« first day (1822 days earlier)
← previous day
next day →
last day (3405 days later) »
00:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 00:00
Huy
20:00
no
I remember the exercise with the arctan
our TA only had this terrible formula for the nth derivative of arctan
and I thought about partial fractioning $1/(1+x^2)$
0celo7
what are you babbling about
Huy
and got a nicer formula
so he's the troll
just listen to the story kids
this is the story of how I met your mother
0celo7
what the heck is 1/(1+x^2)
Huy
the derivative of arctan(x)
0celo7
what
Huy
20:02
even my students know that
why are you trolling me
0celo7
because I can't factor $s^2-2s+5$
Huy
maybe you made some mistakes again
0celo7
can I just give up
oh fine you tell me what the characteristic equation of $y''-2y'+5y=0$ is
Huy
only after 20 minutes
fukin LoL
0celo7
oh are they complex or something
Huy
20:04
well yea
you'll get some fancy sin and cosine
0celo7
how do you know
Huy
do you know the joke with the sin and cosine
0celo7
indeed
Huy
and e^x
I think the joke only works in German
0celo7
they're all cousins in an incestuous relationship
Huy
20:05
so I won't tell it after all
0celo7
sag es auf Deutsch, dann
Huy
nein danke
0celo7
bitteeeeeeeeee
bittebittebitte
Huy
no I'm not in a joking mood
maths is a serious thing
0celo7
you're the troll around here
Huy
20:06
no
0celo7
oh! complete the square! I'm an idiot!
Huy
more like square the circle
if you know what I mean
0celo7
not really, no
Huy
:(
0celo7
It's easy to square the circle
Huy
20:07
lies
0celo7
just draw a box with side $\pi$, right?
Huy
do you even TeX
ACuriousMind
@0celo7 You and quadratic equations are not becoming friends, are you? :P
0celo7
I don't see the issue
@ACuriousMind MIDDLE SCHOOL
Huy
well by Galois you can't construct rationals so it's impossible to draw a box with side $22/7$
0celo7
20:08
@ACuriousMind dude I can't even complete the square :D
@Huy uh lol of course I can
ACuriousMind
@0celo7 How the hell did you pass math in high school, then? :P
0celo7
@ACuriousMind skin of my teeth!
ACuriousMind
No idea what that means.
0celo7
German alert
it's a saying
Huy
deine Mutter
is a saying too
0celo7
20:10
The literal translation...makes absolutely no sense. It means "just barely"
Huy
but in German
0celo7
My mother isn't German
Huy
but a saying ?
0celo7
for the love of crap how do you complete the square
Huy
lol
0celo7
20:10
is it $b^2/2$ that you add?
or $(b/2)^2$?
Huy
so physicists really do only recall formulas and plug numbers in
0celo7
I'M NOT A PHYSICIST
4
ACuriousMind
^that
0celo7
what are the physicists working in the nuclear engineering department?
what are the engineers who do plasma physics?
isn't "physicist" the name/descpription of the job?
I figured out how to complete the square!
Huy
good for you
now you can finally derive the formula for solving quadratic equations all by yourself
0celo7
20:14
what :o
I thought you needed to be a grad student
at least
to do that
Huy
we did that in 3rd grade
0celo7
alright I'm calling bullshit on that one
Huy
call my teacher
0celo7
I went to German school for 6 years
2-8
Huy
I never went to a German school
0celo7
20:15
never saw the quadratic equation
Huy
we didn't even just see the teacher derive it
0celo7
I don't even believe that you proved anything
Huy
we derived it ourselves
0celo7
I must be literally retarded
Huy
our teacher had a very nice exercise sheet for it
which made the quadratic equation a little bit harder every time
0celo7
20:15
I think I have a mental handicap
I didn't see the quadratic equation in a math class until 10th grade
@ACuriousMind did you star those things
Huy
10th grade
rly?
0celo7
yes
Huy
that's a bit late
did you never multiply something by itself before
0celo7
what?
ACuriousMind
I seem to recall it was 8th grade when we treated it systematically.
