« first day (2575 days earlier)      last day (2353 days later) » 

12:02 AM
@ACuriousMind Is, by some miracle, $M\setminus\{p\}$ always orientable?
 
Don't think so - at least the Möbius band being orientable if you remove a point feels weird to me
 
$M$ is a closed manifold.
what is $\Bbb RP^2$ minus a point?
Just a disk, right?
that can't be, because putting the point back shouldn't change the orientability
The punctured RP2 is a mobius band
well, that's not good.
@ACuriousMind Ok, I have another doubt
Suppose $\tilde M\to M$ is a double covering. Is there a way to pull back $M\# T^n$ to get $\tilde M\# T^n\# T^n$ or something?
 
 
1 hour later…
1:22 AM
(yes, there is)
 
@ACuriousMind o_O
 
1:35 AM
@DanielSank That's not true, he's saying it would be strange if it were.
 
2:21 AM
Heading to the beach for a run and quick swim
 
@0celo7 Sure - you just take the preimage under the covering map of the disk you're cutting out from $M$, and that gives you two disjoint disks in $\bar{M}$ you can use to do $\#T\#T$, no?
 
@ACuriousMind Make me minister of memes for Namibia
 
@ACuriousMind Yeah, see the comment right after.
@ACuriousMind I want to draw this for a seminar talk. What's a good double covering?
ideally a 2-manifold
 
@0celo7 $S^2$ and $\mathbb{R}P^2$?
 
@ACuriousMind Well sure, but if I could draw the latter I'd be a topologist.
 
2:33 AM
Well, I think the only double cover I can draw is $S^1\to S^1$ :P
 
(although I do want it to be an orientation covering in the end)
@ACuriousMind lol
I wish I knew where my algebraic topology homeworks were
there was some neat stuff in there
 
@ACuriousMind Buy the Dragon Book
 
@BernardoMeurer Huh?
 
2:35 AM
It's the reference on compiler construction
 
@ACuriousMind For reference, I am studying manifolds of the form $M\# T^n$ where $M$ is orientable. If it isn't, then I can do that unfolding to work with $(\tilde M\# T^n)\# T^n$ instead and it works just as well.
$M\# T^n$ is a natural compactification for AF spaces
 
2:55 AM
@dmckee o/
 
@BernardoMeurer I have a fortran group project
 
@BernardoMeurer Everyone should read the Crenshaw Tutorial before embarking on the dragon book.
 
how much do I have to pay you to write the pseudocode
 
@0celo7 How large is the project?
@dmckee Oooh, I didn't know that
 
It puts the whole subject on a grounded an nonmysterious footing.
 
3:01 AM
I bought the book
 
I haven't looked too carefully, but it seems like something with the heat equation
 
@BernardoMeurer It's my opinion rather than a general rule.
But I stand by it.
 
@dmckee Link?
 
@BernardoMeurer You can find the tutorial on line, and its a quick read.
Looking...
 
Aha
Alright, I'll read it :)
Good lord this is unreadable
I'll format it in LaTeX
 
3:03 AM
kek
@BernardoMeurer do you want to see the typesetting in my thesis? It's top notch
 
@dmckee Thanks for the recommendation! Anything else I should know before starting to write my C compiler?
 
I think I used the plain text files.
 
@0celo7 ye
 
@BernardoMeurer Uh ... get a subset working first. It's not a huge project, but it's nice to have something to show halfway along.
 
@dmckee Alright, got it :)
How's the kid?
 
3:06 AM
 
@BernardoMeurer She's grasping, rolling over, and very sure of what she wants. Sleeping pretty well, though.
 
@dmckee Glad to hear all is well, specially wrt to sleep!
 
ready for diff geo yet?
 
That is indeed top notch
No
I left that life behind me
 
I meant her
@BernardoMeurer what??
 
3:08 AM
Oh, good
 
3:52 AM
@Semiclassical So I've managed to wrap my head around the positive mass theorem literature. I'm about to offer to give more talks next semester. Is that a mistake?
 
