« first day (2593 days earlier)      last day (2336 days later) » 

12:39 AM
@ACuriousMind yo
16
A: How does classical GR concept of space-time emerge from string theory?

Eric ZaslowFirst, you are right in that non-Minkowski solutions to string theory, in which the gravitational field is macroscopic, it should be thought of as a condensate of a huge number of gravitons (which are one of the spacetime particles associated to a degree of freedom of the string). (Aside: a poi...

"First, you are right in that non-Minkowski solutions to string theory, in which the gravitational field is macroscopic, it should be thought of as a condensate of a huge number of gravitons"
can that be made at all precise?
I don't remember seeing anything like that in string theory
the background seemed to be god-given
 
@0celo7 Yes. A modification of the spacetime metric has exactly the same form as the insertion of the vertex operators of gravitons when computing scattering amplitudes. So whether you consider a non-Minkowski metric to be a "background" or an expectation value of a bunch of gravitons is kind-of a matter of taste
 
time for a new pic
 
@ACuriousMind How does this work when the spacetime doesn't admit a flat metric?
 
any ideas?
 
@0celo7 This doesn't depend on what you start with - you can fix a non-flat metric and view modifications of it as a graviton condensate. What you declare a background and what a graviton effect is arbitrary
It's "natural" to consider a flat metric as the "graviton-less" state, but I don't think there's anything forcing that view upon us
 
12:50 AM
flag metric?
 
@ACuriousMind Well that's an interesting question
there are manifolds with no flat metrics
so those must have gravitons?
seems kinda weird
 
Well, condensate here essentially means the VEV of the graviton field is non-zero
I'm not sure that's weird, there's nothing weird about the Higgs having non-zero VEV after all
 
@ACuriousMind maybe not to you!
@ACuriousMind
 
1:25 AM
@0celo7 what's good all around math/phys book to read for leisure?
kinda of like nakahara but more physicsy
 
1:37 AM
Physica electromagnetica de campo electromagnetico et effectu suo in particulas onus electricum habentes tractat. Theoria Maxwelliana vim electricam et vim magneticam in formam theoriae relativitatis speciali congruentem unit. Aequationes Maxwellianae per se describunt campum electricum et campum magneticum et eorum causam imperfectam in particulis onus habentibus. Aequatio Lorentziana vim in particulas onus habentes a campis electricis magneticisque effectam describit. Aequationes Maxwellianae in vacuo sunt basis doctrinae lucis electromagneticae in quo celeritas lucis ...
maybe?
gets the cake for weirdest corner of the internet I've found in a while
 
lol
what is that
english plz
 
that
is Wikipedia in latin
 
urgggggg
i didn't even click it
or read it
you got me
 
@EmilioPisanty I stand in awe
 
@ACuriousMind I know
there's a ridiculous amount of stuff there
 
1:41 AM
Impressive dedication
 
but I mean, surely no one is actually reading that to learn, right?
maybe the articles about Julius Caesar or whatever
but who learns physics in latin?
 
intellectuals
 
and, as a converse, if you're translating the physics pages into Latin, who the hell are you writing for?
it's just an enormous monument to idleness, I should think
 
If we get time travellers from the middle ages these pages might come in handy
 
wait...
how would that even work
 
1:44 AM
Or, conversely, a printout of that would be nice to take with us in journeys to the past
 
you mean if we time travel to the middle ages?
yes
hmm wait i want to fit in too
or, in converse, no
hope i did that right
 
@ooolb Berger, “Nonlinearity and Functional Analysis”
@ACuriousMind Would it? You'd probably get executed for witchcraft
@ooolb Oh, more physicsy
 
Well, I didn't plan on showing it to the inquisition :P
 
@ooolb no clue then
but Berger is still a good math/physics book
if you like legitimate calculus of variations that is
@ACuriousMind Want to do some hellish calculations for me?
 
2:00 AM
Not particularly, no :)
 
urgh
I have to generalize an inequality to when something is nonconstant
and it makes...everything worse
the calculation is already ridiculous
step 1 is to let $\lambda$ be a $C^1$ function in i.gyazo.com/cb89fafec08d2d691b0642403e30596f.png
ugh
 
2:18 AM
@0celo7 what level is it
i only know physicist math
the shady kind
 
Analysis tends to be all over the place
if you know what the final result should be, it's a 2/5
but right now it's a 5/5 because I'm probing blindly
I might need a sharper estimate than I get naively
 
hmm i remembered something
Aug 11 '15 at 16:01, by 0celo7
@ACuriousMind I want to have an analysis fetish for some reason
 
eww
 
this is interesting
did it work out?
 
