« first day (2298 days earlier)      last day (2634 days later) » 

7:01 AM
Haha. Even if they had it would not have survived till today.
We never know
The Indus Valley civilization at similar times used rubber for tyres and stuff according to historians
 
The syllabus keeps changing every year.
 
@YashasSamaga i'm asking about jee main
In advanced it is surely not there
but it came in aieee 2002 paper
 
JEE Main syllabus keeps changing too.
Didn't you write the national olympiads?
 
No
 
Learning thermoelectricity does not take more than 15 minutes.
 
7:08 AM
Hmm
It took me 10 because I left out Seebeck effect
initially
just learnt the formulae
 
Even if a question appears from that topic, it will either be some silly question or a conceptual one.
 
It didn't come up in the last 10 years
so..
I won't worry
:)
 
That doesn't mean it won't come this year. There isn't any harm learning about it?
 
JR explained it to me in short
 
There is an entire lesson on thermoelectricity in HCV textbook I think.
 
7:11 AM
I don't use HCV
Anyway will have a look
Got the book
 
I am searching for it lol
no idea where it is
Do you use Feynman's Lectures on Physics?
 
no
 
You should read it for 100% conceptual clarity.
 
Too late now
 
You can skip some topics which are not required.
 
7:13 AM
My teacher teaches well enough
So I just use institute materials
 
The book is so good that you can read it for 48 hours continously without falling asleep or feeling hungry or ...
 
I don't want to try any new book when just 1 month is left
Anyway thanks for suggesting
 
@YashasSamaga wait, what book?
 
I have a pdf of that
 
oh Feynman
 
7:14 AM
yea
 
yeaaa... my boy
almost anything else puts me straight to sleep
you just made me realize FLP isnt sitting on my bookshelves, time to go fix that
 
Even a 10 year old kid can understand relativity if he/she reads Feynman's book :D
 
Eeeeh
I dunno
many plebs think they understand relativity
But after talking to them for a few minutes it usually doesn't pan out
 
@YashasSamaga Depends. If you are talking about the basics of Relativity, then yes. In depth? No.
Relativity is math intensive at higher levels which Feynman doesn't provide well. It deals with the intuitive part well.
 
Well, I blew it way out of proportion.
10 year old cannot understand :P
Feynman explains everything using simple concepts but there isn't much math in his book.
There aren't any exercise problems either. Therefore, you cannot expect someone to know a topic inside out after reading the book.
 
7:22 AM
@Slereah then set the bounds, what is the minimum you need to know right to understand relativity
this is just asking for your definition of understand
 
What difference will result in pressure if half of the water is taken out from 'b'?
 
@YashasSamaga, why?
 
$P = h\rho g$
the height will be the same for both the containers after you remove half of the water from the container b
 
Dammit
They give wrong questions every year ^
$(10.2 )/(3.2) \neq 0.6$
 
7:29 AM
What number will be shown by hydrometer if sunk in pure water? @YashasSamaga
 
And they say it is frictionless surface
:'D
 
what is wrong with the question?
 
@YashasSamaga Find the acceleration of the system
 
ah I see now
you have extra force lol
@Ramanujan you need to provide more information
 
This was from 2002 paper
 
7:31 AM
@YashasSamaga, why??
 
@Ramanujan at 4 degree C, the density of water is 1000
 
This question is not from anomalous expansion of water but from law of floatation and archimedes principle
 
The density of water changes as temperature changes.
You asked what will a device which measures density measure in pure water.
It will measure somewhere near 1000 or 1
usually 1 because the scale is calibrated to measure specific gravity
specific gravity = relative density
= density of liquid/density of water
 
Is a hydrometer calibrated at g/cm^3 or kg/m^3? I am confused @YashasSamaga
 
You should ask the manufacturer.
 
7:34 AM
??@YashasSamaga
 
If you get question in your test, they will mention the scale used.
 
This is actually the question from a board exam
 
Check your textbook.
 
@YashasSamaga, please see what the textbook has
 
Your textbook said it can be graduated in either scale.
The scale used depends on the equipment manufacturer.
 
7:40 AM
@YashasSamaga, yeah
 
Your exam question will tell you what scale is being used.
 
