« first day (2192 days earlier)      last day (2740 days later) » 

user228700
9:00 AM
@JohnRennie Yeah, sorry, this is what I mean.
 
Mew
Indeed John Rennie's equation is equivalent to negative gradient
RE-arranging John rennies gives m1 = -m2
 
Well the gradient of the tangent at a point $(x,y)$ on the ellipse is just $dy/dx$
If you start with $a^2x^2 + b^2y^2 = c^2$ then, erm, $a^22xdx+b^22ydy = 0$ ... is that right, hang on I'd grab a pen and paper.
 
user228700
No, wait.
 
Mew
It's just a simple oval. Look at it, the fall/run of the top gradient is the same as the rise/run of the bottom gradient
and since rise = -fall
...
 
@Mew: yes but K wants to show it algebraically
 
user228700
9:05 AM
I have an equation with $m$ in it!
 
user228700
I want to go from there.
 
What equation with $m$ in it?
 
user228700
47 mins ago, by Kaumudi
Yes, they are! The equation $y=mx ± \sqrt{a^2m^2+b^2}$ gives the equation of two parallel tangents to an ellipse (Notice, same slope!) with diff. y-intercepts.
 
That's not an equation for $m$
i.e. that doesn't tell you what $m$ is for the tangent at a point $(x,y)$ on the ellipse.
 
user228700
No, it's not, but I can substitute a point to make it an equation of $m$.
 
user228700
9:08 AM
And no, not a point on the ellipse.
 
You've lost me ...
That's the general form of a tangent to the ellipse. To get a particular tangent you have to say which point on the ellipse the tangent passes through.
 
user228700
If Ik the value of (x,y) to substitute in that equation, I get a quadratic in $m$.
 
Mew
@JohnRennie, can you please derive an equation for the gradient, m, in terms of the value x
 
user228700
I mean, I can take any value of $(x,y)$ outside the ellipse and plug it in to get a quadratic in $m$.
 
Those are the two tangents that equation describes.
 
user228700
9:12 AM
Yeah.
 
user228700
We substitute some value of $(x,y)$ that satisfies one of these tangents, doesn't matter which one.
 
Mew
alright
enuf of this non-sense
I"ll show you how it's done
let's start with the equation
 
Ah, OK. You're saying that if we choose an arbitrary point $(x,y)$ outside the ellipse then which tangent(s) pass through that point?
 
Mew
x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = c
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yeah.
 
Mew
9:13 AM
now take the derivative of both sides with respect to x
 
^ $c^2$
 
Mew
yeah
who cares we're getting rid of it next step lol
we then get
2x/a^2 + (2y/b^2)*(dy/dx) = 0
therefore, dy/dx = b^2x/(ya^2)
now here we can see that for an elipse centred at 0, for a given x, you can get y or -y
subbing in shows you get a + or - answer of equyal magnitude for dy/dx
if the elipse isn't centred, it still applies but we need an equation for y in terms of x
that is y = +-sqrt(b^2(c^2 - x^2/a^2))
 
Like so?
 
Mew
put that into the equation
correct
except that diagram is a bit wonky
sorry if the elipse isn't centred you need more complicated maths
but I"m assuming a centred elipse
 
@Mew no it isn't. IIUC K is asking about tangents through arbitrary points not points on the x axis
 
Mew
9:16 AM
you can transform the results later
@JohnRennie, he is asking about why m1/m2 = -1
 
@Kaumudi: have I understood correctly?
 
Mew
and this only applies when the tangents have the same x coordinate
sorry I thought he was still asking about why the two tangents are negative of each other
 
user228700
OK.
 
Mew
u geddit now?
 
user228700
I had asked about tangents from arbitrary points before, yes @JohnRennie
 
user228700
9:19 AM
Secondly, @Mew: I wanted to get the result $m_1/m_2$ not by diff. the equation, but by using the equations I've got.
 
user228700
Thirdly, I'm female.
 
user228700
(:-P)
 
Mew
Sorry you look like a male :-P
 
user228700
@Mew That's not my picture! ^_^
 
Using the equation $y=mx ± \sqrt{a^2m^2+b^2}$ ?
 
