« first day (2731 days earlier)      last day (2203 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

7:14 PM
Hello guys , I tried to read Feynman lectures on electromagnetism, but couldn't really understand it from where the vector fields and gradients and stuff like that . I am also keen on learning quantum mechanics . Well can anyone help me with the pre-requisites needed to understand the Feynman lectures. Or maybe other book recommendations .
I just passed my 12th grade . Thinking of pursuing physics as UG .
 
Hi all
What is the difference between quantum coherent state and a pure state. In this post it seems to imply that they are the same thing?
 
Anonymous
@Amlanmihir Learning multi-variable calculus and linear algebra would be the first logical step I suppose :)
 
@Blue can you suggest some books for the same ?
 
Anonymous
@JohnDoe Did you check out the respective Wikipedia pages? It's explained very clearly there
 
they taught calculus in the linear variable at school
 
Anonymous
7:23 PM
@Amlanmihir Maybe start with Khan Academy
 
@Blue Thank you for helping
 
@Blue no idea, I haven't touched the CDF player
 
@Blue The general coherence is explained well, the quantum coherence has a brief explanation which doesn't really draw a distinction between pure states and coherent states.
 
the usual distinction is between pure states and mixed states
coherent states are a bit more specific
 
Anonymous
In physics, specifically in quantum mechanics, a coherent state is the specific quantum state of the quantum harmonic oscillator, often described as a state which has dynamics most closely resembling the oscillatory behavior of a classical harmonic oscillator. It was the first example of quantum dynamics when Erwin Schrödinger derived it in 1926, while searching for solutions of the Schrödinger equation that satisfy the correspondence principle. The quantum harmonic oscillator and hence, the coherent states, arise in the quantum theory of a wide range of physical systems. For instance, a coherent...
 
7:26 PM
you talk about pure states when doing the density matrix formalism.
 
@Blue Yeah I read it, it seems to imply that pure states and coherent states are the same thing. Is that correct?
 
no.
a pure state can be described by a single wavefunction $|\psi \rangle$
A coherent state is a specific instance of such a pure state, namely one which has minimal uncertainty product
in the density matrix formalism, a pure state would be written as $\rho=|\psi\rangle\langle \psi|$
whereas a mixed state would be a linear combination of such i.e. $\rho=\sum_k|p_j \psi_j \rangle \langle \psi_j|$
So coherent states are special cases of pure states, and pure states are special cases of mixed states.
 
@Semiclassical Okay thanks. What would be an example of a pure state which is not a coherent state?
 
A particle in the ground state of a box is an obvious one.
If you measure the energy, you'll always get the same value. But if you work out the uncertainty product for it, then it's always larger than $\hbar/2$.
most examples of wavefunctions you see in textbooks will not be coherent, really
the main exception being the ground state of a harmonic oscillator
that one has $\Delta x \Delta p=\hbar/2$ and so is a coherent state
But the excited states of the harmonic oscillator aren't coherent
So being a coherent state is a very special case.
 
7:43 PM
@Semiclassical Could you give an example of a two dimensional quantum system wuch as in this post which is a pure state but not a coherent state?
In that post he gave example of a pure state which is a coherent state.
 
@Blue worth a shot to try just renaming...I think only windows really cares about what the extension is (and in windows all extensions has to be 3 characters). In other operating systems, and a myriad of programming languages, the extension doesn't really matter.
 
Not sure off the top of my head in that context.
 
Anonymous
@enumaris Tried it. The CDF player doesn't seem to be able to open .cdf files once they're tampered with, using Notepad.
 
