« first day (2319 days earlier)      last day (2625 days later) » 

12:01 AM
Basically (-3)-(-5) >0 and so is (5)-(3). (for example)
 
Thank you @2017
 
@Kaumudi.H Aha, so I checked the official syllabus again and they haven't mentioned that topic. It seems it isn't there :-). Probably sir taught it to us for our CBSE examination!
 
"Cannot Verify Server Identity"?
 
@skullpetrol Really?
 
Yup, says safari.
 
12:08 AM
@skullpetrol Okay try this (jeesyllabus.in/jee-syllabus)
This is not the official one though ^ (but almost same)
 
@ACuriousMind I'll let you guess. We were doing hyperbolic geometry today and he was treating $ds^2$ in the metric as a "distance"
He was trying to be informal since it's not a geometry class
 
yep :)
 
@Kaumudi.H Fun Fact: Understanding the working of Vernier Callipiers and Screw Gauge properly took me more time compared to whole of Electromagnetism :-P
 
@0celo7 Hehehe
 
12:11 AM
That one works @2017 thanks again :-)
 
@skullpetrol You're welcome :-)
 
@ACuriousMind When he was doing that, I asked him if this was now a physics lecture :D
then he referenced that comic
 
It's good to see even Elven lords appreciate webcomics :)
 
They don't call it "comic relief" for nothing :P
 
@skullpetrol Call what comic relief?
Comic relief is when a funny scene or character lightens the mood of an otherwise serious story
 
12:20 AM
Comics.
 
Something funny that you read to laugh about it is not comic relief
 
Are you saying that the relief that a comic provides is not comic relief?
 
@0celo7 did you get Kato's proof of the JNF?
 
@skullpetrol Yes
 
Thank you.
 
12:26 AM
"comic relief" is a specific term that denotes the role of a comedic element in an otherwise serious/dramatic story
It does not refer to general relief provided by comics, or comedic things in general
 
TIL :-)
 
@bolbteppa What?
 
Kato derives the 'canonical form' in chapter 1, the Jordan form, using residues and resolvents
 
Oh, Jordan normal form
I didn't read it carefully, no
 
It's pretty cool but messily explained there
 
12:32 AM
@skullpetrol Where are you from ?
 
Do you understand his talk of branch points for operators in chapter 2?
 
12:43 AM
@0celo7 at the beginning of the chapter?
 
12:54 AM
Yes
 
1:06 AM
If you treat an operator $T(x)$ as a perturbation of a well known operator $T$, having known eigenvalues and eigenvectors, by some 'small' operator $xT'$, i.e. $T(x) = T + xT'$, then the question is whether the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of $T(x)$ are similarly nice perturbations of order $x$. To find out, you set up the characteristic equation for $T(x)$ and find out that the eigenvalues of this new $T(x)$ depend on the entries of the matrix $T(x)$, hence on $x$, in crazy ways, due to roots.
But now due to this $x$ dependence, the number of eigenvalues can actually change at certain points, indicating the relationship between a perturbation of an operator and of it's eigenvalues is not direct in the way that was hoped.
Not sure where the Riemann surfaces of Banach manifolds is coming in yet :p
 
1:43 AM
@bolbteppa you haven't said anything concrete
 
hey
2:28 AM
@2017 I got these cases , what about when P and V both increases and P ,V both decreases
 
2:43 AM
@hey Draw a graph and see what happens..
 
hello. sorry, but I have a newbie question.
When discussion starts to happen in comments, I see it often move to chat, and there is a room that says "Imported from a comment discussion on .." How do you create such chats?
 
When P and V both increase then $W_{irrev}>W_{rev}$ and the reverse holds true for P and V both decreasing. @hey
 
hey
3:07 AM
You are using which convention
@2017 if reverse holds then the inequality does not apply
 
@hey What?
 
hey
Classius inequality does not hold
 
I don't know from where you got that weird idea. Clausius inequality holds in the whole cycle.
Take into account the signs
I only stated the magnitudes
 
hey
If w(rev) is more than w(irr) , then q(irr) is greater than q(rev)
 
@hey Take into account the negative sign -_-
 
hey
3:13 AM
Are we dealing with physics convention
 
@hey What convention do you want to use?
I'll explain you using that
 
hey
Physics
Let V increases and P decreases
Then w(re)>w(irr)
 
Yeah so take an example value. dw(rev)=4 and dw(irrev)=5 in first case when both P and V increase
 
hey
And both are positive
@2017 fine
 
and dw(rev)=-5 and dw(irrev)=-4 when both P and V decrease
 
hey
3:16 AM
Yes
 
5-4>0 and so is (-4)-(-5)>0
 
hey
Yes
 
So that's it
@hey Okay?
 
hey
Sorry internet problem
@2017 yes ,this is for one case
 
@2017, hello =)
 
3:20 AM
@hey This is for two cases: When P and V are both increasing and when both decreasing!
@heather Hey :-)
How are you ?
 
hey
@2017 ah yes
 
@2017 pretty good, how are you?
 
