> One back channel is the fact that Kennedy’s son, Justin, knows Donald Trump Jr. through New York real estate circles. Another is through Kennedy’s other son, Gregory, and Trump’s Silicon Valley adviser Peter Thiel. They went to Stanford Law School together and served as president of the Federalist Society in back-to-back years, according to school records. More recently, Kennedy’s firm, Disruptive Technology Advisers, has worked with Thiel’s company Palantir Technologies.
Assuming the shooter's reported name is indeed correct, apparently:
Dear god. His grudge against the paper was they ran an article about his serial harassment of a woman on Facebook. jfc http://170.99.108.1/appellate/unreportedopinions/2015/2281s13.pdf
RT this: At least 19 ICE investigators are seeking to dissolve the agency, concerned that the Trump administration’s crackdown on illegal migrants has limited their ability to pursue national security threats, child pornography and transnational crime. https://nyti.ms/2IBiLUD?smid=nytcore-ios-share
Oh wow I saw them complaining and was going to joke that ICE was going to abolish itself in a "You can't fire me I quit" type of deal but uhhh apparently
Been working on this for several news cycles now (they grow up so fast!)--today on @them, my essay on Jesse Singal, how he poisoned the well for trans writers in news media, and why it's time for a change: https://www.them.us/story/cis-media-trans-reporters-trans-issues
this is a great thread on dealing with all the terrible shit in the news
Today seems like the right time to do a thread I've been thinking about for a while on how to handle the seemingly never-ending deluge of depressing and disturbing news. My tips are based on my time as a CIA military analyst in which I dealt daily with disturbing content. (1/)
> During a private meeting at the White House in late April, Trump was discussing trade with French President Emmanuel Macron. At one point, he asked Macron, “Why don’t you leave the E.U.?” and said that if France exited the union, Trump would offer it a bilateral trade deal with better terms than the E.U. as a whole gets from the United States, according to two European officials. The White House did not dispute the officials’ account, but declined to comment.
Yeah, a number of ICE agents but it's not like the whole agency is calling for its own dissolution.
> The agency's targeting of undocumented immigrants has weakened its employees' ability to carry out other work, argued 19 officers who signed the letter, which was obtained by the Texas Observer.
So 19 officers.
Also, these officers are with the HSI division, not the ERO.
Also, not so much complete removal as it is splitting up its two divisions.
> The officers suggested that ICE be dissolved and its work divided among two new separate agencies, one focused on HSI (Homeland Security Investigations) and one focused on Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO)—the unit which has enforced President Donald Trump's hardline immigration policy.
Interesting. "Stuttering John prank calls the White House and actually gets called back by President Donald Trump on Air Force One." http://stutteringjohnpodcast.libsyn.com/
I think someone predicted a while ago that he'd vote in favor of destroying public sector unions and then walk out like "hell yeah my life's work is done" weeks ago
whether or not someone predicted these things it is indeed how it has played out
JUST IN: The Inspector General of DHS released a report showing ICE fails to meet basic detention standards, with little to no accountability.
This comes on the heels of DHS's plans to jail tens of thousands of immigrants, including children and their parents, on military bases.
@GodEmperorDune I would go further than @Ash: this is completely unreasonable. He's over 80 years old and he served on the Supreme Court for 30 years. He doesn't have an obligation to be there for all of eternity just to prevent the wrong president from appointing his successor
user15026
@murgatroid99 This is basically what I meant, yeah
user15026
I get why people are scared and I get that the timing sucks, but like...expecting him to stick for like...potentially 6.5 more years isn't right considering how old the guy is
Can you imagine looking at a person in any other job who's 15 years past the national retirement age and has 30 years on the job and saying "Oh no, you can't retire yet. We need you for another couple of years"?
That's the kind of neocapitalist dystopian bullshit people in this room are always complaining about
So, to be clear, he was a Supreme Court justice for 30 years and you're summarizing his career goals as one specific decision that happened to be his last?
I'm sorry, Justice Kennedy thank you for your service sir, I'm sure you did lots of really good things, and definitely not more bad things than good things
you're right he did more than just destroy public sector unions and make a disingenuous read on "it's despicable to use religion to justify intolerance"
@murgatroid99 I think this being a kind of neocapitalist dystopian bullshit is exactly why people are complaining.
I still think it's all right to think "Kennedy retiring is probably going to have Bad Consequences" without being accused of "so you want him to stay on the Court forever?".