4:29 AM
allo... just wonderin’ if the chat community could identify subfields of physics where the majority of submissions for peer review are NOT in LaTeX. I mean: are there subfields of physics where the bulk of manuscripts are submitted in MSWord for instance? Anecdotally LaTeX is completely dominant in theoretical physics, and a simple survey of arXiv submissions suggests most of these are in LaTeX... but there might be exceptions.
 
5:05 AM
0
Q: A moderator understood and answered my question but put it was put on hold as unclear?

ProcreatorI asked this question Zero Radiation Nuclear Bomb Possible? and a moderator completely understood my question, provided an answer and mention he would like to see other answers, but it still got put on hold for being unclear after he posted. How is this? I believe that it was too quickly dismis...

0
Q: After Three years .......:p

user33995After three years I returned to stackexchange to ask one question...Because it was not recieved well, I am now banned from asking with this account. Really ? Three years on and there is no room for one honest question? I have had a few poorly recieved questions in the past but I have also had a ...

 
5:45 AM
@JohnRennie I can't tell if I'm contrarian, insane, or both
 
Everyone's insane except for the two of us - and I'm not so sure about you ...
 
@0celo7 you're fine. Just do you bro
:)
 
@0celo7 why the sudden crisis of sanity?
If you're wondering if it's normal to be fascinated by abstruse maths then then the answer is clearly no, but by that measure we're all too many standard deviations from the mean
 
@JohnRennie my personal philosophy is against net neutrality
I think I’m in a very, very small minority on the issue
 
That doesn't make you insane :-)
(just wrong :-)
 
5:51 AM
I can’t find a single argument for it that’s not an argument by entitlement or whining
 
You don't seem to believe in a caring society.
... but then that's not compulsory
 
@JohnRennie not a single bit.
I am perhaps the greatest misanthrope ever, but not crazy enough to do anything about it.
 
I think in general Europeans believe we make the world a better place by helping the less privileged.
This varies from country to country.
 
Oh, that’s probably true.
But I don’t consider “making the world a better place” to be a part of government policy
 
The sad reality is that people don't do it on their own. It's not that we're all bastards, but that there is always something more important to spend our money on closer to home.
 
5:58 AM
It’s all about the initiation of violence. And in this case, net neutrality is violence against the ISPs, whereas the converse is...no one really knows.
@JohnRennie I know, hence my misanthropeness
 
The ISPs are just companies. They take money from us, spend some of on running their business and keep the remainder as profit. Net neutrality isn't doing violence against the ISPs, but you can argue it raises the charges the ISPs levy on us.
 
Jesus Christ the reddit posts are awful. “We don’t wanna pay for reddit”. Literally.
 
In effect we all pay a bit more to keep the Internet a level playing field.
 
@JohnRennie if you ban someone from doing something you’re threatening violence if they don’t comply.
 
All companies are subject to regulation, and for good reason.
 
6:01 AM
Maybe a good reason for you, but I find it indefensible.
 
This is just one aspect of the regulation.
Actually I might well have agreed with you when I was 18. You really do mellow as you get older - it isn't just a saying.
 
I am very mellow
I am so mellow that i don’t think anyone should be telling anyone what to do
That’s about as mellow as it gets
I am the ultimate hippy. And with that, I’m going to bed
 
You're telling government that they can't require net neutrality
i.e. you're telling them not to do something
In effect you're saying everyone should live the way you consider best. That isn't not telling anyone what to do.
 
@JohnRennie low effort argument
 
@ZeroTheHero I have a former student doing grad school in space science, and in her end of things most stuff is MS because of NASA.
 
6:04 AM
No, it's a perspective failure on your part.
 
The government is an illegitimate group
 
You're failing to see the beam in your own eye
 
no
 
6:26 AM
@0celo7 I really wish you weren't so unbearable sometimes
I don't know what the h-bar does to you
 
7:04 AM
There is a kind of purity to libertarian theorizing that is very appealing—I desperately want to believe in it myself and think that more than a few thing in the way the US is organized could be improved by a applying a more libertarian approach.
 
