« first day (1684 days earlier)      last day (3542 days later) » 

00:02
@ACuriousMind You should type those up.
@0celo7 Yeah, not gonna do them soon, though. Currently, my coursework exhausts most of my motivation to do thinky stuff
@ACuriousMind I have plenty of other stuff to do before QoGS.
I start at the Senate tomorrow.
Can't wait for 2+ hours of train rides.
@0celo7 You bringing reading along for those rides?
@ACuriousMind You bet.
 
2 hours later…
02:03
0
Q: Calculating Heat Loss of Urine with Multiple Variables

user2555565Before anyone judges or comes to any conclusions I am really just interested in the mathematics of the physics behind this, experimentally I can figure it. I have tried to look for a standard equation for heat transfer and basically came up way more confused than when i started. I am clearly ou...

Seriously?
02:35
now that's what i call pissing around :-)
 
10 hours later…
12:36
Last comment in the thread I posted above (now deleted, so only 10k+ & mods):
> I have a law degree. I didn't come here for legal opinions. This thread is definately explaining to me what Physicists don't know about everything outside of Physics.
I am reminded of the Gorilla Warfare copypaste (warning: lots of "colorful" language in link)
 
2 hours later…
14:32
Attention all, Jims Bond has been chosen as my new name. This also means my profile pic will be reverting back to the old one
You're welcome ;)
@KyleKanos Thank you?
I noticed you updated the post with something to the effect of "next time something over takes I'll change it" so I un-upvoted the Enchanter and upvoted (since I hadn't yet) the Bond one
Ah, I assumed that was HDE, since they commented to alert me to it. In that case, thank you
15:01
How could i make this question https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/189566/most-radioactive-objects-in-a-students-room on topic again?

I mean.. i m merely looking for a couple of the most notably radioactive objects inside a typical room. If i try to answer my own question (which i can if i invest time in it) i can name 5 objects and their radioactivity per gram. Is it really that broad? If so what makes it broad?
Depending on how many objects there are, this question is asking for many short answers. I assume users voted it to be too broad because they anticipate it generating, say, ten or more short answers. But if the answer could be made a community wiki that everyone contributes to, that would probably remove the issue
If you could answer with the 5 objects you refer to and make it a community wiki answer, that might start off the process. I'd be happy to vote to reopen in that case
One of the deleted answers has this to say:
> To me,the question has far too many variables, I don't even know of a "typical" teenager:).
That's how it's too broad & why I voted to close
Issues like that can be edited out of the question
Basically you're asking, "Make up any room you want with anything in it and tell me what is the most radioactive thing there!"
We can say common household items
15:12
Even then, it's still a list-based question
List the n most radioactive items found in a house/room
There's no specific rule against those, is there?
Sure there is:
16
Q: Good list, bad list

NathanielThe Stack Exchange model does not work well for "big list" questions, and these are banned network-wide for good reason. However, many of the other stack exchange sites allow or even encourage list questions that do not fall under the "big list" category. On the other hand, Physics.SE currently ...

One of the listed problems is This is a Q&A site, and as such a list item is not an "answer"
Ok then, this is a bad question
Ok so, how many items can you come up with? I can think of food (bananas), old watches with radium, new ones with tritium.. the human body..
Most of them are already listed (one at a time... for some reason).
Kitty litter (clay in it has uranium & thorium)
15:18
Hmm never had a cat, but.. is a kids room the appropriate room for that? Also, thats 5 total so far.
well pretty much anything that contains clay or rock will contain some radioactive materials
And anything living has C-14 and probably some potassium isotopes
The skull used for satanic rituals might have strontium-90 in it.
Well, i assume pretty much everything has radioactive isotopes
which indeed makes it look too broad.
Don't forget that teens usually have AC/DC or metallica, etc albums. Many heavy metals are radioactive
However, some can easily be distinguished from others (radium or paint),
hahahaha
@KyleKanos That's the best response I could have hoped for. Now I am happy
As for the Good-bad list post.. 2: No, 5: yes, 6: yes and the rest undefined.
(meant to say radium or tritium* paint)
15:42
What if i remove the word "most" and instead i ask of some examples?
Cause i think that if i had asked a question like:

"My teacher told me that human body is the most radiactive object in my room. Is that true?"

i would definitely get someone giving me an example other (more) radioactive objects.
Kind of ironic.
That's the course that uses Wald and HE.
Kind of ironic how i can get the very same answer i m looking for, by changing my question to that.
 