@YashasSamaga, how does CFL minimize loadshedding. "
 
lights
 
I have no idea
 
7:42 AM
They have high quantum efficiency
Nowadays about 90
percent
A fluorescent lamp or a fluorescent tube is a low pressure mercury-vapor gas-discharge lamp that uses fluorescence to produce visible light. An electric current in the gas excites mercury vapor which produces short-wave ultraviolet light that then causes a phosphor coating on the inside of the lamp to glow. A fluorescent lamp converts electrical energy into useful light much more efficiently than incandescent lamps. The typical luminous efficacy of fluorescent lighting systems is 50–100 lumens per watt, several times the efficacy of incandescent bulbs with comparable light output. Fluorescent lamp...
Its written here in detail
A compact fluorescent lamp (CFL), also called compact fluorescent light, energy-saving light, and compact fluorescent tube, is a fluorescent lamp designed to replace an incandescent light bulb; some types fit into light fixtures designed for incandescent bulbs. The lamps use a tube which is curved or folded to fit into the space of an incandescent bulb, and a compact electronic ballast in the base of the lamp. Compared to general-service incandescent lamps giving the same amount of visible light, CFLs use one-fifth to one-third the electric power, and last eight to fifteen times longer. A CFL has...
 
Since when has fluorescent lamps entered high school syllabus?
 
@YashasSamaga Modern Physics chapter I guess
Photoelectric effect
 
:|
CBSE?
 
Yeah
It is given in NCERT
Some chapter
Read NCERT thoroughly
 
It isn't there for JEE, right?
 
7:46 AM
It is there
Obviously
 
Everything in NCERT is there in JEE
 
@anonymous, @YashasSamaga, It is in the chapter Current Electricity
 
Yeah right
I remember now
Even I need to revise the book
 
I am pretty sure it isn't there in JEE -,-
 
7:47 AM
@anonymous, which country do you belong?
 
@YashasSamaga Live with your misconceptions :P
Every year they ask short questions from that book
 
NCERT will work for JEE Main but you'll get screwed in JEE Advanced
 
@YashasSamaga I never said study "only" NCERT.
@Ramanujan Indian living in Kuwait.
 
It isn't there in JEE adv syllabus so idc.
 
It just takes 30 min to go through one chapter of that book
Better not to take risk
Anyway, your choice
Is a black hole a black body ?
 
8:01 AM
6
Q: Is a black hole a perfect black body?

Simon CarlsonA black body absorbs all light/radiation in its reach. According to basic laws of physics, the more energy a body absorbs the more it can emit. Therefore, a black body absorbs all energy directed at it and also emits all energy that's been absorbed. A black hole is known to absorb all sorts of ...

 
Some people say so. However, I feel that black bodies should be good emitters along with being good absorbers. Black holes might satisfy the latter condition but not the former.
So, are black holes good emitters of light ?
That part isn't answered there.
 
black bodies are both good emitters and good absorbers
there is even a law stating that
 
@YashasSamaga Hmm, so is a black hole a good emitter?
In case you say "Yes, black holes are supposedly near-perfect black bodies."
 
I guess so.
 
user228700
When did this place become the IIT JEE prep. room?
 
8:04 AM
@YashasSamaga Oh really? Black holes are good emitters of light? I sort of disagree.
Ya, there is Hawking radiation but that does not make it a good emitter.
I will conclude that the sun (or star) is a better qualification for black body than a black hole
@JohnRennie Can black holes be called near-perfect black bodies? Are they good emitters alongside being good absorbers?
 
I am not sure about black holes but there is a rule which states that the spectral emission coefficient must be equal to the spectral absorption coefficient.
 
@YashasSamaga That rule works only for classical objects.
 
@anonymous Yes and yes. They are perfect emitters but their temperature is exceedingly small so the amount of black body (i.e. Hawking) radiation they emit is very small.
 
@JohnRennie Could you explain why they are perfect emitters? Do they really emit light?
Till now I thought of it as something that only absorbs light
 
8:11 AM
@anonymous The light they emit is the Hawking radiation. The spectrum of the Hawking radiation is a black body spectrum corresponding to the Hawking temperature.
I suspect you're getting mixed up with reflection as opposed to emission. A black hole dioes not reflect any light because it is a perfect absorber (all perfect black bodies are perfect absorbers).
 
@JohnRennie does this makes sense for a black body? "spectral emission coefficient must be equal to the spectral absorption coefficient"
 
@YashasSamaga Yes
 
Does it make sense for a black hole too?
 
Yes
 
So a black hole spews out what it previously sucked?
without any change?
 
8:16 AM
Hehe
Then our examiners don't know about hawking radiation
The answer given in my book is (A)
Haha :'D
@JohnRennie Thanks. I realize now that HR is the emission
 
black holes aren't in the IITJEE syllabus, I'd eliminate that option immediately.
Such questions won't come in the actual test.
 
Hey man, this is from a jee paper
@YashasSamaga
You say "won't come" for everything
:P
 
That must be from AIEEE?
 