The problem is that libertarianism would work well if people were basically nice. Sadly we aren't.
 
And of course real working governances violate the deepest core ideas at some level. (Or like most of the real life pockets of anarchy that do or have existed in place they are embedded in a polty with such a governace and get some support services from it).
 
In Europe we elect governments to make us do the things we should do if we were caring human beings but that we wouldn't do if it were down to us.
 
Which leads the theorizer to question if those governing structures are morally supportable.
Been there done that.
 
I think Americans generally have a belief in their own infallibility that seems naive to us Europeans.
 
7:08 AM
@JohnRennie The theororizers like to imagine a social structure that reinforces the good tendencies and thereby controls the ill. See Vinge's "The Ungoverned" for instance.
But at best we don't have examples of those structures that work at scales bigger than a few time the human monkey group size.
Dunbar's number is a suggested cognitive limit to the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships—relationships in which an individual knows who each person is and how each person relates to every other person. This number was first proposed in the 1990s by British anthropologist Robin Dunbar, who found a correlation between primate brain size and average social group size. By using the average human brain size and extrapolating from the results of primates, he proposed that humans can comfortably maintain only 150 stable relationships. Dunbar explained it informally...
At worst such things are not possible.
 
Vinge, Heinlein et al have proposed lots of social arrangements that would work brilliantly if all humans were like Vinge/Heinlein's protagonists. But we aren't.
 
So, the question for the disillusioned still kinda a libertarian is "How to make this mess we have suck a little bit less?"
 
The solution is simple: kill everyone
 
But it can take a while to get the idealism beaten out of you, and in the mean time ...
 
@BernardoMeurer that is certainly an effective solution :-)
 
7:27 AM
 
Sid
7:45 AM
@dmckee the sleeping part. Who is sleeping well? You or She?
 
Anonymous
@0celo7 For the sequence space $s$, if $|\xi_i-\eta_i|$ blows up as $i\to\infty$, does the metric $d=\sum_i\frac{1}{2^{i}}(|\xi_i-\eta_i|)/(1+|\xi_i-\eta_i|)$ still remain defined (always)? I mean the limit as $i\to\infty$, could be infinite (for $|\xi_i-\eta_i|$), and we'd then get a $\frac{\infty}{\infty}$ for the distance function's terms (ending terms)...which may either be finite or undefined. Is there something more to the definition of the metric (which is implicit) ?
 
Anonymous
@Sid Lol, use your common sense :P
 
Sid
I read this extremely funny article on cats vs babies a few days ago. I wonder if that is also dmckee's experience
 
 
2 hours later…
9:48 AM
Ok done coding for this session
going to grab food, watch tv and then head to bed
 
10:27 AM
I managed to spill some epoxy hardener while repairing the laptop I bought yesterday, and it's horrible sticky stuff. So to clean it up I tried (in increasing order of desperation):
- alcohol
- white spirit
- trichloroethylene
and nothing worked.
Then I do what I should have done at the outset and Google for how to clean epoxy hardener and ...
... it turns out it's water soluble. Warm water does the trick! Doh :-)
 
@JohnRennie Lesson learned for today :)
 
Indeed :-)
The laptop is great by the way. One dab of epoxy and a replacement disk later and it's as good as new. That was £54.78 well spent :-)
 
10:44 AM
hahaha :)
 
@JohnRennie are you gonna sell it on or just keep it and use it as one of many parts to build your laptop obelisk
 
@Phase I was going to use it for experiments with upgrading the CPU. I had thouht it would be a bit battered so ideal as a testbed, but now I find it's in very nice condition. Now I'm not sure whether to use it for testing or not.
I'll probably use it as my main workstation for a couple of weeks just to convince myself it's really all perfect, then decide what to do.
 