Mew
9:21 AM
oo i see
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yes!
 
Mew
@Kaumudi, alright step 1 re-arrange to get m = something
 
user228700
@Mew John Green, that's who.
 
Mew
is that your boyfriend or somethinig
step 2 get -m = -something
 
user228700
@Mew Oh my God. Dude, he's like, 40! I'm 17!
 
Mew
9:23 AM
lol sooooryyyyyy
it happens u know
 
user228700
I've never even met him. He's a NYTimes bestselling author.
 
Mew
some 60 year olds date 20 year olds
especially rich ones like that
 
user228700
@Mew Yeah, Ik. I reiterate; I haven't even met him!
 
Can't you just do: $$ \frac{m_1x + \sqrt{a^2m_1^2+b^2}}{m_2x - \sqrt{a^2m_2^2+b^2}} = 1$$
 
Mew
so you haven't asked his permission to use his photo?
tsk tsk
 
user228700
9:24 AM
 
@Mew let's stay on topic guys
 
Mew
@JohnRennie, I think you made a negative error somewhere
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Rendering
 
Mew
I think he loves pizza
@JohnRennie, I think you just fixed it
 
@Mew Oops, yes, thanks.
 
Mew
9:25 AM
wait
no you didn't
alos put a -1 instead of 1
wait
yeah
-1 on the RHS too no?
 
Mew
the y-values won't be the same hto
 
user228700
Why did u switch signs?
 
Mew
because y of the first tangent is negative of y of the second tangent
oh wait
 
@Kaumudi the equation is $$y = m_1x \pm \sqrt{a^2m_1^2+b^2}$$
 
user228700
9:27 AM
Yeah...
 
where $x$ and $y$ are constants i.e. we're choosing the values of $x$ and $y$ that we want our tangents to go through.
So we have two equations: $$y = m_1x + \sqrt{a^2m_1^2+b^2}$$
and $$y= m_2x - \sqrt{a^2m_2^2+b^2}$$
 
Mew
but
 
QUICK LATEX HELP PLOX
 
Mew
the y coordinates differ
of the two tangents we're interested in
 
No they don't good grief!!
We want the two tangents that pass theough the same point $(x,y)$
 
Mew
9:29 AM
we're looking at my picture h
 
\title{Lógica & realimentação proporcional}
\date{4 de Novembro de 2016}
\author{Bernardo Meurer\\
        \texttt{99999}
        \and
        Maria Adelaide Ambrósio\\
        \texttt{99999}
        \and
        Inês Coelho\\
        \texttt{99999}}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\newpage
\end{document}
 
Mew
no
 
Why does the '&' in my title break things
 
Mew
we are comparing the gradients of the tangent that passes through y, with the gradient of the tangent that passes through -y
 
Ah \&
 
Mew
9:29 AM
I know we are using different equations to model this scenario
but we're modelling the above picture nevertheless
 
$(x,y)$ is the red dot in my diagram, not the points on the ellipse
 
user228700
Wtf is happening? :'-(
 
Mew
oh
 
Mew is barking up the wrong tree.
 
Mew
roof roof
 
9:30 AM
Ignore him, I am the superhuman genius here!! :-)
3 mins ago, by John Rennie
So we have two equations: $$y = m_1x + \sqrt{a^2m_1^2+b^2}$$
 
user228700
:-)
 
Mew
:'-)
 
Did what I said make sense?
 
user228700
OK, no, wait!
 
user228700
You know what? My brain is not performing well.
 
user228700
9:32 AM
It would be best if I came back to this in awhile.
 
Mew
aw k
 
OK. I'm stuck here for several hours waiting in for a delivery, so I'll be a round.
 
