« first day (1091 days earlier)      last day (4134 days later) » 

03:48
@ChrisWhite Oh, we know about that one. /cc @jinawee Thanks for the link
If you see any posts of a similar type from this or another user, ping me in chat.
user54412
sounds good
user54412
lol - I'm sitting here writing a Type Ia supernova paper, dealing with reviewers who insist I need to conform to what is generally accepted about progenitors and spectral features, while reading new papers on arxiv that just go to show we have no idea what the progenitors are or what we're seeing in the spectra
08:26
@ChrisWhite Be a rebel and reject both, instead conform to neutrino cupcakes :P
(Also, what's a progenitor? And why don't we know much about spectra? I thought spectra were a highly accurate tool in astro)
08:38
@ChrisWhite haha, conform to this thing we know nothing about!
Anonymous
@jinawee Ha, see the "(maybe me)" : )
10:26
Saw a message today saying that physics is too small to be split, too small!!
Physics is the basis of the entire universe and everything in existence, but is too small! The logic escapes me :P
 
1 hour later…
11:35
0
Q: Do we need a *Beginners* tag?

John RennieSome time ago I asked if we needed a tag to distinguish questions asked by beginners. The answer was no on the grounds that a layman or beginner tag would be a meta tag and these were frowned on. However we now have a homework tag, and it seems to me that a layman tag is no more meta than the hom...

12:13
Alright... Physicists of Phys.SE, what did y'all wear for Halloween? :D
Any picture I can enjoy watching? :P
Gotcha @PhysicsMeta, what did you wear today? You're always wandering around with that grayscale 80s' style...
Hmmm I am seriously wondering that as a non-theoretical physicist, that I should even bother contributing anymore on the site... (judging by the meta discussions)
Meh... (even as a theoretical physicist), why should you bother?
Anonymous
@CrazyBuddy Oh, no Physics Meta was wearing the Wikipedia Costume
Anonymous
Anonymous
Or for a nicer version: .
Anonymous
12:27
Grayscale -- I'm bored -_-
Anonymous
And no, it was not by purpose that I put the right eye on the omega.
Anonymous
Okay, fair enough @CrazyBuddy
12:44
Hello
Anonymous
Now, it's green-scale. : )
Anonymous
Huh, why did my comment get submitted so late?
13:21
0
Q: applied physics based questions

UV-DI have to be honest, I am seriously unsure as to whether applied/experimental physics questions would be welcomed here. There are a lot involved in theoretical physics (which is great), but, would applied and experimental physics just be looked down upon? I am NOT talking about homework based ex...

 
3 hours later…
16:10
@UV-D I'm realizing the SE sites in general are far more enjoyable when you don't know the meta portion exists. Those conversations are like looking for the man behind the curtain.
16:50
0
Q: Why isn't this duplicate closed?

jinaweeI flagged this question as a duplicate, the flag is marked as helpful. But it didn't get closed, I commented in chat and it's still open.

17:16
Is that a scary face of @PhysicsMeta? o_O
If you look close enough, you can find the eyes...
But, it's not in its profile though -_-
I'm happy @PhysicsMeta: At least you heard my voice :P
17:43
@CrazyBuddy It's a pareidolia
 
1 hour later…
18:54
@jinawee What's that? o_O
19:09
@CrazyBuddy You see faces where there aren't.
Pareidolia ( ) is a psychological phenomenon involving a vague and random stimulus (often an image or sound) being perceived as significant, a form of apophenia. Common examples include seeing images of animals or faces in clouds, the man in the moon or the Moon rabbit, and hearing hidden messages on records when played in reverse. The word comes from the Greek words ' (παρά, "beside, alongside, instead") in this context meaning something faulty, wrong, instead of; and the noun (εἴδωλον "image, form, shape") the diminutive of eidos. Pareidolia is a type of apophenia, seeing patterns i...
19:44
@jinawee What is called if you seem to be hearing sirenes long after they have gone?
Oy! @aufkag! Hello!
@ManishEarth Oy
Wazzup
differential equations -_-
Yes, sure, with my eyes closed and two fingers in the nose.
@ManishEarth Already answered, but isn't it about engineering?
0
Q: rotating an object without changing its orientation

BLOBI have a link hinged at one end and attached to a rectangular object via another hinge in the other end as shown. Now, I was wondering how would I maintain the orientation of the rectangular object regardless of the rotation of the link. I know this sounds like a vague question but I am just ou...

