All I can think of is a song named "Fourth of July" XD. But that is probably because I don't live in the US
--
Oops.
I've noticed that as the q/d rises, the answer percent drops. Kind of makes sense: the new stream of questions isn't getting answered fast enough. Yet.
Oh no! Our views per day dropped by a lot! (2100 to 1700)
Considering where the traffic seems to be coming from, and the holiday there, I'd expect it to fall for July 4th. And on the 5th we'll probably only get half of it back. Too many people will still be feeling the effects of the 4th.
@heather Valid "statement", but no question. If it was converted to a question, it would be to broad. As it is, correct reason it "unclear what you are asking."
I think there are some very good questions that can be distilled out of that question, he just needs to figure out which one he wants and point us in that direction.
I disagree. If there are valuable things there that can be made into a question, it must be posted separately, and the question has to be clear. I don't think a question that doesn't have the details or context needed to answer without asking OP for those details (unless OP is new to the whole idea of SE) should remain open. If he edits it so that it states what he wants, clearly and not shopping-list like, then I'd happily retract my vote.
@ItamarG3 If it takes 5 close votes then it's at 3/5 now. If it only takes 4 then it's at 3/4 already. If the reasons have to match, then it's only at 2/5 or 2/4.
@BenI. I was only referring to the last part of what you said. "he just needs to figure out which one he wants and point us in that direction". If it's unclear what we should answer\address regarding the question, it should be split into separate questions.
I was only saying that, if there are 50 reasonable paths he could take with the (nice) setup he created, he needs to choose only 1 of them for this particular question.
I am slowly learning that answering questions that are about to be closed is often not a favor to OP, because it constrains how they can revise the question.
I'm off to lunch, and then back to my (actual) job. TTY all later!
There is some chatter about the mail-box metaphor around in comments to various questions. i think @nocomprende is worried about reaching students on a complex topic. Why not invite him/her here to discuss and maybe revise, rather than close. The writer has good ideas, imo, generally.
Or to the guidance office, of course.
My answer hasn't had time for up votes (or the dreaded alternative) yet.
Can the mods get an idea of how many folks are around at any time? I have an idea that is possible. If it has been a slow day, not seeing action on a given question has a different meaning than on heavy days.
I think the question at hand is more general than its statement implies, so I gave a more general answer. The SQL stuff was just an example of the issue.
@Buffy I'm not really here but I peeked in for a second. Just to clarify: question closure is not the end of a road for a question, it's often meant to be the start of a rebirth, pheonix-like, into a better version of itself.
Closed questions get marked "on hold". All this means is that no further answers can be made. IIRC, answers can still be voted on, but the question is cannot
At that point, OP gets to revise the question as much as he or she wants. OP can seek out guidance, ask questions, and try to fix the question until it is up to a community standard. At that point, it can be reopened.
The rationale, I think, (I'm still new at this) is two-fold. First, it tells OP that they really do need to edit the question, and second, by preventing answers, it also can save the question itself.
It is poor form to edit a question in such a way as to invalidate answers that people have already worked on.
So, if a question really is too broad, then having a series of answers there can make the question itself almost impossible to edit into what OP really needs.
So I guess I wouldn't think of question closure as a slap in the face (or even on the wrist). I think it's meant to be helpful to the community and to OP
That's a good point. I never quite articulated this (even to myself) until just now. As I said, I am very new to this :) I will try to make that clear when questions are closed going forward.
On hold only prevents new answers. Comments on question, comments on answers, votes on either, and on comments, and flags on anything, all still are allowed.
I just got an up vote on my answer, likely from the OP and an accepted answer mark.
On another issue lately. I've been getting requests to approve edits on some questions. Some of them are not my questions, though. So I really have that much power? AND does the one that proposed the edit get "cargo" when the edit is approved? rep?
My personal preference, when reviewing edits, is to approve if at all possible. If it needs more work, I'll Approve and edit, rather than Reject and edit
The first computer I ever saw was in a locked room and weighed about ten tons.
Things are getting weird when the mods are having a conversation in comments ;-)
Should we approve inconsequential edits? Really just preferred phrasing, rather than something that clarifies. i was just tempted to reject one, but skipped instead.
@Buffy This one? I rejected because it looked like the editor was just trying to leave a comment (the revision comment is "Comment: i think u should find a link to the paper ur quoting....")
They didn't actually add a link, and the rest of the edits were completely superficial
One edit I will always reject is when the OP is in one dialect and someone thinks they need to change how things are spelt, to make it proper English. Otherwise, I rarely reject unless it really is purely superficial.
If I ping someone here with the @ syntax, but they are logged in to the site, but not in chat, do they get a notice at the top of their page? I think I saw something once that may have been that.
Oh, sigh. Good to know. I really was unsure. Mainly because the cs staff's interest in my opinion is very new. I mean, just finished school and then they asked me if I think the current curriculum is good. I was stumped.
I'm not a big fan of it. What are you looking for? Opinion? List of Java's latest features? I tend to be a bit conservative around versions, leaning more toward the core functionality rather than the latest and ?greatest?
Java 8 was a big jump, Java 9 seems less so except for modules which will help with large teams, large projects. Not so much with school-sized stuff < opinion of course >
I'm a big fan of Creativity Under Constraint. Doing a lot with a small tool box. Using brain power and cleverness rather than a new ?improved? hammer.
That's true but java 9 has Stream API which got a load of improvements, and I'm thinking about that. But I'm not closed.to other suggestions for java 9 benefits.
@Aurora0001 thanks for the edit. I'm on mobile so I didn't see the output well.
When does a plethora of features start to detract from the core learning that students need to do. I don't know what level you teach of course. A not very valid way to look at it is with x features and y brain capacity you have x/y to devote to each feature. I'd rather increase that fraction and I can't much modify y.
It is too easy to increase x and hard to increase y. < philosophy >
Actually opposites. New one is looking for help deciding yes/no about adding a SMART board. Old one was when to not use projector (or other tech) and go back to plain (white/black/green) board.
Actually never mind. It's the reverse of the projector question. It asks "Are there actual uses or benefits of a SMART Board in teaching CS that I'm just not seeing? How have you used SMART Boards in your classes?" and the projector question asks "which concepts are easier to explain with a blackboard and how would you use a blackboard to explain them?"
^^ Exactly what gypsy said, sorry for repeating you.
Personally I haven't seen the benefits of SMART over normal projector white-board combination. I do think it has potential, but the enabling software just hasn't arrived in force yet.
Radio-frequency identification (RFID) uses electromagnetic fields to automatically identify and track tags attached to objects. The tags contain electronically stored information. Passive tags collect energy from a nearby RFID reader's interrogating radio waves. Active tags have a local power source such as a battery and may operate at hundreds of meters from the RFID reader. Unlike a barcode, the tag need not be within the line of sight of the reader, so it may be embedded in the tracked object. RFID is one method for Automatic Identification and Data Capture (AIDC).
RFID tags are used in many...
The optics determine where and guess what based on size. The RFID, if equipped, can detect which tool is in use.