« first day (1546 days earlier)      last day (3376 days later) » 
09:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

9:38 AM
0
Q: Why can't comments be downvoted?

bobieI am not proposing to change the software or criticizing the current policy. I always wanted to ask this question since a joined, since it is a glaring asymmetry. Having raised over a thousand useful flags now, and consequently having read thousands of comments, I have noticed that (probably a...

 
10:32 AM
Hi!
If anyone here happens to know about electronics, please take a look at this question:
http://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/151313/inconsistency-in-the-calculation-of-the-gain-of-an-emitter-follower
 
 
2 hours later…
1:02 PM
Just curiosity: Have you ever seen a question that was protected by a non-moderator?
 
1:50 PM
@ACuriousMind I think I've seen one protected by Emilio and one by Chris, I think
Also, for anyone thinking that close votes are detrimental to the mental health of new users, I have some evidence to the contrary (while you still have none):
Sorry for being so unclear, I'm new to this and was in a rush typing up the question. Will edit shortly. Thanks! — Tao Tien 1 min ago
That's OP thanking us for helping him understand that his question wasn't clear.
 
@KyleKanos Obviously an outlier ;)
 
@ACuriousMind This is not the first I've seen, but I'm not motivated enough to scroll through my comment log and find the others
This one just happened to appear at the right time and I felt compelled to share it
 
2:20 PM
And his edit certainly helps a lot.
 
Ell
Hi :)
 
Hello
 
Ell
Anyone around?
Oh hi
 
You can see who is here on the top right of the screen, where all the gravatar/ident-icons are. The ones who are grayed out are "present" but haven't written anything for some time (not sure what the delay for that is)
 
Ell
For some reason, the equation for Lorentz force is different on two wikipedia pages (and also what I was taught). Here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force and here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…
one includes $E$, and the other doesn't
 
2:32 PM
Yes, that happens.
 
Ell
Why is that?
does $q\textbf{E}$ turn out to be $0$ for some reason?
 
hold on, gotta take a phone call
be back in 5 min
 
Ell
coolio :)
 
@Ell there is no $E$ field in the case of $ F = q(v \times B) $ , only a magnetic field is present . so yes as $E=0$ the $qE$ vanishes
 
Ell
but if there is a moving charged particle, mustn't there be an electric field?
 
2:42 PM
I think we are talking only about External field here.
 
Ell
Oh right okay
that makes sense then
Let's suppose a football is negatively charged
if I kick said football, am I creating an electric field?
 
the ball has an inherent field around it yes, you arent creating it but moving it . but if you kick it in an external field it will move in a particular way given by Lorentz force
 
Okay, I'm back
I don't think it's that E=0 in that case
The diagrams to the right show an E field vector
It looks like they're considering only the motions due to the magnetic field
 
Ell
yeah
that makes sense
 
2:58 PM
i think your confusion can be cleared if you think that the external field is usually strong enough to be not affected by the charges' field ?
 
Ell
Yeah, I understand it now
thanks guys :)
On a complete tangent
I can't, for the life of me, think of the word you use to pair elements at the start and end of a sentence
"a, b and c are the 1st, 2nd and 3rd letters of the alphabet consecutively" - but not "consecutively"
Oh it's respectively!
 
@Ell you can edit the previous comment if you think you made a mistake.
 
Ell
that'd mean I'd have to delete the previous messages also, but the time had run out for that
but cheers :)
 
@Ell you actually needn't. The feature's there so that you can 'edit' not 'delete' it.
 
Ell
@Gaurav I mean, editing the last message would make it and the previous messages reduntant
 
3:06 PM
@Ell sure. :)
 
Hello Physics gurus.
I know that if pressure is increased, boiling point is rises, but does melting point decrease? Is it true?
 
Ell
Melting point ought to increase as well
I'm not a guru though
 
user54412
@KyleKanos @ACuriousMind I don't think I have. In fact I forgot I could, since the option only appears on day-old+ questions.
 
user54412
And besides, racing to beat Qmechanic is a losing strategy.
 
user54412
@Farhan Check out the phase diagram for water
 
user54412
3:13 PM
 
user54412
Pressure increase -> moving up. From 1 to 100 atm melting point hardly changes, but from 100 to ~1500 atm it does decrease
 
user54412
Above that it actually increases very rapidly, since at high enough pressure everything wants to be solid.
 