@Yuuki Did you look at the comic I was responding to?
user15026
@Yuuki specifically this is a response to the cartoon's implication that by leaving he is "serving up the country", and thus also implying that he needs to stay working in order to save the country
I've been thinking about Supreme Court appointments. It's true that the lifetime appointment is meant to prevent justices from being unduly influenced by the administration that appointed them and it has definitely worked out that in the past such as with former Chief Justice Warren. At the same time, the nomination and approval process hasn't been effective in weeding out problematic appointees, Justice Thomas is probably the most notable, and lifetime appointments are, well, for a lifetime.
Tried to put "recent" somewhere in the last part but it would make it go over length.
At the same time, I'm not advocating term limits for Supreme Court justices. I'm just thinking about how the Supreme Court works.
> Wisconsin man injured after upskirting shoe camera explodes
he turned himself in to police but since he never actually got anything before blowing up his foot they just gave him a stern talking to about how that would have been a felony
We're #LIVE at the offices of ICE contractor General Dynamics (@GDMS) where people have locked themselves into a cage outside the visitor entrance.
Watch with us here: https://www.unicornriot.ninja/2018/protests-target-ice-contractor-general-dynamics/
@Yuuki i think we should replace it with specific predictable terms. 18 years, offset so that new justices rotate out every 2 years (so that each president gets to nominate 2 justices per presidential term). The justice currently on their final 2 years gets to be chief justice. if someone dies in office, current president appoints a replacement to serve out the rest of the dead justice's term (so the replacement still retires on the schedule).
also put in some concrete timelines for senate to vote up/down on each nominee, to avoid mcconnell style games
this way we get fresh blood on the supreme court, justices don't feel like they have to retire at politically opportune times, and replacing dead justices is not as dramatic
@murgatroid99 yeah the current system of "gotta retire under the right president" is dumb, my suggested replacement is in the above messages
another interesting idea i've heard is to basically toss out the idea that the supreme court is apolitical and force it to be an even number of justices, half republican appointees, half democrat appointees, and that way majority decision to overrule a lower court always needs to be bipartisan
but yeah, i am under no illusions that how we do the supreme court will be changed in major ways, the court resists even minor things like video recording the arguments and decisions for posterity
@GodEmperorDune I've never liked the idea of making political parties are a recognized part of the government (this is why I have issues with MMP), but that kind of idealism is pretty much untethered from reality.
> Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine.
Reposting: plans for white nationalist rally MAY be thwarted by man planning petting-zoo party for the same day. https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/local/city/aug-event-request-includes-dunk-tank-petting-zoo-in-emancipation/article_38b2ce54-7a60-11e8-b725-afaa293e24fe.amp.html?__twitter_impression=true
Another interesting thread on how to change the Supreme Court
I hope what you got from this thread is this: I believe we need to radically rethink where we get judges and justices from and what makes them qualified.
@Unionhawk I was sick yesterday, so catching up from 2 days behind, but I was surprised to learn this when you said it. Figured Coast Guard would be Defense since it's military.
@GodEmperorDune Any thread on how to change the Supreme Court is a bit disingenuous given that the only people involved in the appointment of justices is the President and the Senate.
I mean, I guess I could print out and mail this thread to my senators every day but that's about the extent of my influence on the Supreme Court.
@Yuuki i mean we ostensibly live in a representative democracy so if we don't like how things currently are, our job is to bug our representatives and make them change it
Incidentally, the FCC and Federal Reserve operate under a party appointee system and while the Fed has been somewhat quiet, the FCC is noticeably terrible right now.
@puzzlepiece87 supreme court justices are not ideologically neutral and I will not judge them as such
to state that his primary goals and function were to expand right wing power while occasionally staring into that abyss and deciding not to is accurate
@GodEmperorDune I looked at the Wikipedia page, and for the most part I think he made rulings based on a set of reasonable, consistent principles. I personally don't agree with all of them, but I still think that is a respectable thing
@Unionhawk I thought we were talking about the cartoon, but now we're talking about Kennedy's career record. Maybe I misread the situation and if so I apologize/retract. If we're talking about his career record, your comments were very fitting.
and by that i mean, someone who benefits from work made by the group on their behalf, then turns around to tear it all down as soon as they're in a position of power
@murgatroid99 i'm not sure she was on the heritage shortlist he's using