« first day (2191 days earlier)      last day (2731 days later) » 

5:00 AM
There are two pistons?
@rob do you understand what ffahim is asking?
 
Yes.. anything wrong??
 
rob
Usually we talk about Pascal's Law in the context of hydraulic systems, which are filled with incompressible fluids.
 
Right...
Yeah, forget what I said about gasses.
 
Hang on a second... @DanielSank @rob.. Hydraulic systems have the same way... so why r u not understanding it? . Did I say anything wrong..
F1/A1=F2/A2..
 
"have the same way" <-- what do you mean?
 
rob
5:03 AM
So I can use a relatively feeble force on a long thin tube with hydraulic fluid to exert a large force on a larger area.
 
Pressure is constant
 
Ah, perhaps now I understand why ffahim mentioned two pistons.
 
rob
This is how a mechanic can lift a car by hand, how gentle pressure on a brake pedal transforms to large pressure on brake pads, etc.
There has to be a fluid connection between the two pistons.
 
@rob yes
 
Okay... okay.. let's go terms by terms.. pls wait.. @DanielSank @rob
F1/A1= F2/A2.. so where is the fault of thinking A1 >A2. ?
 
5:06 AM
@ffahim your questions don't make sense and I think it's just an issue of language.
 
rob
@ffahim No fault. You could call them A_{big piston} and A_{small piston} if you like
 
A1 > A2 is correct if piston #1 has bigger area than piston #2.
But unless you tell us that piston 2 is bigger, we don't know.
 
As my pressure is constant then definitely to keep it constant the smaller area will feel the less force.. isn't it
 
@ffahim yes.
 
So most of the cases we discuss about applying less force on smaller area and to get bigger force on the bigger area
But the reverse also true right?
 
rob
5:09 AM
@ffahim Sure, you could do that.
 
@ffahim Yes.
 
But one problem is that..
 
rob
If you had some application where you needed a well-controlled, feeble force, you could imagine using a hydraulic system "in reverse" as a force reducer.
 
Where is the conservation law of energy here?
 
rob
@ffahim Ooh, fun question.
You should try to work it out yourself, but I'll guide you.
How much work is done by a force?
 
5:11 AM
I just get that pressure is constant
Fs
 
rob
That's right, the pressure is the same throughout the system.
Fs means?
 
@ffahim If you remember how work is defined, you can surely answer your own question.
 
F .s.costheta
 
@ffahim What is s?
Define your symbols, please.
s is distance?
 
S means distance
 
rob
5:12 AM
(I'm a big fan of using plain language rather than mathematical symbols. I think I know what you mean, but you should be clear.
)
 
Yeah
 
Ok, @ffahim, so I apply force F1 over the area A1. How much energy did I use?
 
rob
Right. So work is force times the (parallel part of the) distance over which the force acts.
 
I'll shut up, @rob. You take it away.
 
rob
@DanielSank I was about to say the same thing :-). I'll continue.
 
5:14 AM
Sorry I am still not been able to understand pls.. @rob
 
rob
@ffahim So I push on end 1 of the piston with force F1, and the piston with area A1 is displaced by some distance s1. How much work gets done?
 
Fs?@rob
F1s1
 
rob
@ffahim Fine. At the other end, the hydraulic force F2 moves the piston with area A2 by some distance s2. How much work gets done there?
 
F2S2
@rob
 
rob
Yes, but: sign matters. One piston goes in, the other comes out.
 
5:18 AM
But work is scalar
@rob
 
rob
6 mins ago, by ffahim
F .s.costheta
@ffahim (You don't have to ping me every time, and if it's been less than two minutes you can actually edit the ping into your existing message)
 
Hmmm.. what sign u r talking about?
 
rob
Scalars can have positive or negative sign.
If the force is parallel to the displacement, it puts energy into the system: positive work
 
Ohh I remember
 
rob
If the force is antiparallel to the displacement, it takes energy out of the system: negative work
 
5:21 AM
Go ahead.. :-)
 
user116211
@DanielSank \o
 
rob
So you've got work in and one end, W1 = F1 * s1, and work out at the other end, W2 = F2 * s2, with opposite signs so we're not creating energy, just moving it around.
Now, you've said that Pascal's Law relates the pressures at the two ends of this hydraulic system. Can you find W2, at the output end, only using things we know from the input end?
(I always need scratch paper for this part, I can't do it just by typing.)
 
