« first day (1823 days earlier)      last day (3404 days later) » 

18:00
i see
Now three people have starred it!
@JohnDuffield I randomly came across your science2020 bio, why did you never learn math despite such an interest in physics? I think I found a fascinating answer to that rotation = composition of reflections spin question I asked you about, fascinating stuff
@0celo7 physicists can usually solve quadratic equations...
Four people? Seriously
There are four astronomers, great.
18:16
It seems you should not provoke THE ASTRONOMER by talking about stars :P
$\mathfrak{The\,\,Astronomer}$ is evil.
Interesting, why does that look so weird, e.g. why is the $\mathfrak{n}$ raised above the baseline?
Pic?
Looks fine on my screen.
waaaaat
18:19
lol
something's wrong with your TeX :p
you should get that checked out
@0celo7 Dunno, I see the same as ACM.
@0celo7 Are we playing the post-mathjax-macros-to-screw-up-everyone's-rendering game?
I love that game.
@HDE226868 You're Canadian
13
A: Proving Kepler's 1st Law without differential equations

PulsarNewton's original proof was in fact based on geometry (he hadn't invented calculus yet). Richard Feynman devised his own, simpler geometric proof for one of his famous lectures. You can find it in Feynman's Lost Lecture, by Goodstein & Goodstein, and in this article: Paths of the Planets from Hall &

