« first day (380 days earlier)      last day (2065 days later) » 

user15026
12:02 AM
Interesting take from a romance author I follow on the op-ed:
"That NYT op-ed is mesmerizing, but I'm angry at the author, not impressed. Bottom line, this is someone saying they don't want to kick off a constitutional crisis while explaining that they're literally manipulating and/or ignoring an amoral president in order to govern with their own agenda. That IS a constitutional crisis. WE ARE IN ONE ALREADY. Anonymous op-ed are not enough, unless all you're concerned about is preserving the reputations of those who are otherwise unwilling or afraid to speak up."
 
@Ash yep this is an eloquent thing that sums up my feelings on it as well
 
user15026
I get a lot of my best info re: American politics from Romancelandia I swear
 
we have existing mechanisms for how to deal with this president, but congress and cabinet are not stepping up
 
user15026
They are not, no
 
cabinet can do a 25th amendment to say he's not fit to be president
congress can impeach
instead it's "imma passive aggressively steal notes off his desk"
or i'm going to publicly call him out, get fired and do a gofundme for #resistance to throw money at me instead of the more difficult work of figuring out ow to fix the underlying problems we have with our political system
 
user15026
12:10 AM
It's a hot mess, like it feels like weird performance art instead of like...actually doing what needs to be done
 
yes
it is exactly that
 
A discord take:
> So basically the deep state exists, and they've finally announced themselves in the most passive-aggressive, dumbshit way?
 
collect all the financial benefits of working for a corrupt administration lining pockets but then soothe your conscience by quietly complaining about it to coworkers
 
@Unionhawk If it's just the people he brought with him more like the shallow state tbh
Anyway the "Pence wrote it" take is the best because it's wrong and also something that'd be hilarious for Trump to believe since he couldn't do anything about it
Except then he'd nuke Indiana, that part would make it significantly less funny
 
Trump: I could show you 100 photos of Mueller and Comey "hugging and kissing each other" http://hill.cm/c07ESzD
it's official, by his own admission Trump is into Yaoi
 
12:21 AM
@Memor-X ummm wat
 
@GodEmperorDune it's apart of his new strategy to discredit the probe by showing conflict of interest, in this case painting Mueller and Comey as buddies
 
@Memor-X its such a weird choice of words
they were supervisor and subordinate in a professional setting
 
1:10 AM
@TimStone at minimum it's a compelling use of "using someone else's made up words to scuttle any actual search"
I will go on record and say that lodestar is not a real word
It was invented by Mike Pence in 2001
And probably someone up on Mike Pence universe lore used it
 
@TimStone The GOP never wanted that anyways, that was just Trump nonsense. Only reason the GOP pretended to support it was for the votes.
Because I refuse to believe any politician with any actual understanding border crossings or money would actually think spending all that money on a giant wall which would do nothing would actually be a good move
 
@Memor-X whuh
 
@Wipqozn I also don't believe any right wing politician has any actual understanding of border crossings to be fair
 
@GodEmperorDune Trump is writing his own fan fic
@Unionhawk Yeah see I can't really disagree with that either, because I don't think they understand how much of it is done by going under the border.
also I remember reading once about how random citizens sit around the border wielding rifles waiting to spot people crossing so they can see them and that's horrifying
Read about it years ago. It was probably on the Daily Show.
Mostly because thinking back on it the whole presentation had a weird daily show vibe to it
 
Yeah same kind of people were in Houston last week for the national islamic convention
 
1:23 AM
I honestly can't imagine being so filled with hate against immigrants that you'd spend so much of your free time patrolling the border
There's some people I'll never be able to understand
I can understand people who want to curb immigration because they incorrectly think it's resulting in loss of jobs, but patrolling the border is just on a whole other level
Both groups frustrate me, but one group horrifies me
 
2:19 AM
"Obama to come off bench for Democrats in battle for Congress" - reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-obama/…
@GodEmperorDune I was wondering if you guys had that. That's what we did to Harper, a vote of no confidence. After which he just got reelected mind you.
 