no
I hate analysis
it's like a heroin addiction
 
2:26 AM
makes sense
 
these estimates are actually quite crude
well, the result isn't fun to write
but it's ok
 
3:18 AM
@0celo7 you alright?
you feel different to me.
 
yes?
what does that mean
 
idk
 
any cool maffs going
 
@BalarkaSen yes
 
good, good
 
3:29 AM
@BalarkaSen I'm working on gradient estimates for conformally harmonic functions. What are you up to
 
Working on schoolwork. I have approximate plans to make infinitesimal progress on Forster today
There's so much to learn I keep getting confused about what to do and end up doing nothing
I'll pick something for a change
 
I need to do my fluid mechanics final
but this proof has got me ensnared
 
3:49 AM
i just went out to buy some peanut butter
but they didn't have any
dunno what to do now
 
well this proof is actually garbage
...the statement isn't even true
damn, I had the inequality backwards in my mind
@ooolb its a PhD level problem :o
 
dunno what your problem is
did you try asking a PhD?
@SirCumference howdy
 
I was given an honorary PhD
 
show
 
in my group's dropbox:
 
4:01 AM
ah i didn't see
who's mat?
wot you're dr. ryan?
 
the organizer
@ooolb it's an inside joke, but yes
 
lmao
urgggg
i just ate a bunch of plain bread because i didn't want to go buy peanut butter anymore
but i regret it now
 
I wonder if I can just cut out part of the manifold and still have the gradient estimate make sense...
As long as everything is bounded near a compact boundary I completely buy it.
If I'm really unhappy I can surgery on an end and kill it with a cutoff function there
In conclusion, this proof is probably correct
 
i wonder if i can still go buy peanut butter and not be full so i can eat it tonight
 
Actually, I don't even really need the constant to be independent of the function, just a global one
gg yau
 
4:07 AM
i am hungry but can't think of what to eat.
 
peanut butter?
 
syrup sandwiches
 
peanut butter can't cure hunger
 
did you ever try eating it with a spoon
 
in Mathematics, 6 mins ago, by Kevin Driscoll
@BalarkaSen This $U$ is real weird. Its an annulus around the equator of a sphere, but antipodal points are identified. So for example rather than rotating by $2 \pi$ to get back where you starter, you can also rotate by $\pi$ and then go down through the equator. Which means if I cut along the equator, and rotate one of the annuli by $\pi$ then glue it back along the cut equator..... that makes it seem like its just $S^1 \times I$?
 
4:08 AM
in large quantities
 
I wonder if any of you knew anything in physics that basically go back to the start after a half turn
 
do it
 
@ooolb how do you like that ACM's roast of you is pinned?
 
uhm
he's embarrassing himself
i feel so idc
 
4:09 AM
nice
@BalarkaSen yo wanna solve an ODE for me?
 
i don't like peanut butter. i prefer strawberry sauce.
 
depending on the ODE
 
@CaptainBohemian jam?
 
i also have like a couple minutes i can afford
 
4:09 AM
@BalarkaSen actually a PDE but it's separable
$\psi_{tyy}=\psi_{yyyy}$
boundary conditions...no clue
 
i am eating strawberry puffs now. But they don't effectively cure my hunger. I think I need to go to some eatery to get some cooked food.
 
hmmm
when i'm hungry and i dunno what to do
i get bread and peanut butter with blueberry jam
and just stuff it with that stuff until it's gushing out
 
@0celo7 So it's u_x = v, u_y = w, w_y = v?
and then you solve for $\psi_{yy} = w$
 
i found dry food can't usually solve my hunger effectively, not knowing why.
 
it's not dry
then soak it in water first
soggy bread...
it will break
 
4:18 AM
@BalarkaSen yeah
it's not...quite what I'm hoping for tho
because then you have to integrate twice...yikes.
 
it looks like a fucked system
 
so-called dry food i mean noncooked food. I have tried many dry food when hungry, finding only peanuts can solve hunger.
 
@CaptainBohemian peanuts in peanut butter are roasted
jam is boiled
you just played yourself
 
@BalarkaSen the nice thing is that you've got some asymptotic conditions that really narrow the space of solutions
 
like what
 
4:21 AM
somehow it's enough to determine a fourth-order PDE
I'm not trying to think too rigorously
 
@BalarkaSen this is actually for an exam so I'm not saying any more
 
oh ok
 
@0celo7 law abiding citizen eh
 
PDEs are out of my league man
 
4:22 AM
@BalarkaSen will you read my thesis?
 
i am a simple ODE man
@0celo7 sure
if you make it readable at least
 
i only like eating peanuts in whole grain, not pulverized peanuts, like peanut butter.
 