Anonymous
@Kaumudi What is the question btw ? :-P
 
But I suspect it's simpler than you think ...
 
user228700
Yeah, Ik. That's why I need to come back to this later.
 
Mew
9:33 AM
@S007, for a given x-value on an elipse, the tangents to that elipse have gradients that are negative of one another. Proove this result using an unconventional formula as a starting point.
 
user228700
@S007 :-P You're a little late to the party.
 
OK, I'm going off to check my Facebook posts ...
 
user228700
@Mew Well, yeah, basically.
 
Anonymous
@Kaumudi That's true for me in real life too...always ;-)
 
Mew
@Kaumudi, remember if you have a physics problem to pop into www.physicsproblems.nfshost.com
 
user116211
9:57 AM
I'm really tired after this mammoth Abstract Algebra test ;/
 
Guys What can i do for moderator's attention for a question??
 
Mew
what is the question?
 
What question, and what would you like the mods to do?
 
Mew
responding is a good start
 
I want reopening of this question... physics.stackexchange.com/questions/289614/…
 
Mew
10:05 AM
lol
no mod is going to make that happen budd
buddy
don't you know it is "I" not "i"
 
user116211
@THELONEWOLF. Since you edited, it will go to the review queue.
 
user116211
You will have to wait.
 
Okay,Thanks @MAFIA36790
 
user116211
No need for mod attention now.
 
Hey @Kaumudi are you kaumudi harikumar???
Sorry if i m spelling your name incorrectly
 
user228700
10:29 AM
@THELONEWOLF. Uh, why dyou ask?
 
Mew
that's very personal lonely wolf
 
user228700
@Mew: Will u help me solve two equations pls? I'm like, dying.
 
user228700
It's simple af, but yeah, my brain is dumb af so.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie: S'thing I thought might interest you...there's a newspaper called "Kerala Kaumudi". How about that? :-P
 
Is that it?
 
user228700
10:37 AM
Yeah, lol :-P
 
I wonder how it got that name. Is Kaumudi specifically a girl's name in Tamil Nadu or can it be used more generally?
 
user228700
@JohnRennie I will get back to u. I'm trying to solve s'thing.
 
user116211
I need coffee.
 
user116211
It's really cold here.
 
Mew
@Kaumudi, yeah what are the questions
@JohnRennie, can I ask a question to the super genius
 
10:52 AM
If you know one, but if you can't find a super genius I can try to answer :-)
 
Mew
is the word "exchange" in stackexchange copywright
as in
if i make a site called qandaexchange.com
is this a violation of stackexchange.com?
 
Mew
ok thanks
 
Hi, everyone! Sorry for interrupting your ongoing discussions. I feel this must be something trivial but I am not getting it. Is it always possible to find a flat higher dimensional embedding for a given infinitely differentiable continuous manifold? But I think the super genius can also multi-task. :P
 
If you called your site stacksexchange you might be headed for a lawsuit, but quandaexchange seems sufficiently different.
 
Mew
10:53 AM
alright makes sense thanks John
 
Actually stacksexchange might be unsuitable for other reasons :-)
@Dvij that's the embedding theorems.
 
Mew
lol
 
okay. thanks!
 
For Riemannian manifolds the answer is yes and there's even an equation for the minimum dimensionality of the larger manifold.
For pseudo-Riemannian manifolds it's more complicated though I think the answer is still yes.
Google for Nash embedding. Now I think about it, I think only causal pseudo-Riemannian manifolds can be embedded. If a spacetime contains CTCs then it can't be embedded - or something like that.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie: "Kaumudi" is a Sanskrit word and it means "Moonlight". I reckon there are about 20 people in India w/ my name. I haven't met a single person who has heard of the name prior to meeting me, my whole life, so yeah.
 
user228700
11:02 AM
I think it's mostly a name for females.
 