@MAFIA36790 What is that even?
 
Ummm no
 
rob
@ffahim You said F1/A1 = F2/A2, yes? Solve for F2, eliminate that from W2, see where we are.
 
user116211
5:26 AM
@SirCumference This is Nazi salute.
 
@MAFIA36790 ...
 
user116211
Really, I waved my hands to address DS.
 
rob
@MAFIA36790 Hmmm. I had decided it was a low-fi friendly wave.
 
W2=F1*A2*S2/A1 @rob
 
rob
@ffahim Just so, very nice.
Have a look at the numerator, which contains (A2*s2). Can you think of a physical way to interpret that product?
It's an area multiplied by a length.
 
user116211
5:29 AM
@rob yes, it is indeed.
 
@MAFIA36790 Daniel Sank?
 
user116211
yes.
 
@MAFIA36790 By the way, I've been meaning to ask
 
@rob .. nah.. pls help me.. its Volume
 
user116211
Ask what?
 
rob
5:31 AM
@ffahim Yes. Do you see which volume?
 
Oct 10 at 2:34, by Sir Cumference
@bl00 But you really don't need to worry about having a childish name here. @MAFIA36790 Literally has "mafia" in his name. @AlfredCentauri mixed his name with a star.
Since then, I've wondered why you have Mafia in your name
 
user116211
My internet connectivity sucks.
 
@MAFIA36790 What
 
How much fluid was replaced? @rob
Is it so
 
rob
@ffahim That's it. (A2*s2) is how much the volume changes at the second end of the tube.
Likewise (A1*s1) at the first end of the tube.
If the hydraulic fluid is incompressible, what's the relationship between these volumes?
 
5:34 AM
Not yet learned . Sorry
 
user116211
@SirCumference The connectivity is really weak; don't know why suddenly. It is weak lately for few days.
 
What's the relationship
 
@MAFIA36790 That's...not what I asked
 
rob
@ffahim You're not sure what I mean by "incompressible"?
 
user116211
@SirCumference That's my dog's name and I love mafias.
 
5:35 AM
No no.. I don't know the relationship
 
You named your dog "mafia" o.0
 
rob
@ffahim By incompressible I mean that the density of the fluid doesn't change with the pressure.
This is one way to distinguish a liquid from a gas.
 
user116211
@SirCumference Well, I call him maf.
 
Ohh l see.. .. then the volume chance is same?
 
rob
Bingo. Same volume change at both ends.
 
5:37 AM
*change
 
rob
So now, finish relating the work done at end 1 to the work done at end 2.
 
user116211
BTW, you were supposed to be in bed by now, @sirC, isn't it? Or is it that you are still feeling not sleepy?
 
@MAFIA36790 I am in bed
I have a laptop
 
user116211
You should sleep.
 
rob
@SirCumference This is known as "poor sleep hygiene"
 
5:38 AM
I wish I could
@rob It's not a choice
I know how important sleep is, it just doesn't come
 
rob
@SirCumference Insomnia isn't a choice, but the laptop is.
 
@rob The only difference is using a laptop vs. lying in bed, frustrated that I can't sleep
 
rob
The internet is specifically designed to grab your attention and keep you awake
 
Omg... awesome.. @rob
 
user116211
Take pills.
 
rob
5:40 AM
It even makes little noises, @SirCumference
 
@MAFIA36790 No pills are good
 
Thanks a lot... buddy
 
@rob So do the trucks outside
 
rob
Read a book. Sing a song. Use your own brain.
 