@heather Exam season :-P Bit of pressure :-) Do you have half yearly or annual examinations at school ?
 
hey
Now take P decreases and V increases
 
@2017 not yet - that fun starts next year. We get normal tests though (like at the end of units)
best of luck with your exams!
 
3:22 AM
I will join undergraduate college course this year :-) School ended last month!
Probably will take up engineering
or physics
 
oh, you just finished highschool!? congrats!!
for some reason, I thought you were a college student =)
 
yes ! I'm both happy and a bit nostalgic :-P
@heather Hehe, no :-D
 
where you thinking of going (for college)?
 
@heather India only. In Kuwait we don't have any good technical college :/
 
@2017 ah. Have you considered America at all (biased person speaking =P)
 
3:26 AM
@heather LOL :-D I did. But actually it will be a bit difficult to stay there all by myself. I have family members in India :-)
I even took SAT and TOEFL
 
@2017 ah, that makes sense then.
@2017 how'd it go? =)
 
@heather Good enough. I got selected for quite a few US colleges too! :-)
 
@2017 wow, that's awesome!
 
@heather You will be in grade 9 this year, right? :-)
 
Well, I'm in grade 8 currently, but yeah, i start 9th this fall.
that's the first year of highschool for us, don't know if that's the same for you guys.
i'm super excited!
my mom on the other hand is all "you're growing up so fast" =)
 
3:28 AM
Grade 9 is highschool?? Here it is 2 years before highchool . Grade 11 is highschool here
 
oh, how many grades do you have?
 
@heather I know that feeling :-)
 
we have 4 years of highschool
 
@heather 12
@heather Oh, we have 2!
 
only 2 years of highschool??
 
3:29 AM
That's why
 
wow
 
@heather We don't call grade 9 as high school :-P
That is middle school
 
generally, K-5 is elementary, 6-8 is middle school, and 9-12 is highschool here
 
I see. You have a slightly different system!
 
sometimes the middle grades are shuffled around a bit - like sometimes 9 is moved down to middle school, or what have you, but the general idea is fairly consistent.
@2017 what is yours like?
 
3:31 AM
@heather I meant US has a slightly different system of education
compared to the East
@heather Right!
 
@2017 no, I know, I was asking what your system is like =)
 
user228700
@heather: I'm sorry about last night when u spoke about spring break--I was a bit busy trying to understand something.
 
@Kaumudi.H oh, no, not a problem =)
 
@heather We have LKG, UKG, Transistion, and then grades 1 to 12! LKG starts at 3 years age.
 
did you figure it out? @Kaumudi.H
 
user228700
3:33 AM
Also, @2017: Nope, it's not in syllabus. Thanks :-)
 
LKG=Lower Kindergarden
 
user228700
@heather For the most part, yes :-)
 
hey
@2017 I am not getting with other two cases
 
I guess I got to go and study now :-) Have a good day @heather !
@hey I'll get back to this later! Gotta go
 
hey
Np @2017
 
3:40 AM
@2017 have a good day =) congrats again
 
user228700
@heather: (I'm sorry about last night and right now, when I still haven't gotten around to replying to ur message about spring break etc :-|)
 
@Kaumudi.H not a big deal =) thanks though
 
user228700
OK :-/ Exams coming up, that's why.
 
ah, best of luck!
 
user228700
Thank you :-) Enjoy ur break!
 
3:45 AM
thanks =)
 
Hi peeps :-)
 
user228700
4:15 AM
Hi :-)
 
user228700
@JohnR: Do ping me when(/if) u are available to take questions about LCAO (pls :-P)
 
user228700
4:28 AM
Does anybody here know about what "2s-2p" mixing is in LCAO?
 
user228700
*know what
 
@Kaumudi.H we don't have it in our syllabus of jee adv. Jee main may be kind enough to touch that topic a bit.
 
user228700
Lol, "kind enough" :-P
 
@Kaumudi.H it is just the interference of wave pattern involved in 2s and 2p orbitals.
 
user228700
What dyou mean?
 
