« first day (2717 days earlier)      last day (2230 days later) » 

4:00 PM
@Slereah don't let 8 years stand in your way. I have had a lot longer set-backs in my life...
 
@Slereah which is a modification of the group structure, just not the Poincaré group, rather a super Lie group
Ok the hbar on a cellphone id
* is horrible...
 
\o @dmckee
 
I don't get why mobile is taking over market space on the internet, it is such a horrible platfor, like a toy with no easy root access... I fear for the price of desktops in the future!
 
the masses want mobility!
just like the masses want trump
 
Yeah it's good to look where a bar is or what a menu says when travelling but bad for the FLOPS, memory, readability, writing real texts and your upper back!
Trump is mobile?
 
4:10 PM
:0)
 
To define geometric objects on a manifold, like tori, you can chop then up into simpler pieces, like chopping up the tori to a simpler square and identifying the endpoints, but these simpler pieces are linked to discontinuous groups, as with elliptic functions, but now we've linked groups to tori, so we're apparently one step away from the 'fundamental group'
 
Sewage is also mobile.
 
The thinking of these guys is incredible
 
@G.Bergeron "I don't get why the masses are not as nerdy as me, and I refuse to design for them" is a persistent problem, at all levels, in silicon valley.
 
@EmilioPisanty "git gud"
 
4:11 PM
@bolbteppa that sounds like mathematical quackery tbh
 
yes, people want a device that works for them where and when they need it, not something with obscure features that will end up bricking their device because they're not steeped enough in the arcane knowledge needed to handle root competently
no, that is not a problem.
 
This is literally what Poincare's book does haha
 
@Semiclassical indeed. See also "LaTeX is Right and you are Not".
 
Maybe my fingers are just too big for the scree
 
It sounds more like your interpretation than what Poincare says
 
4:12 PM
@G.Bergeron also a design problem ;-)
 
Which I guess is why it doesn't make sense
 
This paper describes it
pdf at the bottom
but looks the same
 
@G.Bergeron though as I understood the term, scree tends to be formed by rather largeish rocks and finger size shouldn't be too much of a problem
 
@G.Bergeron get a tablet?
 
@bolbteppa but then you need to make sure it is globally defined
 
4:15 PM
@bolbteppa I'll be specific; the part which I think sounds nonsensical to me is "but these simpler pieces are linked to discontinuous groups, as with elliptic functions, but now we've linked groups to tori, so we're apparently one step away from the 'fundamental group'". Can you point me out to where you got that from?
 
@skullpatrol maybe one of them CAT smartphones designed for workmen wearing heavy-duty gloves
 
@EmilioPisanty Am I the nerdy one in this?
 
@G.Bergeron by decree, yes
 
@bolbteppa This looks like a nice paper.
I have never actually read Analysis Situs firsthand. Saved for future reading.
 
That link gives a summary of Poincare's book, skim pages 132-134, describing sections 10-12 of Poincare's book, one thing is section 12 of Poincare says, first sentence "We are led in this way to the notion of fundamental group of a manifold" which is not in this paper
 
4:17 PM
@skullpatrol oh I still have my desktops, but I'm afraid I won't be able to build desktop for computing on the cheap if this trend continues
 
and the intro to Poincare's book gives some more explanations, saying his perspective is a bit different but equivalent to the modern view, but more linked to discontinuous groups
 
@bolbteppa this is a topological object, not feometric, then
 
@skullpatrol Perhaps more pointedly the only thing that the masses can do with root access is screw things up. Not having it protects them from themselves.
 
@EmilioPisanty well then, the plebes can go *** themselves :p
 
And providers are more than happy to support that because it lets them sell space on those devices.
 
4:19 PM
true
 
@G.Bergeron For Poincare there is no difference, at least in the beginning of how he sets everything up, maybe the complements in the book refine it
 
I have to root my phone because I'm out of space. Not because there isn't enough storage, but because ~25% of it is taken up by app I don't use but the manufacturer has left in the manifest.
Even though they have discontinued any support for the device.
 
@dmckee I like a machine I actually control
 
@G.Bergeron Well so do I. But we're also willing to take the time to learn what that means and how to do it without creating endless chaos and loss.
 
@dmckee oh this pisses me off too, only way way less so!
@dmckee I mean have you needed to butcher a unix distro so that you can do 'exotic' stuff like gpgpu?
 
4:23 PM
@bolbteppa Mmm I see. Here's what my correction of your statement, which I have better perspective on now, would be: Any 3-manifold can be reconstructed from simpler pieces (you're right on this) modeled by quotients of the Euclidean space by a discrete group of actions (I see what you mean by discontinuous groups now). Also this is not quite how he recovers the fundamental group: section 12 actually describes it as a group whose elements are linear combination of loops on the manifold.
 