@rob I am reading
A paper, Relativistic Cosmology
 
rob
5:40 AM
@ffahim Hey, glad to help. You can get the same result from a lever.
@SirCumference You are talking to me.
 
user116211
@rob, SirC is tortured by being forced to listen to the SU anthem.
 
@rob I am multitasking
 
Really very thanks...
 
@MAFIA36790 That's in the morning
 
rob
@SirCumference Multitasking is poor sleep hygiene.
 
user116211
5:42 AM
^^
 
@rob Sleep hygiene isn't something I really have control over atm
Right now my best bet is to learn physics here
And prepare myself for tomorrow
Ah, I have an idea
I'll write a book
 
user116211
@SirCumference Maths book?
 
user116211
Don't say Asexual book T__T
 
@MAFIA36790 Nah, a book on the Universe's evolution
 
user116211
ohh.
 
5:43 AM
@MAFIA36790 It's not a sexual book
>_>
 
user116211
yeh....
 
rob
@SirCumference When my daughter was about four, she came out of her room after bedtime, weeping about she couldn't sleep. I told her "no one has ever fallen asleep standing up in the hallway and being loud."
Writing is good.
Multitasking is bad.
 
user116211
@rob, Do researchers write book? Does it help them?
 
@rob Looks like high school english classes are gonna pay off
 
rob
@MAFIA36790 Writing is very educational. Nothing concentrates the mind on your hidden areas of ignorance like trying to explain them.
 
5:45 AM
First of all can someone help me define what mathematics is
 
user116211
ohh; Milnor is a great example.
 
user116211
@SirCumference Mathematics is Bourbaki.
 
@MAFIA36790 Very clever
But seriously, I need a definition
...no one?
 
rob
Goodnight, all.
 
user116211
@rob o/
 
5:47 AM
No wait!
I need a definition ;-;
 
rob
@SirCumference You don't need my definition.
You need your definition
 
user116211
You should study metamathematics then @SirC.
 
@rob It would help to get a professor's opinion
 
rob
Which you find by listening to yourself for a while.
 
user116211
But I don't think you require to know metamathematics to do maths.
 
5:48 AM
oh good thing I guessed correctly that you're a professor
@JohnRennie Please help
 
user116211
Morning @JohnRennie.
 
I need a definition for mathematics
 
user116211
@SirCumference You will get it in metamathematics.
 
@MAFIA36790 I'll get to that after metaphysics :P
 
user116211
Metamathematics is logic theory.
 
5:50 AM
Morning all. @SirCumference what do you want help with?
 
@JohnRennie Could you define mathematics for me?
 
@SirCumference No. I have no idea how to define mathematics and I'm not even sure if it can be defined.
 
user116211
Start doing first-order logic.
 
Mathematics is the only thing I can think of that legitimately has no definition...
 
user116211
5:53 AM
@SirCumference Do you really need it?
 
@MAFIA36790 It'd make for a killer opening I have in mind
 
Mathematics has always been whatever mathematicians agree amongst themselves should be included.
 
@JohnRennie I'd ask, why would they agree on certain things being included and others not?
 
When Cantor started doing his work on set theory other marthematicians denied it was maths, but it's now mainstream.
Who knows what new areas today will be part of mainstream maths in the future?
 
At first glance I'd define math as a way for us to understand the Universe, but even still math goes beyond the physical realm
 
5:55 AM
I'd guess that pretty much anything to lends itself to the axiomatic approach could be part of maths.
 
Darn it math. Why does it have to be such an abstract thing?
It isn't constricted by the Universe yet it can describe the Universe
 
rob
@SirCumference I read a great essay a few years ago that concluded "mathematics is ... well, whatever mathematicians do, that's mathematics."
 
@rob Where'd you read that?
 
rob
@SirCumference Couldn't remember in five minutes.
 
Sigh...it just seems a bit irksome that we always use something, yet we have no idea what it intrinsically is
 
rob
6:01 AM
@SirCumference Possibly "Lockhart's Lament," which you should read.
 