One (of three) protected by Emilio:
3
Q: What does $\Psi^*$ mean in Schrodinger's formulation of Quantum Mechanics?

JackI am not a physics student. In one of my courses, some fundamental concepts of Quantum mechanics were needed, so I was going through them when I stumbled upon this. It says $$\text{probability} = \int_a^b\Psi^*\Psi\mathrm{d}x\quad\biggl(= \int_a^b\Psi^2\mathrm{d}x\text{ if }\Psi\text{ is a real...

 
@ChrisWhite Thanks. I was looking at the same graph. I initially thought melting point of water has the same characteristics has the boiling point under pressure.
 
user54412
@KyleKanos How do you find which ones he's protected?
 
Ell
3:22 PM
@ChrisWhite the triple point is interesting
 
His ID is 8563 (it might be in there already due to permalink)
Note that I was wrong & you were right, @ChrisWhite. The Data Explorer says you've not protected a question.
@ACuriousMind: Actually, I think I may have found someone who's a little disturbed by the closure of their question:
@Manishearth, I have no doubt (and do hope) that they usually are! , what is then the point you are making? 1) can you publish the averages or tell me what is mine in VTC and Reopen? 2) I do not know what's your mother tongue, but, do you understand the meaning of: "Is the concept of force of inertia still used (and useful)? Please do not dodge this question! :) — bobie 2 hours ago
 
3:51 PM
Guys, I just subscribed to the weekly physics.se newsletter. Any idea about the criteria questions have to qualify to make it to the 'top new questions this week' section ?
 
There's a newsletter?
4
 
Yeah, it appeared as one of the community ads.
 
Oh look at that. I see it now
I usually ignore the ads
 
Dilaton had posted a PO ad earlier. Don't know whether the mods deleted it or not (?)
 
Jim
The ads are on the home page. Who goes to the home page?
Of us, I mean
 
3:56 PM
I spend my time on the homepage
@Gaurav Where?
 
@Gaurav People can post ads ?
 
9
Q: Community Promotion Ads - 2015

Grace NoteThe dawn of a new year, 2015, now approaches, or has already approached, either way it means that it is now time to reset our Community Promotion Ads! What are Community Promotion Ads? Community Promotion Ads are community-vetted advertisements that will show up on the main site, in the right s...

As long as it fits the criteria of size & minimum upvotes (currently 6), it'll be posted periodically on the main page
There is an answer for PhysicsOverflow there, but it wasn't posted by Dilaton
 
Oh, maybe I just saw it wrong.
I'm surprised PO ads are allowed at all. I would assume mods delete them irrespective of whether they got up votes or not.
 
@Gaurav I wouldn't want to continue posting here under that type of regime. This is a community drive site and not one of moderator fiat.
We as a community have kept the PO ad at a negative score, but there are some who have upvoted it (+16/-18 currently)
 
4:17 PM
@KyleKanos Point made Kyle. I'll reply later as I can't find time now. Bye. :)
 
 
1 hour later…
5:19 PM
Well, it seems bobie officially doesn't like me anymore
 
i dont get the personal animosity here that much , oh well
 
Well that's because you've not had the terrible experience of having a question closed!
 
actually i have , just in Math.SE :P
 
Oh, so how long did it take you to get over it? Months? Years? ;)
 
@KyleKanos I had one of my questions closed on the history SE
 
5:26 PM
@JamalS And how long did it take for you to get over the closed question?
 
I was angry to say the least because it was closed for being opinion-based, yet they didn't seem to realise most of history is opinion-based... They also said resource requests were off-topic, which seems ridiculous for history.
@KyleKanos Ugh, I don't know, an hour...
@KyleKanos Who cares about Bobie anyway, all he does is throw tantrums
 
That's kinda silly to not allow resource requests
On a History site
 
Off-topic, right?
I VTC'ed.
 
Is it even possible to measure the temperature accurately whilst it's falling?
 
@KyleKanos No, I assume he's heating it before and immediately dropping it, assuming negligible heat loss
 
5:30 PM
I mean, it's not going to be falling very long, is the temperature going to change enough to produce a measurable change in that time?
 
