« first day (1703 days earlier)      last day (3225 days later) » 

1:26 AM
@DanielSank Cool. Can you ask him if he's willing to give you the solution manual to his QFT book?
I just got to playing Bioshock Infinite...my face is oO all the time. This game is crazy.
 
2:22 AM
@0celo7 Wat, is there not one available?
 
@DanielSank Not that I can find.
Some of the exercises are in the "no clue where to start" category.
 
2:44 AM
Ugh...kinda annoying when reviewers fail to actually look at the comments
Holy cow
 
@KyleKanos What? Did I miss something interesting?
 
No, just what I'd call pathetic attempts at reviewing
 
It's kinda shit like that that makes me wish I hadn't gotten so involved in this site
 
@KyleKanos Nothing's more fun than criticizing others! :P
 
2:52 AM
@Waffle'sCrazyPeanut You do your duty yet!?
 
@KyleKanos I uh... I forget it quite often (but I do)
I hate my final year in college (especially because I can't do anything interesting during the weekdays)
 
Want to review a few that aren't in the queue? They've been taken out by bad reviews (because one's clearly not a physics question and the other's a duplicate that wasn't discovered until 4th vote but 3 have said keep open)
 
@KyleKanos Throw me the links
 
1 and 2 (this one should be a dupe of the link I gave in my comment, it's totally mainstream, just the other one is better)
 
@KyleKanos The first one's clearly a duplicate, but I'm not sure how the second one can be a duplicate of something that's relatively new
 
3:04 AM
They're both relatively new, one's just a day older than the other
 
Yeah, but we can't close something old as a duplicate of something new o_O
 
But we have closed older versions of questions in favor of newer versions (looks better, better answers, etc)
Would it have killed them to encode some comments in their virus? — alexw 6 hours ago
^ Pretty funny
 
@KyleKanos Agreed, but I've never closed something like that (at least not for questions which are only separated by a day), as I personally feel bad about it, because we have a choice - we can edit the present question to a better form and close the new one (well, we should actually be encouraging the OP if he has some logic about what he's asking but can't express it clearly)
 
I'm not telling you that you have to close it. I just wanted you to review it
 
No, I'm just suggesting that it's probably a bad idea to close it as a dup. of something very new (I mean, the difference is only a day)
@KyleKanos Consider this situation: an OP who's got pretty bad English (but a wonderful logic) and someone who's got nicer English (but nothing much inside). If the second guy looks at our system and finds that we're closing poorly-worded questions just because the new one seems better, then he could simply repost the old question with properly chosen words (in an attractive manner) and we'll just close the old one as a dup. of the nicer one. I don't think that's the right way.
 
3:15 AM
I think the answers would play a role here
In this case, LCD put his answer to the newer question first.
We usually close as dupe the older one if the older question has no answers or not a good one, and the newer one has a decent/good answer (or two)
 
@KyleKanos You know, you could've posted your answer to the old question :)
Maybe I'll just revise the older one...
 
I'm tempted to do it and let mods work it out, muahahahaha
(because they're clearly the same question, so they'd likely have to do the infamous merge)
 
yeah, that should probably work. I'll revise and flag them :)
 
52
Q: If I flip a coin 1000 times in a row and it lands on heads all 1000 times, what is the probability that it's an unfair coin?

Adam FreymillerConsider a two-sided coin. If I flip it $1000$ times and it lands heads up for each flip, what is the probability that the coin is unfair, and how do we quantify that if it is unfair? Furthermore, would it still be considered unfair for $50$ straight heads? $20$? $7$?

Very interesting question with (at least) two very good answers
 
@KyleKanos Nice :)
 
3:57 AM
@KyleKanos: I've revised the question, and now I think it's relatively interesting compared to the dup.
Message for Mods: ... worth some looking on this and this :)
I suggest a merge, so that the answers go to the old (and now revised) question.
 
4:14 AM
Hmm, I wonder how @OBE3075 can access the chat...
 
4:36 AM
@Waffle'sCrazyPeanut Mods can grant exceptional chat access to users who don't have enough rep, I think. (at least that's what DavidZ clarified to me a week ago)
 
@Gaurav: Yeah, but I don't understand why he was allowed in the first place, provided he's a new user, and he doesn't have any activity.
 
Strange. :/
 
4:58 AM
hey guys
I want to discuss some mechanics
there is some thing in my book that I am not fully understanding
can someone discuss with me ?
 