4:43 AM
If you have read about Schrödinger's wave equation then you will get it better.
 
user228700
...I have. Can u please elaborate your point? As it is, it's difficult to understand exactly what u're trying to state.
 
We have a wave func rep 2s orbital and another one rep 2p orbital.
 
user228700
Uh huh...
 
Just interference of those 2 wave patterns is LCAO!
 
user228700
...I know.
 
user228700
4:45 AM
Hang on, were u trying to explain what LCAO is?
 
So what is ur prblm?
 
user228700
Oh, lol, I see that I didn't actually ask the specific question :-P
 
:p ask then
 
user228700
My "problem", PhysiBoy, is that I don't understand how 2s-2p mixing is able to affect the order of filling of molecular orbitals.
 
user228700
...in that this order changes ever so slightly as one goes from $N_2$ to $O_2$ (and beyond)
 
4:47 AM
Ok so you are talking about sp mixing in nitrogeb?
Ok so first are you aware of gerade and ungerade MO?
 
user228700
@PhysiBoy No. Well, I dunno. My question is about that change in order.
 
Until you understand what gerade and ungerade means you won't be able to step inside sp mixing.
 
user228700
I do understand what gerade and ungerade mean but fail to understand why this has anything to do with my question...
 
For know do not explore topics which you do not understand. This will lower your confidence for mains.
Focus on what you have learnt till know.
 
user228700
Lol, I appreciate your concern but I think I know what I'm doing, thanks. Can u explain about it?
 
4:50 AM
Ok wait a sec.
I have a photograph explaining all of that.
But how do i send it?
 
user228700
What are u on--mobile/pc?
 
Mob
 
user228700
Right. Dyou see an "Upload" button near the box in which you type, next to the "Send" button?
 
Nup
 
user228700
...Alright, dyou see three horizontal bars at the top left-hand side of the page?
 
4:53 AM
Yes
 
user228700
If u click on that, you will see an option: "Go to Full Site"
 
Ok done
 
user228700
Once u click on that, you will be redirected to the desktop version of this site, where u'll be able to see the "Upload" button near the "Send" option next to the box in which u type.
 
user228700
Dyou see it?
 
No
 
user228700
4:54 AM
What dyou see?
 
Nthing
 
user228700
What? What does ur page look like?
 
Desktop type but no desktop like features
 
user228700
Gimme a minute.
 
user228700
 
4:57 AM
Any mail id?
 
user228700
Is that not what your page looks like?
 
Similar but no upload button
 
user228700
Huh. That's strange.
 
hey
@PhysiBoy hey
 
user228700
Dyou have an account on imgur? If you would be so kind, you could upload the picture over there and post a link here.
 
4:59 AM
No
 
user228700
...alright, never mind, then.
 
user228700
Thanks anyway :-) I'll ask JR when he comes on.
 
Ok
 
5:26 AM
@PhysiBoy Just go to ask a question section of any SE site and paste your image there to get an imgur link. Copy paste that link directly over here. The image will appear. That is a temporary solution till you get access to the upload button.
 
user228700
^ This is excellent advice but it's alright, @PhysiBoy, u don't need to bother urself :-)
 
user228700
5:53 AM
Dyou guys know how to find the bond order of heteronuclear diatomic molecules? It's easy enough once the order of filling of their molecular orbitals is determined and this will...vary for different molecules, no?
 
user228700
(Ever since Doraemon was banned/suspended, I've expected him to return. In the span of a few months, lots of JEE aspirants have joined the conversations in chat and now I suspect almost everybody of being an imposter :-P)
 
@Kaumudi.H pingggg
 
user228700
Morning :-)
 
Morning
 
user228700
I've decided to forget about those questions--I suspect that they aren't supremely important for my exam.
 
user228700
5:58 AM
Although I do have another question that I asked just a few minutes ago...
 
Yes?
 
user228700
Oops, I'm sorry for the timeout--my battery almost fell out.
 
user228700
This:
 
user228700
9 mins ago, by Kaumudi. H
Dyou guys know how to find the bond order of heteronuclear diatomic molecules? It's easy enough once the order of filling of their molecular orbitals is determined and this will...vary for different molecules, no?
 
Things like NO?
 
user228700
6:05 AM
Yep.
 
