The h Bar

0celo7

12:00 AM

that's not my area so I wouldn't feel comfortable talking about it

Semiclassical

agreed

0celo7

Of course I'm avoiding applications in GR

Semiclassical

12:37 AM

it's confusing that while hydrodynamics aren't (as far as I remember) an example of Lagrangian mechanics, there is such a thing as the Lagrangian formulation of hydrodynamics

0celo7

@Semiclassical indeed there is

it's in Hawking and Ellis -- also a notoriously difficult section

Semiclassical

there is a Lagrangian formulation (in the mechanics sense) for hydrodynamics, apparently. see the opening paragraph here: wwwhome.lorentz.leidenuniv.nl/~saarloos/Papers/…

which has Lagrangian density $\mathcal{L}=p$ where $p$ is the pressure, evidently

0celo7

1:11 AM

@Semiclassical huh

Physics Meta

1:56 AM

0

Q: Editing my own stuff get me suspended?

I just got taken off a 1 year suspension for the second time. I don't want to do anything that will get me another 1 year suspension. I saw many things I wanted to edit on my own stuff while I was suspended. Should I pace my edits or am I safe to edit everything with in scope of coarse?

bolbteppa

2:14 AM

@0celo7 turns out if you set $r = C(r)$ in Schwarzschild and use forms, computing Schwarzschild from nothing becomes really simple and so much stuff looks the same you can memorize it, done here nicely youtube.com/…

vzn

3:37 AM

@Semiclassical hydrodynamics rocks =D

0celo7

@Semiclassical oh my god

these girls are crazy

Semiclassical

3:53 AM

@0celo7 ?

0celo7

@Semiclassical did I not tell you that I'm in a project group with 4 girls

for a philosophy class

Semiclassical

oh, right

0celo7

they're a therapy group in the chat

not even kidding

I would post pics but that would be mean

Semiclassical

the lives of others

0celo7

they need to suck it up and be sociopaths like the rest of us

Semiclassical

3:58 AM

lol

silly women, what with their emotional intelligence /s

0celo7

one of them has such bad anxiety she can't come to class

Semiclassical

ugh

that sucks

0celo7

(she's a sorority party girl)

press X to doubt her story

anyway

how do I compute the order of a zero of a holo function?

Cows

Ok I will be coding again tonight

Still waiting for Verizon's answer

Semiclassical

well

$f(z)/z^k\to$const. as $z\to 0$ works

as does showing that $f^{(k)}(0)$ vanishes for $k=0,1,2,...n$

0celo7

4:02 AM

yes, but admittedly I don't know how to compute the limit in this case

Semiclassical

What's the case of interest?

0celo7

hw, don't want that much help

Semiclassical

mmkay

0celo7

@Semiclassical hmm

Semiclassical

i mean, that's a pretty computationally involved approach

0celo7

4:03 AM

@Semiclassical I like your suggestion.

thanks

Semiclassical

so it's usually not a great one unless the order is small

np

0celo7

first order, so...

Semiclassical

nice

0celo7

@Semiclassical you actually have to compute the next derivative too

to make sure it's not zero too

Semiclassical

right

0celo7

4:05 AM

er

no

for a first order zero, it's enough to show that $f'(0)\ne 0$

Semiclassical

right.

0celo7

you want $a_1\ne 0$ in the taylor expansion

Semiclassical

which will be the same as $f(z)/z\not \to 0$, so in this case there's not too much difference

0celo7

so when you divide off $z$ that term becomes the constant

Semiclassical

(presumably it's obvious in your case that $f(0)=0$)

0celo7

4:07 AM

@Semiclassical Yes

It was $\sin nz$

Semiclassical

ah yeah

0celo7

so really easy to compute the derivative too

and it's not gonna be zero where sin is zero

Semiclassical

ya

the issue I have is (usually) not finding the order of the zero

it's actually getting the residue if I have to do things by hand

not hard in a technical way, just tedious

0celo7

next part is to compute the residue of csc n\pi

Semiclassical

that's a useful one to know

0celo7

4:13 AM

@Semiclassical ah well here it's nice because the residue formula is 1/difference quotient

Semiclassical

right

vzn

5:25 AM

@Cows so whats the prj/ lang anyway?