19:52
Huh, I voted to leave open
@tpg2114 yes, but they go some way to explain the attitude some members have towards some topics.
@tpg2114 Unfortunately this is very true. Though not on all sites, I've seen some great meta communities elsewhere. Usually comes with having a coherent and cordial main community
Ours is a bit more ... spiky
20:08
@jinawee Maybe it was the effect of Halloween :D
(on my computer though...)
@ManishEarth Is there a way to remove oneself of just one of the SE sites? Getting one's username in grey and stuff?
@aufkag Yes.
OK. Pls?
You can request for your username to be removed from specific posts, or
you can ask for your account to be deleted. Which is per site
@aufkag You want account deletion? On Phy?
:(
No, I want to be deleted from Sports SE.
20:18
@aufkag Ah. How much rep do you have? IIRC mods cannot delete after a certain rep level
However, you can do this
one sec
hmm, 866
My stuff can stay. I just want out. Grey.
@aufkag sports.stackexchange.com/contact There's an "I want my account deleted" option.
Fill it in (give your reasons if you wish to)
there will be instructions following that
@ManishEarth I only see "I need to delete my user profile". Is that it? Will I keep my user profiles on other SE sites?
@aufkag yes that one. That will work
@ManishEarth Will I keep my user profiles on other SE sites?
20:23
yes
Don't worry, that form is per-site
@aufkag There's one step where you edit your profile to say "please delete me" (not sure if it's still there, it used to be). Make sure you just edit your sports profile, and you don't copy it to all sites
@ManishEarth OK, done. We'll see. Thanks.
Any reason you want to share?
@ManishEarth Sure. Pissed off by herd-voting, non-voting, silly mod, basically the lack of logic on the site. I've seen completely illogical answers upvoted to +17.
@aufkag ah
@ManishEarth Just to keep you sharp!
20:32
heh
20:43
@ManishEarth Did Ben stay here or is he gone?
@aufkag Still around on other SE sites, but as far as I can tell, has not done anything on Phy since his post: stackexchange.com/users/506533/ben-crowell?tab=activity
He may come back, or he may not
I don't think he's read the responses on the meta post either (was hoping some of them might deter his decision) by his "last seen" time :/
The Great Outdoors must be fun also. :)
Outdoors? What is this witchcraft you speak of?
I've never seen any outdoors. Though it seems to be a scary place. Not at all great.
It's full of people. And green stuff. shudders
@ManishEarth Look around your enclosure. Perhaps there is a rectangular panel with a knob. Twist the knob. Push/pull.
That knob? Noooo there is this thing that hurts my eyes out there!
I prefer the enclosure. Nice and dark.
No green things. No people.
20:54
@ManishEarth Quite unbelievably, 't Hooft is still watching us. I hope he returns.
@aufkag I don't think 't Hooft left, he's just busy.
I was surprised a guy like him had the time to participate here in the first place
Same goes for Shor
@ManishEarth You think he forgot to remove a window from his computer, which he never turns off? Something like that?
@aufkag I mean that he never decided to leave the site. He just got more and more busy and had to cut down on contributions
kinda like what's happening to me, though I bet 't Hooft is orders of magnitude more busy than I am :P
Why, he's retired. Isn't he?
oh, right
didn't think of that
Then again, probably building a sekrit quantum computer under his house so that he can crack RSA and make oodles of money
21:07
@ManishEarth He's still listed among the employees of Utrecht University, so perhaps he's not retired after all.
@aufkag hmm. Wait, I think he currently is working on something
involving cellular automata
@ManishEarth Yeah, that's true. Although I haven't seen anything recently. Didn't really get the traction he was probably hoping for.
@ManishEarth I'm off. Happy moderating! :)
@aufkag /me studying. Not moderating :P Cya!
22:05
Does anybody know if there is a standard notation for the lower triangular portion of a generic matrix?
@tpg2114 I don't know of any
Me neither... I hopped into the math room to see if they knew
All I could come up with would be A_L and I have to explain what the _L means
But if I have to explain, then it's not standard :)
22:19
@tpg2114 ISO 9001:200 certifed matrices
FOURIER TRANSFORMS!!!
I prefer Laplace transforms personally
haha well for solving differential equations Laplace is better
But fourier transforms works beautifully with physics
I just realized that the fourier of the Hermite eqn is the Hermite eqn
...in retrospect, I should have figured it out
Yeah, turbulence is like 75% Fourier transformations
Still, beautiful
And 25% statistics of those Fourier transforms
22:21
A lot of solid state physics is full of fourier transforms
everything is fourier transforms
4

« first day (1091 days earlier)      last day (4134 days later) »