Avenatti: Dems must add two new Supreme Court seats after they take back White House http://hill.cm/Im7HGl7
It's pretty amazing that among everything else hardcoding the number of Justices never made it in anywhere
"What could possibly go wrong?"
 
suggestion for a more fair system for Justices. GOP selects 2, Dems select 2, Public votes for 1 in an election thing
 
'I'm scared to drive' says one grieving mother. Great work here from @DugBegley and @stjbs @HoustonChron Out of Control: Houston’s roads, drivers are nation's most deadly https://www.houstonchronicle.com/local/article/Houston-s-roads-drivers-are-nation-s-most-12865072.php?utm_campaign=twitter-premium&utm_source=CMS%20Sharing%20Button&utm_medium=social
 
more fair since if the justices rule in a way people don't like, you only have the people to blame
 
/cc @Yuuki never go on any road
 
2:28 AM
@TimStone Is there not anyway of removing a judge from the Supreme Court?
 
They can be impeached, but that's only happened once
The Senate acquitted that guy though
Funnily enough he was impeached because of partisan leanings (this was back in the early days where people did crazy shit seemingly just because they could and SCOTUS justices were also circuit judges for some reason)
But yeah, hard to remove a judge unless they did like, an actual crime, because of the general independence of the judiciary, so just adding more justices is technically easier
This @lyzl profile of Carlson is fantastic. Don’t miss the kicker. https://www.cjr.org/the_profile/tucker-carlson.php
> Paul Greenberg, who edited Carlson at The Arkansas Democrat Gazette: “Tucker was a pleasure to work with. I knew he would fit right in in Arkansas when I discovered that he chewed tobacco.”
lol god damnit I can picture his confused face and then without warning spit
 
@TimStone He's going to win
 
2:46 AM
@TimStone "I'M NOT YELLING, THIS IS MY INDOOR VOICE. <span style="font-size:72pt;">AND THIS IS MY CHURCH PRAYER VOICE</span>"
now in "politicians being dickheads but this isn't about Trump for once"
The Victorian government is being put under the spotlight over a political attack on the state's Opposition Leader which resulted in the publication of sensitive information relating to everyday Victorians. http://bit.ly/vicrelease
> the woman's medical history, financial records and even her young daughter's name and date of birth were posted online by state parliament.
*very* *slow* *clap* well done
 
3:03 AM
Judge orders candidate removed from ballot due to fraud in win for Democrats http://hill.cm/REnEeZ7
> Judge Gregory Rupe of the Richmond Circuit Court made the ruling in response to a lawsuit from Virginia Democrats, who alleged that petitions in support of candidate Shaun Brown (I) included signatures from people who were dead or said they had not signed.
would have thought someone would have learned from The Simpsons at least
 
@TimStone hue
> “Who thinks I’ve changed?” he demands. I didn’t want to give up any of my sources, a few of whom still count him as a friend, so I stammered out my editor’s name.

“Uh, Kyle Pope,” I said.

“Is Kyle kind of dumb?” Carlson responds.

(Editor’s note: Arguable.)
 
3:23 AM
hue hue
> He then went on Dancing with the Stars and was immediately voted off.
 
3:34 AM
.@senkamalaharris asks if Judge Kavanaugh has discussed Mueller Investigation with anyone at Kasowitz Benson Torres law firm. #Kavanaugh: "I would like to know the person you're thinking of." Sen. Harris: "I think you're thinking of someone and you don't want to tell us." https://t.co/pI2XEHNba9
i guess as a prosecutor she got good at this sort of thing
 
Pimp who won Nevada GOP primary under investigation over sexual assault allegations http://hill.cm/qv5J9tF
🤷🏼‍♂️
These predictable substory arcs are really something
 
@PsycheSojourn @cspan @SenKamalaHarris First rule of “lawyering”: never ask a witness a question you don’t already know the answer to. She knows. Now he knows she knows and she knows he knows she knows. 😉
 
@TimStone fire the writers tbh
@Memor-X yeah that was an oh shit face for real
 
4:23 AM
@Memor-X Ah, the mispronounced mumble ploy.
Classic.
 
user15026
4:44 AM
If you see this 6-eyed sand spider that is highly venomous, please let the Philadelphia insectarium know. The spider, along with 7,000 other creepy-crawlies, have gone missing. https://mnatu.re/2MKkT3n
 
user15026
Nope nope nope nope nope
 
@Ash thank fuck this is in the US. i got enough to worry about there
 
5:13 AM
@Ash i cannot NOPE enough
 
user15026
Saaaame
 
5:43 AM
Trump: "Nobody is going to come close to beating me" in 2020 http://hill.cm/ETTsiOu
> Trump spent several several minutes Wednesday listing his administration's accomplishments.

