« first day (1804 days earlier)      last day (3423 days later) » 
00:00 - 13:0013:00 - 00:00

00:00
@DanielSank ah the bigoted goodness
00:21
Howdy
you
have you learned some math yet
I wish.
Still ain't got any math classes yet
We haven't replaced the teacher
Fml...calc is the one subject I wanted to learn above anything else
So...
just learn it
it's very intuitive
Easier said than done
Crap
Calc is a hell of a lot different from most things they teach you before it. I'd rather it be taught properly than confuse myself
what's stopping you
well you're not getting taught properly, are you
calc is not hard if you had a good precalc teacher
00:31
I didn't have precalc
you never had algebra 2?
Skipped precalc. The precalc teacher for most kids was my calc teacher. And she just left, so...
if you skipped it
then you know the material
so you know everything necessary
go learn calc...
We were "speed-learning" it. So I got through the basics of precalc before she left in the first week.
Ya know, that's like me telling you "go learn about quantum mechanics" when you don't know what an electron is.
It's not easy
@Pies quantum mechanics tells you what an electron is
00:34
...
Fair enough. But how about, "go learn how to read" when you're just learning how to speak?
there are literate mutes
;-;
Just work with me...
My point is that, if calculus is one of the most important classes I'm going to use later in life, I'll need to learn it properly. That means I want to learn it in a structured order
When did ya learn calc?
@ChrisWhite Howdy
crap
NEVER SAY HOWDY TO HIM
Er...?
user54412
00:49
The last person to say howdy to me ...
...yeah...?
.-.
poor Kyle
poor, poor Kyle
._.
HE WAS SO YOUNG
well, like 31, but compared to really old people he was young
k...?
00:53
he doesn't come around here anymore
Oh XD
@0celo7 Say, what'd ya major in for college?
gender studies
Oh...thought it'd be related to QM or something.
wow, prejudicial much
Er, no, just expected most people on this site to have majored in physics of some sort
00:58
so you "expect" me to fit to your standards
I bet you think I'm male as well
...I did?
user54412
...
No wait, not because of anything like that
Just because you got a guy as your profile pic, so I...I...
uh-huh
.-.
00:59
right
::wonders if CW is going to say anything::
user54412
0celo7s are male; 0cele77es are female.
Er...k?
user54412
@obe How often do you change your picture? And how often do you change the colorscheme?
So what're ya majoring in, Chris (if you're in college)
obe
obe
@ChrisWhite I normally don't change it... though I changed it a lot in the last 3 weeks. The color scheme is always blue.
01:01
he's supply chain management
user54412
wait, I just realized some people have bio information that pops up when you click their name in chat
user54412
@Pies Do I seem that young? ;)
Dunno, I'm still in high school so...
I guess I'm "that young" ._.
user54412
my profile contains my life story, all 3 sentences of it
(mine too!)
why did you spoil it for him
01:06
Funny, I wanna major in astrophysics...and I'm looking at princeton
I was waiting for him to find out on his own
sigh
has astrophysics increased GDP?
obe
obe
sigh...
user54412
@0celo7 who exactly do you think came up with this whole "fusion power" idea?
@ChrisWhite Donald J. Trump
user54412
exactly. astrophysicist
01:09
in other news
@obe teach @Pies calculus
._.
obe
obe
he can learn it on his own in like 3 days.
he refuses for some reason
Sigh...a'right, how old were ya both when you learned calc?
01:11
Wait how?
In sophomore year?
yes
you just learn it...
In school?
college
I meant sophomore year in high school?
the answer won't change
01:13
So...ya learned it on you're own?
obe
obe
@Pies same as 0celo7.
mit has some nice lectures.
;-;
obe
obe
I watched them in 3 days on 3x speed.
and learned it... i guess.
user54412
I wish I could say I learned it at a normal age. But I was also around 15...
Sigh...so I gotta do something about this on my own?
Doesn't help that I skipped precalc
user54412
01:15
@Pies Either you have a teacher, or you have to do it on your own.
probably the worst decision of your life
welcome to digging ditches
user54412
::wonders what precalc is::
Wasn't a decision. I did too good on my regent
@ChrisWhite 1+3=4
stuff like that
They just skipped me.
user54412
01:16
regents? are those anywhere outside NY?
Nope.
Well, now I don't know calc or precalc. So trying to learn calc without any basic knowledge is unlikely
what do you think is in precalc
I dunno, differentials, integrals maybe
solve $ax^2+bx+c=0$
@Pies what the heck is in calculus then
Same thing, but more elaborate?
01:19
no
can you solve that equation
er...does that problem need calc?
...oh boy
Since ya ain't giving me any of the variables...
Goddammit...
oh boy
...Did I fail?
01:20
you failed Freshman math at my high school
.-.
I guess A = 0, B = 0, C = 0
oh god
@ChrisWhite @obe say something
;-;
obe
obe
idk what to say.
user54412
@Pies In all honesty, most people in the US who do take calc in HS retake it in college anyway. So you'll get it eventually.
01:22
can you solve it
maybe that equation can't be solved
...what?
obe
obe
lol.
Ya didn't give me A, B or C. So I can't do anything with that...right?
holy crap
have you done any algebra
Of course
obe
obe
01:23
@pies you didn't learn how to solve a quadratic equation?
we learned that in grade 7.
Oh crap
@ChrisWhite is this unreasonable for a junior to solve?
wait, I know it
Dammit...what's the quadratic formula again?
DERIVE IT
DON'T MEMORIZE ANYTHING
obe
obe
you can turn that into the quadratic formula by altering it a bit.
since he gave you the general form.
user54412
01:24
@0celo7 Well, it was in grade 8/9 in my school.
-b ± √b^2-4ac
-----------------
2a
right?
wrong
you didn't derive it
0 credit
.-.
F---- for cheating
obe