I want to say that something like $\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(|0\rangle +2|1\rangle)$
That's definitely a pure state, but I don't think it's a coherent state
the difference here being that the two coefficients don't have the same absolute value
 
o.O
wut
isn't coherent and pure states the same thing, I've never heard them differentiated lol
 
7:46 PM
they're really not
 
vzn
@Amlanmihir this is a very cool book on QM foundations & relates it to semiclassical theory, a rare pedagogical pov, Quantum Challenge by Greenstein/ Zajonc amazon.com/Quantum-Challenge-Research-Foundations-ASTRONOMY/dp/…
 
hmmm, I've heard them used interchangeably like a bajillion times
 
though tbh I'm suspicious about how that answer is written
 
so if there's a difference, it seems like most physicists aren't too careful with it
at least most physicists in my experience
 
7:47 PM
not that I've met most physicists lol
I think perhaps the specific use of "coherent" state as "minimum uncertainty state" is more like a quantum information field terminology?
like surely decoherence is the theory behind moving from pure states to mixed states...and not the study of moving from a minimum uncertainty state to a different pure state...
 
@Semiclassical I think there is different terminoloy for coherence used in quantum mechanics. See the last section in this wiki post.
 
it's probably some terminology that has to be used more carefully...
 
@enumaris Yeah there clearly is some confusing terminology...
 
I can only say from my experience, and between physicists I know and meet, coherent state and pure state is used pretty interchangeably
but my field is not quantum information
 
@enumaris What is your field?
 
7:56 PM
well now I've moved on, but before I was in astro-particle physics
 
Anonymous
@enumaris How's the transition going? I'm seeing you here after long
 
@enumaris Is there a lot of QM in astro-particle physics, sounds interesting.
 
@Blue I got a job, so I'm here loool
 
Anonymous
Wow. Nice. What type of job?
 
Anonymous
Congrats, by the way :D
 
7:59 PM
@JohnDoe certainly, my whole thesis is on simulating particles using a Hamiltonian. Though by the time you get to my thesis, it's more like just solving PDEs...
@Blue data scientist :D
 
@enumaris Sounds interesting, busy learning QM but I also have an interest in astronomy, would be an interesting intersection to do research in...Have you completed your PhD?
 
@enumaris Really? A coherent state essentially models the idealised output of a laser cc @JohnDoe
 
Anonymous
@enumaris Cool. Data science seems to be the new hot field nowadays. Very interesting too
 
Which was something drilled into me from near the start of the PhD
 
@JohnDoe yeah, I finished last year
 
8:03 PM
More definitions in the pot :)...
 
@Mithrandir24601 maybe because I worked with quantum kinetic equations...and it was kinda used interchangeably there...
I don't think there's a way to save the word coherence in physics lol
 
@JohnDoe There's an actual maths definition from quantum optics, although generally we just use $\left|\alpha\right>$ as a coherent state
@enumaris Hmm, fair
 
Also, @JohnDoe This is different to a 'state which is coherent' (i.e. a state that hasn't decohered), just to confuse things further :P
 
"As long as there exists a definite phase relation between different states, the system is said to be coherent."
what about "is said to be coherent"? D:
 
8:08 PM
@Mithrandir24601 Are you familiar with a general quantum measurement where the environment and measuring apparatus are included as states (as a tensor product) and the measurement is a projection onto a probe (or pointer state)?
 
@enumaris Hasn't undergone decoherence, which is related in the sense that if you model an ideal laser using a coherent state, then a real laser will (for one) undergo decoherence (this is where 'decoherence length' etc. presumably comes from) and will no longer be (as accurately) described as a coherent state
 
I was more talking about semiclassical's point of minimum uncertainty wave packet
 
@JohnDoe It's been a while since doing that, but yes, I noticed you posted a question on quantum computing about it :)
@enumaris A coherent state has minimum uncertainty, yep
 
but the sentence I just pasted suggests a much broader definition of coherence does it not?
it specifies only that there is definite phase relations between different states
Which would apply to all pure states. Much more than states of minimum uncertainty.
 
@Mithrandir24601 Yeah but that's a different question:) Does this statement make any sense to you "Coherences between different measurement outcomes
do not remain in the joint state of systems A (apparatus) and Q (quantum system to measured). Any
such coherences have “leaked away” into the environment
during the dynamical evolution. The pointer states are
in fact determined by the requirement that different
measurement outcomes decohere via interaction with the
environment"
I think I might post that as a question.
 