OK, folks, question: was there ever a time when the term "CC-Wiki" was an acceptable synonym for "CC BY-SA"?
4
 
@BalarkaSen or just the standard definition, isn't it?
 
and if so, when was it, where is it documented, and when did it stop?
 
@G.Bergeron The only time I've even needed to really diddle a linux distro is when I wanted to use a minimalist window manager and raw X on a legacy machine and the distribution really, really wanted me to chose a fancy descktop environment that would have eaten all the ram on the machine.
@EmilioPisanty Never heard of it myself. The CC pages has always had the form where the hypenated group specifies the riders exactly.
 
@dmckee I always start from tje bare server dist and work my up, I guess I like pain...
 
4:26 PM
@dmckee I seem to recall that, since it's the wikipedia license, folks would use the term with at least some measure of ok-ness from CC
with a subsequent discontinuation of the term
but I can't find any evidence
I'm thinking of writing to this George Duckett person to raise some hell about them ebooks and I'd like to fully understand the status of the term
 
@dmckee Or worse, implement an IC library on a microcontroller off pf a graphical depiction of pulse train with timings...
 
@G.Bergeron Yep, stated in more concrete terms, it seems. It feels like he starts off with coordinate functions $f_1, \cdots, f_n$ on the manifold $M$ and considers the loops $\gamma$ which generate the fundamental group $\pi_1 M$ to be the ones such that $f_i$ has nontrivial holonomy along $\gamma$ (i.e., $\gamma$ lifts to a path with distinct endpoints in the universal cover).
 
@EmilioPisanty yeah that thing is weird. I wonder if any of my answers are in there?
 
@G.Bergeron do a google-books search on your username
 
@dmckee I don't think your question is a good way to demonstrate that coordinate speed has no absolute meaning. What I would do (and maybe will do) is start with the Schwarzschild metric then use a transformation to convert the metric to shell coordinates.
 
4:29 PM
From what I see, he calls the fundamental group $G$ to be the group of transformations of the local coordinates under holonomy about the loops.
Spoken like a true physicist, one might say (cc @bolbteppa)
 
@BalarkaSen I think the natural link is, as the the intro written by Stillwell in Poincare's book says, the sides of say a square being identified - on a quotient surface (hence the link to discontinuous groups) the sides come together and form a closed curve, and this is how he thought of the fundamental group, and something to do with translations, it's a mess but he seen this as obvious apparently
 
@G.Bergeron doesn't look like it google.ca/…
 
@bolbteppa Yup.
That's exactly right.
 
@BalarkaSen so really the equivalence classes of maps $S_1 \to M$ under homotopy...
 
Don't really see it yet but at least I finally see some links between all these ideas
 
4:31 PM
Sorry for being a little too critical initially. I see what you were getting at with that statement.
 
@dmckee Then you can show that both the Schwarzschild and shell observers agree that the local speed of light is $c$ but disagree about the coordinate speed at all other locations.
 
I shouldn't try to push the rigor monster over every conversation I have
 
@dmckee Since the transformation is purely algebra and involves no assumptions about the definitions of the meter and second this demonstrates that the coordinate speed has no absolute meaning.
 
@JohnRennie Which would be a concrete example of what Javier is talking about?
 
Cooking a whole chicken tonight
to celebrate the week end
 
4:33 PM
@dmckee yes
But the transformation is a bit of a mare as I recall
 
@G.Bergeron It's more than that, actually, because he also talks about the transformation of local coordinates under holonomy about those nontrivial homotopy classes! So it seems he also found out the definition of fundamental group as deck transformation group of the universal cover $\widetilde{M} \to M$
 
My sense is rigor will let you start from the simple stuff and get to all this fuchsian stuff later, and that's cool, but these guys started from the fuchsian stuff and waved their hands and it all worked out
 
Which is pretty surprising to me
 
@dmckee I'll have a poke around and see if I can come up with anything.
 
@bolbteppa True I don't disagree. They didn't have a concrete, logical language to parse the full logic into but there were nontrivial ideals involved
 
4:35 PM
@EmilioPisanty Actually yes, my username is G. Bergeron. Also I noticed my uncle is cited, haha.
 
Maybe two hundred years from now that's how people will perceive modern mathematics
 
@dmckee Though it should be obvious to any but the completely brain dead that since coordinate speed is a 3-vector not a 4-vector it cannot possibly be a covariant quantity.
 
call us plebs for writing in category theoretic terms
 
ncatlab will be baby math by then :\
 
lolol
 
4:36 PM
I wonder if nlab has an article on addition
Let's see
 
@BalarkaSen ideals as in rings?
 
Hey @creativecommons, was there ever a time when the term "CC-Wiki" was an acceptable substitute for "CC BY-SA"? (& if so, until when?) I'm preparing a strongly-worded letter about infringement and I'd like to have that background solid.
 