@JohnRennie I can just imagine you diving scrooge mcDuck style into a pool of laptops
@ACuriousMind jesus christ Planescape's intro cinematic is so edgy
 
@Phase It's from the 90s
 
Ok that's scary why did he just appear
 
10:53 AM
That's what was cool back then ;)
 
@ACuriousMind that seemingly unnatural reflex time to enter the h bar is proof you're an AI
 
@JohnRennie Haha
@Phase lol, you just got lucky I entered the room right now
And I'm only up that early because I was woken up by a phone call :P
 
ohai
 
@ACuriousMind should I play on Enhanced mode?
It says it gives me a larger FoV, does that ruin any of the difficulty of combat?
 
I don't know what "Enhanced mode" is
I have an original edition of it, and use mods to make it a) run on modern computers without choking and b) have a larger FoV than an ant.
 
10:56 AM
Ill just go with Enhanced
 
I see nothing bad with it
Remember: Int/Wis/Cha stats here have more impact than in your usual D&D game, if you played any before
 
Nope I havent
but I already went like full int wis cha
because they tend to the most fun stats imo
Im like 15/16/17/9/9/9
inb4 get killed in one shot
 
@Phase Well, in something like Baldur's Gate or NWN they are almost completely useless unless one of them is a special stat for your character class.
(you don't get to pick a character class in Planescape, just play the game and options to change it will appear)
In unrelated news, I think this is the first time in over a week that the sun is actually shining here. I had almost forgotten how nice sunlight is
 
11:12 AM
@ACuriousMind morte is great
 
Yes, he is (I had him as my profile picture before you were around, I think)
 
@Phase it is best to use a modern version, yes
Planescape Torment the original version runs very poorly on modern PCs
 
"Did you see the way she was checking me out?"
Well Im glad the enhanced edition is so smooth
 
It's one of those 90's game that was made with very specifically 90's PCs in mind
 
11:26 AM
hm
I found the note from one of the raised dead, and it says "click the use button below in this screen" but theres no button of the sort
 
It's a blue button with white "Use" in it at the bottom of the box in which the text about the inventory item is written, iirc
 
am i blind? :(
 
Oh, I have to d it from the actual inventory not the quick item slot
What a weird requirement
 
@ACuriousMind hi, hope it s not a bother, are you in mood for a question regarding our discussion the other day? or is it a poor timing?
 
11:34 AM
@user929304 Ah, there was a ping from you I didn't respond to yet, right? Sorry about that, it just slipped through the cracks
 
@ACuriousMind no worries of course. Have you seen this post? (specially the answer by Zachos) physics.stackexchange.com/questions/333024/…
 
@user929304 Hadn't seen it, but sure, I see it now
What troubles you about it?
 
@ACuriousMind what I m confused about is, in that example, where essentially we re dealing with an explicitly time dependent hamiltonian, it seems that we lose the equivalence between heisenberg and schrodinger picture, and as a result the "interaction picture" becomes a necessity to remedy the situation. Is that at all true? or is there still a way to show the equivalence of H-SCH pictures that holds for time dependent and independent cases?
 
@user929304 No, we don't lose equivalence. They're still unitarily equivalent by $H_H \leftrightarrow U^\dagger H_SU$ at each point in time.
I think you're confused about what equivalence of the pictures means, but I can't quite tell what you think it means so I don't know how to convince you of the correct notion ;)
 
@ACuriousMind well i understood equivalence in practical terms, that either theory, when it comes to predict average values of observables, they would turn out in agreement with experiment, so it would not matter which picture I used to express that average, the result will be the same
 
11:54 AM
@user929304 Then, indeed, the pictures are equivalent in that sense
 
I already have no clue where to go
 
help
I have Disco Inferno stuck in my head
 
$\langle \psi_H\vert A_H\vert \psi_H\rangle = \langle \psi_S\vert A_S\vert \psi_S\rangle = \langle \psi_I \vert A_I\vert \psi_I\rangle$ for all states $\psi$ and all operators $A$.
 
I just gave the Fiend lady needle and thread, but now all the doors seem to be locked and I cant find any body with the number 42 which is my only lead
Burn baby Burn, Disco inferno!
Is that helping?
 
not very
 
11:56 AM
Turns out 50 cent also has a song titled "Disco Inferno"
 
@ACuriousMind aha! thanks. So there was no need per se for the interaction picture, right?
 