...

Trump also noted that the U.S. will be one of the host countries for the World Cup in 2026 and said "we have started" building a wall along the Mexican border.
1) i think it's a bad idea to start building something you don't have funding for since Mexico said they wont pay for it and 2) what has the 2026 world up hosting got to do anything?
 
@Memor-X it doesn't, he probably heard about it recently
tbh his base probably doesn't like soccer anyway
 
 
3 hours later…
8:43 AM
@Ash aawww, cute spider
 
@KevinvanderVelden The spider buries itself in desert sand and causes massive necrosis when biting. Victims usually die because they're far away from medical assistance
 
@Nzall okay not cute venom, still!
 
 
2 hours later…
10:20 AM
India court legalises gay sex in landmark ruling - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-45429664
4
 
 
2 hours later…
11:51 AM
Who has your data? Researchers scrutinize apps for ties to advertisers, analytics firms
https://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/app-privacy-policy-apptrans-uoft-third-parties-ads-code-1.4791834
Shared via the CBC News Android App
 
12:12 PM
> If you want to better understand how an app or a service plans to use your personal information, its privacy policy is often a good place to start. But a recent study found there can be a gap between what's described in that privacy policy, and what the app actually collects and shares.
 
12:40 PM
> Machine learning
this immediately sounds suspect to me, because now you run into a case where a machine effectively decides whether an app breaks the law
and I don't know if they verified manually whether the findings of the AI are correct
 
 
1 hour later…
2:04 PM
@candicecd @MotherNatureNet @Netroots_Nation i mean, if i wanted to hunt down potentially dangerous animals hiding in dark places i would be a capitol hill reporter. jokes aside, this situation has me really upset because those animals are either going to die or be sold off on the black market to a rich jackass, then die.
hue
and then :(
 
2:30 PM
@GodEmperorDune Nike and I think Apple as well for the slavery issue.
 
2:55 PM
Delaware primaries today, wish us luck!
Meanwhile, Booker just posted the committee confidential emails that he promised to release earlier this morning: https://www.scribd.com/document/387988906/Booker-Confidential-Kavanaugh-Hearing
Active shooter scene reported in the heart of downtown Cincinnati in the state of #Ohio: https://twitter.com/WCPO/status/1037693538488791040
Shit
Four dead including the shooter
 
Hello
from what I understand, specifically targeting the loading dock at the fifth third building
or something like that
 
BREAKING: Trump administration says it will sidestep court agreement that limited detention for immigrant children
 
3:14 PM
@TimStone Something something andrew jackson
 
huuuuue (Kim Jong Un made a statement telling Trump he's never said anything bad about him personally and still has full faith in him, and Trump will definitely buy that because unlike Bolton, Kim Jong Un doesn't have a moustache)
Dick Durbin to Cory Booker: "I concur with what you are doing. Let's jump into this pit together ... If there is going to be some retribution against the senator from New Jersey, count me in. I want to be part of this process." (via CBS) https://t.co/4x9FW84L10
Booker is risking a threat of expulsion from the Senate over the releasing the emails and Durbin is saying "let's go all in"
 
E-mails again?
Time is a flat circle indeed.
 
You will be shocked to learn that the Republicans are very against anyone having to release any email now
 
especially, hypothetically, an email about brett's take on whether Roe is settled
you know
strictly hypothetically speaking
 
3:31 PM
@Memor-X Sorry for repeating myself but no this is absolutely not a good idea.
Jun 29 at 18:52, by GodEmperorDune
another interesting idea i've heard is to basically toss out the idea that the supreme court is apolitical and force it to be an even number of justices, half republican appointees, half democrat appointees, and that way majority decision to overrule a lower court always needs to be bipartisan
Jun 29 at 21:24, by puzzlepiece87
@Yuuki There are other concerns about this - parties do birth and die and change and represent different populace fractions over time.
I'm definitely NOT in favor of enshrining either existing party in the court nor allocating either party half of the justices. This idea would be doubling down on dumb, in my opinion, and doesn't reflect knowledge or consideration of how parties change, are born, or die in American history.
Please remember that just 100 years ago Republicans were still the actual party of Lincoln and Democrats were the Southern racists party.
 