@G.Bergeron Lol, I meant, ideas
 
maybe that'll work?
 
Close enough
"From an nPOV, one may consider this as follows: $\mathbb{Z}$ is a filtered colimit of sets"
 
4:38 PM
LOOOOL
 
these duckers will write every mathematics from the n point of view
 
@JohnRennie Such arguments are nice for people who have encompassed the mathematical structure of physics, but they come across as simple argument from authority for people whose exposure is purely poop-sci.
 
@Slereah It bring back memories of going through that with friends one summer
 
@BalarkaSen Come on, now. Munge those curse words, please.
 
4:39 PM
The article on $\mathbb N$ isn't too bad
 
@dmckee Whoops, edited
 
Thanks.
 
My guess is one is able to explain category theory in a way that taught you at least 6 subjects all at once and learn them simultaneously, it just needs to be written
 
@bolbteppa without learning one of those subjects to provide examples, my guess is it would be pretty abstract nonsense :p
 
'As a group, ℤ is abelian and is the Grothendieck group of the monoid (or semigroup) ℕ of natural numbers'
 
4:41 PM
@dmckee we get claims that confuse the coordinate speed of light with a covariant quantity from people who have ostensibly encompassed the mathematical structure of physics too
 
@JohnR And I am interested in having something to point to in the event that "relentlessly inaccurate" (to quote that authoritative figure D. Adams) information gets posted over and over again.
@EmilioPisanty Touche.
 
@dmckee I agree that such a resource would be mighty valuable
though maybe your question dithers a bit too much to be effective on that front?
I must say I got pretty confused by the language
 
@dmckee Not sure I understand the usage of ''encompassed'' here, Actually I am not sure of the exact meaning of this word...
 
'In number theory, one generalises integers to algebraic integers, an instance of the red herring principle.'
 
@G.Bergeron Oh ... I think that might be a archaic (or at least very rare usage). Something is "within ones compass" when you understand of grasp it, and following from that to encompass an idea is to learn it well or completely.
 
4:45 PM
@Slereah Don't you think Tysson is a bit over the board, sometimes?
 
I think nobody likes Tyson anymore
 
do you mean neil dedass dyson
 
Tyson is my hero
 
@dmckee Yeah I understood his sentence from context, but to me it meant something like ''above and around'' (figuratively speaking). But yeah, english is not my first language.
 
4:47 PM
@Slereah So what did the picture you posted means?
 
I got no answer for my question on electronics.stackexchange :(
 
@EmilioPisanty By our very own orgnaization, none the less...
 
@bolbteppa because he triggers people?
 
1
Q: Possibility of hybrid forward-flyback topology

G. BergeronWithin the context of isolated converters, the flyback topology is nice in its simplicity as can be the forward topology, in spite of needing a second primary reset winding. However, both make poor use of the transformer core in as much power is not continuously passed through the transformer. Wh...

Any EE here?
 
4:49 PM
Him triggering the right people is an additional bonus :p
 
And right here they have an image that says "cc-wiki" hosted by creative commons.
 
trigger = troll
 
I think it might be at least a little official.
 
@dmckee 'ndeed
@dmckee goodness
 
@EmilioPisanty I'd make a joke about bibliography style files but I don't think anyone pretends that those are good
 
4:50 PM
that is an excellent lead, thanks =)
 
@EmilioPisanty oh, how did the presentation come out
 
@Semiclassical yeah, I don't think I've seen anyone arguing that
@Semiclassical pretty good =)
 
BST files seem like the LaTeX equivalent of COBOL
3
 
nice
do you have any pictures from the demo?
 
4:53 PM
I'm jealous of math overflow
 
@Semiclassical nope
 
dang
oh well
 
yeah, I know
it is pretty easy
particularly if you get a nice round droplet
you do need to fiddle with it for a while but I got one in a couple of minutes
 
though of course with the stress of being in the middle of giving a lecture that mounts up
 
4:54 PM
hah, yeah
 
was there a Q & A session?
 
@skullpatrol brief
there were plenty of questions throughout
 
@EmilioPisanty For me the stress can only exists before
 
@G.Bergeron try doing a demo halfway through
 
@EmilioPisanty Like TAing? What do you mean by halfway through?
 
4:57 PM
@G.Bergeron as in, seminar-style presentation with slides on a projector
then you pause
and you do a live demo with the projector turned off
 
Oh, well... I wanted to do that to show the mathematics in electronics for undergrads, but yeah I'm afraid my chaotic oscillator might just stop wanting to oscillate
Analog circuits always are a function of your temperament, the captain's age, and wether you had coffee this morning or not
Speaking of which, I'll go get myself a cup!
 

« first day (2717 days earlier)      last day (2230 days later) »