obe
would you know how to solve it if he used variables s,d,f in the equation?
01:25
Sigh...I shouldn't be forgetting basic algebra
Of course
you did get it right
but you either looked it up
or tried to remember it
I swear I didn't
I had to sing the song in my head...
you should have derived it
SONG
._.
obe
obe
lol it was once an exam equation to derive it in grade 10.
01:26
they should make a song for remembering cohomologies...
obe
obe
@0celo7 I'm undepressed now, I can do the problem set.
To my defense...my algebra II teacher sucked. So maybe it's not entirely my fault...I hope?
obe
obe
...due tomorrow.
I walk into class one day and the question on the board is "If you are going 80mph, how many hours would it take you to go 80 miles?"
I swear I wish I were joking.
80?
dunno
obe
obe
01:28
lol.
Yeah, but one of the morons in the class yelled "5.4, I CHECKED IT ON MY CALCULATOR"
user54412
how many of you remember the other quadratic equation to use when the standard one is prone to catastrophic cancellation? :p
Er...
what?
never seen a different one
obe
obe
@ChrisWhite never happened before.
01:29
A'right, 0celo, ready for a math problem?
uh
as long as it's interesting
A pen and a notebook together cost $1.10. The notebook costs $1 more than the pen. How much does the pen cost?
wtf
.05
n00b
Dammit...
that's literally the topic of my psychology seminar...
01:31
A'right, is it sad I don't remember long division?
yes
obe
obe
really sad because you need it in calculus.
to do those damn integrals.
I usually just figure it out in my head...
Sigh...
obe
obe
though not as sad as i didn't finish my qft problem set due almost 3 weeks ago.
dude
I SOLVED IT LIKE THREE TIMES WHILE PLAYING VIDEO GAMES
01:32
So...now calc is kind of scaring me
obe
obe
@0celo7 show off.
that has nothing to do with it
Meh, I'll manage
I gave you the answers!
obe
obe
i need to write them down.
I was depressed ok.
01:33
the professor was right about you
Er...ya okay, obe?
that's not an excuse
user54412
So you have $x^2 + a_1 x + a_0 = 0$. Define $s = \sqrt{a_1^2-4a_0}$. If $a_1$ is positive, your two (ordered) roots are best given by $(-a_1-s)/2$ and $-2a_0/(a_1+s)$. If $a_1$ is negative, the (ordered) roots are $-2a_0/(a_1-s)$ and $(-a_1+s)/2$. That is, the other formula is $x = 2c/(-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac})$.
obe
obe
@0celo7 You don't know how it feels.
When in God's name did ya use that, Chris?
01:34
wait why do I need that @ChrisWhite
@obe neither do your professors, employers or whoever needs or pays you
user54412
@0celo7 because using the wrong formula can lead to huge numerical errors
@ChrisWhite example pls
"wrong formula"?
Ya mean the other QF?
as long as $a\ne0$ I don't see any reason why it should not work
Say...does anyone here know some nuclear physics?
obe
obe
01:37
0celo7 does.
user54412
Make $b$ large and positive. Then $-b + \sqrt{b^2-4ac}$ is close to $0$, but you're using up multiple significant figures keeping track of $b$.
no?
not yet
D:
@ChrisWhite you learned that in high school?
or some numerical class
user54412
@0celo7 No, which is kinda sad.
user54412
01:39
But I guess kids would get all confused with two formulas running around.
well why would any of us know it then
obe
obe
cool i learned a new formula.
just do the problem set...
obe
obe
i will now.
So is there any redeeming quality of degrees?
Since they're just gonna get replaced with the more useful radians?
01:41
@Pies most well paying jobs require one
...
user54412
"This line has a pi/4-radian slope." <-- said no one ever
Well yeah, but radians are more applicable than degrees
wow
angleist
.-.
But come on, 360° is just an arbitrary number. 2Ï€ at least makes sense
A circle could be considered 473° and it'd still be the same thing
01:43
360 can be divided by like everything
Yes, but radians are absolute
Show this man some rational trig
There's a specific amount of radians that make up a circle. That won't change. But you could keep redefining the amount of degrees that make a circle.
Hell, degrees don't always work. Ya can't find Sin(x) using degrees, unless you convert them to radians first
Same with cosine
obe
obe
I don't agree.
@ChrisWhite why yellow
01:50
Sigh...someday, maybe they'll stop teaching degrees altogether and just teach gradeschoolers radians
obe
obe
I doubt it.
no
what is wrong with you
obe
obe
me or him?
him
Why?
01:55
degrees are going nowhere
just...just go learn calculus
you're wasting time on here
but...but...
you could have already learned how to integrate
sigh...
I haven't learned precalc. How do I go straight to calc?
I'd understand in school, since they'd recap the precalc. But online?
All right, imma go. 'Night
@obe teach him
I'm busy
obe
obe
teach him what?
@Pies I know exactly what you need.
02:04
start with Zee and work up to Arnold/HE
obe
obe
I found this nooby calculus book I used when I was 15, it had a great chapter recapping pre-calc. It's called calculus early transcendentals by stewart.
@Pies read chapter 1 of it, find a pdf.
...he left.
it's snowing this week and -3.
woo.
I used Larson
Good book, had some proofs
obe
obe
epsilon-delta?
02:45
yes
obe
obe
same... surprisingly those books had it.
Surprisingly you're not doing work
obe
obe
03:06
by now it shouldn't be a surprise... idk why.
03:27
I was playing Manipulate in mathematica 10
but it takes forever to see the result.
does that mean I should get a new computer? or something wrong in the Manipulate?
03:47
for calculus, A.)pick any pre-calculur, then calculus you think you understand (at your level, I think the U.S. has many good pre calculus books, and calculus.), then read it, work the problem set. then you should B.) pick Apostol or Courant's Calculus. If you don't feel the awe of Apostol, Courant then you should probably return to A.) @Pies
 