> just 100 years ago
 
> just 100 years ago
 
We're at ~250 years right now?
 
and also if this were a thing it'd be Neil gorsuch vs like
merrik garland
 
I mean, I agree with you in that I'm not in favor of making political parties even more of a recognized thing than they already are, but our current party make-up has been in existence for almost half of the lifespan of the country.
Regardless of whether they've swapped sides ideologically, it's still been a mostly even two-party system for half-ish of America's lifetime.
 
3:42 PM
concept: the democrats get 2, and PSL get 2
 
@Yuuki Yup that's right
@Yuuki Oh for sure - FPTP puts lots of pressure for there to be two parties. (Doesn't guarantee it - some other countries have FPTP and >2 parties, at least in the present and near past)
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 this is something that has tripped me up some in the historical romances I have been reading this week but it has lead me to a lot of research on Black history and American political history so that's cool
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 we technically do, sure, but effectively, it's basically gonna be a 2 party system
 
user15026
Fptp is a stupid system.
 
@Yuuki That said, I like to pretend that in the future things could improve and we could have a party that's not so shitty like our two current ones. Enshrining them in the court makes this much harder.
In addition, this is such a foolish time to enshrine the Republican party.
 
3:46 PM
In fact, since the beginning of political parties (Federalist vs. Democratic-Republican) with Adams and Jefferson, we've pretty much always had a two-party system except for a few years when Roosevelt threw a fit.
 
They are facing MAJOR demographic pressures. It's not guaranteed that they will exist as a force for the remainder of our lifetime.
2 mins ago, by puzzlepiece87
@Yuuki Oh for sure - FPTP puts lots of pressure for there to be two parties. (Doesn't guarantee it - some other countries have FPTP and >2 parties, at least in the present and near past)
@Ash Amen.
 
There were some periods in US history where we had more than two political parties, but it still behaved like a two-party system because the parties joined up into two separate coalitions.
And I'm guessing that's the case in countries with FPTP and >2 parties.
 
@Ash One of my polisci professors once drew a graph that helped make it easy to understand for me. You're comfortable enough with math to know what I'm talking about when I talk about an x-y axis graph with a line through it, right?
 
It'd basically be like calling Freedom Caucus and the Congressional Black Caucus political parties.
 
@Yuuki I'm content simply saying that FPTP puts pressure towards two parties while still allowing for FPTP implementation differences and differences in country culture.
@Yuuki Also, just to try to blow a small hole in this, aren't CA jungle primaries FPTP? So technically you could have 1 party (though again, I mostly agree with you that FPTP pressures would likely split that one party apart sooner or later, in American implementation and culture)
 
user15026
3:52 PM
@puzzlepiece87 mhm
 
@Ash Cool, so this is oversimplifying reality, but the way that the professor made it easier for us to understand was by putting fiscal liberalism/conservatism on one axis and social liberalism/conservatism on another axis, and drawing a straight line through the graph. One party occupies the space on one side of the line, and the other party occupies the other.
 
user15026
Well, yes, that is generally how it falls out
 
Then, the line will rotate around 0,0 or about there, and he drew some samples from different periods of American history.
 
user15026
Like look at how we go lib/con/lib/con generally
 
So basically how it happened for Democrats and Republicans flipping sides was that the line rotated and rotated over the 100 years until it had eventually gone 180 degrees.
 
user15026
3:55 PM
(with some NDP blipping in bits here and there but nothing of major consequence usually)
 
It was a gradual change.
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 this is how I pictured it, effectively
 
user15026
Based on what they wanted then and what they want now, I can see how it slowly came to be
 
@Ash Great, you're a smart person :)
 
@puzzlepiece87 I'm not sure what you mean with regards to the tendency of 2+ parties to group up into 2 separate coalitions.
 
user15026
3:56 PM
It just wasn't a thing I knew of before I read these romances but then again there is a lot I don't know about y'all and also Beverly Jenkins is good at historical
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 thanks? I guess? I mean I wasn't questioning my own intellect but okay
 
@Yuuki Oh, I was looking at it from the other angle of potentially <2 parties in FPTP, and trying to illustrate how I think that implementation (and also culture) might not necessarily result in 2 parties long-term in every FPTP system (though I agree about probably).
It's not inconceivable to me that if the FPTP implementation was jungle, a party might have so much social centripetal? adhesive? force that it usually advances two candidates to the general and thus becomes more of a one-party system with the second party, while technically existing, not having enough seats to really do anything.
 
Technically, I guess. But I would hazard a guess that one-party rule under FPTP is markedly worse than two-party rule.
 