5:20 AM
@KarimMansour Sure, go ahead.
 
With zero torque the angular momentum of the body, as seen from the outside, must remain constant in direction and magnitude according to the general principle of conservation of angular momentum. With resepect to rotating axes fixed in the body, however, the direction of the angular momentum vector may change, altough its magnitude must remain constant.
I don't see first of all why this follows from conservation of angular momentum
I see that this will follow first of all since L is constant by direct integration
@Gaurav
 
@KarimMansour Yes, I'm sketching the system you mention momentarily.
 
alright thanks alot
 
@KarimMansour You might as well ask it as a question on the main site. I'll answer it there, so that it's visible to a greater audience.
 
Okay I will add some information aswell to cover more information
 
5:39 AM
0
Q: Free rotation of a rigid body

Karim MansourSo I am currently reading fowless and cassidy there is something I am kinda of confused about in the section about geometric description of free rotation of a rigid body. I will present the stuff first that I am confused about and then I will ask my question. First of all from the following we h...

 
 
2 hours later…
7:29 AM
@DavidZ long time no speak. How's research / work going?
 
8:21 AM
2
Q: Can you depict the electron's electromagetic field?

John DuffieldI've had a number of discussions with individuals about electromagnetism. A recurring issue concerns the distinction between field and force, and seems to be associated with the lack of unification in contemporary teaching. As we all know, Maxwell unified electricity and magnetism a hundred and f...

0
A: Why doesn't current induced by changes in flux affect the flux, while current induced by a battery does?

John DuffieldWhy doesn't current induced by changes in flux affect the flux, while current induced by a battery does? Because electromagnetism features a "screw" mechanism. Take a look at Minkowski’s Space and Time: "In the description of the field caused by the electron itself, then it will appear that th...

0
A: why is the magnetic field circular

John DuffieldAccording to relativity, If magnetic field is just an electric field viewed from a different frame of reference... Relativity doesn't quite say this. Take a look at Minkowski's Space and Time: "In the description of the field caused by the electron itself, then it will appear that the division o...

2
A: Considering this hypothesis...is charge really quantized?

John DuffieldNow, from Coulomb's Law we can find a vector for the electric field due to this electron at all points in this space. When you read about Coulomb's law, you can see that it describes the force between two charged particles. When you set them down such that they have no initial relative motion, ...

0
A: Force on a layer of charge: How can electric field impart force on the charges which created the field?

John DuffieldHow can really a field exert force on the charges that created the field? See section 11.10 of Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics where he says "one should properly speak of the electromagnetic field Fμν rather than E or B separately". Now think of a single electron, just sitting there in space...

0
A: Atomic explanation of magnetic field

John DuffieldHow are electrons responsible for magnetic field around a wire? Via the "screw" nature of electromagnetism. Minkowski referred to this in Space and Time, as did Maxwell in On Physical Lines of Force: "a motion of translation along an axis cannot produce a rotation about that axis unless it meets...

1
A: Is there any other momentum besides the Poynting momentum stored in an electromagnetic field?

John DuffieldI am having some conceptual difficulties with energy and momentum stored in the EM field. Maybe that's because there's some conflation between field and force. See Minkowski's Space and Time: "In the description of the field caused by the electron itself, then it will appear that the division o...

0
A: Why the induced field is ignored in Faraday's law?

John DuffieldBecause at the fundamental level, there is no induced field. EMF is electromotive force. To understand this, simplify the situation down to a single electron. It has an electromagnetic field. If however you were a charged particle with no initial relative motion with respect to the electron, yo...

 
 
1 hour later…
9:28 AM
@Bosoneando: If you wanted us to dish out some downvotes, you've accomplished that :P
 
@ACuriousMind I wanted that someone had a look at those posts. If you think that they deserve the downvotes, go ahead.
 
The user seems to have a very...idiosyncratic conception of electromagnetism.
2
And most of these posts are only tangentially related to the questions they supposedly answer, anyway
2
 
9:49 AM
Heya
 
Haylow
 
10:13 AM
You know what pisses me off? Not being able to solve $x=\sin t + t$ for $t(x)$
2
 
@Danu You'll have to learn to live with that ;)
 
@ACuriousMind I cry evrietym
 
Blurgh
 
10:55 AM
@Bosoneando what for are these answers/questions?
 
 
3 hours later…
2:24 PM
Why is there with exactly one question in it?
 
3:05 PM
@0celo7 @JiK If you VT-d passthrough, there is very little of a performance hit (and you can use the GPU).
 