@user929304 The need is that it's very hard to actually compute these things in the other two pictures.
 
Isn't the whole interaction picture thing a lie
 
@Slereah Only in QFT :P
 
Oh well
 
11:59 AM
@ACuriousMind makes sense. was my gut feeling as well. Do you happen to know of nice texts (paper or book) where this equivalence is carefully explained? (among the main 3 pictures of QM)
 
Interaction is where the time dependence is in both the state and the operator right?
Like a mixed schrodinger / heisenberg picture?
 
@user929304 I'm not sure what there is to explain that would justify a text devoting much time to it. At the level of ordinary QM, you're just taking $\langle \psi\vert U^\dagger A U\vert \psi \rangle$ and defining $\psi_{H/S/I}$ and $A_{H/S/I}$ differently, but the actual value of the expression never changes.
Switching between the pictures is basically just a time-dependent basis change of your Hilbert space by the unitary time evolution operator(s)
The only potential problem, which is the problem that essentially leads to Haag's theorem in QFT, is that this unitary basis change may not respect the commutation relations of the algebra of observables, but for ordinary QM, the Stone-von Neumann theorem guarantees that nothing can happen at least for the usual algebra of $x^i$s and $p_i$s
 
@ACuriousMind thanks, is a good way of summing it up. I m learning a lot;)
 
Isn't there also a potential problem for unbounded operators?
Or am I misremembering that
 
@ACuriousMind in retrospect, was what Zachos saying in that post true then? I mean he seemed to suggest "we lose the equivalence" in the time-dependent case
 
12:05 PM
@Slereah Yes, the SvN theorem really only works for the exponentiated/bounded version of the commutation relations, but I don't think that's a good detail to go into right now ;P
@user929304 I don't see where he would suggest that
 
@ACuriousMind Damn you and your quantum lies
 
OH COME ON WHERE DO I GO
I EVEN KILLED THE NICE MEDIC LADY FOR A KEY AND I STILL DONT KNOW WHERE TO GO
 
Where are you @Phase
 
@ACuriousMind "The crucial point is that, as you implicitly noticed, the Heisenberg Hamiltonian is not the Schroedinger Hamiltonian, by contrast to the time-independent case"
 
why did you kill the nice lady
 
12:07 PM
@user929304 Which is true, but does not suggest the pictures are inequivalent.
 
You monster
 
The beginning, the medic lady stitched me up and I bashed her head in with a zombie arm
Because I thought she might have a key I needed to get out :(
 
Though to be fair you're basically never coming back to that floor after that
Wait, yes you are
But that's fairly far
 
That $H_H\neq H_S$ does not imply that $\langle \psi_H\vert H_H\vert \psi_H\rangle \neq \langle \psi_S\vert H_S \vert \psi_S\rangle$.
 
@ACuriousMind ah I see. I guess what is most confusing is that I dont see what the time dependence or independence changes in the matter at hand :(
 
12:08 PM
Now I have a loud ringing
and zombies chasing me
oh my god
oh my god
I wanted to know if it autosaved and if I could reload
and now im at the main menu because "cancel" doesn't actually mean "cancel"
i'm gonna kill that medic lady so many times
 
@user929304 Time dependence means that the Hamiltonian no longer commutes with the time evolution $U$, since $U$ is no longer a simple exponential of $H$. In the time-independent case, they commute, so $H_H = U^\dagger H_S U = U^\dagger U H_S = H_S$, which is not valid in the time-dependent case
 
Im angry
 
@Phase chill
 
@ACuriousMind oh wow! I thought H and U always commuted! sigh... Ive got it all wrong
 
They suck
Why are you afraid of zombies
Why are you afraid of zombies
You can basically kill them all at this stage of the game
 
12:13 PM
@ACuriousMind I wonder, how do we go about relating $H_H$ and $H_S$ in the time dependent case?
 
@user929304 Well, as Cosmas writes, $H_H = U^\dagger H_S U$, you just can't simplify that relation in the time-dependent case.
 