@Yuuki Yup, corruption for days. Not saying this is ideal, just illustrating why I'm more comfortable saying FPTP = pressure for 2 parties rather than FPTP = 2 parties.
 
@Ash woo the southern strategy
 
4:03 PM
@Ash I'm not sure if I shouldn't have said that at all or if it just came across wrong, but what I was trying to convey is that I don't think I would have put everything together as well as you did if I was in your shoes. I was being impressed with your ability to put things together and trying to say nice work.
 
The thing is that there will always be variations in what politics people have. If one party advances two candidates to the general election, then either they both share the same platform, which leaves votes open for someone with the opposite views, or they have very different platforms, in which case they are only nominally in the same party
 
@murgatroid99 That's definitely, illustratably not true.
In fact, in less partisan/extremist periods of US history, there have been candidates of different parties whose platforms have been fairly indistinguishable from each other.
Even in today's hyper-extreme climate in the US, look at like Joe Manchin and Doug Jones
I'm not saying they're equivalent to Republicans, but I'm saying that you can see how, in a time where the parties don't have a football field between their policy positions, how there are not always "very different platforms"
However, I've talked about FPTP pressures for two parties - similarly, you could make an argument that even in a more cohesive culture, time itself is a pressure for division between people ostensibly of the same party or cultural preferences - that ongoing events naturally cause people to have different opinions and preferred solutions.
Also, you could argue that more cohesive political periods in the US were largely driven by disenfranchisement.
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 Alright, it just felt a little patronizing, and kinda weird
 
However, America is a pretty individualistic culture - I'm not sure time would be as potentially pronounced of a divisive force in a more communal culture. It would still have some potential but it's also possible for a communal culture to just work around the vibrations and achieve an updated consensus.
@Ash I'm sorry! It wasn't a graceful remark. You're right. I apologize. Nice job figuring all of that out, I don't think I could have done it. I'm impressed.
 
user15026
(I have a lot of people question my smartness because of my neurodiverse stuff, the fact that I am female-presenting, the fact that I am fat, that I grew up rural, etc - so I am just like....mmmkay no, I'm not a potato)
 
4:14 PM
@Ash Aaaaaaand now GlaDOS is stuck in my head.
 
user15026
@Yuuki :D
 
BECAUSE I'M A POTATO
 
Yay good news!!!
You can use it with feet, elbows, etc.
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 I LOVE THIS THING
 
@puzzlepiece87 You can also add your own connectors and pads to it.
It's great.
 
user15026
4:18 PM
even the box is accessible.
 
user15026
Like it's not perfect, there is a cost factor and such but like...I think the people reviewing it don't really understand how expensive most adaptive tech is, this is a pretty decent start
 
@Ash I didn't notice that and I'm glad too! We're talking about how it's not complexly interlocking cardboard and how it has the strap to help you open it?
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 yep!
 
@Ash thumbs up
 
user15026
I know they worked pretty hard to make the box easy to open and such
 
user15026
4:21 PM
(sorry, accessibility of tech is my jam)
 
I'm enthusiastic about accessibility too.
 
user15026
I am curious to see if this helps ablegamers help more people
 
user15026
(I suspect it might)
 
That is extremely cool
 
(I doubt I'll go see it but I made time to watch the trailer)
 
user15026
4:33 PM
@puzzlepiece87 The existence of this is not really news I don't think?
 
@Ash You're right, it's (Christmas! ...) off-topic. I was (merrily) rejoicing in happy/funny(/Santa) news before we get back to our usual depressing ledes.
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 Fair enough :)
 
user15026
I can see the logic, but we're just trying to keep focus, if that makes sense
 
I love the police union president in there trying to make "this is why there aren't grocery stores in black neighborhoods" not racist
god
I mean that's his job technically speaking but like
 
4:50 PM
> Twentieth Century Fox pulls scene from 'The Predator' after director casts his friend, a registered sex offender
Incidentally, this is not the first time Singer has added cameos for this friend.
Also incidentally, this is not the only friend of Singer's who is a registered sex offender.
 
@Ash It makes sense, and now we're back to our usual cops, man. Focus recovered :P
 
@Unionhawk I honestly don't understand how it's possible for police to be so poorly trained they're not able to handle a shoplifting child without using excessive force
 
@Wipqozn Or doing racism even apparently lol
 
@Unionhawk At least this statement makes it really damn clear that actually yes, racism does have everything to do with this incident
 
He is friends with not one, not two, not three, but four. Two have been convicted, one has been tried but not convicted (so I guess maybe that doesn't count), and one has had multiple accusations of sexual assault and molestation.
 
