiths for E&M and QM.
Even if you dont understand them initially, just having them is good imo
Electromagnetism
Oh
Well I'm pretty good with a lot of QM's main concepts
That and GR are incredibly interesting to me
05:15
Me too!
I gotta learn the math behind it though
Ya in college or...?
Yup
Econ major
I'm in high school...
Second year
Nice!
Not nice
I don't get to learn the cool stuff
I gotta stick with Newtonian physics and Galilean relativity
05:17
Well, it depends. My high school teacher did research in supergravity with higgs
Soooooo
All depends on where ya go i guess
But I have friends who hate hs
Cuz they are ready for better things
U sound in that boat
Yeah
Why are they teaching basic chemistry to people who know a good amount of QM?
sans the math...
05:18
Because most people dont care
At all
Sigh...
Well yeah, my teachers hate me because I ask so many questions
Ha! I have the same problem
Like "Why doesn't electron capture happen in protium?"
Every time I ask something, they're like "Sigh..what?"
Many people find it annoying when i get curious. They just want to get by, not learn
Same!
The other students get annoyed when I ask big questions
This is why students should be separated by performance, not age
05:21
I totally agree
On a side note, what branches of physics have ya had to study?
Age is not irrelevant, but it is often used in a discriminating way.
Me? Uh I like GR and QM
I want to learn QFT
How about special relativity?
Conflicts a bit with QM but still interesting
05:22
I am just starting to really master that
And then there's relativistic QM
I finally understand what an affine space is
But i need to learn like SO_+(1,3)
And the generator stuff in SR
But at least I get the basic ideas now
I padded myself on the back for understanding vector and scalar fields... ;-;
needed for a deeper understanding
And spin...
Haven't even begun with tensor fields
05:24
John Lee's books are really good imo to learn differential geometry
Sigh...I gotta learn more calc first
I also wanna as many math branches as I can...
@0celo7 can probably rattle off a bunch of good titles for u. That guy knows this stuff cold.
Differential geometry, noneuclidean geometry, mathematical analysis
Well then there's the (somewhat) uninteresting parts like statistics
Statistics is not the most interesting for physics, but for econ i have found it incresingly interesting in ways I had not anticipated
Well yeah, I took 2 years of a stats class
05:27
What's been the best class u have had so far?
I learned some interesting things but it wasn't the kind of "OMG THIS MAKES SENSE" that I got with other maths
Hmm...I've never really learned much from a class besides stats
Since I mostly research on my own
That's where I learn all the cool things, like why $e^Ï€i = -1$
wait
Do u have access to a lab? Thats a great way to break out of the hs bubble
screw it
I worked in a genetics lab in hs. It was nice to be taken seriously
Nope, not at all
We have one lab, but we're shielding from almost any interesting project
*shielded
So yeah, I have to learn the cool things on my own
And figure out the confusing stuff...like this
05:30
Have u watched Susskind's lectures?
U should, he's really well known and is great for learning advanced physics
He's a stanford prof and leading string theorist
One of the most interesting lecturers i have ever watched.
Eh...string theory
No not string theory
It runs on mathematics and assumptions
05:32
He does EVERYTHING
like he has a course on every intro level physics topic
Huh, I'll check it out
Its like 120 lectures or something
Each topic gets like 10
He do GR and QM?
05:33
Yeah in depth
Its a lot of fun
Cool, I'm loading one
Internet sucks...
On the mean time, ya maybe know the answer to this question?
0
Q: A camera and time dilation?

Sir CumferenceIf I travelled near a black hole, my time would progress slower relative to someone on Earth. This is clear enough. However, what if we sent a probe with a camera to a black hole? When we watch the screen, would we see time through the camera's perspective — that is, would the Universe appear to ...

@ChrisWhite likely can answer that.
Anyways gotta run. Gl with ur learning
I actually wrote a 52 upvoted answer on that site
Thanks
06:03
@SirCumference Where are you learning calculus?
On a bunch of different sites
in a random order
I'm heading for differentials and integrals first
@0537 Why ya ask?
Good luck, finish before winter break ends.
Unlikely
Calculus is a big subject
Depends.
 
4 hours later…
09:57
Great, jet lagged.
@Huy $d(f,g):=\int_0^1|f(x)-g(x)|\mathrm{d}x$ is not a metric if $f,g$ are only integrable functions because they can differ on a set of measure zero. How do I show that if $f,g$ are continuous, then they don't differ on a set of measure zero?
(so that this is a metric)
@Huy I watched Goldfinger on the flight home.
The scene where he says "Man talk" and slaps her on the ass is delicious.
I could taste the SJW tears
Huy
Huy
10:18
@0celo7: take $h = f-g$, then $h^{-1}(\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\})$ is open
@Huy Ah, and a set of measure zero is closed?
Huy
Huy
maybe
but an open set can't be of measure zero
because any open set contains an interval
and an interval has a length $> 0$
Yes.
Well, that's good enough for me.
Huy
Huy
yes, that scene is hilarous
Craig should have done that in every movie
I also watched Age of Ultron. That movie was basically Mass Effect.
10:25
I have a physics slash philosophy question:

Consider a system of two isolated spins $\lvert \uparrow\rangle$ and $\lvert \downarrow\rangle$

