Interesting take from a romance author I follow on the op-ed:
"That NYT op-ed is mesmerizing, but I'm angry at the author, not impressed. Bottom line, this is someone saying they don't want to kick off a constitutional crisis while explaining that they're literally manipulating and/or ignoring an amoral president in order to govern with their own agenda. That IS a constitutional crisis. WE ARE IN ONE ALREADY. Anonymous op-ed are not enough, unless all you're concerned about is preserving the reputations of those who are otherwise unwilling or afraid to speak up."
"That NYT op-ed is mesmerizing, but I'm angry at the author, not impressed. Bottom line, this is someone saying they don't want to kick off a constitutional crisis while explaining that they're literally manipulating and/or ignoring an amoral president in order to govern with their own agenda. That IS a constitutional crisis. WE ARE IN ONE ALREADY. Anonymous op-ed are not enough, unless all you're concerned about is preserving the reputations of those who are otherwise unwilling or afraid to speak up."