4:53 PM
@Yuuki I'm dying of smoke inhalation over here.
 
Correction, the director of 'The Predator' is Shane Black.
I guess Singer was mentioned in the comments as a "this is another scumbag in Hollywood" thing.
> Black defended his decision to cast Striegel [the registered sex offender] in a small part in “The Predator” as a jogger who repeatedly hits on Munn’s character.
wtf
 
user15026
@Yuuki O.o
 
@Yuuki ummmmm dafuq
 
Unfortunately, I can easily see this being a dudebro director justifying this as "aw man, this is pretty sick method acting, bro".
 
5:27 PM
"New York attorney general issues subpoenas to all New York Roman Catholic dioceses in sex abuse invest"... - Get updates at Reuters.com
 
6:38 PM
Hmm... am I still an atheist if I use idioms like "Jesus Christ" or "my god"?
 
@Yuuki Yes
I do the same thing
 
@SaintWacko I guess it's part and parcel of being raised in a fairly religious society.
But it definitely feels strange to me whenever I do it.
 
@Yuuki I mean, I do agree with that
Whenever I use one of those there's definitely the little tickle that it's odd to do that
 
7:08 PM
lol Tucker is on the case re the anonymous op-ed author
Cory Booker insists to me he did break committee rules last night and continues to release confidential docs today. Cornyn says he won't press for sanctions regardless because he doesn't want to turn him into a martyr.
This is chef's kiss
"Ah you see we actually are spineless all around"
 
1. Yay Cory Booker - personal favorite of mine
2. I can't imagine how this supposed martyrdom can hurt you, but I guess since you all already have the nomination in the bag regardless you're trying to avoid fixing what's not broken.
 
He's just afraid of following through with anything of consequence. Hearings for days but when you get to the meat and potatoes, here we are
Sen. Rand Paul, one of Trump's biggest allies in Washington, says anyone with a security clearance who works in the White House should take lie detector test to figure out who is "talking to the media against the policy of the White House."
tbh highly disturbing how many people think lie detectors are accurate
 
@TimStone ah texas
@TimStone Cornyn's in a bit of a "f--ked if you do, f--ked if you don't" situation right now. I mean, on the one hand I guess you don't want to turn him into a martyr. But on the other hand, not punishing Booker means you're basically telling everyone to release confidential docs because you're not going to slap any wrists.
Guess maybe your entire party shouldn't have done super shady things.
#JustTreasonousProblems
 
7:25 PM
@Yuuki I still don't understand how this supposed martyrdom is even supposed to work. What Republican is going to be moved by Cory Booker?
 
@puzzlepiece87 :shrug:
 
I am strongly not understanding what the rock is here in the rock/hard place combo.
@Yuuki I mean, I was asking you because you were just claiming rock/hard place.
 
It really only matters that Cornyn thinks there's a rock there.
 
@Yuuki I'll give that a 85% well said, 15% he's just making s*** up and doesn't actually perceive a rock there.
But I'm the cynic who always thinks we give too much credence to the words of these people.
 
Whether or not he actually perceives that Booker could become a martyr and that might be a problem, he's definitely behaving like that's a possibility.
At least at the moment.
Who knows, he might press for sanctions before the end of the day.
 
7:42 PM
Burt Reynolds is dead.
Correction: Turd Ferguson is dead.
 
> The author of the Times op-ed has explicitly told the president that those who offer such advice do not have the president’s best interests at heart and are, in fact, actively subverting his best interests as he understands them on behalf of ideas of their own.

He’ll grow more defiant, more reckless, more anti-constitutional, and more dangerous.

And those who do not quit or are not fired in the next few days will have to work even more assiduously to prove themselves loyal, obedient, and on the team. Things will be worse after this article. They will be worse *because of* this article.
Well said David Frum.
(Though the rest of the column isn't as great)
Adam Serwer's take is much better, imo.
Better in terms of being grounded in big picture reality and motivations.
 
7:58 PM
The fact of the matter is that the op-ed is nothing more than a "I'm totally a good person, guys" in a lot more words.
 
Exactly.
The significance of the NYT anonymous op-ed is that it shows Rs beginning to think about how they'll be positioned in a post-Trump era, however it arrives.
 