Physics Meta

0

Q: We should answer/comment more on the original question of the duplicates

The whole point of creating a duplicate is to encourage users to add a new answer/comment on the original question so that it would also address/encompass the subtle differences of the duplicate question and the original question. But in reality, it seems that by creating duplicates, the origina...

discussion duplicates late-answers

Physics Meta

6:13 AM

0

Q: What things can I do that does not create work for others here?

I just got off a year looooong suspension and I want to interact while learning here. How can I help and shoulder some of the work here? What can I do to my own stuff that doesn't create work for others?

support moderation

Slereah

7:06 AM

@0celo7 I did not

Wald claims the same thing as Moretti, but he just redirects to the PCT book for proof

Which doesn't have the direct proof, just the proof of the edge of the wedge theorem

Cows

7:17 AM

Dancing in my room to stir fry by Migos

fun fun fun

Tanuj

9:47 AM

@JohnRennie Hey!

John Rennie

@Tanuj Morning :-)

Tanuj

@JohnRennie Morning. It's nearly 3:30 here. I'm from India you might know.

I've got a question from Optics I can't solve correctly.

John Rennie

OK?

@Tanuj let's use the Problem solving room

Tanuj

10:29 AM

@JohnRennie Sorry if I'm bothering you, are you available rn?

Slereah

10:40 AM

Apparently it's fairly easy to build non-time orientable wormholes

Well, mathematically

Tanuj

1:40 PM

@Blue Hey !

Anonymous

Hi

Tanuj

I never asked you , which college are you studying in ?

Anonymous

@Tanuj Jadavpur University

Tanuj

didn't you get above 300 in mains ?

Anonymous

@Tanuj No, who said that

Tanuj

1:44 PM

I assumed

how much did you get ?

Anonymous

@Tanuj 225 iirc

Tanuj

That's soo good !

@Blue Can you give me some tips , tricks , shortcuts for any chapter , any concept ?

Anonymous

@Tanuj Not sure I'm the right person to answer that question. Also got to complete my homework now...

Tanuj

@Blue uhm you must have some tricks ? If not do you know someone who has ?

Anonymous

I don't know what tricks you're talking about

Tanuj

1:56 PM

like there are a few tricks I know from youtube

some shortcuts or direct results and formulae for particular cases of a concept

Secret

I need to later figure out how non time orientable is reversing what

user228700

@DawoodibnKareem: It's true. For the record, I don't quite need loyalty, haha. I have observed it among the boys, and have envied them from time to time, that's all.

Anonymous

@KaumudiH Grass always seems greener on the other side ;)

user228700

True, true :-)

user228700

2:12 PM

OH! I've just remembered that it's John's birthday tomorrow!

3

Anonymous

@KaumudiH Make some plans XD

user228700

Lol, what am I capable of doing, so far away from him?

user228700

I'll wish him, as per usual :-)

Anonymous

@KaumudiH Well, you shouldn't have revealed it a day earlier!!

Anonymous

The first thing he does when he visits the chatroom is to go through the transcript :P (I guess)

user228700

2:19 PM

:-) That's OK, I suspect he's not too fussy about turning 57.

2

user228700

He's at his Mum's, I believe, so at least there will be cake! :-D

bolbteppa

2:34 PM

Kaku on reddit: "I work with supersymmetric 11 dimensional tensor calculus. We think that is the ultimate language of nature."

Slereah

what a nerd

Anonymous

@bolbteppa Is that real? Link?

bolbteppa

reddit.com/user/DrMichioKaku

One of his posts

Anonymous

"I am Dr. Michio Kaku: a physicist, co-founder of string theory, and now a space traveler – in the Miniverse. AMA!"

0celo7

co-founder?

bolbteppa

2:37 PM

Yes

0celo7

@bolbteppa he is such a meme

bolbteppa

The guy is a boss

Slereah

How is Kaku even co-founder of string theory

Anonymous

Who's the CEO of String Theory?

0celo7

if you boast about 11-dim tensor calculus, you probably don't understand string theory or physics in general

bolbteppa

2:39 PM

If you don't understand his point, you don't understand how special 11-dim super tensor calculus is

Slereah

Where are Veneziano and Nambu's AMAs

bolbteppa

This explains why 11 is so special and crazy math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week158.html

Physics Meta

0

Q: Is it proper to ask about the preferrence of units?