4 hours later…
07:50
New close reason: "Post contains the phrase 'thanks in advance'."
@ChrisWhite heheh, true.
 
1 hour later…
08:54
0
Q: Tiering tags according to user reputation in area

Kurtovictl;dr: Tags for questions are unlocked with reputation, whereby you can have x levels of a tag (e.g. electromagnetism 1..5). Users can request a question to be tagged on a higher level if they don't have the reputation to do so themselves. Reputation gain could be higher for higher level question...

 
1 hour later…
10:13
What happens when you search "Why quantum mechanics is linear":
6
Q: Nonlinear dynamics beneath quantum mechanics?

SchroedingersGhostYesterday I asked whether the Schroedinger Equation could possibly be nonlinear, after reviewing the answers and material given to me in that thread I feel like my question were adequately answered. However could there still be nonlinear dynamics underneath quantum mechanics that could potential...

10:31
@Secret A more appropriate question would be, why there are nonlinear theories? :-P
you suggesting nonlinearity is an emergent property from linearity?
(At least that's the first thing I came into mind when I read your question...)
My mind must be short circuiting after that broad discussion with a peer that spans from science to arts to philosophy..
@Secret That's exactly what I was suggesting
interesting
and that is what actually happens
it is rigorously proved in many instances
17
Q: Linearity of quantum mechanics and nonlinearity of macroscopic physics

Andrea AmorettiWe live in a world where almost all macroscopic physical phenomena are non-linear, while the description of microscopic phenomena is based on quantum mechanics which is linear by definition. What are the physics points of connection between the two descriptions?