this deserves more attention
18:20
@0celo7 Again, nope.
@DanielSank No?
@DanielSank never played it
@HDE226868: Which operating system are you on?
@Danu Whenever I read stuff like that I feel like it's just broke-ass calculus.
@ACuriousMind Windows 7.
What about you?
18:22
@DanielSank 0/10
@HDE226868 Same. Probably to do with the installed fonts, then
I can appreciate some good ol' Euclidean geometry
I'm on Yosemite ATM
brb switching to Win8.1
The question isn't amazing, but the answer is.
@Danu Yeah, but then people start making these infinitesimal constructions with limiting procedures.
At that point, just do the calculus and move on?
18:22
@Danu Geometry as done by Euclid is not what we call "Euclidean geometry" :P
@Danu I mean, those constructions are essential for teaching calculus, don't get me wrong.
@ACuriousMind lol
@DanielSank No they're not :P
@0celo7 Why are we posting pictures of words?
@Danu ?
Oh you mean the general ting
the infinitesimal constructions with limiting
I thought you meant this particular ellipse thing
18:24
@Danu Yes.
@Danu That would be a ridiculous statement.
@DanielSank Hence my reaction
@DanielSank There are some differences in what people's computers are rendering for that word.
@DanielSank I complained about $\mathfrak{The Astronomer}$ looking weird on my screen (e.g. the 'n' sticking out). Now we're looking for the reason it looks that way to me but originally not to 0celo7
@HDE226868 Can I play too?
@DanielSank You're welcome
18:25
That's the ugliest capital letter "a" I've ever seen.
@0celo7 How do I play?
I think we can fairly resonably conclude that it has to do with different font installations on Windows compared to OSX.
@ACuriousMind It looks like that to me, too.
@DanielSank render the word and take a picture
@Danu That's an "a"?
18:26
(Windows)
I thought it said "The Ustronomer"
@ACuriousMind My second picture is on Windows!
@DanielSank Yeah, "zoom out" a bit
(squint)
@0celo7 How to render?
"Start ChatJax"
18:26
uh, chatjax?
@0celo7 Yes, and the 'n' is sticking out.
@ACuriousMind Not as severely, if I see correctly
@0celo7 That'd be the difference between Win7 and Win8, then
Oh, we're rendering it via chatjax? I thought you meant via a local TeX compiler.
18:27
Also, your picture is larger, it's hard to tell
@ACuriousMind 1800p master race
Why is the "n" a little above the other letters?
@DanielSank that's the question
@DanielSank you can do that too!
@DanielSank You a bit slow tonight? :D
@Danu That was a joke, dude.
18:29
@0celo7 Now it's flat.
From TeXShop
You know, there is a TeX Stack Exchange...
Yeah, TeX does it correctly, it seems this is a MathJaX issue
How do I get mathfrak?
18:30
@DanielSank What do you mean?
I don't think \mathfrak is in default TeX
@0celo7 It's not.
It wasn't in mine, I had to get a package.
Dunno which one
Apparently it's amssymb.
Try using the package amsmath
BTW, looks that odd way to me when I type it in an answer on the site, too, so it's not an issue with chat
18:31
Anyway, on my system (Ubuntu, TeX installed via texlive package), the n is where it should be.
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb, amsthm, yfonts, esint, fancyvrb, mathrsfs, tikz-cd, graphicx, bbm, physics}
It's one of those
It's amssymb.
What is physics?
@DanielSank Unrigorous
Provides bras, kets and stuff
@DanielSank What is meaning life?
18:33
Fizks
skziF
bbm?
@Leuchte A process which self-replicates and reduces local entropy?
I have no clue what my packages do
18:33
@0celo7 I was just about to ask what esint is :P
::eye twich::
@0celo7 lolwat? I found something that's blocked for you but not for me? :D
I just disproved Galileo's observation about falling bodies and their equal velocities.
You see, if you take a transparent shampoo bottle and turn it back and forth upside down you will find that a large air bubble rises much faster than a small bubble.
@ACuriousMind That's blocked for me too.
@MatsGranvik lol :D
18:34
@MatsGranvik Isn't that a rising body though?
:D
p-p-p-proxxxxy
@DanielSank We are in the same country you know...
@DanielSank Then neither of you will get to know what love is...
or are we...
You might think TN is full of hicks but we're just as American as you ;)
18:35
@Leuchte Yes but the amount of shampoo is constant.
and it falls
@ACuriousMind Nooooooooooo
@ACuriousMind No idea!
Ah, multiple integrals.
And it makes the loop on the closed line integral larger.
@dmckee: with respect to your bountied question:
I never use these silly triple or loop integral signs
@ACuriousMind I don't either
18:39
I see two different approaches. Frequently with circuit analysis the student is puzzled because he/she does not understand how to think about a linear response system.
I just like the bigger o on the \oint
Wait you said "loop"
Well screw you
A possible answer could assume that Ohm's law is correct and then carefully explain why that law applied to each individual resistor results in shared voltage.
However, you may want a more physical approach wherein we start with basic physics such as the force on a charged particle from an electric field.
@ACuriousMind What packages do you run?
If we start there, the standard course would be to derive Ohm's law, and then go back to the first approach.
Let me know what you have in mind and maybe I'll write it up.
@ACuriousMind It spaces measures properly :)
18:42
@ACuriousMind How do you indicate loop integrals, then?
@0celo7 Those I need. Only ones I always use are hyperref, xparse and xcolor
@Danu Why bother changing the integration sign at all?
@Danu Uh, by having $\gamma$ be a loop and writing $\int_\gamma$?
@ACuriousMind How do you get frak?
@ACuriousMind +1
18:43
Wish I could -1 in chat
@0celo7 From amssymb. But not everything I write needs mathfrak
@ACuriousMind Wait you assemble packages differently for each doc?
@0celo7 Yes.
@ACuriousMind Weird.
Why?
18:44
Why would I want to load something I don't need?
@ACuriousMind Laziness.
Although note that this is quite different from the usual notion of "lazy loading" :D
Does the load even take a noticeable amount of time?
I crack myself up.
18:45
Also, the more packages, the greater the danger something might conflict among them
@DanielSank lol
@DanielSank I didn't get it
@0celo7 Computer joke.
@ACuriousMind I figured, but why do you know about it
Your realm of knowledge never ceases to amaze me
@0celo7 Because knowing how to computer is really really useful?
18:48
While I'm not doing it much anymore, I like programming.
@DanielSank I'm an engineer, I have to learn how to computer
@ACuriousMind I think it's like pulling teeth, but to each their own.
@0celo7 Your own or someone else's teeth? :D
@0celo7 >:(
@ACuriousMind eewwwwwwww
@ACuriousMind Tie my tooth to someone else's and run at full speed away.
@0celo7 gross
18:50
@DanielSank What?
@DanielSank no u
@0celo7 Programming is super fun and really useful!
@0celo7 wat?
@DanielSank Hell no, agree.
@0celo7 I do not understand that sentence at all.
Sewers are also really useful. Not so much fun.
@DanielSank you're a wat
@DanielSank "Hell no" to the first part, "agree" to the second part.
@0celo7 I see.
@0celo7 How come you're always talking about diffeo geo if you're an engineer?
18:55
@DanielSank It's interesting
@0celo7 But not career material for you?
@DanielSank God no
@0celo7 I see.
I'm also a math major you know
That's how I feel about math.
18:55
I think people forget this
@0celo7 Hard to forget what you never knew.
@ACuriousMind That costs more words :P
@DanielSank Hmm, it says it right in my profile.
@0celo7 Duh
@Danu Seriously?
18:56
@Danu I don't do that.
@0celo7 Not sure I ever read your profile.
Custom preambles all the way
Maybe you guys don't use a lot of packages
I use like 30+ in most documents, don't want all possible combinations in there
@DanielSank I read everyone's if I talk to them. Maybe I'm strange.
@Danu I use maybe eight.
@Danu Woah.
@Danu Holy crap
@DanielSank In my ideal world we'd have (at least) one of each, and I'll take my guide in deciding the bounty from the voting.
I did a hand-wavy version of the microscopic model, without explaining the connection to Ohm's law, because my sense was that both posters (the sandwich model guy and yesterday's poster) wanted a intuitive feel rather than a careful explanation of math.
18:58
@Danu I have seven in my "always use this" preamble.
I think the method assuming Ohm's law has the advantage of clear sequence, however; rather like a mathematical proof. And would appeal more to the nominal audience of the site.
@DanielSank Welp... :P
@dmckee I see. Indeed, deriving Ohm's law via the e.g. Drude model seems out of place there.
I don't see how you can use so few packages
In fact, I think I did this in chat with @0celo7 not so long ago...
@Danu amsmath, amstext, amssymb, graphicx, import, appendix
19:01
You did. I didn't understand any of it.
The rest I define myself in a macros.tex file that I always \input.
amssymb, amsmath, amsthm, mathtools, enumerate, graphicx, tikz all absolutely mandatory :P
At least, I wasn't convinced we had derived Ohm.
mathtools?
amsfonts
subcaption
hyperref!!
those are just the minimal things :P
oh yeah.. geometry for margins
@Danu I do margins in my class files.
19:03
I like this idea of splitting packages and macros
Maybe I'll start doing that next semester
my preamble is getting too long
Pic?
It doesn't fit on a single screen unless I zoom out a lot
@Danu I try to respect the fact that TeX is a typsetting language. The fact that it's a programming language is a somewhat sad accident which has been abused up the wazoo.
@DanielSank meh
@Danu Nah, dude, this is not a "meh". Doing any kind of modularity management in TeX is really a pain in the butt.
Even sensible equation referencing is nigh impossible out of the box.
19:05
@DanielSank I don't really need modularity---but I understand that it's your thing
@DanielSank ? why that
@Danu You may want it when you write your dissertation.
@DanielSank Might
@Danu Suppose I write a personal note for myself. Then six months later I want to incorporate it into a book I'm writing.
How the crap do I manage name collisions on \label'd things?
@DanielSank Copy + paste the text
@DanielSank Be careful about the labeling
19:06
but I see what you mean
I don't number many of my equations so it's not an issue for me
Either you're joking or you've never worked on a large document or software project.
but I know that most people do
never worked on a software project, always stuck to sub-100 page documents so far.
"Be careful about labeling" is the road to hell.
What is the shortest dissertation on record?
I need to write/find a package which can prepend labels with the full path of the object, i.e. the chapter/section/subsection.
19:07
26
Q: What is the shortest Ph.D. thesis?

