seems like it worked

ubuntu

@JohnRennie flavour?

On my Christian chat you're calling it flavour of Linux

@enumaris sudo service ssh start

but the command I issued seems to have worked...

@BernardoMeurer "Christian chat" wtf?

and I think I remember on ubuntu 16.04 it's systemctl not service anymore

@BernardoMeurer does that make me an Arch enemy?

@DanielSank It's a meme

@JohnRennie No, you don't run Ubuntu

@enumaris well try typing sudo service ssh restart and see what happens ...

@BernardoMeurer wat

Why would a Christian chat be shocking?

@JohnRennie Is Ubuntu not on systemd ?

@0celo7 Because I have never previously encountered any reason to believe that this chatroom were religious.

also seems to work..?

You miss a lot of stuff.

I don't get any error message

I'd have to get my laptop to see if I actually started ssh or not

@DanielSank It's just something you say when someone commits heresy

are you a software engineer?

Me?

yeah

I'm a child

I'm a CS major

Ah

makes sense heh

@BernardoMeurer is a very good programmer.

He wrote his own OS.

wow

...but I think it didn't have a working file system.

It doesn't, it also doesn't have a proper allocator... yet

Soon

@BernardoMeurer I will let you run it on my machine

does it have a GUI

on a separate hard drive and I have to disconnect the others

@enumaris it doesn't even have a shell

lol

@0celo7 It doesn't support UEFI (I think?)

u mean like a command line?

Yeah

it's just a kernel

how do u input commands and stuff then? o.o

then wtf does it do

You don't

it boots

o

And demos some stuff

Like memory allocation

boots on what

A VM

your calculator?

I also tested on an old machine

No, but good idea!

I'd need to rewrite the bootloader for ARM

I have an old MacBook pro ~2008

so is most of it like...

getting all the different hardware of the computer to work together...

@enumaris It's a tour-de-force

It's not meant to be usable

I dunno what actually a OS is supposed to do behind the scenes

it's meant to say "Look, I know x86 and C well enough that I can write a basic kernel."

like how much is included in the OS and how much is...like...hardwired or hardcoded into the hardware?

Except it's written in Rust :P

I dunno what that means

:/

lol

I would like to explain, but I'm half busy

is it compatible with multiple types of hardware?

I can't teach CArch right now

Yes, if you write a bootloader for the respective architecture

uhhhhh

I only wrote it for x86_64

lol, maybe when u have time u can tell me what that means lol

@enumaris Ask me again tomorrow after 1800 PST

alright XD

I can give you a tour of how computer works, what a kernel is and what it does

sounds interesting

We'll learn about how RAM works, what's pagination, syscalls, and so on

of those words, I know RAM

lol

And honestly this stuff is hard

I only learned enough CS to code some physics

that's about it

It took me and one of the engineers at @DanielSank's lab a good 20 minutes to figure out pagination code, lol

and then I learned some machine learning stuff by myself in my free time

20 minutes doesn't sound too bad..

On that note, @DanielSank, god bless Kunal's soul, he saved me so much time that afternoon

@enumaris 20 minutes for a CS student who focuses on low-level and a hard-core engineer to figure out something trivial is bad :P

ah..

@BernardoMeurer Kunal is awesome.

20 minutes is bad?

are computer people geniuses

Yeah, he is, I really like him

@0celo7 It'd be like you and your advisor spending 20 minutes trying to show something is a manifold

@BernardoMeurer Hard core with a PhD, no less.

Something not insane

@DanielSank Yep

...that depends entirely on what the something is

It definitely took me more than 20 minutes to understand what a manifold is

@0celo7 Hey so, why are you so mean to me?

What?

I don't even talk to you. How can I be mean?

the silent treatment is kinda mean

@0celo7 Lately, your comments toward me have been somewhat acerbic. Are you under stress?

@enumaris I think it took most people more than 20 minutes to understand what a manifold is

@DanielSank He has an ulcer

Ah.

@DanielSank Apologies if you feel addressed by me. I'll try to avoid that in the future.

@BernardoMeurer No I don't.

@0celo7 You just don't know it yet

How on earth is that not obviously addressed to me?

oh

::Shrug:: I have a bad memory.

I've been reading DanielSank's username as DanielSan...I thought...a karate kid fan...

uhhh....

almost...done...

1940s topology is awful

@DanielSank Am I weird to much prefer "Dr. Bar" to "Foo Bar; PhD" ?

what on Earth is going on

The second one sounds more cocky somehow

@0celo7 That's not a proof

No way

well there's more

but I can't tell if he's saying it's surjective, injective, or something else

Lol I think he's just saying it's a function

Old math is so weird

I read a homework assignment I wrote which was a review of ADM GR...it kinda made my eyes bleed

TouchID really doesn't work for me

@BernardoMeurer why

I don't know

is it your phone or you

It just doesn't read my fingers

get someone else to try it

Probably me

maybe the lack of alcohol is causing your fingers to disintegrate

@enumaris why

the formulas were too long

lol

yeah they can get bad

@0celo7 Not unlikely

I have to do the ADM formalism from scratch in the seminar I'm helping to organize

not looking forward to rederiving all this crap

lol

why do u do so much pure math and physics as an engineer?

all just personal interest?

I'm not an engineer

You're an engineer major tho?

no

-.-

so u lied?

no.

@BernardoMeurer don't tell him

uh...

@enumaris there's only one possibility left

(assuming I'm not insane)

lol

I remembered wrong?

I do recall you saying you were an engineer of some sort, or that you were an engineering major of some sort...

past tense

@enumaris He's a physicist

@BernardoMeurer Nah, that makes sense to me.

Jk

@BernardoMeurer those are fighting words

@0celo7 Is a set theorist

set theorist...

I'm not a degenerate type of philosopher

take that back

@0celo7 That is an unreasonable assumption.

@DanielSank Excuse you.

u should develop Wheeler's superspace into a more formal formalism...and then get to the real dynamical variables by removing the Hamiltonian constraint

sounds like a fun project

go go gadget physicist

I don't know anything about that part

@0celo7 My bad, I was joking

@enumaris He's actually just an algebrist

@BernardoMeurer is a poor troll

so what was an algebra again

x+4=17 something like that right

data transfer finish...finallyyyy

hmmm so it's taking me about as much time to load the training arrays into memory as it does to actually train on them...almost the same amount of time...which means...I can do a lot better if I go for a parallelized version...probably...