I would like to seek an answer to the following question but am not sure if my question will be considered as off topic: I read that bond angles are almost always measured in degrees instead of radians. A scientist told me that in his research, they always measure the temperature in Celsius inst...

discussion questions

Slereah

John Baez, I love your site but get a mathjax plugin, please

look at those nasty equations

Anonymous

@bolbteppa It sounds like something fancy that would attract laymen

0celo7

2:42 PM

@Blue yes, that was my point

saying you work with 11 dimensional tensor calculus is pretty cringey

Anonymous

@0celo7 Indeed

0celo7

I work with n-dimensional geometric measures

Anonymous

I doubt any serious mathematician or theoretical physicist would bat an eyelid

0celo7

it's the ultimate language of geometry

@Blue well, the index hell would scare a few people ;)

bolbteppa

Your geometric measures do not even incorporate super groups, while his stuff does

@Blue That's the story of his pop sci career :p

0celo7

2:45 PM

Kaku's problem is that he flat out says stupid shit when in pop sci mode

I don't doubt he is/was a serious physicist

Slereah

that's how you sell books baby

I got a kaku book for Christmas once

Because the relatives think that is what physicists enjoy

bolbteppa

It is a bit shocking seeing him say pop sci things then seeing how insane his textbooks and papers really are

Anonymous

@Slereah Looool

0celo7

lmao Reed and Simon

Theorem XI.101

how do you have 100 theorems in a chapter

@Slereah how long till duff is back?

bolbteppa

@0celo7 how do you solve Einstein's field equations in this form, basically Zee's equations in the forms chapter:
\begin{align}
R^t \, _t &= - \frac{1}{B^2}[\frac{A''}{A} - \frac{A'B'}{AB} + 2 \frac{A'}{Ar}] \\
R^r \, _r &= - \frac{1}{B^2}[\frac{A''}{A} - \frac{A'B'}{AB} - 2\frac{B'}{Br}] \\
R^{\theta} \, _{\theta} &= - \frac{1}{B^2}[- \frac{B'}{rB} + \frac{A'}{Ar} + \frac{1}{r^2}] + \frac{1}{r^2}
\end{align}

0celo7

2:48 PM

@bolbteppa oh dear god

Slereah

18 days

0celo7

I had to solve the equations by hand for a summer project

bolbteppa

You have to subtract the first two to get $\frac{A'}{A} + \frac{B'}{B} = 0$

0celo7

don't do this to me again pls

bolbteppa

But seriously, the $R^{\theta} \, _{\theta}$ is not solvable using this, these equations are not solvable in this form, but they should be

0celo7

2:49 PM

@bolbteppa which page in Zee?

bolbteppa

611, different from the equations on 368 or around there, but he says they are the same, and these equations are right

You can get the cosmology eom so quick with forms

Balarka Sen

what is new

Slereah

Hm

0celo7

::gets out lethal weapon that is zee::

this book is ridiculous

bolbteppa

There's so much stuff in this Zee tbh, yesterday I finally understood the coefficient in the EH action I always forgot to check because of him

0celo7

2:53 PM

wot

Balarka Sen

I wrote an answer to something but I guess people did not like my inkscape skillz

1 hour and no upvotes

Slereah

If I have a curve $\gamma$ on a Cauchy surface $\Sigma_t$ in Minkowski space of length $l_\gamma$, is it true that for a curve $\gamma'$ that projects to $\gamma$, the soonest it can reach $\Sigma_{t + s}$ is if $l_\gamma / s = c$?

It's true for geodesics, but is it true for general curves

0celo7

are you sure it's true for geodesics?

what is $c$?

Slereah

Speed of light

Or $1$, if you prefer

0celo7

you mean 1

the parametrization of cauchy surfaces is arbitrary though

Slereah

2:55 PM

It's at least true for geodesics in the canonical foliation

I dunno if it's general

0celo7

canonical foliation?

Slereah

$t = cte$

Wait what's the english symbol for a constant

0celo7

const

Slereah

I should probably check the Gorgone book

It's probably in it if true

0celo7

what book?

Slereah

3:01 PM

Gourgoulhon

I guess if I have a curve $\gamma(\lambda) = (0, \vec x(\lambda))$, I can convert it to a null curve by $((-1 - |\vec x|^2), \vec x(\tau))$

Or something similar

One of those dreaded non-geodesic null curve

How to show it minimizes the time to that hypersurface, tho

0celo7

@Slereah let's do an exercize

let $\phi\in C^\infty_c(\Bbb R^n)$, show that $|D\phi|^2/\phi$ is bounded where defined

Slereah

What's $D$, any derivative?