Timothy ChowThe question is self-explanatory, but I want to make some remarks in order to prevent the responses from going off into undesirable directions. It seems that every few years I hear someone ask this question; it seems to hold a perennial fascination for research mathematicians, just as quests for...

@0celo7 I think it might be DeBroglie.
3 pages of content
Wow. 3 good pages?
Anyway, @Danu, I see documentation somewhat similarly to how I see computer code: you want to re-use fragments to maintain consistency and reduce work.
This is why we reference papers instead of rewriting them every time we need a result.
@DanielSank That's a ridiculous analogy :P
19:12
@Danu I disagree, obviously.
@DanielSank So how'd you solve the equation referencing thing
@Danu Haven't yet.
My stop-gap solution is to use the full path of the labeled object in the \label macro.
@Danu You should not be putting in equation tags by hand, anyway
@ACuriousMind Howzat?
@ACuriousMind What do you mean?
19:12
@ACuriousMind ?
That sounds rather ridiculous
Okay, one step backwards: What exactly do you mean by "equation referencing thing"?
Either I've misunderstood you or you've misunderstood me :P
I'm just gunna leave this here.
^still don't know how git works
@Danu Can still browse files.
> \levelstay{Introduction}

This is a book about quantum computing.

\leveldown{Sub-introduction}

Quantum computing is cool.