0celo7
20:17
Well I took 8th grade math in Germany, and I didn't see it
ACuriousMind
@0celo7 If I answer that, THE ASTRONOMER will punish me.
0celo7
it's telling that I was a C student in math in Germany
...why am I a math double major? what's the point, I'm not good at it
Huy
u can become
study functional analysis
would be a good start
0celo7
I've tried becoming good
I asked a TA about that, and the book he said was a light intro is too hard
Huy
I have a headache
0celo7
20:19
telling me to study functional analysis is a troll meme at this point
Huy
you're the troll at this point
0celo7
I bet you feel real proud about that one
Huy
very much so
0celo7
@ACuriousMind well don't say his name so loud, goof!
Huy
I printed it out and am laminating it
0celo7
20:22
random factor of $5$ floating around
more sign errors
an odd number of them!
@Huy oh I'm sure
just know that if you're not actually doing that, you're just trolling :)
Huy
I know
0celo7
pic?
Huy
I don't send my pics to strangers on the internet
0celo7
you sent me pics of your room!
omg I bet it wasn't even yours
Huy
maybe that wasn't my room
0celo7
20:26
@ACuriousMind Seriously, are "physicists" only people who have degrees in physics?
ACuriousMind
I would say that that is the defining characteristic of a professional physicist, yes.
0celo7
Is Dyson an exception?
So what you're telling me is that you could talk to a professional but not be able to say that he is a physicist without looking at the diploma?
ACuriousMind
Yes, because that's how I chose to define "professional physicist" in the sentence above :P
0celo7
seems like you're trying to bar me from kinship :'(
ACuriousMind
19 mins ago
, by
0celo7
I'M NOT A PHYSICIST
You did that yourself.
0celo7
20:31
I'm not
anything
.
I have a high school diploma.
Huy
laminated?
0celo7
probably not
Huy
then it's worth nothing
0celo7
lol @ 3rd order ODE
so much writing
Danu
hullo
Huy
20:33
hi danu whats up
Danu
not much
agar.io
0celo7
what?
Danu
a stupid online game
that I play when I'm braindead
I proved some stuff about the "topologist' sine curve"
which was pretty great
0celo7
@ACuriousMind Do you have
Hitman: Absolution
?
Huy
that it's not path connected but connected?
or is there something else I must know about it
Danu
20:35
are the games after blood money good?
yes
ACuriousMind
@0celo7 No. I've not heard good things about it, either
0celo7
@Danu dunno, just started and I'm pretty terrible at it
@ACuriousMind Too "mainstream"?
Danu
@0celo7 Those games are pretty hard
(I know them up to part 4)
Young me was unable to "properly" complete most levels.
0celo7
for one I just shoved the guy down a steam vent and stabbed everyone while making my escape
I intend to replay that one :D
ACuriousMind
@0celo7 No, it just has bad writing/story and not excellent enough gameplay to gloss over that
0celo7
20:37
the story is incredibly confusing
I have no clue what's going on
I'm about an hour in.
er, anyone know how to inverse Laplace transform an reciprocal cubic?
Huy
.............................................................................................................
0celo7
what's that for?
Danu
Have you played the old Hitman games though, @ACuriousMind?
ACuriousMind
@Danu No, heard good things about them, though
0celo7
I got Silent Assassin for a buck and change
Danu
20:42
@ACuriousMind Pretty friggin' awesome.
Most epic games I think I played as a kid
@0celo7 Oh man... That first mission...
I spent
so
many hours lurking in the outside hills hahaha
0celo7
I feel like you just have to
wait
a lot
Danu
I was way too young to be really good
@0celo7 Guess what real hitmen* do
0celo7
for a hole to open in the guard patters, etc
@Danu nice edit :D
Danu
@0celo7 brainfart :D
0celo7
Real hitmen = Sam Fisher
Danu
20:44
haha
0celo7
yes, I have a mancrush on him
Danu
Keep on dreaming
0celo7
Sam Fisher is real!