8:14 PM
@enumaris Yeah, 'coherence' isn't the same thing as being a 'coherent state' (unless coherent state has some different, alternative definition, which is very possible)
 
that's just needlessly confusing semantics lol
"This state is coherent, but it is not a coherent state" for reals?
D:
 
@enumaris For reals :P although a 'coherent state' (from quantum optics, anyway) is coherent (that's something, at least). I should probably emphasise that this is in relation to quantum optics and when someone from outside that sphere mentions 'coherent state' it's possible they mean something different (but I've never actually heard of that before)
 
cool beans T_T
 
@JohnDoe Yes. With the addition that "different measurement outcomes decohere, which may be a result of interacti[ng] with the environment"
 
@Mithrandir24601 What does it mean exactly (and hopefully simply) that measurement outcomes decohere?
 
8:20 PM
@JohnDoe In this case, it appears to be referring to becoming a mixed state
 
how active is the field of quantum decoherence these days?
I haven't met anybody working on it...
but it seems important...to figure out how quantum mechanics transitions to the macro world
 
@Mithrandir24601 So it means that after evolution and measurement the joint states become more mixed?
 
@enumaris Don't particularly know - I do a (little) bit of stuff on interactions with the environment, which necessarily involves decoherence. This at least is an active field
 
@Mithrandir24601 If you have time, you can answer question that I will post in quantum information tomorrow.
@Mithrandir24601 How would you describe the decoherence mathematically if we start with the joint state $\rho^{(A)} \otimes \rho^{(Q)}$?
 
@JohnDoe Yeah, this seems to make sense
@JohnDoe It's (usually, in a measurement context, at a relatively simple level) described by the projection operators, with the environment ignored. A more complicated way of doing it would be to, say, interact the system with the environment using the Lindblad equation and the system will naturally decohere with time
An alternative would be to use Kraus operators as a quantum channel interacting system and environment, then tracing out the environment - this is essentially the discrete time version of using the Lindblad equation
 
8:30 PM
o.o
 
@Mithrandir24601 If you have time please see post.
@Mithrandir24601 Can't hear about a more complicated way at the moment :) still figuring out the simple way.
 
@JohnDoe Fair, I'll hopefully get the time (probably be tomorrow though at this rate). It's very possible someone else will answer first though :)
 
@Mithrandir24601 Thanks man. I mostly don't get what "coherences between measurement outcomes do not remain in the joint state of systems $A$ and $Q$" means....in a mathematical sense (and every other sense I guess :/).
Have to go, have a good night/day everyone
 
cya pal
 
Anonymous
It's amazing how many in-built graphing features the good old MS-Excel already has. I spent so much time using Gnuplot unnecessarily.
 
Anonymous
8:43 PM
Apparently it can also make cubic spline plots
 
apparently in the work force, tableau is super popular for plots
 
Anonymous
Never heard of it
 
it's like software specifically for plotting
it connects through SQL or to an excel sheet or w/e
makes pretty plots
and u can build whole dashboards that have like a ton of plots on it
interactive plots...the whole shebang
#!
physics.stackexchange.com/questions/402522/… woah...thems fighting words...
 
Anonymous
There are a lot of proprietary software which provide good quality "interactive" plotting features. For Mathematica's interactive CDF plots look pretty cool. But I don't really want to spend my money on buying proprietary graphing/plotting software, at least in the near future. :P
 
excel is proprietary
 
Anonymous
8:50 PM
@enumaris Shh. I got it for free.
 
xD
 
Anonymous
Well, an old version though. 2003
 
Anonymous
Works quite well
 
Anonymous
Solid build
 
open source plotting, I'm sure there's a bunch as well.
python has matplotlib
pyplot
 
Octave has...can't...remember...
 