3:36 PM
@alarge Good to know I guess, but everything worked just fine the way I did it.
 
@ACuriousMind Because those questions tend to get closed and deleted, but people keep reviving the tag.
 
@0celo7 Sure, two separate OSes will work, but there's always the terrible hassle of booting between them.
 
@alarge Less than 30 seconds for me.
The bigger hassle is transferring files.
I can transfer OSX -> Win internally because OSX recognizes the Windows partition. For Win -> OSX I have to put the files on a thumbdrive and manually download them on the other end.
 
@0celo7 I don't believe anyone has Windows booting in 30s to functional. Sure you get the GUI up, but it'll be doing plenty of stuff in the background for ages. For me the biggest issue is closing all my windows and currently ongoing work, background SSH connections, connectivity to other externals and whatnot.
 
And I don't have any FAT-32 compatible USB 3.0 sticks.
@alarge Even with an SSD?
 
3:42 PM
You should be able to download software to make Windows recognize other filesystems. When I still used to use Windows 10 years or so ago at least you could download an ext2 plugin.
 
Windows 10?
The one that's not yet released?
 
Windows XP, or whatever was available 10 years ago.
Windows 10 has been available for a long time, though, you can download the beta for free from Microsoft. That's the only Windows image I have (to use with VMs) right now.
 
I can't run beta Windows.
 
Well, you'll have the real deal later this month. But anyway, even older Windows versions should be able to handle other filesystems besides Microsoft ones if you download the relevant software.
 
@alarge No, I have to wait for Apple to upgrade BootCamp to work with Win 10.
 
3:46 PM
Umm... O..k... Whatever that is.
 
The support software that allows Windows to recognize Apple hardware is not released.
If I try to insert the Win 10 disk, it will say it is an unsupported version of Windows.
 
@JimsBond What kind of a role are you aiming for with a Master's in physics and self-studying risk management? Seems a bit backwards, doesn't it?
 
4:22 PM
@ACuriousMind no idea, I'm getting rid of that
 
4:36 PM
@Waffle'sCrazyPeanut next time you might want to ping us ;-) but I took care of it
 
4:57 PM
@DavidZ Alright, thanks :)
@DavidZ But, why was the older question closed? It's much better than the new one as far as I can see. Why can't we merge them into the old one?
 
5:23 PM
Because it already had 4 close votes
but also I mentioned in a comment why I think the question that got closed wasn't a good one
 
5:43 PM
@ACuriousMind : Actually I wrote a comment about that:
Concerning edit (v2), did we just re-introduce the philosophy tag, cf. meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/80/2451 , meta.physics.stackexchange.com/q/821/2451 and links therein? — Qmechanic ♦ Jun 1 at 4:21
 
6:01 PM
@ACuriousMind Do you have the 2K texture pack for Skyrim?
 
@0celo7 No...but now that I'm aware of its existence, I might get it.
 
@ACuriousMind It's not appearing in my load order...
 
@Qmechanic You should've probably addressed the editor there - I bet he didn't ever read that comment of yours.
@0celo7 Well, I think it's not supposed to because it isn't a .esp plugin
 
Is there a way to hide the vote counts in the answers?
 
@ACuriousMind The official Skyrim HD DLC appears.
 
6:12 PM
Apropos the discussion of boot times above, I had need recently to boot a laptop from a live CD/DVD. The first couple of live linuxen I tried were every bit a slow and horrible as I recalled such things being.
 
Looks like some stone textures changed.
 
@0celo7 Yes, because it is a .esp plugin :P
 
Then I tried puppy linux.
 
I guess that works for me.
@ACuriousMind grr
 
You may imagine my hair streaming out behind me in the displaced air ...
Wow!
 
6:17 PM
@ACuriousMind Oh wow, that makes a huge difference!
Wood floors actually have grain and knots.
 
6:31 PM
@ACuriousMind : The editor @David Z might have not seen my comment, but he sure knows the issues concerning the philosophy tag already.
 
@0celo7 That souinds awesome
 
@ACuriousMind I'll upload some screenshots.
 
@Qmechanic Unless I've forgotten how to read a revision history, the editor introducing the tag was SebastianRiese, not DavidZ?
 
I'll let you figure out which one is which.
 
@ACuriousMind Yes.
 
6:37 PM
Not taxing on the GPU while in cities, but the high res distance textures are murdering my fps.
Might delete the "landscape" texture pack.
 