@puzzlepiece87 The person who "identifies with FDR liberalism and Teddy R's progressivism" claiming the tax breaks as a good thing hurts my brain.
It hurts my brain a lot.
 
Sorry, did mschmitt do that? I don't even know the guy, his above tweet was linked in the articles I was reading and I was using it to agree with what you said.
That the only point of the op-ed was PR for the author.
 
No, it's in one of the replies.
Okay, never mind, I re-examined the words.
Makes more sense now.
 
@Yuuki Republicans went the other direction, the "Well actually we wanted the documents released" direction.
> “Let’s jump into this pit together,” said Senator Dick Durbin, the second-ranking Democrat in the chamber. “If there is going to be some retribution against the senator from New Jersey, count me in.”

The support led Booker to remark: “This is probably the closest I’ll ever have in my life to having an ‘I am Spartacus’ moment.” (Republicans later said that they had agreed to release the documents before Booker acted, though they protested his move at the time.)
 
8:05 PM
@puzzlepiece87 We were always at war with Eastasia.
 
8:24 PM
“No!” Don McGahn tells reporters when asked if he wrote the NYT Op-Ed.
lol
Whoever wrote it is kind of an ass since this is going to go on forever until Tucker convinces Trump it was a particular person
But also imagine a scenario in which someone was like "Ah, yes, you got me, it was me all along, my perfect plan ruined because I am powerless against your question"
Also RIP Burt Reynolds?
 
54 mins ago, by Yuuki
Correction: Turd Ferguson is dead.
 
And none of this staying in the locker room either. STAND UP. Be honorable. Show respect. It’s a simple ask compared to what our service members sacrifice EVERY SINGLE DAY for us. 🇺🇸
Ahahahaha holy hell
Out here trying to be REAL SERIOUS about telling people not to use their first amendment rights to protest brutality with a Bitmoji
 
8:41 PM
@TimStone dafuq's a bitmoji?
 
🤔
They're personalized emoji-type images
I mean not really like emoji though but
A dozen passengers on two flights arriving @PHLAirport from #Europe have fallen ill. https://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2018/09/06/philadelphia-international-airport-cdc-investigating-multiple-passengers-sick-international-flights/
Good, good. Opening that sarcophagus has finally paid off
Oh for the love of god
Will be on @JoeRogan at 9:30pm Pacific on Thursday
Someone stop him, please. It's not even funny now
 
@TimStone "Joe Rogan is popular with the humans of the internet, yes?"
"Bring me to him"
 
I am not the author of the New York Times OpEd, nor do I agree with its characterizations. Hiding behind anonymity and smearing the President of the United States does not make you an "unsung hero", it makes you a coward, unworthy of serving this Nation.
 
@TimStone this is why he wants to maybe go private so that nobody will be allowed to
 
Honestly now I think it was definitely Perry because until now I had kind of forgotten about him and had no reason to suspect him
@Unionhawk lol fair
 
8:50 PM
He's not smart enough to frame Mike Pence
 
Ah Ben Carson denied it too which is also suspect as the article was not an extremely expensive table
Your next justice of the Supreme Court https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/kavanaugh-emails_us_5b917067e4b0162f472b242e?o1
#rub-n-tug
The tweet is misleading as he was the recipient not author of that message
But having seen it I had no choice but to subject all of you to the same horror
 
@TimStone Yeah
 
@SaintWacko Surprised he didn't demand Joe Rogan come to him.
And then, I dunno, call him a pedo if he refused.
 
@TimStone These emails that are getting withheld remind me from the scene from Liar Liar: "I object" "Why?" "Because it's devastating to my case!"
 
Yeah, there's a lot of questionable stuff which either he has justification for, in which case we should hear it, or he doesn't, in which case there's a problem
Twitter has permanently banned Alex Jones and Infowars, citing a video attacking a CNN reporter yesterday: https://www.thedailybeast.com/twitter-permanently-bans-alex-jones-and-infowars/
 
9:01 PM
@TimStone jack must be so upset
 
@TimStone Thanks for clarifying that, person who nobody suspected in the first place.
 
PJW has to do all the heavy lifting now
 
@GodEmperorDune lol that video from yesterday of him and Loomer harassing Jack while he was leaving the hearing probably had Jack like "Wow this dude actually is annoying, to me, personally"
 
@TimStone My thought exactly.
 