0celo7

the gradient

$\partial_i\phi\partial^i\phi/\phi$

Slereah

3:17 PM

The derivatives give continuous function on the support, which is compact so there's a maxima, hence we're just dividing two finite numbers on the support?

0celo7

no $1/\phi$ blows up at the boundary of the support

Slereah

Hm

0celo7

because $\phi$ goes to zero

so somehow $|D\phi|^2$ cancels it

Slereah

I'm guessing it's gonna be something where the convergence of $\phi$ to $0$ is only as "fast" as $D\phi$

0celo7

right

for some reason the hypotheses are actually $\phi\in C^2_c$

so does one have to take another derivative?

Slereah

3:23 PM

If $x \in \text{supp}$ then $\phi(x - h) - \phi(x) = \phi(x - h) = 0 - h \phi'(x) + h^2 \phi''(x)$

0celo7

wot

why is $\phi(x)=0$

Slereah

Because it's on the boundary

0celo7

you said it's in the supp

Slereah

(should have been $\partial \text{supp}$)

Hm, what then

$$\frac{(\partial \phi(x + h))^2}{\phi(x + h)} = \frac{h^2 \phi''(x) + O(h^3)}{h \phi'(x) + h^2 \phi''(x) + O(h^3)} $$

Hm

Don't think that helps

0celo7

I think I've done this once before...

Anonymous

3:33 PM

@BalarkaSen Is this a meme yet: youtu.be/dr8MdKdIBIA?t=4s ? It's showing up all over YouTube (ads!)

Anonymous

At least till you read he has palsy, it looks pretty hilarious.

Anonymous

Not the best ad without context

Balarka Sen

its a strange ad but i dont consider it funny

vzn

in theory salon, 49 secs ago, by vzn

The Argument Against Quantum Computers (Kalai) / Quanta mag

0celo7

4:09 PM

@Slereah I think one should assume it's unbounded, take a sequence that blows up the ratio, then get a convergent subsequence (compactness) and compute the difference quotient along this subsequence

and then somehow that contradicts the sequence blowing up

Slereah

maybe

time to go home

l8er

0celo7

cya

bolbteppa

4:34 PM

Another Kaku-ism, he has a section called 'a simple proof of the Atiyah-Singer index theorem' in his book, mental

hxri

hi

0celo7

@bolbteppa what are the chances it’s completely wrong

hxri

can anyone tell me what the image, shown in Griffiths Electrodynamics textbook?

bolbteppa

0 chance, Witten probably proved it

Slereah

Looks like lorenz attractors

hxri

4:43 PM

@Slereah thank you so much! Its a Lorentz "Strange" Attractor.

bolbteppa

5:01 PM

@0celo7 those EFE do give the right solution, but you just have to solve a more complicated ODE...

0celo7

@Semiclassical when is murder of project group members justified

Slereah

@0celo7 when they promise to finish a thing for the due date and do not

Professors have this thing where they try to make groups of "equal level"

This means that one member of the group will be a big thicky bobo

0celo7

My group has mostly hobos

An autocorrect to be sure, but a welcome one.

Slereah

I assume you meant to say "robots"

0celo7

5:23 PM

@Slereah no, bobos

Slereah

Bobos? What is this, the 1980's?

0celo7

one has such bad anxiety she can't come to class, another has the flu, another has some lame excuse to not come to the group meeting

vzn

"something I made on Desmos site while I should have been working on math hw" / reddit

0celo7

@Slereah you wrote bobo!!!

Slereah

Oh yes

Man i still have like 600 pages of Gourgoulhon to read

0celo7

5:25 PM

turns out I have twice as long for this presentation as I thought

vzn

↑ hey numerous math geeks, heard of desmos site? very cool stuff have been playing with it a bit, javascript graphics/ calculation/ symbolic analysis etc

0celo7

I'll be pulling poisson brackets out of my ass

vzn

@0celo7 so you have your own harem now? with all the fun that goes with it? :) :P

13 hours ago, by Semiclassical

silly women, what with their emotional intelligence /s

← still trying guess SCs gender o_O :P

0celo7

@Semiclassical is definitely a girl

vzn

@0celo7 sounds poissonous! o_O :P

@0celo7 what class is the prj for? math? you have 3 other girls in a math class? o_O :P

Slereah

5:35 PM

Well he's doing math and engineering

Girls in math is likelier than engineering

vzn

@Slereah have you seen that documented? was not aware. decided to look into it. oh ofc wikipedia has entire long article on it now o_O

Women in STEM fields

Many scholars and policymakers have noted that the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM fields) have been predominantly male occupations, with historically low participation among women, from their origin in the Age of Enlightenment to the present time. STEM professions, like medicine, require higher education or training in nearly all cases. Since the feminist revolution of the 1970s, the opportunities available to men and women in higher education have become broadly similar in most advanced economies. In some countries, such as the United States, 33% more bachelors...