@KyleKanos No, I think you misunderstand his question.
He's heating them to different temperatures, and dropping them, I think...
 
The statement is my idea is to see how the diameter of a plasticine ball (flat bit) varies with the temperature of the plasticine when the ball is dropped down from a certain height
 
Okay, it doesn't make sense then.
 
I read that as "I want to see how the diameter varies with temperature as it's falling"
Which makes it seem like the temperature increase/decrease is due to the fall
I do think it's unclear though
 
Is he dropping it at different temperatures (prewarming the ball) and wants to see to what extent the ball gets squished?
 
5:34 PM
^ That's the most sensible extrapolation I can think of from what he's written.
Either way, it's still off-topic. He doesn't have a real question.
 
what i thought was he is dropping the ball and due to heating of the ball on collision ,the diameter changes and he wants a relation between this and the temperature change , lol
 
Yeah, that's even worse lol
 
I think it's on topic, just rather unclear: He wants to know what kind of equations he might be able to use to supplement his experimental results. I don't think there's a need to VTC: Commenting that it is unclear ought to be enough, it's a new user anyway.
 
I disagree, I think blatantly asking 'what theory/equations can I use for...' is off-topic; we have closed questions in the past for just asking for a formula. Asking for a theory or way to model something without showing effort or some specificity is probably off-topic.
 
@JamalS Go VTC this
 
5:43 PM
:D
 
Which is to say that I completely disagree with what you said.
 
Well, let's agree to disagree, and end it civilly there :)
 
I think VTC is the appropriate action. When/If OP edits it to clarify the methodology, I'll be more than happy to reopen it
 
@alarge That question is still bad, it simply attracted a couple of really good answers (and they only got that good by riffing off one another). The vast majority of such questions never get interesting answers. The policy is set by meta.physics.stackexchange.com/a/5968/520 .
When they do (attract good answers), people jump in to deliberately break the policy for that particular exceptional question. Which is what happened to the coin problem.
 
@dmckee Why is it a bad question (other than showing little effort, but I thought the effort policy was only for homework)? Most of the top voted questions are very similar ("I noticed a phenomenon, why does it happen? Can we model it with equations?")
 
5:53 PM
@alarge The "I noticed a phenomenon..." doesn't apply here anyway, the OP has not made any observations at all.
Also, homework on the SE doesn't mean actual homework.
 
@JamalS Which question are you talking about? The plasticine? He has described his experimental protocol, which is far more effort than what is put to the average question (it is unclear if the OP actually carried out the experiments yet, though, and he doesn't want to sahre the data anyway, which I suppose is fine).
 
What's unclear about the plasticine problem is what he is actually modeling is unclear
Is he heating it up, then letting it fall?
Is he trying to measure the temperature as it's falling?
 
^
 
Is he measuring the temperature before and after to see what temperature changes?
 
@KyleKanos I agree, it is unclear, and I accept that it might be put on hold for that reason. But that didn't really seem to be the issue: JamalS described it as off-topic because he was asking for formulae.
 
5:58 PM
No, then you have completely misinterpreted what I have written.
It is off-topic for being unclear first and foremost.
 
I don't see where Jamal's said that
 
^ Danke.
 
@KyleKanos "I think blatantly asking 'what theory/equations can I use for...' is off-topic; we have closed questions in the past for just asking for a formula. Asking for a theory or way to model something without showing effort or some specificity is probably off-topic"
 
Yes, and?
 
That doesn't seem to be about the plasticine question though
 
6:00 PM
@alarge Read it properly, that never says I think he's asking for a formula.
 
The first line at least
The 2nd line says *without...some specificity is probably off-topic"
Plasticine Q is not very specific
 
What that was a reply to was my "I think it's on topic, just rather unclear: He wants to know what kind of equations he might be able to use to supplement his experimental results. I don't think there's a need to VTC: Commenting that it is unclear ought to be enough, it's a new user anyway."
 
Exactly, we can't be expected to outline an entire theory of elasticity or stress in the hopes it will apply to what he is doing.
 
which JamalS disagreed with.
 
If the OP can clarify his experiment and what exactly he is trying to model, I would be willing to nominate it for reopening.
 