You're telling me real hitmen don't clear a room while hanging upside down from a pipe on the ceiling?
pls
Danu
Just rewatching the first mission of Hitman 2 is giving me mad nostalgia :D
0celo7
you can't just say Sam Fisher is a joke and not explain
he will cut you up
Danu
20:50
As Leeb likes to say: "Proof: Clear"
0celo7
Leeb can go f*ck his proofs
Agent 47 vs. Sam Fisher vs. Solid Snake
@ACuriousMind How does one factor a cubic polynomial?
ACuriousMind
With math
0celo7
For example $3x^3+5x^2+x-1$
ACuriousMind
Seriously, that's not hard to figure out
0celo7
@ACuriousMind why do you troll me
@ACuriousMind what?
I've never been taught how to do it
is there a way to find one zero and divide it out?
Danu
20:56
Wikipedia
Huy
-1 is an obvious one
my students love doing this kind of stuff
0celo7
ok, we get it, you have smart students
Huy
no
0celo7
but that doesn't help me one bit
Huy
I'm just trying to emphasize your middle school maturity
Danu
20:57
@Huy hehehe
0celo7
rational root theorem? what is this madness
Huy
wow
0celo7
Wolfram knows what level I'm at
Huy
I never know when to use "evaluate" or "compute" or "find"
0celo7
@Huy I didn't see it
Huy
21:03
usually you start by checking 1, and afterwards comes -1
0celo7
never would have guessed
Huy
yes because the measure of a singleton is 0
0celo7
huh?
Danu
Calculate?
0celo7
oh I remember that
ahhhh
yes, it's coming back
Huy
21:05
measure
probability
anything ?
0celo7
you really are a troll, you know
Huy
:(
0celo7
you guys are so mean you'd probably just laugh if I asked how to factor a quadratic
Huy
ask in the maths chat
we're used to trolls there
0celo7
dude I seriously can't factor $3s^2+2s-1$
the best I can do is see $-1$ is a root and long divide
user685252
21:10
Use the quadratic formula
Huy
u can factor -1 even twice
and then you're done
0celo7
I used to be able to just write it down
Danu
I've never learned long division
Lel
ACuriousMind
@Danu wat
0celo7
@Huy what
Huy
21:11
means u can divide by $(x+1)^2$
Danu
@ACuriousMind Never needed it, either
Huy
and not just by $x+1$
0celo7
the cubic, yes
but not the quadratic
Huy
lol
hint
$(x+1)^2 = (x+1) (x+1)$
0celo7
stop trolling
Huy
21:12
I don't understand your confusion
0celo7
how do you factor that quadratic
ACuriousMind
@0celo7 I do not see what you find so difficult about this. Just compute its roots!
0celo7
@ACuriousMind I can do that
There's a trick for just writing it down, but I've forgotten
Huy
zweiklammeransatz?
0celo7
what?
Huy
21:14
idk what trick u mean
0celo7
I'll give you two parentheses
ACuriousMind
Computing the roots is not hard. I don't see why a "trick" would be needed
0celo7
because it's hard for other people
Huy
what other people are you talking about
ACuriousMind
You are not "other people", are you? :P
0celo7
21:17
ok I know I told you guys to be meaner, but this isn't what it was supposed to be like :(
@Huy I have to do partial fractions on this now
user685252
If you can't factor it then its prime :P
DanielSank
@Danu I would indeed have answered that question, but now someone else did it with "sandwiches".
I f*$#@%g hate those stupid food analogies.
Danu
I never heard that one
But the bounty is about explaining it without sammiches
DanielSank
@Danu orly?
0celo7
food analogies are the best
a black hole is really a donut shop
you get so fat you never leave
DanielSank
21:20
@0celo7 zomg that hurt.
user685252
Ba dum tss
0celo7
it's funny because rotating black holes have ring singularities
and donuts are products of rings
Huy
wat
0celo7
$\mathrm{donut}=\mathrm{ring}\otimes\mathrm{ring}$
Huy
don't tensor me
ACuriousMind
21:23
::cringes::
DanielSank
^ should I turn on chatjax for that?