It's beyond our understanding, but it somehow works
I don't know, maybe I'm the only one bugged by it
 
user116211
You should read texts of Hilbert on metamathematics @SirC.
 
user116211
I dare you to read Principia Mathematica.
 
@MAFIA36790 Newton's?
 
user116211
It's lethal on its notations.
 
6:04 AM
Or that one that tries to prove mathematics without axioms?
 
user116211
@SirCumference Russell's.
 
Oh, thought ya meant this at first
Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Latin for Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy), often referred to as simply the Principia, is a work in three books by Isaac Newton, in Latin, first published 5 July 1687. After annotating and correcting his personal copy of the first edition, Newton also published two further editions, in 1713 and 1726. The Principia states Newton's laws of motion, forming the foundation of classical mechanics; Newton's law of universal gravitation; and a derivation of Kepler's laws of planetary motion (which Kepler first obtained empirically). The Principia...
Huge work of Newton, but you probably know that
 
user116211
It tried to make everything rigorous.
 
@MAFIA36790 Russell's?
 
user116211
yes.
 
6:06 AM
It was kind of an interesting idea
Proving math without axioms
Shame it isn't really possible
 
user116211
Did he succeed? No.
 
user116211
Thanks to $\mathrm{G\ddot{o}del} \,.$
 
@MAFIA36790 Darn Gödel with his theorems
 
user116211
I like that ;))
 
It just makes math all the more mysterious to me
 
user116211
6:08 AM
@SirCumference You don't need that to do maths, I re-iterate.
 
It's something that is entirely based on axioms, yet it beautifully works and can't be defined
It just seems bizarre
It isn't even bound by physical laws, like everything else in the Universe
It basically sounds impossible...
 
user116211
Maths is abstract; you can't expect some physical motivation/intuition for that.
 
@MAFIA36790 It's aggravatingly abstract
Its basis is so darn confusing
 
user116211
Unless, of course, it is applied maths.
 
@MAFIA36790 Yeah, but the existence of pure mathematics is what befuddles me
The fact that math is based entirely on axioms, isn't bound by the universe and can't be defined, yet describes the universe and more
It's seems like baloney
 
rob
6:26 AM
@SirCumference You should definitely read Lockhart. His "Mathematician's Lament" is an essay on the difference between mathematics and what gets taught in math classes, and his 2012 book "Measurement" expands on the idea.
One thing to realize is that mathematical cognition is a biological phenomenon, honed because people who were good at it tended not to die.
And yet, a logically consistent application of those rules has this shocking predictive power in contexts that are apparently totally unrelated to each other.
And furthermore, thinking about it is fun (another biological phenomenon).
 
user116211
6:44 AM
0
Q: Condensed Matter Physics and Quantum Mechanics

A Nitthin AnanthHow to analyze the quantum mechanical spin state of magnetic nanocomplex systems ?

 
@MAFIA36790 Unclear
 
user116211
No efforts at all?
 
user116211
unclear?
 
user116211
oh, yes.
 
user116211
I hate my internet ;/
 
7:12 AM
@rob Mathematical cognition may be a biological phenomenon, but math itself must be something more, right?
 
user116211
GO TO SLEEP @sirC ;(
 
@MAFIA36790 I was lying in bed, but suddenly I was wondering if anyone replied
 
user116211
Hmm; it's already 3:15 at your place, right?
 
user116211
Well, I go to sleep at 3 or max 3:30; so legit....
 
Huh, what time is it for you?
You live in Venezuela right?
Oh, same here
 
user116211
7:19 AM
@SirCumference Mine is 12:49pm.
 
user116211
India.
 
user116211
Wow! It's raining heavily!
 
$\small \text{...oh...}$
nvm
@MAFIA36790 You're lucky you never had to take our crappy standardized tests
like the ACT
 
user116211
@SirCumference What test?
 
7:21 AM
@MAFIA36790 tests to get into colleges
 
user116211
I have a Linear Algebra test tomorrow.
 
user116211
@SirCumference ohh.
 
user116211
You never heard of JEE?
 