6:03 PM
is VTC and putting on hold the same thing
 
Yes.
One puts a question on hold by voting to close (VTC).
Well, I guess they are not the same actually since one VTC does not guarantee a hold.
 
Let's say it's 20% of putting a question on hold ;)
 
On Hold is a temporary status
After a few days w/o edits and reopen nominations, it becomes Closed
NB: I put a disclaimer on the plasticine question that if he clarifies it, I'd be willing to nominate it for reopining
 
The internal flag is the same, though - there's no mechanical difference between "on hold" and "closed", except that the former shall indicate that reopening is indeed a thing.
 
^ That whole "psychological" thing
 
6:11 PM
alright i thought when Q is VTC'd by 5 users it's closed immediately , there lays my misunderstanding
 
@Gowtham That is correct - 5 VTC put a question on hold/close it
 
101
Q: What is a "closed" or “on hold” question?

Justin StandardQuestions can be put on hold or closed. What does it mean for a question to be closed or “on hold”? Who can put a question on hold? What are the reasons for putting a question on hold? What if multiple close reasons are used on a question? Is closure the end of the road for a question? When are...

 
@KyleKanos thanks !
 
No problemo
Also interesting:
28
Q: How soon should I "vote to close"?

FlimzySince it's currently impossible to delete a "vote to close",* when I see a poorly asked question, should I immediately vote to close, or should I comment, and give the OP a chance to improve his question? Waiting increases the chance that I'll forget, and never vote to close, potentially leading...

Answer is immediately
 
Jim
7:07 PM
This made me realize how mean I'm being today
-1
A: Derivation of Electric Force between Parallel Plates

Bashdar Mhamadexperiments plate capacitance of the lab in physics

Perhaps I should stop being mean
Nah
 
7:40 PM
@alarge In my view, because it's too open ended and poorly motivated.
I'd also note that neither answer actual found an arbitrary way to find mass from the sound. They showed that a particular set of known coins could be distinguished on one hand and how the mass effects the noise but is entangled with geomatric and materials properties on the other.
Great answers to the better questions that could have been asked, but weren't because the asker didn't really know enough to formulate them.
 
As for the "most of the top voted questions", it's true but it's not very telling. It shows you that there are more people who can related to the easy (even it poorly specified) question than to the one that physicists (the audience for the site) consider good.
That situation is exacerbated by the network hot questions tool which directs yet more off-site attention to questions that are already popular. Not that I want to see that tool go away, because there will be future users among the people who follow those links.
I just don't take raw numbers of votes as indicative of quality in the "building an on-going community" sense.
@Jim The classic editorial irony here is "This sentence no verb."
 
Jim
@dmckee I'd like to state for the record that with the coin question, I commented on it almost right after it was asked something to the effect of "The sound it makes has too much to do with other properties like size, shape, material, angle and speed of impact, impacting surface, etc. to be used to find specifically the mass of any coin drop." But I was argued with and answers popped up saying it was possible anyway, so I didn't feel like agruing.
 
@Gowtham "On hold" is another name for "closed". It is used when the closure is recent to indicate to less sophisticated users that they can get the status change. Well, "can" might be too strong, but that the decision is not automatically permanent.
 
Jim
@dmckee Really? Did not know that. But it wouldn't have conveyed all the information I wanted to anyway
 
@Jim Well, that's the one that the editors I've worked for all used. With glee. And malice.
 
Jim
7:54 PM
Glee and malice are the only way you should review things
 
@dmckee Is this not always the case, though?
 
@alarge Probably not, but the policy is not mine, it's not Stack Exchange's, or Shog9's. It is of, by, and for the regular users who have (collectively, by rough consensus and with lots of grumbling) a vision for what this place should be. And that vision is that it is, not exactly a walled garden where visitors are unwelcome, but one where we do questions of interest to physicists.
Purely popular question like that can be good on their own merits and still not belong here.
You are (or anyone else is) welcome to try to build a new, "nice"er consensus and get the policy changed.
 
@dmckee The problem is not the policy per se, but that it doesn't reflect well what actually happens in Physics SE (e.g. you call the coin problem a bad question, yet it is among the most popular here; Sometimes similar questions get closed, and sometimes they garner a lot of good answers, indicating an unclear policy).
 