@Kaumudi Aha!
 
user228700
What? :-P
 
Mew
moonlight that's a pretty name
 
user116211
@JohnRennie WTH are you writing John?
 
I just meant *aha* as in that means the newspaper name is unrelated to people's names.
The Moon tends to be taken as feminine in most mythologies, with the Sun as masculine.
 
Mew
11:04 AM
Yeah the moon is weak and the sun is strong
 
user116211
Hmm; the chat room is going weird.
 
@MAFIA36790 it's a web site for transgender physicists :-)
 
user116211
Girls, relationship, death; and now these ;/
 
user228700
@Mew Yeah, thanks :-) My mom was reading a Sanskrit scripture whilst pregnant with me. And in it, there's the word "Kaumudi". Apparently, in the middle of reciting, when she said " Kaumudi", I kicked for the first time :-D
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 Duuude. Give us a break.
 
user116211
11:04 AM
@JohnRennie Aha! Only this left out of the chat room.
 
user228700
@JohnRennie Yeah :-)
 
user228700
@MAFIA36790 lol :-P
 
Mew
Hi @heather
 
@Mew, hello
 
Mew
@heather, did you see the meta post about the new site domain name
pls let me know what you think
 
user116211
11:13 AM
@Mew, Are you looking for new name?
 
@Mew, just saw it...I'd have to go physics.qandaexchange.com, I think that sounds good; the site background would obviously have a physics style design.
 
user116211
I would go with @johnR's suggestion.
 
Mew
@MAFIA36790, yes we want to abandon the nfshost.com
 
user116211
Learning Physics.
 
Mew
we're going to go with physics.qanda-exchange.com
 
user116211
11:14 AM
Very well then.
 
@MAFIA36790 thank goodness for that, I thought you meant stack sex change.com for a moment.
 
sounds good to me
 
Mew
haha
 
user116211
@JohnRennie This chat is going crazy ;(
 
I'd design the page with just the physics bit though, just like stack exchange
 
Mew
11:15 AM
@MAFIA36790, what do you expect after we saw the graph
of how many weeks we hav e
silliness for the max
 
@Mew, what graph?
 
user116211
@Mew Huh?
 
Mew
@heather, you don't want to know
 
@MAFIA36790 it went crazy a long time ago. As long as some good physics is discussed in between the bouts of lunacy that's fine by me.
 
Mew
there was a graph yesturday
 
user116211
11:16 AM
...
 
Mew
by kaudmaudi i think
you can go look if u want
I think it was a chart of the number of weeks a human life has up to age 90
and it didn't look very big lol
 
user116211
Anyways, Mosul is separated from the entire country by Iraqi Forces; ISIS' days are numbered.
 
Mew
na ISIS is a virus
they aren't localised
 
user116211
@Mew Their hub is in Mosul.
 
@Mew, what do you think of this meta post I just added?
 
Mew
11:21 AM
@heather, I like it
fantastic job
 
Okay, just making sure
 
Mew
One recommended adjustment if i may
 
Go ahead =)
 
Mew
I'd remove quesiton 1
 
okay...
 
Mew
11:21 AM
I don't like questions where I might not like the answer
we're going to be talking about both sites on both sites
 
took care of it
 
Mew
so I don't think we should ask for permission to do so
cool :)
 
gotcha
@BernardMeurer, I'm in CDT (in the U.S., I live in Iowa)
 
Mew
I'm from AUS
 
cool!
@Mew, okay, what should I be doing?
- what changes need to be made to the ad?
- do I need to write any code for you?
- do I need to help with the background design?
- are there any meta questions, on PSE or on PPQA, that need to be asked?
 