No, what's that
 
user116211
hmm.
 
7:22 AM
Oh, just looked at wikipedia
 
user116211
Well, that's one of the major entrance tests in India.
 
...
> It is regarded internationally as one of the most challenging engineering admission tests.
 
user116211
Huh~~
 
Guess I can't complain then...
lemme try to take one
 
user116211
@SirCumference Not that difficult; it's just too numerical...
 
7:24 AM
is there a difference between jee and iit jee?
 
user116211
It's the old name of JEE.
 
Okay, this is pretty tough...
I have to recall a lot of physics
Most of which I had to teach myself for the SAT II test
(another college entrance test)
 
user116211
@SirCumference I know that.
 
user116211
It is conducted in India too.
 
Wait, really?
How about the ACT?
 
user116211
7:28 AM
yes.
 
user116211
@SirCumference Don't know about that.
 
But...you know what ACT stands for, right?
American College Test
@MAFIA36790 It's an alternative to the SAT
 
user116211
ohh; no idea.
 
I assumed both were American because they were alternatives, and one is called the American College Test
 
user116211
I know about SAT and Oxbridge exam only.
 
7:30 AM
So did you take the SAT II in physics?
 
user116211
No.
 
did you take an SAT II?
 
user116211
I hardly recall whether any of my classmates took SAT.
 
user116211
@yuggib o/
 
Mew
7:59 AM
Gday peeps
 
@MAFIA36790 \o
 
Mew
upvoting on comments has now been enabled
notifactions have now been implemented
 
user228700
8:22 AM
@MAFIA36790 There too?! :-D
 
user116211
You know about the new room @mew, right?
 
user228700
Hi everyone :-)
 
user116211
Write the updates there too @mew.
 
user116211
@Kaumudi hello
 
Mew
8:25 AM
@MAFIA36790, thanks for that i didn't see that site
bbl dinner
 
user116211
@Mew You are the room owner there.
 
9:17 AM
Magnetic monopoles - spoiler, not really ...
 
9:32 AM
Gotta have a catchy title, @JohnRennie
Title : IS TIME TRAVEL REAL???
Abstract : No
 
:-) Arxiv clickbait!
 
"I will start with a short argument in support of ER=EPR. By now it is clear that the existence of an ERB between two black holes implies that they are entangled"
Is it actually clear?
 
how will ERB ensures the two black holes are unable to be described as a product state (criteria for entanglment)?
 
@Slereah Susskind paper?
 
Especially (if I recall), black holes with ERB are not actually topologically connected like that of a transversible wormhole, i.e. not a tube
 
9:53 AM
-2
Q: Quantum time travel?

Hyper Novathis is a theory i made up but is it possible, could quantum tunneling go thru time? In quantum mechanics everything exist every where, so can it exist every when? let me know if this is possible

It would have been a meaningful question if time is an observable in quantum mechanics
Otherwise we cannot really say anything along the lines of "the wavefunction is delocalised through time"
Actually on second thought, the reason why this question is not meaningful is that there isn't a notion of a "energy barrier in time", that is, we cannot expect the wavefunction to suddenly become exponentially decaying and then return to oscillatory as if passing through a barrier
->actually, won't that basically means the wavefunction is evolved by some time dependent potential that rotates its imaginary phases so it can become real momentarily...? Might investigate this later...
 
user228700
@JohnRennie: Morning! :-)
 
Morning
 
user228700
10:31 AM
@0celo7:
 
user228700
in The Periodic Table, 22 mins ago, by M.A.R.
The only thing worse than a homework question is a homework doubt.
 
???
 
user116211
@Secret a piece of pop-science myth and lack of knowledge of QM.
 
user228700
The classic "u don't mean doubt, you mean QUESTION" @JohnRennie
 
user228700
in The Periodic Table, 24 mins ago, by M.A.R.
No. It is my doubt. I know Birch reduction (Metal Reduction of Alkynes) and how that happens. However I saw this question in a paper. So I am wondering how reduction will happen. Anyway, thanks for reply. I will try to figure out if you don't tell. — Rohit 5 hours ago
 
10:33 AM
Ah. I'm used to Indian students saying doubt when the mean question.
 