\levelstay{Sub-introduction II}

No really, it's super cool.
Haha
19:15
^ ?
@ACuriousMind Uh, by having $\gamma$ be a loop and writing $\oint$?
Less work.
And if there's only one loop there's no ambiguity.
The chat room just got weird.
@Danu What?
Spread MAXIMUM confusion! :D
19:18
@0celo7 Your comment about loop integrals came at a confusing time, and was marked as a response to another message in a way that doesn't make sense to me. Then @Danu posted more weirdness.
It this now a music thread?
@0celo7 Don't post your "music" please ;)
^German weirdness
I can't resist. This is my favorite piece of music ever written
@DanielSank That's a very strong statement.
19:20
@Danu It's also true.
@DanielSank Wow, terrible taste in music I'm afraid.
@0celo7 :(
@Danu Thanks for that song!
@0celo7 Says the hardcore guy :P
@Danu I listen to a lot more than hardcore.
19:21
@DanielSank I think it's likeable---but not that special. It just doesn't do anything that really really stands out
The only reason I'd move to Dutchland is for the dance music.
@Danu I listen to a lot of guitar and a lot of tango. This piece is special in several ways. Doesn't mean you have to like it.
I think German music sounds strange.
The melody is traded between the two instruments so smoothly that you don't even notice unless you really pay attention.
19:22
(although I like the album version slightly better)
It is difficult at times to really say which instrument is carrying the melody.
@DanielSank Yeah, but favorite piece ever is just too strong :P
Though I think it's too strong a statement for any piece of music
@0celo7 I hope you're joking :P
@Danu You have decided that people cannot have favorites? Who the hell are you, God?
19:23
@Danu About?
@DanielSank Definitely
Haven't you noticed that I'm omnipotent, by now?
@Danu I see. Well I suppose I ought to apologize for past insults, etc. etc.
@Danu The mod power has gone to his head!
19:24
@0celo7 Ah, you're in this phase
But seriously, piss off. I think I know my favorites better than you do @Danu.
@Danu Phase?
@DanielSank No need, I could see you didn't mean it
I like most hard dance.
@DanielSank Ai, did I anger you?
19:25
It can be soft or really hard.
@Danu No.
@DanielSank Then piss off is a bit strong, don't you think?
Is this also "phase" music?
@Danu Uh, I don't know. Is it strong? In my head it's a silly phrase with almost no meaning since nobody in the US ever uses it.
19:26
@0celo7 For a younger me, it was
@DanielSank It's so non-standard that one only uses it when serious.
(typically)
I'm sure you've noticed that people that are really angry don't tend to go for the standard insults
I listen to a sufficiently broad amount of music that I don't think it's very phase-y.
@Danu Oh. I mean, I don't think I've ever heard it said in real life.
@0celo7 Time will tell :)
In British movies it's used between people who are sort of mildly annoyed at their friends... I think.
But you're not British
19:28
@Danu Correct.
@Danu Maybe. Wonder what I'll like ten years from now.
Hopefully not that dreadful "rock" thing.
In 2-3 years it'll already be very different---if my experience is any kind of guide
Hmm, how long did your "phase" last?
@0celo7 Don't listen to him.
And I don't listen to that much hardcore. The production quality of 90% of hardcore is abysmal.
19:30
I had a "phase" starting when I was 14 that hasn't ended yet.
If you like music you like it.
I think I've listened to the same type of music for the last 4 years.
At least since BF3 came out. A guy on Symthic posted a Frontlinear song and I've been hooked ever since.
@Danu I just put on a hardcore album, thanks for the suggestion.
What does "hardcore" mean to you guys?
Metal?
@DanielSank Right, and your experience is likely to be a better guide because [citation needed]
19:37
@DanielSank Definitely not true in my opinion.
@DanielSank It's a type of electronic music
Hardcore, formerly called hardcore techno, is a subgenre of electronic dance music originating in Europe from the emergent raves in the 1990s. It was initially designed at Rotterdam in Netherlands, derived from techno. Its subgenres are usually distinct from other electronic dance music genres by its faster tempos (160 to 200 BPM or more), the intensity of the kicks and the synthesized bass (in some subgenres), the rhythm and the atmosphere of the themes (sometimes violent), the usage of saturation and experimentation close to industrial dance music. == HistoryEdit == === EmergenceEdit ...
@Danu My baseless assertions are as valid as yours.
3
@DanielSank Yeah, so don't try selling them as more valid :D
@Danu Why not?
Right, fine, be like that ;)
@Danu Will do, thanks.
19:39
@Danu I think most of my music is just hardstyle of rawstyle.
I'm definitely not into that.

« first day (1823 days earlier)      last day (3404 days later) »