Huy
for your own safety don't
0celo7
just some engineering math
ACuriousMind
I see engineers misuse the $\otimes$ even worse than physicists :P
0celo7
Hmm, I think the people of this chat forget that I have two majors
oh well
I doubt it will ever matter, anyway
So I wrote down the problem wrong. That's fun.
Huy
21:25
classic 0celo7
0celo7
I can't do anything right.
@ACuriousMind It's funny that BBS sometimes uses $\times$ and sometimes $\otimes$ for the group product :D
Huy
dear lord
I'll try to cry myself to sleep now
thanks for the nightmares
good night and good luck with your remaining exercises
0celo7
they also make no distinction between algebra and group
Huy
...............................................................
please stop the torture
mercy
0celo7
wonder what else they do
@ACuriousMind You surely have a list of offenses committed by BBS, right?
Huy
21:30
what is bbs anyways
0celo7
amazon.com/String-Theory-M-Theory-Modern-Introduction/dp/…
Huy
bible of bs ?
0celo7
pretty much, although I think GSW/Pol is more standard
Huy
ok
i sleep now
bya bya
bye
0celo7
sweet dreams
Huy
21:31
thx <3
0celo7
$\mathrm{SU}(2)\otimes \mathfrak{so}(5)\times E_8$
Danu
@DanielSank Yush!
DanielSank
@Danu I see. I was confused by the fact that there's already an accepted answer.
Danu
@DanielSank Note that the question is four (!) years old.
ACuriousMind
@DanielSank Note also that the bounty is from dmckee, not the asker.
0celo7
21:38
maybe he
is
the user
dun dun DUN
DanielSank
@ACuriousMind Indeed.
0celo7
@ACuriousMind what's the biggest abuse of notation in physics?
probably some QM or QFT thing, right?
DanielSank
@0celo7 Actually, one of the worst offenders is the
constant
conflation of functions and variables.
0celo7
please elaborate
DanielSank
Similarly, there is a very frequent conflation between vectors and
representations
of vectors in a particular basis. This confusion is made worse by the fact that representations of vectors are themselves vectors!
0celo7
21:49
are you saying like $v^ie_i$ vs. $\{v^i\}$
Danu
But those errors are mostly problematic for beginners, at graduate level that type of stuff doesn't really pose any problems.
DanielSank
@Danu I wouldn't agree with you there.
@Danu Self-consistent notation really helps me understand what I'm doing. This was a huge issue in GR.
0celo7
lol, you'd love wald
abstract index notation is the biggest scam
DanielSank
@0celo7 What? No it's not.
Abstract indices are a very good idea IMHO.
0celo7
dude it's just index notation but the indices aren't indices!
DanielSank
21:52
@0celo7 Right! They're labels on function arguments.
0celo7
and it hurts when he writes partial derivatives or Christoffel symbols in abstract index notation
DanielSank
@0celo7 I wouldn't know about that.
0celo7
as far as I understand it, the abstract indices should
only
be on tensors
but Christoffel symbols aren't tensors
I think one can make the partial derivatives make sense
Danu
@DanielSank Meh---I think most people seem to get by just fine.
Also, AFAIK the tensors-not-being-their-components is done in most graduate courses.
DanielSank
@0celo7 Yes.
@0celo7 Oh.
Danu
21:57
(neither are partial derivatives)
DanielSank
@Danu True, but most people don't understand what the hell they're doing.
0celo7
@Danu Yeah, I'm trying to think how he defined $\partial_a$
but I don't have the book with me and my iPad is at home, too
Well, now that I think about it, Hawking-Ellis uses the same notation
So neither makes sense.
00:00 - 20:00
20:00 - 22:00
22:00 - 00:00
« first day (1822 days earlier)
← previous day
next day →
last day (3405 days later) »
all rooms
Transcript for
Oct
30
Oct '15
31
Nov
1
The h Bar
General chat for Physics SE (
physics.stackexchange.com
). For M...
9
116
join this room
about this room
00:00
06:00
12:00
18:00
all times are UTC
site design / logo © 2025 Stack Exchange Inc;
legal
mobile