« first day (1878 days earlier)      last day (3348 days later) » 
00:00 - 17:0018:00 - 00:00

18:05
@Slereah lol
0
Q: Surge of reputaiton ... don't oppose but just why

Gyro GearlooseI've just got a surge of 100 "zorkmids" on every of my accounts. I don't object, but I can't find any information why that happened. As to my experience any meta-question will be punished by lots of downvotes, please answer only via comments, so I can shed off the downvotes by simply deleting th...

@Slereah can one do GR on Kahler manifolds
who knows
Probably
Well not all interesting manifolds are Kahler
18:29
@Slereah you should find out what the condition is for a manifold to be Kahler
"In mathematics and especially differential geometry, a Kähler manifold is a manifold with three mutually compatible structures; a complex structure, a Riemannian structure, and a symplectic structure."
and then see if interesting GR manifolds satisfy it
I guess it has to be even dimensional, for a start
+1 GR
19:12
Hey the Dolbeault operator
It was that kind of shit I read about when preparing for my thesis
That never came :,(
19:25
I would appreciate it if someone third could explain-to-OP/mediate/step-in/vote-to-reopen/vote-to-close here.
@Qmechanic Commented with a link to a sufficient duplicate (which one could close with the same reason of "unphysical premise", but the actual question about the propagation of gravity doesn't actually rely on spontaneous creation/disappearence, I'd say)
19:45
@ACuriousMind : Agree.
@0celo7 wtf
6
I thought you were an aspiring physicist
6
why are you asking questions like that?
6
20:08
wtf +5
@FenderLesPaul I have no clue what your "wtf" comment is about
also how did you get +5
@FenderLesPaul explain!!!
@0celo7 what exactly is a "perturbation"?
@StanShunpike depends on the system...but typically it's some sort of small variation of the parameters of the system
and perturbation theory is then seeing how the system behaves under such a change
Is that a sufficient definition? So its just like a fluctuation in whatever parameters I am considering. So, for exampls, a system in thermo equilibrium with fixed energy could be "perturbed" by fluctuating the energy level by some small amount.
20:23
@StanShunpike well...sure?
I've never seen thermodynamic perturbation theory before
but let's take something I do know
Ok let me try a different example
GR!
LOL
Ok lets do gr
20:24
we can study perturbations around minkowski space by writing $g=\eta+h$ and expanding the einstein equations in $h$
so you are perturbing flatness then?
we can also do it around some fixed curved background by writing $g=\bar g+h$
@StanShunpike we are making a small variation of the parameters around flatness
Does $\eta$ have to be a tensor?
in the GR context?
$\eta$ is the minkowski tensor
Yeah
Oh lol better review havent done that since march
20:26
you separate the metric into some "background part" and some "fluctuation" part $h$ and expand GR as a power series around the background in terms of $h$
Ok
So then
Does h have to be a tensor?
well...yes
how else will $g$ be a tensor
but that's hardly relevant
we could do this in QFT as well
or QM
Arnold does perturbation of classical mechanical systems as well
Yeah so in Griffiths QM book, he describes on 224 a one dimensional infinite square well. He says $H^0\psi_n^0 = E^0\psi_n^0$ and suppose we have solved this TISE for that potential. He then suggests a new hamiltonian $H = H^0 +\lambda H'$, ie with perturbation. He then proceeds to write $E_n$ and $\psi_n$ as power series in $\lambda$. Why might power series be useful in a context like that?
@0celo7 ^
because you can calculate each term in the power series but can't sum it
the sum is not possible in closed form
but you can approximate it
and there are various sum methods to get info from such series
Huy
Huy
just keep reading
Huy
Huy
@0celo7: iirc it gets pretty obvious why he writes it as power series
am I correct or not
I don't have that book
Huy
Huy
maybe
what's h^{-1}(0)
at least not in Munich
@Huy I have no clue. Seriously.
Huy
Huy
troll
I got the book for free
found it rather handy as a first intro
for a total noob
wtf man people who got their PhD are now doing AMAs and get 200+ upvotes
20:42
@Huy can you please just explain what $h^{-1}(0)$ is
Huy
Huy
$h: X \to Y$, $h^{-1}(0) = \{x \in X| \, h(x) = 0\}$
yeah no shit
Huy
Huy
well you couldn't
but what's the answer to your question?
Huy
Huy
which one
20:44
to write down $h^{-1}(0)$
Huy
Huy
I said "write it down as a set"
and for some reason you didn't
and said you didn't know how
and now you say no shit
-> troll
7 hours ago, by 0celo7
@Huy $f^{-1}(A)=\{x\in X|f(x)\in A\}, f:X\to Y, A\subset Y$ IIRC
Seriously?
Huy
Huy
you didn't proceed
$h = f - g$ and $A = \{0\}$
well I didn't know if that's what you wanted and you never said
Huy
Huy
cuz you seemed like you were just trolling
20:47
@Huy are you serious
Huy
Huy
yes
how do you do a reverse $\subset$
Huy
Huy
$\supset$
ah, thnx
Huy
Huy
that actually makes sense
I find $\in$ vs $\ni$ funny
20:48
yup
@Huy I knew that one
Huy
Huy
does this one work $\unlhd$
wtf is that symbol
Huy
Huy
yeah no idea what that's supposed to stand for
normal subgroup
but idk why "unlhd"
normal subgroup has no line
Huy
Huy
it's like $\subseteq$
idk how to do the one without the line tbh
20:51
$\triangleleft$
Huy
Huy
Let $H \triangleleft G$ be a normal subgroup.
that just looks wrong
Let $H \unlhd G$ be a normal subgroup.
the triangle should be the same size as in the second one.
are you studying lie groups
Huy
Huy
sometimes, yes
do you know this one
$\rtimes$
yes
Huy
Huy
do you use that in physics
or why do you know it
I haven't used it since my algebra course
only now in Lie groups again
20:56
the Poincare group is the semidirect product of the Lorentz group and translations
Huy
Huy
ok
do you know a lot of group theory
or just like what they are
@Huy no, but I want to
Huy
Huy
ok
@Huy pretty much
Huy
Huy
we can study together
20:57
no?
Huy
Huy
I'll restudy algebra at some point
you call me a troll and refuse to play GTA with me
Huy
Huy
why you no like me?
why would I help you
Huy
Huy
well yeah after the Steam disaster yesterday
and I think everyone in this room would agree with me that you are a troll
20:58
what steam disaster?
I disagree
issue has been resolved
I just turned on Steam
am I screwed?
Huy
Huy
so what
anyways
algebra is cool
but I don't understand it
Huy
Huy
21:00
nobody asked you
@0celo7 it was supposed to help you btw
@FenderLesPaul so what did I do that's so bad that it warrants 5 stars
fine, ignore me
whatever
Huy
Huy
mad
are you Ghost
 
2 hours later…
22:53
@0celo7 yes they do if you are logged in...the discount is already there in the shopping cart
23:08
@0celo7 nuthin
foeggabout it
23:32
it's kind of difficult to forget when it's 5 starred on the side.
lol.
http://i.imgur.com/j4KkZCj.png
Why is there so much hate against John Duffield?
I don't really understand anything about the topics he answers about (quantum mechanics or general relativity), but in my non-knowledgeable eyes he usually provides answers directly to the question (whereas other people seem to skirt over some issues or provide half answers). Does he get downvoted so much because he is wrong all the time? (I'm not sure if he is or not anymore)
He's flat out wrong
about most of the things he answers
not all but more than a fair amount
00:00 - 17:0018:00 - 00:00

« first day (1878 days earlier)      last day (3348 days later) »