1 hour later…
17:17
OMG, somebody has much, much, much too much time on their hands
> The table of integrals by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik is one of the most widely used ones.
It is our goal to present proofs of these formulas and put them in some context.
17:57
I don't think your answer or comments have any basis in reality. — Kyle Kanos 16 mins ago
Hard to be more succinct
The air = many bubbles did it for me
The lightning = stress fractures in air did it for me
18:36
@EmilioPisanty in the age of mathematica, is there still a need for those sorts of integral tables anyway
@innisfree Let me guess, next you'll be questioning the need for abacuses too?
haha. i guess there are things mathematica can't do...
@innisfree do people use mathematica, for which you have to pay something like 190 gbt, or is it just a short cut name for a computer algebra program?
People use mathematica
Otherwise there wouldn't be a Mathematica.SE:
@gonenc You haven't mentioned option 3: people use Mathematica and don't pay 190 gbt for a license
18:43
But why? What makes it superior to other programs
?
@innisfree How would that be possible?
@gonenc Some get it for free from their university
besides piracy
@KyleKanos hmm that would be nice if I enrolled in a university :)
I suspect that it's massively pirated
You'd have to find a university that actually gives a free-to-use license, rather than a only-on-the-university-wifi license
I got Matlab for free because of the free-to-use license
@KyleKanos found one! ^^
18:45
@Kyle but you could ssh into the university network anyway
@innisfree True, but once you graduate & your credentials are lost, so is Mathematica
Not so with my Matlab, muahahaha!
Of course, Octave works just as well as Matlab and is even more free
mathematica is the undisputed champion of computer algebra packages. afaik it doesn't have any serious rivals.
Maxima?
Sage?
wxmaxima indeed
:)
@KyleKanos "Octave works just as well as Matlab" which is to say not particularly well?
18:47
@innisfree WolframAlpha ;)
I use it for all my labour work so to speak :D
@KyleKanos Now (and keep in mind I'm a mathematica fanboy) you're just making things up. Wolframalpha is terrible compared to mathematica.
You can't do so many things!
@KyleOman Matlab works pretty well for its intended purposes; trying things beyond that is when frustration overtakes functionality
@KyleOman I think it means it works almost exactly like Matlab and free both as in free beer and free speech
@NeuroFuzzy That last one was for humor's sake.
18:48
@KyleKanos Oh. Just checking :)
But I am serious about Maxima (and its variants) and Sage as competitors to Mathematica
I'm too much of a mathematica fanboy to have a sensible conversation about other competing languages.
I got my Mathematica license from my university. Still have it almost a year after graduation. Don't tell anybody, I want to see how long it stays valid
Also, Maple is a pretty handy symbolic math program
Not as good as Mathematica, but it works when you need it to
BTW I think mathematica connects to the internet to run the calculations is it so?
@0celo7 Newton's cannon! $\infty$ points to whoever can tell me what this image is supposed to be plus.google.com/+JonLawhead/posts/…
18:57
Slugs
seals?
@NeuroFuzzy Faces of dogs?
at least in some places
Yeah I would have said a seal/dog... biomass?
@NeuroFuzzy This might be worth a read: ask.sagemath.org/question/8583/…
(Though a little old, so info might be a little dated)
user54412
19:13
@JimsBond One of Mathematica's university licenses explicitly allows those with it to keep the software forever. You're just not entitled to upgrades, or to reinstall it on new machines (so you're basically limited by the lifetime of the hard drive).
user54412
@gonenc Often it connects to a license server to see if you're paying your dues, and it can connect to download packages/data on the fly, but the calculations are generally local.
@ChrisWhite That could be what I have. If so, then I can live with that
@0celo7 Did you look at the notes?
@NeuroFuzzy I'm sure everyone noticed this already though there is a small town and two people on a small vehicle, with their friends, in the bottom left.
@innisfree I'm a perfectly happy user of Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. Still perfectly current even in the age of Mathematica. But this guy has twenty five papers going over the integrals and proving them, just because they're there.
19:28
@Icosahedron At work.
@0celo7 You don't want to be seen reading GR lecture notes while at work.
I'm scared to log onto SE on a gov't PC.
@0celo7 You probably should only visit politics.SE there :P
@0celo7 Gov't is all about wasting time. They'll probably promote you for finding such a productive way to be appropriately unproductive
It's my first day, I literally have nothing to do.
user54412
19:35
Sounds like most days in most internships.
@0celo7 How long will you be there?
@Icosahedron Long enough for you to finish Shankar.
The race is on.
You have till 5:30 EST.
@JimsBond I'm more worried about logging into a website that might be internally blacklisted.
@0celo7 If they don't want you using it, they would block it. But why would they not want you logging into a site known for helping to solve work-related problems?
19:53
Someone got fired for editing wiki.
Hmm, seems rational to not want to use SE on a gov't PC then
@0celo7 Most likely for the same reason why every school is IP blocked from editing wikipedia.
20:19
Really? That's interesting.
20:50
@Icosahedron Why is that?
@0celo7 mischief duh
vzn
vzn
21:24
A Private View of Quantum Reality on Fuchs/ QBism interpretation, wired mag
> Christopher Fuchs is the developer and main proponent of QBism, an alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics that treats the quantum wave function as a reflection of ignorance.
21:46
@Icosahedron Oh wow. I didn't see that. So it's clearly a large seal-dog eldritch horror blob crushing a building in front of helpless witnesses.
22:44
@vzn Can't say I've ever taken the time to learn how supports think that differs from a hidden variables model. Is there a short-short version?
vzn
vzn
@dmckee QBism is based on bayesianism & the idea that probabilities may represent knowledge vs physical reality. not familiar with it myself but seems step in the right direction.
my short elevator pitch for value of QM interpretations (amongst this tough crowd) is that something in it is likely hinting/ pointing to new, objectively real physics. & whoever figures out the details will be the next generation of heroes who get nobel(s).
&, some ppl working in/ esconced/ drenched in science seemingly sometimes (amidst/ steeped in the current dominant paradigm) forget the meaning of the word research...

« first day (1684 days earlier)      last day (3542 days later) »