Semiclassical

lol

vzn

acc to US section statistics table its about ⅓ in math and ¼ in engr. different but close )( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_STEM_fields#United_States

Semiclassical

A data point that may clarify: I do not consider myself to have a great deal of emotional intelligence

vzn

@Semiclassical lol fitting right in here + keeping us guessing...

← knows at least 3 female math majors... wife of old college friend, coworker, mom :)

Slereah

5:51 PM

@0celo7 Do you have to take humanity classes like is traditional in the US

vzn

(oops 2nd thought maybe the coworker was CS, said she wasnt good at math lol... maybe getting her mixed up with her mathematician dad)

Balarka Sen

STEM fields are bullshit anyway

vzn

@BalarkaSen o_O typical rabblerousing eh? you are even calling "M" BS?

Balarka Sen

math is absolutely garbage, yes

vzn

sigh it seems you have nothing to live for then :( :P

Balarka Sen

5:55 PM

who says i can't live for garbage

Slereah

@BalarkaSen is a noble raccoon

Just like @0celo7

vzn

ok thats the spirit. theres a rock band called garbage so why not :|

Slereah

Digging through math garbage

Balarka Sen

please. rat, not raccoon

vzn

← pictures 0ce + BaSe as dirty homeless dudes with long hair/ unshaven/ + worse... scounging for next meal o_O

Slereah

5:57 PM

Me trying to read some math

vzn

what do raccoons have to do with it? ok at least they have opposable thumbs right?

Balarka Sen

maybe i should be a giant beetle instead

much more classy

vzn

@BalarkaSen maybe better. reminds me of the story of jung + the beetle :) (oh and also another famous rock band) :)

Balarka Sen

i was thinking about kafka

Slereah

how kafkaesque

vzn

6:00 PM

lol just read a kafka quote recently that reminded me a bit of you... forget where, maybe reddit...

Slereah

A good time is had by all

Balarka Sen

beatles suck ass. didn't you hear what quincy jones said?

vzn

oh sorry ~~kafka~~ camus got it mixed up. Should I kill myself or have a cup of coffee? The Stoics and Existentialists agree on the answer iainews.iai.tv/articles/… reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/7bnc78/…

Balarka Sen

i havent read camus yet

i hear he is hip

vzn

@BalarkaSen not a huge fan of beatles either, like a few songs eg revolution. yeah quincy jones making big headlines with recent interview. he said hes dated ivanka also. did he say something about beatles (same interview)? wondering if he might have been drunk or high... o_O

Balarka Sen

6:05 PM

he said beatles are the worst musicians of the world

vzn

@BalarkaSen got to read Stranger in english class, quite subversive, must admit some major affinity for/ identification with the existentialists.

Balarka Sen

i just thought it was funny

vzn

@BalarkaSen good to hear you can laugh occasionally :)

Balarka Sen

not that i am a big beatleshead

vzn

@BalarkaSen have you read any kafka? it appears the idea his famous story was specifically about a beetle or even an insect is partly a translation assumption that kafka himself disavowed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Metamorphosis

Balarka Sen

6:11 PM

i have read the metamorphosis, yes. yeah i know the translation issue

i read wikipedia too

vzn

Jan 16 at 18:28, by Balarka Sen

Perhaps. I am not as fluent on my terminology as wikipedia readers

huh browsing thru your old comments. found this one (on physics!). think its a good question. do you still care about the/ an answer?

Apr 27 '17 at 11:08, by Balarka Sen

Hmm. What does electric permittivity measure? I see that if the medium's $\varepsilon$ is greater, Coulomb attraction between two charged particles decrease. Does it measure how much resistance the medium creates against the electric field? That sounds completely contradictory to "permittivity" :P

Balarka Sen

I got an answer

im happy

vzn

@BalarkaSen ok. fair enough. think its deeper than you/ others realize. :)

Balarka Sen

post an answer on r/iamverysmart. i'm not going to read it.

vzn

Apr 27 '17 at 11:18, by Balarka Sen

@blue I know, I was just asking what all these really measure.

you know that asking what is really measured is really against physics dont you? :P

ACuriousMind

6:24 PM

@0celo7 busy :P

Balarka Sen

Hey @ACuriousMind

ACuriousMind

Heyhey

Balarka Sen

How's life

Happier than a string theorist, I hope?