@MAFIA36790 Well technically, due to how dynamics are defined, the wavefunction does exists every when (because dynamics means the quantify is well defined for every point in time). The problem is that time is not an observable thus one cannot do a time measurement
 
It's just a manner of speech, and all social groups have their own argot.
 
user228700
:-) 0celo7 and I had a looong discussion about this a few weeks ago
 
user228700
Set me straight :-P
 
Well, you know, Ryan is such an easy going and relaxed person :-)
 
user228700
10:35 AM
Ryan?
 
0celo7's secret identity, well not really very secret, is Ryan Unger.
 
11
Q: I have a doubt about "doubt" in doubt titles

Martin - マーチンFrom the depth of the stack exchange network I bring to you the newest season (7) of our community effort against buzzwords in question titles. The word of the season this time is doubt. In Indian English the word doubt is used as a synonym for question (see ELU), which makes it as terrible as q...

 
It's on his blog.
That's why it's not very secret :-)
 
user228700
Huh. @JohnRennie: How did u find this?
 
10:41 AM
I think 0celo7 posted here when he created the blog.
 
user228700
Oh, OK...
 
user228700
And Sam Lereah is Slereah?
 
Yes
 
user228700
Cool. Ryan Unger is the CEO of some company. Unrelated, I assume :-P
 
I'm sure there are many Ryan Ungers in the world, just as there are many John Rennies :-)
 
user228700
10:43 AM
Yes :-)
 
user228700
Ryan. It's a nice name to have if u listen to the podcast "Dear Hank and John". They have this running joke about it, how John Green prefers to answer questions from people named Ryan and how Ryan is the best name in the world, etc. :-P
 
user116211
@Kaumudi It's in his profile and he told us about this when he started to write the blog.
 
user116211
Only Voldefield knows the significance of the name of his blog.
 
@Secret Ah, I recognise that picture at the bottom right :-)
 
user116211
10:45 AM
@JohnRennie That insulted you in a video.
 
yup, that guy
 
I'm a bit offended I only rank 20th.
 
user228700
Oh, yeah, that guy.
 
Still, I suppose 20th isn't bad given how many John Rennies there must be out there.
 
and some of these are historical, it seems
 
10:47 AM
A lot of John Rennies were Scottish engineers.
One of London's bridges was built by a John Rennie
Rennie is a Scottish name, or to be precise a Gaelic name.
Not that it's of any great significance, but I'm currently reading an Indian SF book ...
 
what is the scifi about?
 
user116211
0
Q: Is it possible that big bang are still happening?

Bhagyesh ChaudhariI was reading on this site about big bangs, and it got me wondering, about two things. There’s no exact spot that the Big Bang happened. In fact, the Big Bang happened everywhere in the Universe. 1) if there were multiple big bangs, then is it possible that one galaxy from another explosion...

 
user116211
11:13 AM
$\Large{+1}$ from me. ;-) — Babak S. Apr 28 '13 at 2:20
 
user116211
I'm shocked.
 
user116211
flagged..
 
user116211
0
Q: Does bonfire night in the uk increase temperature of the country / local area?

user202944I am not sure if this is the right forum for the question but failing to have any better location to ask it, i have come here. In the UK we have a tradition of lighting bonfires on the 5th of November (or the weekend closest to it). With numerous amounts of bonfires of a large size being create...

 
user116211
Do you participate in this ritual @JohnRennie?
 
@MAFIA36790 Not these days. Bonfire night is mainly an occasion for children these days. I used to love going whan I was a child - fireworks and a huge bonfire, what more could a child ask :-)
 
user116211
11:25 AM
ahh.
 
11:58 AM
@JohnRennie come on, we went as students and there were lots of adults too ...
 
@Sanya at my age students are little more than children :-)
 

« first day (2191 days earlier)      last day (2731 days later) »