10:38
quantum mechanics is linear because we observe it to be that way
ans 1 mentioned a "mechanism" on how this occur
that "mechanism" is, nowadays, quite well understood
it's called classical/mean field limit
and it is, in my opinion, one of the few physical instances of something that is better understood by the mathematical community rather than by the physical one
The concept of emergence does reminds me of something I have done a week ago when I am self studying numerical analysis (give me a sec.. when I dig out the findings...)
1
Q: Logistic map chaos theory experiment, need advice on interpretation of results

SecretRecently while studying this lecture notes to learn about numerical techniques, I performed the following experiment in Mathematica as the lecture note encourage the reader to explore the logistic map (which caused me to first learn and stumble upon chaos theory in the process, hence I am still r...

From that self study I learnt that chaos is deterministic, thus there is no randomness
and this caused me to have an hypothesis (after got my brain saturated with fourier series because of some quantum assignment or something)
Hypothesis:
Given some f that is closed under iteration:
$$f(r_{Chaos})=ar+bf(r_{Chaos})+cf(f(r_{Chaos}))+df(f(f(r_{Chaos})))+\cdots$$

Now I just need to prove this, or find a counterexample to it
sorry correction:
Given some f that is closed under iteration:
$$f(r_{Chaos})=\left. ar+bf(r)+cf(f(r))+df(f(f(r)))+\cdots\right|_{r=r_{Chaos}}$$

Now I just need to prove this, or find a counterexample to it
where $r_{Chaos}$ are values of r that is known to produce chaotic behavior
and a,b,c,d are coefficients
10:59
prove what?
that chaotic behaviour of a function f is a series of the function f of higher and higher iterations, analogous to a power series where you have higher order terms in the form of powers
So unless there's a math theorem (that I am not aware of) that say this is false, It is possible that chaos might be some kind of a linear combination of functions of different iteration orders
you need to define things better ;-)
how do you define chaos?
(I don't want an answer, just that you clear things in your mind)
only when you have a satisfactory definition of things, you can try to prove something
a very famous mathematician/physicist, James Glimm said:
"A good definition should be the hypothesis of a theorem"
3
;-)
11:23
0
Q: What will happen if there is large amounts (massive) of electrons in a region?

GstestsoFor large amount of hydrogen, they will be bound by gravitation force, start fushion and become a star, how about electrons? Will they also "fuse"?

Dammit xkcd
11:41
Hello the @0celo7
Frenchman.
So where the hell is @yuggib from, anyway.
His name is big guy backward
So probably American
Racist
@0celo7 Forum cornelii
Sounds like...Yugoslavia? Dunno
11:46
Forum Cornelii è il nome antico dell'odierna città di Imola. La città mantenne tale nome lungo tutto il periodo di Roma antica. Il nome Imola risale agli inizi del VII secolo.
apparently he is in Ancient Rome
exactly
actually, it was cisalpine gaul originally
France?
That's a long way from Yugoslavia.
cisalpine gaul was mostly not in france
Ok, some more trivia. This is tricky.
@yuggib Says you
11:54
@Slereah Give us back the wedding at Cana
and all the others
a country of thieves... :-P
@yuggib : That will teach you to invade Gaul!
(and anyways, even in your map cisapline gaul is mostly not in France)
Well it is a protectorate of France :p
@Slereah I was in Gaul in the first place.... :P
And now here you are
Chumming up with Cesar!
What would Vercingetorix say
12:15
probably something unintelligible
12:35
http://www.tcd.ie/Physics/Foams/Lecture_Notes/PY2T20ChaosAndComplexity/chaos_complexity2014.pdf
A nice gentle introduction to chaos theory

I think I might have enough background to seek fir the counterexample
you know what I'm gonna ask
are you gonna ask for a diagram
product, of the gross domestic variant
ew gross
???
0
Q: Why does a black hole grow when it consumes matter? Isn't this a contradiction?

ScaryAardvarkI've been thinking about this for a while but can't get my head around it. A black hole's mass is such that its gravity can overcome light. Its event horizon, as I see it, is the boundary up to which light is "pulled back" into the black hole, from the black hole's point of view. Surely then, i...

oh jeez
@Slereah pls serenade him with the song of closed trapped surfaces and the like
00:00 - 13:0013:00 - 00:00

« first day (1804 days earlier)      last day (3423 days later) »