Yes. I am including a lot of background
 
you're done?
 
Cool. That'd be dope
 
4:23 AM
@ooolb not even close
 
nice
 
I'm working through the hardest (and most controversial) chapter now
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian It's not you. Food with high water content makes everyone feel more full (compared to a an equivalent amount of dry food). I think this has some interesting science behind it. You could ask on Bio SE ;).
 
can negative research result easily be published?
 
what does that mean
 
4:26 AM
@Blue i have never visited bio SE.
 
@ooolb As in, showing something is not the case, rather than showing that it is.
 
good bot
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian Hmm. So?
 
@CaptainBohemian depends if it's controversial
 
@CaptainBohemian depends on how many people think it's true
 
4:32 AM
but i guess not many people know the formulation i test because the editors usually spend long to find the referees to review it.
 
if you really want it published you can put the preprint on vixra
but it's shady af
 
but i can't upload it there
 
oh ur not in science
 
i have graduated and all of my academic emails are all cancelled
 
vixra doesn't need one i believe
 
4:35 AM
i used yahoo to publish a paper
 
lmao
is that even a thing
 
Anonymous
yahoo!?
 
Anonymous
gosh
 
just make a website and upload it there
so ppl can find it if they search
 
i mean yahoo email
 
Anonymous
4:36 AM
Also uploading on a peer reviewed site doesn't mean publishing
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian wtf...
 
@Slereah uses Yahoo
 
degenerate
 
sigh, nvm
 
4:37 AM
@0celo7 what?
 
i know a uk professor also used yahoo email to publish papers.
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian What's your paper's topic tho ?
 
You heard me
 
@0celo7 say it louder
 
4:38 AM
ooolb u should listen to vaporwave
 
i do sometimes
link me up b
 
feel the vapor
 
@BalarkaSen retarded question (unrelated to exam): I have $\lambda:[0,1]\to\Bbb R$ continuous in a neighborhood of each point of the domain. That means it's continuous on the whole thing and the image is connected, right?
 
inhale the vapor
be the vapor
@0celo7 Locally continuous means globally continuous yes
 
Thanks
Just making sure
 
4:40 AM
oh right
@BalarkaSen did you mean
listen to
$$\mathsf{V \,\,\,\,\,\, A \,\,\,\,\, P \,\,\,\,\, O \,\,\,\,\, R \,\,\,\,\, W \,\,\,\,\, A \,\,\,\,\, V \,\,\,\,\, E}$$
 
yes, A E S T H E T I C C M U S I C
 
I like my music with T H I C C b A S S
 
like Macintosh Plus リサフランク420 / 現代のコンピュ
 
I don't get vaporwave
 
you're not hip enough
 
4:42 AM
I'll hip your butt
 
@0celo7 that [song i linked] has a really thicc bassline
@BalarkaSen i can't believe you didn't watch cowboy bebop
 
should i? i searched around and it looks like a seriously good anime
 
dude
 
i am not big on animes
 
it's not like anime
definitely watch it it's really good
has all the elements i feel you'll like
 
4:46 AM
very nice, i will
 
it's episodic
 
damn
the prof dropped epic hints
 
with a lil story line but not really
 
I'm on the right track
 
@BalarkaSen watch this scene
 
4:46 AM
@BalarkaSen Do you do any real drugs?
 
i love this it's incredibly deep
 
@0celo7 i do the yellow bugpowder
 
(dw about spoilers it's episodic)
 
@BalarkaSen :o
teach me your ways please
 
4:49 AM
Big Sean & Metro collab!????!?!
 
@ooolb damn
 
watch it lol
episode 1 is kind of bad though
don't let it give you a bad first impression
 
@ooolb what's a good yandere anime?
 
actually i found using yahoo email to publish papers is better than using academic email if you are just a student or research assistant because academic email will be cancelled some short time after you graduate or leave your position
 
@ooolb mmkay.
 
4:57 AM
@0celo7 dude do i look like a dude who watches anime?
i've only seen like 7 animes smh
 
Yes.
 
u give off a lo fi hip hop vibe not gonna lie
but good to know you're not an anime boi
 
@BalarkaSen is that a compliment
i used to listen to lo fi
 
well, just a general remark on your online appearance. see, guessed that right
 
@ooolb prolly not
 
4:59 AM
I listened to lo fi before it was cool
 
the one good music tastes are pop music and classical music
 
like in 2015
 

« first day (2593 days earlier)      last day (2336 days later) »