@ACuriousMind ah indeed, sorry silly me :) many thanks for your patient explanations and your time, I ll carefully go through these again. My knowledge of QM seems completely shaken at the moment now that I ve learned H and U don't always commute...
 
@user929304 You're welcome, I'm here to explain things, after all ;)
 
@ACuriousMind :) really appreciate it
 
Ok @Slereah where do I go
I wasnt but
 
12:18 PM
Lemme check the map
 
I put points into Wis and wanted to talk to the guard and wasnt sure if he would if I basically had just killed everyone
 
Where are you currently
Are you still on the same floor as when you started
 
WHAT
THERE ARE STAIRS?????
 
I CHECKED THE MAP AND SAW "STAIRS"
 
12:19 PM
Did u not notice
Those little stair-shaped things
 
oh my god either they're camouflaged really well or I'm dumb because until now I didnt
I thought it was just like, collapsed wall / weird tiered wall thing
The pathing in combat isn't.. great..
 
yeah, combat is kind of a weak point of the game
but it's mostly fine
 
g'damnit after all that I had to go be a mong and tell a Dustman "yo dude I woke up dead"
guess Im rolling with the punches
 
So much for the diplomatic route
 
Ikr
oh nice
all i have to do is die to reset the alarm
 
12:32 PM
Yeah
ur immortal, that helps
though beware, there's a few ways to get a game over
Not a lot but there are
 
HOLY MOLY
those skeletons hit hard
11 damage
 
true, but*
you're immortal
you should be fine
 
indeed
 
@Phase Welcome to the plight of AD&D low-level characters ;)
 
IIRC old DnD games are literally DnD
Which means the computer just rolls dices according to the rules
 
12:43 PM
@ACuriousMind never played old DnD games or DnD
 
A lvl 1 wizard without CON modifiers has 4 HP and is killed by pretty much everything if it hits them.
 
to be fair a physics student is basically a wizard and I'm pretty sure I have 4 HP
 
Baldur's Gate's first few maps are essentially an exercise in reloading unless you start abusing the AI e.g. by kiting with one character while shooting at the enemy with the other
 
I don't remember Baldur's Gate being that hard either
Though I did save and reload a lot :p
It's all about finding the right order to fight the enemies in
 
@Slereah It's not hard, just annoying!
It gets much better after lvl 3 or so
 
12:46 PM
Baldur's Gate was pretty disappointing after Planescape
very basic fantasy plot
 
@Slereah Oh, you played BG after P:T?
 
yeah
 
Much better the other way around, at least for BG1. I think BG2 is still great, storywise
 
the only RPG I actually played when I was a kid was this
Which I remember liking
 
Just did the British physics olympiad.... best 3 hours of my life, naturally.
 
12:51 PM
did u win
 
Nah it was a test paper
like round one or something.
no winnin
 
wack
 
yeah but there was a fun gravity question...
got to derive keplars 3rd for a few marks.
 
Who is Keplars
 
you know... this bloke
 
12:53 PM
I know :p
 
oh wait I spelt his name wrong :c
sorry
didn't noticeeee..
 
I think I just talked a dead man out of killing himself
 
ummmm... good?
 
@Phase By far not the weirdest thing you'll do in this game
 
ohh wait. you're talking about a game...
that was... weird.
 
12:58 PM
@CooperCape How would you talk a dead man out of killing himself in real life?
Do you regularly communicate with the dead?
 
@CooperCape it's a game where you get a wooden board and a glass lens
 
Planescape Torment technically has an alignment system but I'm not 100% sure it matters that much?
 
I was marginally confused... then again I am by most things.
 
I think the ending differs
I dunno about much else
 
Im gonna tip my fedora at everyone and be a nice guy
 
12:58 PM
I mean yeah... I get psychic sammy on the case to talk to my grandma...
 
except for the people I've already killed brutally with my large hammer
 
hmmm
I might... just... leave.
 

« first day (2575 days earlier)      last day (2353 days later) »