Now consider the possible states of this system as a whole:

$$\lvert \uparrow\rangle,\lvert \uparrow\rangle$$
$$\lvert \uparrow\rangle,\lvert \downarrow\rangle$$
$$\lvert \downarrow\rangle,\lvert \downarrow\rangle$$

We know that the quantum number $M_S=\sum_i s_i$ where $s_i$ is the spin quantum number of each spin

Therefore from the above, we have
$M_S=-1,0,1$ respectively that describes the possible macrostates of the system in question
Huy
Huy
I started watching Marvel movies
never had time for them
I mean the ones from Marvel studio themselves
pretty good stuff
 
2 hours later…
12:07
@Secret Once again, your basic treatment is wrong. There are not three possible states of the combined system, but four: $\lvert \uparrow \rangle \otimes \lvert \uparrow \rangle, \lvert \uparrow \rangle\otimes\lvert \downarrow \rangle,\lvert \downarrow \rangle\otimes\lvert \uparrow \rangle$ and $\lvert \downarrow \rangle\otimes\lvert \downarrow \rangle$. Furthermore, $\lvert \uparrow \rangle\otimes\lvert \downarrow \rangle$ doesn't have spin 0.
However, it is well-known (as in, you should have seen this somewhere) that the combined space of states of two spin-1/2 objects decomposes as the direct sum of a one-dimensional spin-0 space of state ("singlet") and a three-dimensional spin-1 space of state ("triplet"), so there is an altogether two-dimensional subspace which has $M_S = 0$, i.e. this doesn't uniquely identify a state.
@ACuriousMind Well what spin does it have then
@0celo7 It sits in a mixture of the spin-0 and spin-1 representation, so assigning $m_s = 0$ to it is nonsensical, since the $\lvert s,m_s\rangle$ scheme needs a fixed $s$.
(However, it is an eigenstate of the spin operator with eigenvalue 0)
@ACuriousMind Yes...I knew that.
@0celo7 Why are you asking me, then?
@ACuriousMind But this is what I was really asking :P
12:13
Ah
Juuuuust checking
13:01
@Huy did you ever complete that proof of the coordinate invariance of the divergence
Huy
Huy
no, that's PhD analysis
damn...
13:29
...I do recall seeing something similar in the context of constructing molecular orbital diagrams by using character tables and symmetry representation, in particular, the two spin state that you mentioned seemed to be similar to the treatment in a hydrogen molecule electronic states (because it can be shown to have a singlet and triplet state). However, the fact that I still made the mistake (and not aware that
I made the mistake, and I am still pretty confused about singlets, doublets and triplets means I should redo my exercise on this to understand it better
However (as I later realise right after I finished typing the original question) the semi philosophical question can exist independently of the two spin treatment above (I was originally trying to choose a simple enough system to illustrate my philosophical question, but as Acuriousmind pointed out, I made some mistakes

Given some observed outcomes from the system (including energy that can be measured) and processes that connects them, what are the ingredients needed in order to uniquely specify the (time) evolution of a system (that is, what else is needed to tell us that the system evol
---
^ *I should reread the relevant chapters on spin multiplets*
@Huy what do affine maps do that's so special
Huy
Huy
preserve some geometry, but I have never seen the expression outside of geometry courses
13:50
@SirCumference what
14:10
We haven't had a starred comment in three days
Say more amusing things people
@Slereah There are two singly-starred ones from yesterday.
They're...not really amusing, though :P
@ACuriousMind Anything JD says is amusing
JD does not renew his repertoire, though
He always says the same things
@0celo7 Our tastes in humor obviously differ :P
@ACuriousMind do you like Louis CK or George Carlin?
or Larry David?
14:13
@0celo7 Carlin yes, CK no, never heard of David
And now I gotta go again...holidays are exhausting
@ACuriousMind surprised that you like Carlin
Larry David wrote Seinfeld
and starred in Curb Your Enthusiasm which is p. amazing
and wrote it, but as I understand it a large part of that show is imprompt
14:36
@DavidZ : I recommend to first agreeing on the main principles and contents of the homework-and-exercise policy. Which semantic names to best describe this policy should then be decided later.
@Qmechanic I couldn't care less about names
The idea is that we stop trying to determine whether the intent of a question is educational, and instead close questions because they are asking us to do a calculation, rather than asking about a concept
2
This should cover a lot of the homework-like questions we close already - perhaps not every single one, but most, I think - but it also covers a lot of questions that are not anywhere related to homework, and not even educational, where somebody just wants us to do some math for them
We could even consider generalizing it to a wide-ranging "insufficient effort" close reason
So to be clear, this is not about a name change or wording change, this is about a major expansion of the class of questions we can address with a single close reason
15:22
@Slereah : I'm constantly extending my "repertoire".
ADG
ADG
hey anyone here?
15:33
Nope
15:50
My cat is sitting on the floor crying pls help
He needs to learn English
I have no clue what he wants
@0celo7 Check water, food, cat litter first of course, but also try gently petting his head.
Maybe he just wants you to give him attention
He demands your attention but denies your affection
If his food/water is OK, picking him up and talking softly may help.
Do you actually have a cat Terry
Most cats are not fond of picking up
Many cats, many years, all of mine like being picked up, but you have to do it right, with full support of the legs and freedom to leave.
My wife, Sponge Bob, and Homer.

« first day (1881 days earlier)      last day (3344 days later) »