I'm not sure there's a simple answer to that ...
 
user228700
I was hoping that there would be a relatively simple answer to that because I have questions in my textbook that go along the lines of:
 
user228700
> "Find the bond order of the following molecules: $CO, CN^{-}, NO^{+}, O_2^{+}$"
 
user228700
Alright, now I'm starting to wonder whether the order really even matters. Even when going from $N_2$ to $O_2$, the order changes but the bonding orbitals are still together and come first--dyou know if this will be the case all of the time? (Yep, yeah, I'm asking u questions like I've assumed that u're God and know literally everything about everything, what with there being so many effing molecules and all :-P)
 
I risk misleading you since I don't really know, but you get all sorts of special cases. e.g. CO is a triple bond - standard covalent double bond + a dative bond from an O lone pair to the carbon.
 
user228700
6:12 AM
Riight. This is what my infamous textbook has to say:
 
O, bond order is a different thing to the energy ordering of the MOs. Bond order is defined to be half of the number of occupied bodning orbitals - half of the number of occupied antbonding orbitals. This is why you need to draw an MO diagram to answer these questions
 
user228700
@Secret Yes, of course. However, knowing the order is important because OK, look at what my textbook has to say:
 
user228700
> "The B.O of $CO, CN^{-}$ and $NO^{+}$ is 3 because these three are isoelectronic (with 14 electrons) to $N_2$ whose B.O is 3, which is why the B.O of these molecules is also 3"
 
user228700
However, if the order were different--if say, one of the antibonding orbitals actually came before a bonding orbital, this argument wouldn't work.
 
user228700
Does that make sense?
 
6:17 AM
@Kaumudi.H for bond order of diatomic molecules draw MO. But remember CO+ is an exception to that it has BO of 3.5
 
user228700
> Draw MO
 
user228700
My question is whether or not the order of filling changes in case of heteronuclear diatomic molecules.
 
user228700
Besides, in cases like $CO$, how to know if s-p mixing happens to adjust the order of filling accordingly?
 
BO=(e in Bonding MO-e in antibonding MO)/2 always works
Filling pattern is same low energy first also pauli exclusion principle is followed
 
user228700
Order of filling--that's what I'm having trouble with, essentially.
 
6:20 AM
yeah, I think that claim will not work if e.g. sigma 2s* get destabllise so much that it goes above the pi pxy orbitals. So the claim works suggests no antibodning orbitals can go above a bonding orbital at least for diatomic systems

For heteronuclear molecules, the stuff I learnt in 3rd year is only a qualitative treatment. Basically, you drew the MO diagrams in a simialr way, but the splitting is constrainted by the initial orbitals you start with. Let me crop you an example:
 
user228700
@PhysiBoy Are u sure that it's always bonding first? Like I noted before, this won't work if one of the anti-bonding orbitals had to be filled before a bonding one (of the same shell)
 
Except in extreme cases, bonding orbitals within the same shell will always be more stable than the antibonding orbitals in the same shell
so 2s* < 2s is almost unheard of
 
user228700
OK, that's all the confirmation I was looking for :-P Thanks.
 
2s* < 2p can happen, but not in diatomics. The proof will took me too much time given that I am still trying to fix my DFT calculation
The website I refer you also show how to qualitatively combined orbitals of heteronuclear species
 
user228700
No no, don't bother with trying to give me a proof. The fact that it's almost unheard of is plenty for me, thanks.
 
6:24 AM
as you can see, the splitting is less than the homonuclear ones, as it can only be stablise a little bit more than the most electronegative species for the bonding orbital and the least electronegative species for the antibonding orbital
This is because overlap is best when both the symmetry and energy matches. So for heteronuclear, there is a bigger mismatch in energy hence the overlap is weaker
 
user228700
Dude, thanks but really, I honestly don't need to know more about this :-P
 
ok then, (I am terrible at dumping things back to the correct level of context)
 
user228700
Yeah, u kind of are :-P As a general rule, just with me, I'm assuring u that I absolutely don't need more help when I say "Thanks a lot :-)" after u've answered (:-P)
 
user228700
I always figured that u were trying to figure out some more just for urself every time u add more information.
 
@Kaumudi.H yes i am
Also sp mixing takes place when sum of protons of both atoms is greater than or equal to 15
 
user228700
6:40 AM
@PhysiBoy Huh. OK...
 
user228700
I have a dumb-ish question. Why is the oxidation number of oxygen -1 in peroxides?
 
why as in how the calculation showed that the oxidation number is -1, or an underlying mechanism on why it is -1?
 