9:22 PM
twitter.com/DPRK_News/status/1037696680814993408 I assume that's a parody account given that the US has sanctions against the DPRK?
 
@Nzall I mean, it's not verified so who knows.
 
@Nzall lol, yes, it is
Many news outlets have fallen for it though, it's great
 
Yeah, it looks like really good satirical comments on current events
Reminds me of the /r/pyongyang subreddit, and the comments of "you are now banned from/you are now a moderator of"
 
@Nzall What a fine meme that was.
I guess it's died off though
 
New filing in United States v. Elizabeth Holmes: Indictment https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4834948-Indictment.html
lol never forget Mattis was on Theranos' board for some reason
 
9:42 PM
Satirical rebuttal to NYT op-ed by Alexandra Petri in WaPo
If anyone wants to laugh to keep from crying
 
Yesplz
 
10:01 PM
@puzzlepiece87 the buzzfeed one was also good
 
@GodEmperorDune Lol the title alone has me cackling.
 
10:17 PM
I'm gonna go out on a limb and suggest that perhaps not all of those people were "lifted" willingly
 
user15026
@puzzlepiece87 I want to find humor in various responses to the op-ed but then I just get mad that the op-ed exists and that it's just a mess and aaaaaaaaa
 
This is like a direct admission that nobody's getting that $4k from the tax cut right?
 
Additional income sounds trickle down too me
 
Taxes are also not compensation but I know they don't understand words
 
Who is CEA
 
10:22 PM
It's his economic advisers
 
So it's made up numbers
About a thousand
On average
one point four percent change in vs inflation income growth fuck off
 
The chief is this guy who wrote "Dow 36,000" right before the dot-com crash, lol
I like that we're at the "seat belts bursting into flames" part of the story, which has definitely not yet jumped the shark
 
You want to know what a 1.4% bigger annual increase would have been for me (BEFORE inflation)? Like $14
maybe $16
I'd have to run the numbers
How do those numbers compare to your oh so important increase in production and the market
 
Look the whole message here is that Donald J. Trump's (their inclination to spell it out fully, not mine) economic policies have great results and it's not pure happenstance that they haven't totally tanked everything, yet
If you're against that you're against freedom or something, I am being lead to believe
 
> He spent a whole Cabinet meeting asking us what an updog was.
 
10:34 PM
technically real wages are up like a percent since 1970 which is technically not flat
The 200% increase in productivity since then is unrelated
 
Kav: If I committed to deciding a particular case, which includes committing to whether I would participate in a particular case, all I would be doing is demonstrating that I don't have the independence of the judiciary, 1/2
"If I told you my position you would have made me pick it" taps head
BREAKING Russia warns US of its pending attack in Syrian area of At Tanf where US troops are present. US warns Moscow "stay away" @CNNPolitics https://cnn.it/2QbfY9R
Ah cool I'm sure this won't end poorly
JUST IN: GOP candidate running for Kansas House seat charged with election fraud http://hill.cm/Xc6uSiK
looooooooooooool
 
@TimStone hue, go get the governor candidate too
 
It looks like Kobach finally found an election fraud case
 
> Miller told the Star that he is glad “that the Johnson County district attorney has more political courage than apparently our secretary of State who claims to be so much against election fraud.”
hue
 
Hmm another hour and 15 minutes
 
11:03 PM
Harris raises Kennedy's legacy on LGBT rights, and specifically the Obergefell majority opinion — asking whether it was correctly decided. Kavanaugh pivots to Masterpiece Cakeshop: "The days of discriminating against gay and lesbian Americans are over," he says he paraphrases.
mmmm buddy
 
> Officer Brown did not turn on his bodycam video until after he tased the girl.
STOP ALLOWING THEM TO TURN THEIR BODY CAMS OFF
That completely defeats the point
 
user15026
@SaintWacko why the fuck do we body cam them if they can turn the fucker off
 
@Ash Exactly!
 
user15026
@TimStone oh, sweetie no
 
11:24 PM
@Ash allegedly to allow them to talk to victims and informants and such without recording
 
user15026
@GodEmperorDune allegedly.
 
There's also an issue of battery life and storage capacity I guess
 
@SaintWacko Most often, they don't allow them to turn it off; but they don't look too hard when it encounters, "technical difficulties"
 

« first day (380 days earlier)      last day (2065 days later) »