Mew
11:26 AM
@heather, what would be helpful is a meta post of a to do list on what we need done to the site
then as we find more bugs and think of new improvements we can add them and cross them off as they are developed
Also if you get time asking good quality questions will be helpful
 
@Mew, yes, that is a good idea
 
Mew
as many new users will be turned off if there aren't many questions on the site
 
okay, I will work on those
 
Mew
The add is good and I will work on changing the url
when that is done you can update the add if necessary with the new site name
I will keep both urls linking to the new address
so users who have favourited the old url will still be ok
 
okay, that makes sense
 
Mew
11:28 AM
Once the "to do" list is created, it will be easier to see how much more coding is required and how we can plan to achieve it
are you comfortable coding in php heather?
and javascript, jquery
 
javascript, yes
php, no
jquery, a bit
 
Mew
yep jquery is just a javascript shortcut
useful to leanr
the site is based on php and javascript
there is a tutorial for creating plugins somewhere hold on
 
I'd definitely be willing to learn php
 
Mew
it mnight not be necessary
I should be able to do all the coding but if you learned it and wanted to help that would be fine too
 
sure, okay
 
Mew
11:32 AM
actually i'll just do all the coding probably easier that way
 
okay =)
whichever you think is better
 
Mew
yep
so a meta on technnical issues is good ie the to do list
and also a meta on non-technical to do list
e.g. designing logo, advertising etc.
or ti could be all in one meta, whichever
We also need to construct a privacy policy
and terms and conditions
 
already started a list of things to do, I'll split it into two parts (different headings)
okay, terms and conditions
legalese...=(
 
1
Q: Physics Problem Solving Site

heatherSo, some of you may have heard of how a couple of us tried to propose a new physics site for less conceptual questions and more problem solving, the proposal was closed, and we ended up creating a new site outside of the stack exchange network (see here for more details). In this post, I'm going ...

 
Mew
cool free advertising ^
 
11:38 AM
yup =D
@BernardMeurer, UTC is 5 hrs ahead of CST
@Mew, what needs to be done for terms and conditions?
 
Mew
dunno
whatever SE has I guess
 
I guess, yeah
 
Mew
@heather
important question
what's better
physics.qandaexchange.com/ or physics.qanda-exchange.com/
 
@Mew, hmm...how about the first one? I don't think the hyphen is necessary, and I don't see an embarrassing words hiding in there.
 
Mew
@heather, thanks heather the new url has been created
it may take time to update and will be available within the next 24-48 hours
both urls should work after that (and the current one should still be working now)
 
11:54 AM
@Mew, okay, I'm a good ways along on the new meta post, I'll be posting it shortly
@Mew, how's this
 
Mew
looks really good
good point about QandA being the same as Quesitons
 
okay
glad I did it right =D
 
Mew
r u really 14
 
in that age bracket, yes
 
Mew
impressive
 
12:01 PM
you removed the compliment to you in the meta post
 
Mew
yeah
don't want to make it persona
l
 
okay, just let it be known that I meant that =)
 
12:21 PM
@obe Answer plz
 
Mew
@heather, maybe we should delete the physics.SE meta post until the site is more refined
it has -1 vote
 
user116211
@Mew No.
 
Mew
@MAFIA36790, why not?
 
user116211
@Mew One downvote doesn't mean you have to delete the post.
 
Mew
The site has a new name physics.qandaexchange.com
 
12:28 PM
-1 is hardly a good start
 
Mew
@MAFIA36790, yes but given the site isn't refined yet, I think users will be more receptive to it later
exactly @0celo7, voting here shows a scale free topology
that means that people tend to vote in the way the users before them have voted (as they are influenced by the existing score)
 
user116211
@Mew then you should mention it explicitly that it is still in preliminary stage. I don't think deletion of the post is the answer; but that's your call.
 
Mew
it's heather's call
 
user116211
Well, okay.
 
Mew
you could be right
maybe it will turn around
but if it gets to -2 i'd delete before it gets to -10
 
user116211
12:30 PM
Just wait for a day, at least so that most of the users of the community get the chance to read that.
 
@heather Ah, that makes sense
so you're UTC-5, I'm UTC+1, but we have DST right now so the time delta is 5 hours (as opposed to 6) between us
Or does CST have DST right now too?
 
