« first day (2138 days earlier)      last day (2794 days later) » 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

8:14 PM
@ACuriousMind "Geschliffen und poliert wird immer ziehend."?
What does Ziehend mean
 
pulling
 
I know that's what the word means
 
I'm guessing it's telling you to make motions toward you, not away from you
 
Hmm.
 
8:34 PM
@HDE226868 One good rule of thumb is that any question which ceases to make sense when you remove the code blocks is off topic here.
The thing that appears in our help center is that questions about implementation details are off topic here. Other computational physics questions may be on topic.
 
@DavidZ Nice.
 
@DavidZ Okay, cool. I wasn't going to include any code in my question; it boils down to a question about an algorithm as applied to astrophysics.
 
That might be on topic for us, then
Can you summarize the question? Maybe I can be more specific
 
Sure. I'm working on a program in Python that integrates the equations of stellar structure using a fourth-order Runge Kutta method. I was wondering if, in this particular application, there's a significant advantage to using higher-order RK methods (I know that RK4 is by far the most common).
 
what the hell is a silicon wafer
 
8:39 PM
@HDE226868 OK, well... that's borderline. The chances of it being on topic are high enough IMO that you could just post it and see what happens, but I think it might fit better at Computational Science
 
@DavidZ Thanks. I'll try it over there.
 
Also the answer is probably no, because the answer is almost always no to that sort of question :-P
 
I figured, but I was curious, especially because I was going to start with relatively large timesteps.
 
Likely the increase in accuracy from decreasing the time step is going to be a lot more significant than the difference between RK4 and higher-order methods
But I guess I can't really say without knowing the details
 
You know, I might as well just test it out myself.
No need to ask other people to do something which I can figure out by putting in some more effort.
 
8:45 PM
For reasonable amounts more effort
 
True.
 
But yeah, this is easy. In particular, you could test with a variety of step sizes (like $h$, $h/2$, $h/4$, etc.) with RK4, RK6, and RK8, and see (1) whether they approach the same solution as you extrapolate $h\to 0$, and (2) whether the rate at which they approach that solution depends on the order of the method
In theory, the error of an n'th order method should scale as $h^n$
 
9:25 PM
@ACuriousMind Any clue what "Vor dem

Ablösen des Präparats wird das überstehende Probematerial mit einer

Hartmetallspitze am äußeren Rand des Lochgrids angeritzt, damit es sich nach dem

Ablösen leicht entfernen lässt." means?
 
@0celo7 You should scratch the excess material that sticks out at the edge before you peel off the sample.
 
9:56 PM
@HDE226868 Can I ask what for? I'm working on something similar and I might have to do neutron star stellar structure integration soonish.
 
10:36 PM
@Loong I'm confused, why?
 
@NeuroFuzzy I'm just doing it for fun. I've been learning Python and also reading Schwarzschild's text on stellar astrophysics, so I decided to combine the two.
 
I don't know what edge they're talking about
 
@0celo7 because then it is easier to completely remove the excess material later, after you took out the sample.
@0celo7 "at the outer edge of the hole grid"
 
11:21 PM
Is there a procedure wherein we can go through questions without an accepted answer and, as a community, vote to mark one of the existing answers as good enough?
I ask this because @Danu previously suggested "answer the unanswered questions" sprints, and while I like that idea, I'd rather do it if there were a way of getting stuff marked as accepted.
 
58
Q: Would it be possible to have a "community accepted" feature?

George IVRecently, I have answered a few questions that were upvoted by factors more than the accepted answer, but not accepted. This one, at the time of my writing, has an accepted answer that the asker said was not what he wanted. I don't know why. In the future, when people view this, people might only...

 
@Loong What excess material though
@Loong the sample is stuck to the hole grid
you're not peeling it off of the hole grid
 
11:41 PM
@Loong Thanks.
 
@0celo7 If your sample already has a plain edge and you don't have to remove any excess material, then, I guess, you don't need to scratch it.
 
@Loong plain edge?
 
@0celo7 I don't know how your sample and the hole grid look like.
 
@Loong I don't know either
I'm translating a paper for my prof
But I'm not removing the sample from the hole grid
so what am I using the carbide thing for
the sample is stuck to a pice of glass
I glue it to the hole grid
I then remove the sample from the glass using acetone
where does the carbide come into play?
 
11:58 PM
@0celo7 well, your sentence is talking about removal
3 hours ago, by 0celo7
@ACuriousMind Any clue what "Vor dem

Ablösen des Präparats wird das überstehende Probematerial mit einer

Hartmetallspitze am äußeren Rand des Lochgrids angeritzt, damit es sich nach dem

Ablösen leicht entfernen lässt." means?
@0celo7 you would use a hard carbide tool to scratch the material
 
01:00 - 20:0020:00 - 00:00

« first day (2138 days earlier)      last day (2794 days later) »