8:10 PM
Popularity =/= good question
 
Jim
@alarge It is important to note that quality and popularity are not equivalent. A question that the policy would consider a bad fit for this site can still become popular just as a good question can fail to draw any attention at all
 
It only means that people could relate to it in some sense
I think most of us "prolific" answerers have all stated at one point or another that our best answers have received very little attention, while also having some highly-voted answers that aren't really anything good
3
 
Jim
The policy also works as a guideline. If a bad question becomes popular enough that we feel it can be helpful to keep on the site, we are free to use our discretion to make it an exception to the policy
@KyleKanos case in point
48
A: Is gravity just electromagnetic attraction?

JimShort answer: No. Long answer: Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Moral of the story: Gravity and EM are two very different things that look similar to some people because they both fall off like $\frac{1}{r^2}$. Be careful what you trust. When someone makes a claim like th...

 
Or this one:
73
A: Why are rockets so big?

Kyle KanosThe problem is what Konstantin Tsiolkovsky discovered 100 years ago: as speed increases, the mass required (in fuel) increases exponentially. This relation, specifically, is $$ \Delta v=v_e\ln\left(\frac{m_i}{m_f}\right) $$ where $v_e$ is the exhaust velocity, $m_i$ the initial mass and $m_f$ the...

Highly voted, but not my best work
 
Jim
What? That one wasn't nearly as bad as mine
It's a model answer by comparison
 
8:16 PM
I usually put more effort into other questions
That one was almost too simple
Like, look at this one:
1
A: Why does this equation refer to magnetic tension?

Kyle KanosI think the easiest way is to start off with the conservation of momentum in the conservation-law form: $$ \frac{\partial\boldsymbol\pi}{\partial t}=\nabla\cdot\mathbb T=0 $$ where $\boldsymbol\pi=\rho\mathbf u$ and $$\mathbb T=\rho\mathbf u\mathbf u+\left(p+\frac12B^2\right)\mathbb I - \mathbf...

 
Jim
I'm looking at my list and I think all of my high-voted answers were the simple ones that I didn't try too hard for. The ones I put real effort into are all down near the last few pages
 
I think it offers a great deal of insight into the pressure of magnetic flux tubes
It got 1 up vote and the check mark
 
@alarge This is certainly one of the areas of policy where the consensus is a bit uneasy. Changing it may not be easy, but if you are diplomatic about it no one will object to you feeling out the ground and trying to round up support for a change.
 
This one got 5+check mark, but shows how a vector is advected along a flow:
5
A: How can I see this equation describes advection?

Kyle KanosThis term looks like Faraday's law that is used in Ideal magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). So yes, it is true. In order to see the mathematical advection, you'll need to apply some vector calculus: $$ \nabla\times\mathbf a\times\mathbf b = \mathbf a\left(\nabla\cdot\mathbf b\right) - \mathbf b\left(\...

 
But you can color me in as against a change.
 
8:20 PM
Way better and way more detailed than my rocket one
 
Still, best of luck, I can live with a few policies I don't really approve of.
Have done before.
 
@dmckee The key, of course, being diplomatic. Crying and pointing fingers doesn't do anything
 
@KyleKanos Not that we know anyone who would do that.
 
No, of course not
 
Jim
@KyleKanos I know what you mean. I think it has something to do with length maybe, but the ones you work hardest at and are most proud of get little attention. Like this
3
A: Estimating the expansion of the universe using light from supernova

JimThe first thing I want to introduce is the standard candle, which is an astronomical object with a very well known luminosity and emission profile. One of the best standard candles we have is the Type 1a Supernova. This type of supernova only occurs in a very specific way such that all type 1a su...

 
8:25 PM
@dmckee As I said, my problem is not with the policy itself (although I do not fully agree with it), but rather that it often seems to be applied arbitrarily, with two questions with similar content suffering very different fates (in terms of moderating). Rather than changing the policy, one could alternatively try to communicate it better (especially to the ones that can VTC).
 
Jim
Grin and bear it?
 
@alarge I would argue that inconsistencies are due to the lack of a critical mass of capable reviewers
 
Jim
Plus magnets
 
@KyleKanos Ok. If this is the problem, how could it be addressed? Seeing that the review queues are almost always empty, I think the reviewers on Physics.SE are very active. Are you saying that some of them might be "diligent but stupid", to quote Hammerstein-Equord's classification?
The quote was not meant to be taken in an offensive way.
 