12:48 PM
I don't even know when DST is
 
Here it kicked in a few days ago
 
user116211
@BernardMeurer Daylight savings?
 
Fucking Benjamin Frankin
First electric charge, now this
 
user116211
That old US father guy.
 
user116211
We need Trump to fix all these.
 
12:53 PM
I doubt he'll fix anything
 
user116211
I like his new tactic to allure Hindu voters.
 
@MAFIA36790 DST=Daylight Saving Time, yeah
 
user116211
@BernardMeurer This is bothering.
 
user116211
Afternoon @JohnRennie.
 
Why is daylight saving time bothering you?
 
user116211
12:58 PM
No, not this.
 
People continuously moan about DST in the UK as well.
 
Mew
same in Aus
 
Whether DST is a good or bad thing doesn't have a simple answer. The real question is whether the benefits outweigh the disadvantages.
Personally I don't care either way, but I have a lot of sympathy for the argument that it means schoolchildren don't have to walk to or from school in the dark.
I suspect the main conclusion to be drawn is that people like moaning :-)
 
Mew
They should just change school times
 
user116211
1:24 PM
 
user116211
Do you miss the punch cards @johnR?
 
user116211
Old days.
 
@DanielSank You cannot always find a Hamiltonian/Lagrangian description of a physical system. The question of whether or not a given equation of motion admits a (global) Hamiltonian description is in general an open question. Relevant physics.SE posts: physics.stackexchange.com/q/282724/50583, physics.stackexchange.com/q/175021/50583, physics.stackexchange.com/q/51510/50583 and some other questions linked there
In particular, I'm rather certain that there are dissipative systems that don't admit a Hamiltonian formulation, because the Hamiltonian formulation of disspative systems usually exploits some special property or symmetry of the system in question
 
@MAFIA36790 I did use punch cards in my first year at university. That would have been 1980. However as I recall the card punches were replaced with teletypes the following year.
And no, I don't miss using punched cards :-)
 
user116211
Ah. You are not that old.
 
1:48 PM
@ACuriousMind Recent work seems to admit a Lagrangian description for dissipative systems so I wouldn't be surprised to see a Hamiltonian formulation arxiv.org/pdf/1210.2745v2.pdf
 
2:08 PM
@user507974 Ah, well, introducing additional variables is cheating ;)
 
@ACuriousMind But does it seem to help with @DanielSank 's question
 
I think there are two different questions: "Does a given equation of motion admit a Hamiltonian formulation?" and "Does every physical system admit a Hamiltonian formulation?" I answered the first, you answered the second, and you're probably right that the second is what he asked.
 
@ACuriousMind Have you heard about perfect maps?
 
2:24 PM
Fractals? :D
 
@0celo7 Vaguely
 
2:53 PM
I have question. I have a state equation of the form AN^3+BN^2+CN+D=0. Where A,B,C,D depend on things like chemical potential, and other physical parameters(k,w). I know that this system has a critical point for values of k,w where N has a double degenerate solution, and then it bifurcates in two branches in (k,w) space. How would I go about finding the critical point?
 
user228700
3:36 PM
@JohnRennie: Guess I never came back :-P
 
Well you're the one trying to pass a stressful exam, so you should use this chat in whatever way works best for you.
I use the chat for the pleasure I get in discussing physics, so you shouldn't feel under any obligation :-)
 
user228700
:-) I just never got back to it.
 
user228700
Did u get that "delivery" lol :-P
 
I did. I have a shiny new laptop to play with!
 
user228700
:-D Enjoy fixing the screen!
 
user228700
3:41 PM
(Isn't that the one?)
 
@Kaumudi Yes. It is a surprisingly enjoyable process fixing laptops. It's the satisfaction you get when you turn them on and they work perfectly.
 
user228700
:-) Well, have fun!
 

« first day (2192 days earlier)      last day (2740 days later) »