@Kaumudi.H ask how much the oxidation number would have to change by to make it zero as in O2.
i.e. how many electrons the peroxide anion would have to lose.
 
oxidation number is just a rough "make all bonds ionic" description
So draw out the molecule, and for each bond bond, give two electrons to the more electronegative atom (or one each if they are equally electronegative).
 
user228700
@JohnRennie ...this is more difficult to imagine when the peroxide bit is attached to other atoms as well.
 
6:49 AM
Well most peroxides are basically ionic.
And the anion is $\text{O}_2^{2-}$
 
user228700
In molecules like $H_2SO_5$, there is a peroxide linkage like this: $H-O-O-S...$
 
Ak, OK, I wouldn't have called that a peroxide ...
 
user228700
In these cases, I'm finding it more difficult to reason why those two oxygen atoms have an oxidation state of -1.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie What would u have called it?
 
Persulphate
 
user228700
6:52 AM
Persulphate? OK...
 
user228700
Anyhoo, why is the oxidation state of those two O atoms -1?
 
look at my explanation above. you only need to look at neighbors
oxygen is more electronegative than sulfur
oxygen is more electronegative than hydrogen
 
user228700
And oxygen is as electronegative as...well, oxygen. Right, yeah, OK, I see.
 
user228700
@BuddyJohn @JohnR Thank you :-)
 
np
 
user228700
7:00 AM
Riight, turns out that I was confused about the basic difference between the concepts of formal charge and oxidation number.
 
user228700
@PhysiBoy: Thanks for the invitation :-) I am quite aware of the existence of that room-in fact, I used to be on of its owners before I withdrew from that position a few months ago. Secondly, I find that I like hanging out here a lot better and I mean absolutely no offence by this.
 
user228700
 
user228700
:-)
 
Does anyone know the history of physics well?
I've always wondered if people thought that special relativity predicted nature should have parity symmetry, before they found out it didn't.
 
7:19 AM
-2
Q: Downvote of newcomers with less than 100 points

HolgerFiedlerThere was a small dispute about the downvote of newcomers with less than 110 point: ...the SE is supported by only a view enthusiasts. And they are doing this very well. But how to grow up more active people without giving them a chance to adopt to SE? It's really necessary to downvote somebo...

 
user228700
@JohnR: How's it going, BTW? Are u still at ur mum's?
 
@Kaumudi.H yes, I'm driving back tomorrow (Sunday) morning first thing.
 
user228700
Oh, OK :-) Have u been eating a lot more food than usual?
 
All PCs fixed and new low energy light bulbs installed for my mum, so it has been a good trip :-)
@Kaumudi.H Oh yes! :-)
 
user228700
Ah, nice :-)
 
user228700
7:30 AM
Oh, lol, have u found a new maid who's willing to take on the job of cleaning your "bin of a house" yet? :-P
 
But I have been making a special effort to only eat at set mealtimes and not eat continuously throughout the day, which is a deadly temptation at my mum's house since there is always food around.
I'll find out tomorrow how much weight I've put on this week ...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie That's a good strategy :-P
 
@Kaumudi.H To be honest I haven't looked yet. I'll ask around if anyone has recommendations for a cleaner.
 
user228700
Does he/she do the dishes as well?
 
No. I do my own washing up.
The kitchen is actually very clean as I'm careful about hygiene.
 
user228700
7:33 AM
Ah, OK :-)
 
It's the dust in the corners of the living room that I find it hard to get excited about.
 
user228700
Lol, OK.
 
Dust is, well, just dust ...
 
user228700
I realise that this is completely unrelated to dust, but have u ever written fiction? A short story, perhaps?
 
We had to write stories at school but I was always rubbish at it. I tend to be very focussed and what makes stories good are the little diversons and aside that help fill out the characters.
 
user228700
7:35 AM
I've noticed that u're impressively eloquent...
 
So my stories were all just plot with little attention to the characters.
 
user228700
x'D OK, that sort of makes sense.
 
I doubt I have a glittering career as an author ahead of me.
 
user228700
Ur first language is English and u've read many thousands of books but I'd kill for a vocabulary as broad as yours :-)
 
@Kaumudi.H that comes with age. Over the years you amass a large vocabulary just by osmosis.
I don't think I was especially elequent as a teenager.
 
user228700
7:37 AM
It's not just vocabulary, I suppose. It seems to me that u do have a certain way with words...which is why I asked if u've ever written anything.
 