Anonymous
@enumaris Yes. Matplotlib is very useful. I like it!
 
I can only do the basics
 
Anonymous
But then you need to write code for it, which can be a bit time-consuming
 
Anonymous
Useful for those things which Excel can't do
 
8:53 PM
I was gonna code an animation of a heatmap-type plot in matplotlib for my thesis...but then I got too lazy lol
 
Anonymous
@enumaris My strategy is to learn the necessary code as and when required instead of trying to learn all of them at one go before "beginning"
 
yep...same here
which is why I only know the basics
cus I never needed the more advanced stuff...lool
 
Anonymous
Same XD
 
Anonymous
@skull That post seems to have stirred up a huge civil war in SO ;)
 
what civil war
 
Anonymous
8:58 PM
See their Meta questions in the past 24 hours: meta.stackoverflow.com/questions
 
@Blue i'm was surprised it got pinned in here
 
Anonymous
@skull Well, that post was a "bomb" for some
 
Anonymous
I don't know why they would pin it here though
 
perhaps, they want us to be nicer...
 
Anonymous
Speaking from a person who rarely posts on SO, I think there is some element of truth in it. For example, receiving around 5 downvotes for posting a duplicate question which I wasn't even aware existed - thanks to the terrible search. However, I don't think it was framed in the best possible way.
 
9:04 PM
@Blue That's a problem - duplicates are good
 
Anonymous
True. Frankly speaking, I don't find duplicates and cross-posts offensive at all. In fact, I personally feel that cross posting exposes a question to larger community of people with varied expertise. Also, you get a different perspective to the question, from different communities.
 
Anonymous
(I do support linking cross-posts to each other though)
 
Anonymous
As for duplicates, I feel the better option is to just "mark" them as duplicate rather than preventing answers to them altogether.
 
9:34 PM
I find identical cross-posts a bit annoying
it's fine to pose similar questions to different audiences, but they should be framed as such
e.g. "what are the physical aspects of this" vs. "what are the mathematical aspects"
otherwise it does read as just "I want to have twice as much likelihood of getting a response"
 
@BalarkaSen @Semiclassical @ACuriousMind @Slereah Insanely good colloquium talk today. Went from Erdos to Yau to Tao to Feynman to Glimm-Jaffe. Stat mech, analytic number theory, harmonic analysis, path integrals.
 
that's pretty broad
 
People are doing crazy shit to solve nonlinear Schroedinger equations.
 
I only know of IST
 
@0celo7 Was that the one which you thought looked weird?
 
9:39 PM
Yeah
@Slereah that only works in 1D apparently.
 
I'm glad it surpassed your expectations
@0celo7 sounds right
I know the broad strokes of IST
but the details...yikes
 
@0celo7 Not necessarily but it becomes very bad very quick if you go beyond 1+1D
 
Integrable systems are cray cray
 
@Slereah for NLS on the torus it fails in n\ge 2 apparently
Oh also fucking Gromov and h principles
 
could b
 
9:40 PM
the talk touched everything except for pure algebra
 
Who was the speaker?
 
thx
now I'm curious if there's any versions of the talk online
hmm, there's this at least:
since that was a conference talk it might be a bit more narrowly focused than a colloquium talk
another version here: youtube.com/watch?v=udEzzqzHo_I
"Periodic Schrodinger equations as infinite dimensional Hamiltonian systems"
Now that catches my attention
I'll have to watch one of these at some point.
 
looks very ivy league
 
@skull what?
 
9:48 PM
her cv
 
10:13 PM
anyone here an expert at plotting stuff?
 
 
1 hour later…
11:15 PM
@BalarkaSen I can get a relative Hodge theorem from my method.
Also a Poincare-Lefschetz type theorem.
 
wb semic
 
11:39 PM
o/
 
\o
 
\o/
 
11:59 PM
:-D
 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (2731 days earlier)      last day (2203 days later) »