ACuriousMind

@BalarkaSen Life's pretty good :)

Balarka Sen

Nice

ACuriousMind

6:28 PM

How about you?

Balarka Sen

A little pressed with upcoming exams and schtick. But all in all, not bad. I'm still learning new things

bolbteppa

Nobody could be happier than a string theorist playing with superconformal ghosts in trees and forests (all technical terms :p)

Physics Meta

0

Q: Are there AIs among us?

If I may share a slightly tongue-in-cheek theory about some of the users I've observed on SE, and especially a specific user that has come back recently: This user seems like it could be an AI developed by Google or Microsoft, which has been programmed to simulate human behavior by "participatin...

discussion

bolbteppa

Schwarzschild down to 4 pages that a typewriting monkey who can solve separable ode's and work with vielbeins could crank out without any thinking

ACuriousMind

@BalarkaSen Ah, good luck for the exams, and may you never stop learning things ;)

Balarka Sen

6:37 PM

Thanks :)

2

Emilio Pisanty

8:11 PM

Northern Line Extension Tunnelling Breakthrough

►

^ so that's what "breakthrough" is meant to signify

Avantgarde

@BalarkaSen I never liked them. I don't get the craze!

no_choice99

so back in 2016 i was told here that the number of photons was a lorentz invariant but now I read that it's not? can someone reconcile the accepted answers of physics.stackexchange.com/questions/241522/… and physics.stackexchange.com/questions/21830/… ? they seem to be in conflict with each other to me

Mithrandir24601

@no_choice99 What do you think makes one conflict with the other?

Balarka Sen

8:26 PM

@Avantgarde well, they're better than the pop music we hear now so there's that

i think they were far from the worst though but i won't defend them :p

no_choice99

@Mithrandir24601 the first link shows that yes, that number is invariant. the 2nd link states that no, it isn't invariant

both answers are utterly highly voted

Slereah

Photon number is a Lorentz invariant

It's not diffeomorphism invariant, though

Mithrandir24601

@no_choice99 The first link states that the number of photons is lorentz invariant. The 2nd states that if you put a photon emitter in a rotating (i.e. accelerating) gravitational field, it emits photons. There's nothing weird here - there's a difference between an accelerating particle and one frame moving at a different velocity to another

Secret

8:43 PM

journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.060601

This paper talks about controlling the direction of flow of thermal noise and building a thermal rectifier. It works in theory but experiments are to be checked

Avantgarde

9:03 PM

@BalarkaSen Yeah well, a lot of today's pop is bad. But I'd still prefer today's good pop over them.

Slereah

I'm more of a dude in 90's music

The 1790's, that is

Avantgarde

I can't say they were the worst. Haven't even listened to them that much, so it isn't a fair judgement.

Slereah

Ahahah, hehehe, little brown jug how I love thee!

Oh wait, that one is from the 1860's

Avantgarde

What is love? Baby don't hurt me.

Slereah

nvm

What's a 1790's song

Yankee doodle?

1780's

close enough

Avantgarde

9:05 PM

I don't remember the 90s

Balarka Sen

surely a good beethoven

Slereah

Also a few french revolutionary songs

ie

La Marseillaise

A ça ira

La Carmagnole

etc

all great songs

la carmagnole

►

Good songs to behead nobles by

Balarka Sen

@Avantgarde I'd rather have rock music in my pop plate than rap

tbh

Avantgarde

Camila Cabello - Havana ( cover by Donald Trump )

►

Love the covers these guys make. Hilarious

Balarka Sen

Donald Trump - Bigger Better Stronger (Remix by Party In Backyard)

►

10/10

Avantgarde

9:10 PM

haha great

Donald Trump And Barack Obama Singing Barbie Girl By Aqua - Maestro Ziikos

►

Secret

(Cont.) Perhaps, with the various thermal analogue of circuit elements slowly becoming available, future computer might also be able to use their waste heat as an infomation storage medium and do computation with it

It is kinda amazing despite the restrictions of the 2nd law, we can achieve that level of control of thermal noise

Avantgarde

@Balarka Doesn't this look like a prog album cover art from the 70s?