Again, you just pick up the literary flourishes just by repeated exposure to them.
Though I do enjoy playing with the language.
 
user228700
I'd buy ur book if u sat down and wrote it first :-)
 
One day I will write a book about the geometric approach to special relativity, but I doubt that would be a literary masterpiece.
 
user228700
Lol, maybe not that one :-P
 
user228700
Lunchtime...
 
7:40 AM
I could write an autobiography - My life as a gutbucket
 
user228700
I didn't even know what a "gutbucket" is until I googled it just now.
 
user228700
I don't understand 90% of British slang.
 
@Kaumudi.H I see the top hit is an album. I might just buy a copy if only for the title :-)
 
@JohnRennie I have a question about simple harmonic motion, are you free for a few minutes?
 
I need to work in about 10 minutes so make it quick!
 
7:46 AM
A particle moves with simple harmonic motion in a straight line. In the first T seconds after starting from rest it travels a distance a and in the next T seconds it travels a distance 2a. Is it possible to find the amplitude of this SHM unless we know the initial position of the particle ?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie :-)
 
I framed two equations but they were terribly complex to solve
 
The particle is presumably starting at the maximum displacement at time zero, so the equation of motion will be: $$x = A\cos\omega t$$
 
@JohnRennie Starting from maximum displacement? Is that an assumption ?
I mean is it possible to solve it without that assumption?
Or is it unsolvable without that assumption?
 
The particle is only at rest at the extrema of the motion
 
7:50 AM
@JohnRennie Oh oh, I get it now. That was clever :-)
I can solve it then!
Thanks
 
@JohnRennie I would buy it :-)
 
@skillpatrol it's a long standing hobby horse of mine that SR is much simpler to understand once you grasp that it's a geometrical theory and stop messing around with flipping light clocks. I'd like to write a book aimed at beginners in SR showing the geometrical approach.
But writing a book is an enormous amount of work and I suspect it's another of those things that I'll never get around to doing :-)
 
I'd buy it too! :-) I hope you do it someday!
Or you know you could make a video lecture series! That would be less burdensome!
I'm pretty sure they'll get viral
(But I remember you saying that you are shy in front of the camera :-P)
 
8:16 AM
nice proof
 
@Slereah In my grade 10 maths book 50 percent of the proofs just stated: Check proof 5.6 (some arbitrary proof which was 5-10 chapters back). The authors/publishers are plain lazy or they were saving money while printing the books :D
P.S: I'd do the same :-P
 
you hack
 
9:11 AM
How to determine the direction of tilt and direction of rotation of the ellipse from their equations in Lissajou's figures....any idea anyone ? upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/12/…
@Kaumudi.H We have composition of SHM, right?
Lissajou's figures?
 
user228700
I haven't ever heard of "Lissajou's figures" before.
 
It seems to be there
It was asked in 2014
(online paper)
 
user228700
:-/ I see. Well, composition of SHM is certainly there.
 
user228700
I have a QQ; given the bond length alone of $HCl$, is it possible to calculate its dipole moment? (I have no other information at hand)
 
@Kaumudi.H Yeah it is possible
1
A: Dipole moment - calculation of percentage ionic character

ron The calculated dipole moment is charge on electron * radius of molecule That's off a bit, the calculated dipole moment (calculated assuming one electron has been completely transferred from hydrogen to bromine) is dependent on the bond length (interatomic spacing), not the radius. \begin{a...

Assuming it to be 100 percent ionic
 
user228700
9:20 AM
Right. A complete transfer. Thanks.
 
@Kaumudi.H And equation of damped SHM is also there, no? There are so many extra things to learn for mains :-P
 
user228700
Yep, it's there.
 
Thanks
 
user228700
Lol, yes. Have u learnt how the eye works yet? :-P
 
@Kaumudi.H LOL XD Learnt it a month back...forgot...I'll revise everything once in the next 3 weeks
I have it in my notes
 
user228700
9:26 AM
Cool :-)
 
I'm making two page notes for each chapter :-)
 
user228700
9:41 AM
Nice.
 
user228700
I've another QQ. Aren't the following two statements contradictory to each other:
 
user228700
> "Since deuterium has a higher mass than protium, simple Bohr theory tells us that the deuterium 1s electron will have a smaller orbital radius than the 1s electron orbiting the protium nucleus"
 
user228700
Vs.
 
user228700
> "Deuterium is more electropositive than protium"
 

« first day (2319 days earlier)      last day (2625 days later) »