Very nice.
 
@ACuriousMind : Ah, that editor. He wrote in a now deleted comment:
@Qmechanic My mistake. Given the answers I thought it would be best to add this tag (as the question only be tagged energy seemed wrong). I was surprised there was no "*philosophy*"-tag and created it without checking meta first. Shall I add a question to meta regarding the future of the tag? (In my opinion a philosophy tag with the right scope can be beneficial and on-topic for this site). — Sebastian Riese Jun 1 at 6:45
 
Just think, I've been used to the worse one on 720p!
When outside, simply turning around and looking at something in the distance with the new textures drops me to 30fps.
 
@Qmechanic Ah, I see
 
6:58 PM
Quite the post:
I didn't read much of it, but OP certainly put quite some effort into it
 
 
1 hour later…
8:06 PM
Anyone know how I might interpret a timestamp of 40983.91072 when it should be something like 19-03-2012 10:49?
 
8:21 PM
@KyleKanos Perhaps it's the minutes counted from some set date?
 
I've thought that, but I think it's too arbitrary of a date (ends up being February 8th)
This is part of the test thing I'm doing for the data mining job and is probably the biggest hurdle right now
More than half the data has dates of this form
 
8:35 PM
@Danu omg me too
We should ban the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
4
 
@KyleKanos Do you have another reference time?
 
All (human-readable) dates are between Mar 08 2012 and Mar 22 2012. The first few of the non-readable format are 40983.91072, 40983.95396, 40983.94837, 40983.90378, 40983.87797
But there's no other reference to the human readable form :(
 
Why are they not in increasing order?
 
Different users
 
8:50 PM
So what exactly are we looking at here? I mean, different fields and systems might have their own standardized ways of annotating time.
 
Sometimes it is decreasing, sometimes it is increasing. It's hella weird
 
And to what accuracy are the human readable times given? Minutes?
 
user1: 40983.61259, 40983.60453, 40983.60343, 40983.59617, 40983.59262 (consecutive instances) and user2: 40983.60266, 40983.60905 (also consecutive instances)
@alarge (sorry misread) to the minute
 
So what do you mean consecutive instances: Is the system something where you might expect those to be separated by milliseconds, say?
 
@alarge The log file contains Timestamp, IP Address, URL, User ID, City, Region/State, Country but it's not in any real order
 
8:54 PM
So if you were to just scrap all the data in the "wrong format" (whichever that may be), would you be losing much?
Or can you connect the timestamps to real times through userID?
 
@alarge A little less than half
Wait, little more than half
Like 54% of it
 
JiK
@alarge I'm using VirtualBox for which I couldn't find a working solution for GPU.
 
I mean, I could infer the remaining data based on half the population (chalk it up to "bunk numbers")
 
@JiK VT-d passthrough would be a potential solution. Requires hardware support, of course.
 
Accuracy down a few notches, but the statistics probably won't be affected too much (analysis would be on ~192k records, rather than ~420k records)
 
8:58 PM
@KyleKanos Does each user have both kinds of time stamps or is it random?
 
JiK
@alarge I found only this table when trying to google it, which didn't sound promising. acceleware.com/blog/…
 
@alarge Some have both
Some have only one, others only the other (cursory look, not terribly detailed)
IDk...but I've gotta run. I'll probably end up posting the question to SO if I can't think of anything.
 
@JiK If you can do say this, I don't see why you wouldn't be able to do CUDA as well.
 
JiK
@alarge That's Linux host, Windows guest; I have the other way round.
 
@JiK Yes, but I would imagine VMWare to support this as well. It's not like the technology is in any way obscure.
That said, it might require an extra bit of tinkering, as you may need two GPUs really to work that out if the OS does not support releasing them on the fly.
 
10:04 PM
@gonenc and anyone interested, you can read my opinion here
 
10:35 PM
@Bosoneando I completely understand know why you did it.
the answers are all almost copy pasta
 
11:21 PM
Look what I found on Wikipedia guys:
In his biography of Einstein, Carl Seelig reports: "Einstein later laughingly recounted that his dissertation was first returned by Kleiner with the comment that it was too short. After he had added a single sentence, it was accepted without further comment."
 
@KyleKanos is it possible that they refer to the unix time stamp? The number you have given above seem quite peculiar though if it is indeed the unix time stamp. It translates into Thu, 01 Jan 1970 11:23:03
 

« first day (1703 days earlier)      last day (3225 days later) »