Yeah
 
AIEEE is not JEE
JEE replaced AIEEE
JEE Advanced papers are set by IITs
 
8:19 AM
JEE Main is set by CBSE
 
This year's paper is set by IIT Madras, so prepare well in math.
 
user228700
I happen to personally know some of the profs. setting the paper, if that's of any interest to either of u :-P
 
@Kaumudi.H As if they will tell you the questions ;)
 
user228700
Of course they won't :-) They're my friends' parents so I know them is all.
 
They won't or else they will lose their jobs
@YashasSamaga You too :)
 
user228700
8:23 AM
@anonymous Probably.
 
I am making some waffles
I think I poured in too much batter
 
I hate the dough in waffles
Rather I hate dough itself
 
Send help
 
Let it be. Clean the mess later :P
 
yo
 
8:36 AM
ho ho ho
 
8:49 AM
Hm
what book to get
I should get Penrose and Haag
Haag is 40€
ouch
But still reasonable by physics standards
Oh wait, I already ordered Penrose
But it's still not there
It's been two weeks dammit
hm, what else to get thne
 
@Slereah Ebook ?
Or hard copy?
 
Real books
 
Ebooks are way cheaper
 
Yeah but they are not very practical to read
I should get this
it's cheap and it's referenced in Geroch's paper
Hm, what else
choquet bruhat still too expensive
Jost, maybe
I could use a good analysis book on the shelf
there we go
All done
 
9:26 AM
Hello
 
9:41 AM
hi
 
hey
 
Hi. Hello. Hey. How are you? How is the weather ? :'D
 
It's sunny
 
So anyway
How did meteors work, in Aristotle's physics
Meteors were supposed to be below the ether
But how did they get up there?
Obviously they can't go up naturally because only air and fire go up in those layers of the world
So it had to be a forced motion
But which one
 
10:00 AM
Is there any way to calculate the number of field lines a magnet (say bar magnet) produce, from one pole to another ?
 
"number"?
 
In the lab I always found that iron filings arrange in a certain way along field lines
 
yes, but
 
And there are finite number of them
 
There are infinitely many field lines
 
10:02 AM
@Slereah In that case field lines should not be visible when iron fillings are arranged isn't it? They should be everywhere around the bar magnet
I am badly confused
 
Well, I don't know if iron fillings would arrange themselves along all field lines
 
number of field lines is not a legit physics question
 
They might bunch up together due to things
 
field lines are just a visual construct to make understanding fields easier
 
10:03 AM
higher density of field lines = larger the strength of the magnetic field
 
There should not be any white space left there
 
Let's find out
 
As there are infinite field lines'
 
Field lines are not real.
 
My guess is that some process makes it so that the filling bunch together due to some process
 
10:04 AM
If you had smaller filinings, you would find less white space.
 
Maybe they get slightly magnetized?
 
The more smaller you make, the less white space you get.
 
"when exposed to a magnetic field, the filings are themselves temporarily magnetized along their long axis"
yeah
Probably why
 
Its seems more to do with shape and size of iron fillings
I am not sure though
 
so they might try to pull adjacent filings to themselves
but field lines are just a mathematical construct
 
10:06 AM
That will form clusters of a certain width depending on the field strength
 
@YashasSamaga What makes them leave white spaces nearby and still form patterns farther away? The iron fillings are small enough to fit in the nearby white spaces.
 
See what I said
 
Firstly, you need to give away the idea that you can "measure" the number of field lines.
 
@Slereah "when exposed to a magnetic field, the filings are themselves temporarily magnetized along their long axis" Agreed. They will form clusters of certain width ? Why? Why not a continuous patterns rather than leaving white spaces between ?
 
Either accept it as infinite or accept it as just a mathematical construct to understand fields.
 
10:09 AM
@YashasSamaga I get that.
 
I am guessing that if you put extremly tiny filings, you will have all the white space filled.
 
Because if you have a continuous cover of iron filings, the magnetic force exerted by nearby iron filings will attract the nearby ones
Up until there are no more filings in proximity
 
And the magnetization near the poles are stronger.
The filings will attract their neighbours more strongly.
check the answer for that Q
 
@Slereah In a continuous stream each iron filling will be attracted from both sides. So that wouldn't make them cluster.
 
Probability has a role to play.
 
10:12 AM
The strength of the attraction isn't the same in both directions
 
If you keep two sets of filings on each side, and then add one randomly, the set to which the random filing goes to becomes stronger.
 
since the field strength is higher closer to the magnet
 
The one which gets stronger, gets even stronger.
because it attracts then earby filings better
 
@Slereah Okay makes sense
 
when one filing goes to one of the set, the domains in the filing get aligned and it behaves like a magnet.
 
10:14 AM
@YashasSamaga I agree with you. Yes.
Thanks @Slereah @YashasSamaga
:)
 

« first day (2298 days earlier)      last day (2634 days later) »