We need 3k+ rep users who understand what the site's goal is and what is on/off-topic
I estimate that there's about 10 of us who are rather active in the queues
And beyond the queues, it also requires participation in the bi-weekly chat sessions
Active on our Meta
It also requires us to not have people who are actively trying to harm the site
Or do what we can to mitigate that subset of people
 
8:39 PM
@KyleKanos How can you actively harm the site, anyway? (I get that there's been a couple of trolls, but they do little except add some noise; And it doesn't seem that common, anyway)
 
By (a) voting to leave open every question, (b) upvoting bad questions, (c) flagging everything, (d) leaving comments that their question can be answered elsewhere on the internets, and so on
 
Hello, quick question.
Sometimes I get the following question: does one lamp produce as much light as two lamps together in one direction?
This is specifically for lamp armatures that holds two lamps instead of one. The person asking this wonders if using one with two lamps will produce more light than one.
Now, I think of light as the number of lumen. So should I just add up the amount of lumen of both lamps and compare them with the other one that has just one lamp?
 
Lumens are addititve
It's a measure of flux through a steradian
 
Jim
@KyleKanos I don't think I've participated in one of those
 
Which is why you can take a whole bunch of LED bulbs and put them together to make a flashlight
 
8:47 PM
@Jim Well now you need to
 
@alarge In the past we've had instances of people apperentlly trying to generate a divisive atmosphere
 
@tpg2114 TIL, thanks :-)
 
Jim
@KyleKanos But it's during lunch time. I'm not sacrificing lunch to discuss policy in a chat room
 
It's at 11:00 am now
Eat during lunch break
(that is, bring your lunch from home)!
 
Gin up various personal animosities and such.
 
Jim
8:49 PM
@KyleKanos Lunch isn't just about eating. I have lunch with my colleagues and we discuss things
 
@HamZa Just pay attention to the units. I'll leave it as an exercise for you to figure out if candela are additive
 
@Jim Things like whether or not "eh" is defined in a dictionary?
 
Or lux
 
Surely lux isn't define in the dictionary. Is it?
 
It's an SI unit apparently:
The lux (symbol: lx) is the SI unit of illuminance and luminous emittance, measuring luminous flux per unit area. It is equal to one lumen per square metre. In photometry, this is used as a measure of the intensity, as perceived by the human eye, of light that hits or passes through a surface. It is analogous to the radiometric unit watts per square metre, but with the power at each wavelength weighted according to the luminosity function, a standardized model of human visual brightness perception. In English, "lux" is used in both singular and plural. == Explanation == === Illuminance ...
 
8:51 PM
It's a pretty big deal when it comes to light bulbs :P
 
Jim
@KyleKanos We may or may not have discussed that. (It's in some but not all)
 
Which I was not aware of since I don't think I have ever done anything with lighting/radiation that wasn't just dealing with Watts or Joules
 
Like...buying a light bulb?
 
@Jim Is it?
 
@Danu All of our bulbs are rated in Watts
So I haven't had to learn about other units
 
8:52 PM
Here in Germany it has both watts and lumen
the latter is the integral of lux over the sphere
 
Jim
@KyleKanos I don't think it's in a Canadian dictionary, but other places use "eh" far more than Canadians do
 
@Danu Same here, but the lumen part is quite new here...
 
Jim
Australia, for instance
 
I'm pretty sure there is some fine print that has lumen
Particularly with the high efficiency bulbs where the amount of light is no longer tied to the watts consumed
But they just tell is the equivalent watts for an incandescent bulb
So it's still easy and we don't need to educate ourselfs. 'Murica for the win!
 
Irgendwie muss ich da an Erich Fried, "Die Maßnahmen" denken:

Die Faulen werden geschlachtet
Die Welt wird fleißig

Die Häßlichen werden geschlachtet
Die Welt wird schön

Die Narren werden geschlachtet
die Welt wird weise

Die Kranken werden geschlachtet
die Welt wird gesund

Die Traurigen werden geschlachtet
die Welt wird lustig

Die Alten werden geschlachtet
die Welt wird jung

Die Feinde werden geschlachtet
die Welt wird freundlich

Die Bösen werden geschlachtet
die Welt wird gut
 
8:54 PM
Lol
you know he doesn't speak German, right?
Funny poem-thingy though :)
Let's start implementing!
 
Yes, I know he doesn't speak German, but I don't know a comparable English text.
 
I'm reading "geschlachtet" several times. So who's being massacred here? :P
 
literally everybody :D
 
Jim
So this is a happy german poem then?
 
Is the title The World was studying?
 
8:55 PM
@Jim Is there such a thing?
 
lazy, ugly, goofy, sick, sad, old, evil
@KyleKanos the title is "Die Maßnahmen"
 
Jim
@tpg2114 Good point, it's one of the happier german poems
 
Ah, busy
Google translate FTW
That's a rather demoralizing poem
 
It means "The Measures"
 
Google Translate actually does a much better job with German than with a lot of the romance languages
 
8:57 PM
Interesting
 
@KyleKanos What did you expect? :D
 
Not so great at Dutch or Flemmish I've found though
 
Die Fledermaus?
IDK
 
@tpg2114 For that, you have me :D
 
Jim
@tpg2114 Possibly because German to English is a lot easier (being of the same root) than Latin-base to English (being of different roots)
 
8:57 PM
@KyleKanos A Fledermaus is a bat.
 
I know
But it's an opera
 
@Danu When the cycling classics start in up a few weeks and I am watching illegal feeds of Sporza, I always get a crash-course in my Flemmish
 
@tpg2114 Probably because their sample size is too small for those languages
 
Jim
Fledermaus is perhaps the best name for a bat I've heard yet
it's so much more fitting than "bat"
 
@tpg2114 Haha nice, nice. Sporza is nice for sports. Better than the Dutch ones. You into cycling?
@Jim Dutch has "Vleermuis"
pretty much the same idea but I like it better
 
8:59 PM
@Danu Yeah. But it's really hard to find video feeds in the US. I always have to VPN or use a virtual machine so when I get trashed with viruses I don't actually do any damage
 
@tpg2114 drakulastream?
 
Jim
nope, fledermaus kind of flaps out of your mouth. Feels right
 
:(
 
@Danu Don't know that one
 
@tpg2114 Give it a shot; does very well for me. Not sure how much Sporza they have though.
I use it for tennis
@Jim
 
Jim
9:01 PM
Yes?
 
you guys (english speakers) have fluttermouse, flittermouse and flindermouse
same root
 
@Danu That's awesome. There are a few cycling-specific websites that collect the feeds for races. But this has other sports which is awesome
 
Jim
but we call it a bat
 
@tpg2114 pretty much everything I ever need is on there :)
 
9:19 PM
I found a nice English translation: byzantiumshores.blogspot.de/2002/06/…
 
9:42 PM
1
Q: How do I find the right lens for my laser?

user3330644I purchased this line laser recently and I'm running into a bit of an issue. The laser shoots out at a 120 degree angle which is perfect. However, once the laser spreads to about 4.25 inches, I need to redirect the light to move straight again. However, I have never worked with lenses before...

Engineering or not?
3...2...1... FIGHT!
 
(I wish @DanielSank was here)
 
user54412
@Danu My vote: not. If there's anything wrong, it's with the open-ended, criterionless request for a purchase recommendation.
 
hey @alarge ! u there?
 
user54412
As the person who worded the engineering policy, it was always my intention to exclude only questions that dealt with cost or ease of manufacturing or manufacturing a device to known specs, rather than the broader category of anything to do with laboratory equipment. Though I do wonder if that intention maybe got lost in the writing.
 
9:56 PM
@ChrisWhite what?
 
user54412
@Danu The only engineering thing in that question imo would be the "Is there a way to get the lens that I need machined?" subquestion.
 
user54412
@TAbraham ? I was just continuing my conversation above
 
@ChrisWhite If it makes you feel better, I understand that aspect of it.
And I argue it too
 
@ChrisWhite ok... sorry to interupt...
 
user54412
@TAbraham No problem. Multithreaded conversations work fine here.
 
9:58 PM
@ChrisWhite yep..
 
09:00 - 22:0022:00 - 00:00

« first day (1546 days earlier)      last day (3376 days later) »